"Why are you robbing me? I'm a nice person!" "Oh, geez lady, sorry! I must have the wrong address. I was supposed to rob that mean lady down the street. Here's your stuff back. No hard feelings!"
That one actually made me proud to be Murican. We've made such a safe country for the indoctrinated youths of Murica that even idiots like her can survive past the age of 18. I'm sure it took a while to figure out that whole how to breathe thing and yet here she is. Good for us. We've made something truly great.
@Fisher Man Hey there. I understand how frustrating it is to listen to these answers. However, accusing someone of being an idiot is not redemptive, but just turns people off. There are many people out there who are very smart, but who, through the educational system, and lack of parental instruction, have been inculcated into believing a lot of lies about the history and reality of our country. Those are the ones we need to reach, not provoke into becoming even more closed to the truth. This is incidentally, a Biblical truth (Ephesians 6:4). One of Denis Prager's consistent mottos is "I don't strive to win a debate, I strive to clarify". Will Witt did a service to his audience by clarifying, and as a result some of them went away more willing to think through their misconceptions. That is a much more effective strategy then putting people down automatically because of a particular answer. It's often born simply out of ignorance, which most if not all of people have been guilty of at one time or another, and certainly does not make them an idiot.
Giles Baron I would like it if you would change your language so that it's more accurate to the reality of the situation because those people are not being "taught" they're being indoctrinated. There is no thinking that's occurring. Just blind acceptance to whatever ideology the indoctronator espouses.
Is she saying that all those people who were shot (Columbine, Parkland, movie theater in Aurora CO, and the church in Texas, Wal-Mart in El Paso) were not nice people? Maybe we should be thanking the shooter for ridding our society of all these not nice people. SMH
The fact that you were able to make them think and consider means A. You're a good teacher B. They've been intentionally misinformed by bad teachers/information
But unfortunately, these people would change their mind again on the way to the local Starbucks and forget why they changed their minds in the first place.
Guys, watching this video and comments from Europe seems totally crazy: you just have to look at any other developped country in the world to see that if you do not have free access to automatic rifles, then you do not have mass shooting. But since some people benefit from the guns industry they are trying to imagine any option to avoid hindering their profits...
"I'm pretty sure you can be 14 and walk in and just buy a gun" "He could have shot him in the leg to disable him" "I'm not worried I'm a nice person" 3 of the dumbest things I have ever heard and I have a 5 year old son.
I mean, shooting them in the leg disables them for about 60 seconds until they finish bleeding out and die. So she's not technically wrong on that one. But even if you can't walk, your hands work just fine to keep shooting, so that's still a problem she didn't account for Edit: for all the replies I'm getting about this. No, shooting someone in the leg is not a viable strategy for the majority of people, simply because it's harder to do than just shooting for the chest which is a much bigger target. It's not impossible to shoot someone in the leg, it's just much harder for most people that aren't used to shooting a small moving target
@TheSandsofFlowingTime anyone who thinks "shooting someone in the leg" is a realistic solution to a deadly threat encounter has never handled a gun before or doesn't understand how to properly handle one. It's a ridiculous thingbto say, almost as ridiculous as thinking a 14 year old can walk into a retailer and buy a weapon.
@@Shaggy9763 I'm well aware of how stupid it is, which is why I was making a joke out of it. It does technically disable them and stop them from walking until they bleed out and die, but that's all it does, if you can even hit their leg
@@thesandsofflowingtime Except shooting someone in the leg (a small moving target) under duress isn't as easy as the movies make it appear. I'll assume you've never shot a gun, & if you have, it wasn't under duress.
Being a "nice person" is very subjective and different for everyone, the killer with the gun may think they're a nice person so it really doesnt meant anything.
Honestly those who think everybody is out to get them, train hours a day and think they need a Glock, a backup gun and 5 magazines on them at all all times are as crazy. The truth is in the middle. Be prepared, but be realistic.
the brain is shut-down,and just throw out what i thas been indoctrinated, "you do not need gun police has guns" she just ignored what was asked even if you see people out you house talking to raid in, even if you call someone, help may come too late
I always love the "I don't believe that people can be trusted with guns" and then turn right around and say "I'm not worried about people doing bad things".
They have no clue that there are hundreds of thousands of Americans walking around in public everyday and they are carrying and they don't harm anyone just because they have a gun. "I don't believe people can be trusted with guns", literally millions of Americans CAN be trusted with them and statics prove that. The rate of shootings is so low when compared the number of privately owned guns.
@Melissa Bowers I live in what might be considered a ghetto on the west side of Chicago. I hear gunfire frequently and hardly ever hear sirens afterwards, unless it's an ambulance.
So true, it is estimated that it takes the police 10-15 min. to answer an emergency call. Think about what could happen in that time. Best to arm yourself, better to be tried by 12 instead of carried by 6.
I’ve carried a gun for 30 years. Frankly it’s a pain. It’s uncomfortable, I can’t wear the clothes I want, and puts me at greater personal and legal risk. But I still do it. And these idiots will be glad I have it if we’re in the same area and a bad guy starts misbehaving.
But they will also be the first to turn around and testify against you in court when the corrupt state officials want to charge YOU with the horrible crime of self defense. even if they have to outright lie. because you had an EVIL GUN!
i dont know why these people still make that argument. we have 425m guns in the USA. we are a bit past the point of no guns... guns will never go away in the USA. criminals will always have them even if they were all banned today.
UK violent crime rate is 2x higher than USA's rate think about that number for a second. It is greater than the entire US population. If guns killed people, wouldn’t we all be extinct at this point?
@@Lerossignol94 yep, exactly. the vast majority of guns are never used in a crime. if all gun owners were violent criminals the country would be a warzone.
Also shooting him in the leg wouldn't stop him, unless you hit an artery, in which case he is dead anyway. Not to mention you would still need a gun to shoot him in the leg.
@@austinveno6743 yes, and who's to day this person can't just keep shooting whilst on the ground?? I've seen crazy meth heads keep fighting even after police have shot him over a dozen times.
What bothered me most about the “shoot him in the leg” girl was that she was appalled by the good guy who stopped the mass shooter not the guy bent on killing innocent church goers.
@@judgedread9724 Her response obviously doesn’t take into account that the poor man had .01 seconds to decide wether to pull the trigger, and where to shoot before the murderer killed another one of his friends. It’s sad the murderer’s life went down this road, but I save my sympathy for the actual victims and the poor man that had to pull the trigger to save lives.
@@lukecage3485 - You monsters are trying to take aways innocent people's protection. Violent crime has skyrocketed in cities that were cheering "defund the police" last summer. It seems all you lefties want is innocent law abiding citizens vulnerable so they can be targets for violent criminals. You're the fascists.
> "I'm not concerned about being attacked I'm a nice person" So... only bad persons are victims of murderers, robbers, rapists? You learn something new every day!
Right. It stands to reason a person of low character, like a criminal, is going to stay consistent in that low character, and seek out the weak to take advantage of, to prey upon. She actually becomes more of a target if she truly is the nice person she says she is.
Lemme get this straight, you hate trump? "Yes" You don't want anyone to have guns? "Yes" So, you want to give those guns to the government? "Yes" The same government that trump owns? "....Wait?" Yea, you just did a dumb.
The leg is less of a target then the midsection so there is more chance of missing, hitting someone else, and drawing the shooter towards you. It’s better safe than sorry
@@topaznightengale1433 its also a lot more dangerous due to the much larger amount of arteries. A torso shot is much less likely to be a deadly shot than a leg shot.
Right. In an insanely tense life or death situation with the adrenalin pumping at a 100%, you're going to calmly aim and shoot someone in the leg. Sure you are. Idiot.
@Make Romania great again I've said this or a long time now. If these lefties want to keep pushing this extreme gun grabbing legislation, we can go the extreme rout too. We can fight to have *ALL* gun laws that have ever been enacted, stricken down based on them being unconstitutional...that would include even those that are considered actually sensible (like laws to keep felons from LEGALLY purchasing a firearm).
I mean they're not wrong. They wouldn't be killed because they'd give out their life savings just so that they wouldn't be killed, that's how nice they are.
I guess a "nice person" sign on the front door would be effective. Self-preservation is a natural right. You guys should ask Prager if Palestinians have a right to Self-preservation. Haha
@@bff1316 Yep. There are some gray areas but most animals are either predator or prey. Sheep and wolves are made that way. Humans can choose to be either.
You are so wrong. Criminals with guns never attack nice people. Come on. Get with it. When I was a young skinny guy, I was once chased down by this ruff gang of thugs. They caught me and started to beat me up when I screamed "I'M A NICE GUY!!!". You should have seen the looks on their faces. The immediately apologized to me and begged my forgiveness. They never messed with me again.
I like your story better than mine. When I was in 4th grade, I had to ride the high school bus. My dad was the neighborhood pacifist. Doesn't take a high IQ to figure out the rest of the story. When I got into high school, after 5 years of nearly daily beatings (even during summer vacation), my parents decided I needed to learn how to protect myself. They enrolled me in YMCA karate classes. That made the next 2 years unbelievably hellish. But when I hit my Junior year, I won my first battle with an older kid. After a few more wins, each one leaving my attackers (sometimes multiple attackers) increasingly bloody, the neighborhood bullies left me alone. Peace will always come to the ones who don't seek out violence but have no problem raining it down when needed.
“He could’ve like shot his leg, like disable him from being able to like walk.” Ahhh yes, because as we all know, you can’t fire a gun if you are unable to walk. Smart. Edit: Oops guys, just realized I made a mistake. She provided a better alternative; call someone instead of defending yourself. Wow, silly me forgot about calling "someone."
Shoot him in the leg to stop him from walking . Hmmm so then the guy can come back and sue you for stopping his crime. If only laws were made that they or anyone of there family members cannot sue the person who maybe gave them a second chance in life instead of just shoot to kill.
People say this but have never shot a gun or even shot at a moving target to know how difficult it is to shoot a leg and not a huge target like the center mass.
You are a smart guy. You can almost never change another persons view if you dont treat them with some dignity and respect before you challenge their beliefs...challenge the idea not the person. Well done!
1:54 'he should have shot him in a leg" well that tells us that she has never held or shot a gun to know how hard it is to shoot someone in a leg while they are moving plus do it in a seconds plus it's a situation when most people don't have nerves to aim at somebodies leg and that's without saying that just because he got shot in a LEG does not mean he can't shoot with his HANDS and kill
If you wear a firearm, you are usually much more concerned of being attacked than if you just choose to wear none. If you need a gun to carry a gun to feel confident, better you carry it not. Those that carry a gun should carry it as the soldier in the frontline: you must be ready to die. Those that live by the sword, die by the sword!
@@mattbrown5511 If there was no sin in being the victim and there was nothing sufficient worth the victim could do to prevent it, that is, with full forgivenes toward the perpetrator of such an act, then yes. But please remember: we should not allow others to do wrong if it is in our powers to prevent it, not only against a third party, but even against us. It is worse to comit an injustice than to be the victim of it, but in both cases, injustice is evil. We should not allow others to do wrong not only for our own sake, but for theirs also, and this is the love expressed by that christian command that goes withall: love thy neighbour as thou lovest thyself. Take care.
Having a certain opinion on one single topic does not automatically categorize you as a liberal, conservative, democrat, republican, right-winger, left-winger etc. Stop jumping to conclusions.
I take a different tack. "designated gun person, not a police officer" translates to "regular militia." I'm all for reforming a regular militia. I also am in favor of supporting an irregular militia. And I am really, really in favor of liberals' heads exploding when they realize that what I just said is "the Second Amendment pretty much says it expects every household to have a gun suitable for use by infantry in time of war, and the training to use it, at a minimum."
I liked that the person asking questions did so in a very respectful manner which opened the conversation up instead of closing people off and causing a double down argument.
"Could've shot him in the leg" Yeah in a situation where another person has a gun pointed at you, you don't shoot to injure, you shoot to kill. Life or death situation right there. I can't even believe these people.
Kuinkakohan pitkäks aikaa joutuis suomessa vankilaan, jos puolustais jotakuta muuta aseellisesti? Oli pakko kommentoida kun oli vahva Suomi viittaus tossa sun nimessä😂
Ikr?!! While growing up if I knew my dad had a gun in the house I'd feel perhaps a little too confident in my dad's ability to light a burglar up... Dad's are supposed to be protective by nature and mine definitely was. It'd make me feel hella safe!
Amen! They clearly have No idea how adrenaline, safety, or laws work. If someone is shooting people you want the stopping power to end the threat, shooting someone in the leg does nothing in a high intensity situation like an active shooter.
@@thatblondeequestrian7673 not to mention there are major arteries running down the legs that can easily cause someone to bleed out to death in mere minutes if severed as well.
Shows how many of these loons think reality should work like those tv or movies where a guy can shoot the gun right out of his hand or some other nonsense.
I hope they see the consequences and pay for the price of downgrading the capability of law enforcement. Each and every second could make a difference in real life: people will soon begin to notice - whether they like it or not - what really happens when the law enforcement becomes passive/weakened.
@@clauspapaya1227 no, that is not true. those people are saying to put money into organizations that do absolutely nothing to fill in he role of cops. stop generalizing
"Healthcare is a right" - Not found in the Constitution "guns rights need to be infringed" - the right to own and carry guns shall not be infringed is found in the Constitution. All gun limitation laws at the state and federal level, including all dating back to 1913 are unconstitutional.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." - idk chief, sounds a lot like the right to bear arms is dependant on a person being in a well regulated militia
That's why the Maoist left is smearing your founding fathers. They want you to hate the founding fathers of the USA, then hate their liberal ideas. And don't underestimate the power of Maoists. Just consider how they were able to turn the meaning of the word "liberal" in the US, which now means almost the complete opposite of what it once meant...
All the people he talked to except that one woman with a buzz cut either: 1) did not pay attention in their *required* political science classes, or 2) did not even take one
Here in my cuntry it's illegal to have guns and the first thing my dad taught me was how to use one precisely because there's way too many messed up people , and all of them own a gun and enter houses with it. In her case though she probably fears her father, wich means the problem is him not the guns - and also , of course, that he probably has it already
NurturingTalents I think that happened when she was 11. But either way that’s gross and creepy, so kids who think like that and DO that are weird. Like her
Exactly exactly exactly, they have nothing personal against you, they bank on you being mild manor weak and timid. A good guy with a gun doesn't attack nice people without a gun, it's the criminals and they bank you people thinking that way.
The point she's arguing from is that since she's a nice person, she doubts that she would do anything that would make anyone deranged enough to actively come after her. It's actually not a dumb thing to believe, as if you keep to yourself and don't do the wrong thing, theoretically no one should come after you. In practice, however, you'll learn that it pays to be prepared.
That moment of red pill was priceless. I loved when he mentioned government is corrupt, and they are like "yeah", and if the government took all the guns, and they go "oooohhhhh"
When he's talking to those girls about handing guns over to a government that they think is corrupt, the girl going, "oooooohhhhh shiiiiiiit..." was priceless.
A true "light bulb" moment for that young woman. Will's Socratic method to these videos and his calm California demeanor really give folks a receptive mood. People are willing to listen. That's good.
Some of the most educated people I know, are also the biggest dumbasses that I know. Education does not guarantee intelligence nearly as much as it equates to indoctrination.
But what exactly is the point? Even without possesong all of the populations guns the government still has control over the military. Do people really think that their guns would be enough to protect them against the strongest military in the world?
@@jonaslussi3866 The government may have tanks and aircraft, but where do they get fuel, food, water, ammunition, electricity and spare aprts from? Believe it or not, 150 million people with guns can shut down all of that and effectively stop the federal government and the military. Plus, you seem to be operating under the assumption that the entire military would just do what they're told. That they'd just march into the populace and shoot anyone that doesn't comply. Well, the total military of the US is a little over 2 million people and most of those are not combat troops. But there are about 150 million gun owners, many of which are former military. Do you really think the military can stop even 10% of them?
Right 😂 I grew up with a violent father (who has since repented and our family has never been stronger) and we also had guns. Not once did I feel unsafe because of the guns and not once in all his fury did he use them to threaten us. 🤷♀️
Yep!!! I've been pretty nice, and I've been attacked! Why don't we get rid of cars and go horse-and-buggy?!! Cars KILL people, and they should be banned. And if it weren't for the horse farts, horses and buggies would be more environmentally friendly than cars!
"You say you want to ban guns and the government is corrupt and spends money badly, so technically you'd be giving your guns to these corrupt people and they'd be the only ones that have guns." Loading.... Your connection has timed out.
How would you defend yourself against someone with a gun? "I'd run around and find things to throw at him and hope for the best." You can't make this shit up.
If you don't have a gun, the next best thing is a large blunt object. Next to that would be a knife. And the reason I say the large blunt object is better is because of reach. You want to keep the enemy at as much of a distance as possible. Anything that can be turned into a staff will make a decent enough weapon if firearms aren't an option. An edged weapon will technically do more damage, but also requires that you willingly close the distance on the enemy.
There should be a mandatory 30 second law for all rapists, robbers, mass murderers, car jackers, that gives the victim time to call 911 for help! I'm sure the law abiding criminals would honor this rule.......loud and continuous guffaws ensue! Lord, but these nitwits are clueless!
maybe they played payday 2, where as soon as the alarm goes they have zeal team six, swat vehicles with turrets on them, on you in less than 10 seconds.
I used to be like these people especially that one girl “I’m not too worried about it I’m a nice person” Then I got raped and robbed at gun point. Now I own an AR and a pistol.
Naive people who thinks that someone with an agenda is not going to kill them because karma 😂, good things happen to bad people and bad things happen to good people.
@@ErinRSU Christians can confidently defend the Second Amendment in America because we know that the values and morals which lie beneath the right to keep and bear arms are biblical - the value of human life, the right to defend it, and the goodness of protecting our family and freedoms
Supreme Court ruled that police don't have a duty to protect citizens over themselves. Meaning if they "feel their life is in danger" they don't have to respond. mises.org/power-market/police-have-no-duty-protect-you-federal-court-affirms-yet-again
Let's be real here for a moment: Just because you have a gun doesn't mean you can respond. If you have any idea of response/gun training you know that somebody who shots some guns and calls himself a good guy with a gun has no chance at all to do anything. The USA has a fundamental gun and social problem and the solution is clearly not to give everybody a gun. Let me be clear: i have a gun from my mandatory Military servic and i am in a shooting club meaning i shoot regularly in a competitiv invironment. I am not against guns i am against this stupid arguments like the Good Guy with a Gun. The Democrats solution is no solution either because taking away the Guns takes them away from the wrong people.
@@domenickeller2564 The argument goes like this. When there is somebody doing harm to others with a firearm, (Mandalay Bay Shooter) the only way to stop that person from continuing to do harm is to stop him. SOOOOO how do we stop that person? The answer is simple friend. We need people who only want to harm one person. (The BAD GUY) The one whom is doing harm to others. Those people would be Cops, or a good samaritan AKA a Good Guy, who has the means to stop the threat. (with a gun)(Or C4 and a robot) Just break it down and it makes sense. Not sure how thats so hard to comprehend. If you have a gun, and have the means to stop such a person, then you are either a good guy or sheep, depending on how you respond. Go look up Steven Willeford, he is the pinnacle of Good Guy with a gun. The guy even referenced him in this video.
This is why it's important to raise your kids & teach them how to think instead of letting them be indoctrinated by the state because most "parents" are too lazy to look up from their damned phones to interact with their kids at least once in awhile...
If you were right all of Europe and any other country with strict gun laws would have the same problem like the US - and I know this is a big shocker for guys like you, but we don't have these problems. And all the time in the comments you can read the same lame excuses why strict gun laws don't work written by people who never had any first hand experience of living in such a country. At least have the common decency to really inform yourself as neutral as possible (maybe not on a NRA website). You could watch videos of some fellow american expats who live abroad and talk about their experiences. I follow at least 10 channels of americans that live in Germany, on every channel their personal sense of security were a topic at some point and all of them felt safer here than at home (where all the good guys with guns protect the country).
@@paradx8332 That is exactly what it means. A police force with no funding doesn't exist. Simple as that. If people mean "reform the police", then say that... but defund = remove.
@@Cimlite No real spokesperson has said they want to take all the funds away from the police (atleast that i know of) they simply want to remove some or a lot of the funding and relocate it to other (social) services, in part to lighten the burden on the police and help people the proper way
@Aidan Hoffman He never said that. But there was an hilarious simpson (halloween special) episode where Lisa find the tomb of Billy the kid with that phrase on it, and convince springfield to ban guns. 5 minutes after, Billy and other criminals comes back as zombie and, being the only one armed, take over everything.
I'm hispanic, and it's sad to see what happened in Mexico since 1977 when guns are almost completely outlawed. The amount of murders has doubled and the people haven't woken up yet.
Watch the Christchurch New Zealand massacre. The shooter jammed his rifle multiple times and struggled to clear it. Halfway through his first rifle jammed hopelessly, so he slowly walked out to his car and got a second rifle, casually walked back in and kept shooting. It was brutal watching helpless people try to cram themselves into the corners as they were gunned down. In America somebody would have been able to kill him.
The shooting at the church in Texas lasted three seconds. In that short amount of time, two church members and the gunman were killed. Imagine what would have happened if there had been no good guy with a gun.
@@worsethanjoerogan8061 The reason for you guys having 1 mass shooting a month is exactly that. Everyone has guns which leads to them being able to protect themselves but also having a much higher risk to get involved in such a scenario. Its just the stupidest concept and i really don't get why so many people still cling to your amendments written 230 years ago
@@user-en3my1cl7r people cling to them because the country was founded on the distrust of government, and granting the government monopoly on such power. How about you tell us what magically made governments incorruptible, and totally trustworthy in the past 200 years? What makes you believe the government sincerely believes in protecting people by eroding a person's right to defend themselves? Because I very much believe to some extent, their policy ideas when it comes to guns come from a place of power-hunger because new york local government fielded a bill to ban body armor too a few weeks ago. Doesn't sound like the government wants people to protect themselves. There's nothing wrong in clinging to these ideas because the world never was, and never will be a utopia where personal freedoms are still preserved where the threat of violence is unneeded to enforce it. Even without guns, people were mowed down by terrorists in vehicle attacks by the dozens across europe during the migrant crisis. Your imagined society without guns isn't much better when humans found ways to make massive body counts out of disarmed defenseless people for thousands of years, wether it's a lone madman, or a government doing it. We've seen dictators do it several times across the world last century. What separates our government from possibly becoming that after manufacturing consent? Our government is just nicer? Guns even the playing field. This isn't paranoia. This is human history, and I've been given no tangible answer for what stops the threat of violence from criminals or a government willing enough to abuse their power/military beyond a threat of retaliatory violence. Do you have a better suggestion?
I love seeing the two girls on either side of him when he says (essentially) "the Govt is corrupt, and only they will have guns if we give up ours." They both go blank...a brand new thought rattled around in their empty leftest heads.
I've been growing up in Russia in the 90s. Once people from mafia called the landline and asked my Mum "Do you still have 2 children?". I wish my parents were allowed to have handguns. But only the criminals had handguns.
Thats why i dont understand the people who are terrified of Trump (even tho its not founded in reality). You think someone who is scared for their life and liberty would be off the charts Pro-2A
marsjacobvolta ........I can defend myself against most criminals. You can not defend yourself from politicians. Give them your guns and we will all pay a very high price.
Exactly. The only time you see someone successful shoot someone in the leg is in the movies. If someone wants to take my life, then they better be ready for me to take theirs.
kasykah I watched Steven Crowders video and he showed the average distance that shootouts happens at, which is 7m and they talk about how it would be hard to shoot someone in the lower body, in the moment.
If they hit them in the leg they can still shot it won't immediately take them out they will be on immense pain but they are still capable of doing harm and they are likely to die anyway why not make it quick and the least likely for anyone else to get hurt
These idiots don't understand that if you intentionally shoot someone in the leg in a self defense situation, you're going to prison because it suggests you weren't in fear of your life, therefore deadly force wasn't justified. These people have absolutely no clue what they're talking about yet think they have the authority to lecture others about it.
@@janetmerai Why are 99% of them female? Why is it that females always want less freedom? Why do they always want someone to rule them?? And isn't it interesting how there is a push to get more females into politics when, statistically speaking, females don't care about politics? Very interesting. Almost as if there is a force out there that wants to use their delicate naïveté against them and the rest of us. Democracy is absurd... especially when 50% of the population (females) will nearly always vote for more authoritarianism without actually studying what they are advocating for. Then add in the increasing numbers of soy boys who think the same feminine way, and you can see why we're doomed.
I thought she was saying the defender could have shot himself in the leg instead of trying to shoot the bad guy... and then it would have been really bad because then you are shot in the leg and disabled... but in reality it wouldn’t matter cuz they would all be dead!!! Lol
Please show where in the US Constitution that is. I have read the founding documents repeatedly, and have never seen those words, strung together in that phrase, any where.
"Emperor", Booker DeWitt notes the concealed carry permit, as did others in the video and in the comment section. Exercising a "God-given", inalienable right does not include a permission slip from the government. Anyone with any cognitive reasoning can figure that much out. So, what is your point? That government gives us our rights as humans? Please elucidate your position.
I appreciate it too, but at the same time, he was editorializing and even arguing his point. If you want a really good example of interviewing people on the street in a calm, heart and mind changing, non-confrontational way, I recommend Anthony Magnabasco's street epistemology.
@@henryrodgers1752 that may be so, but I still think he did it better. Will is doing better than some, but he has a way to go and could learn from Anthony as we all could. His back catalog of videos is more than enough to get a feel for how it should be done.
