How Europe and the USA's relationship is changing 

I wish you have said something about the latest submarine controversy which is relevant to this video ;) Great job as always nonetheless!

What is your personal opinion on the creation of an EU army?

Hi Can you make a video of turkeys 2023 election and What it means to Europe?

how do you see the future of Europe? are you pessimistic or optimistic about the possibility of being more united and having greater political and economic weight?

What sources you use for getting information on topics.

You are right that the UK was against a European military but he meant that it would be harder to defend as allies in the EU with such a major country gone, the UK wasn't against working together militarily, just one single military.

@@tobywilliams278 eu never was a milititary alliance. It has common border and EU border guard agenfy Frontex financing after UK left is far more bigger. Brexit only gave opportunity for rest of EU increase Frontex capabilities, since UK is still in the Nato, overall military might just increased.

@@grumpydinosaur2347 It was never a military alliance but if you declare war on an EU member country then all the other eu countries have to help.

One of the reasons British people wanted to leave the EU was because they feared an EU army.. which the media at the time laughed at and made fun of...

Our French President Macron is planning to build an European Army 🟦🇪🇺. Ambitious project, indeed. But will the other European countries be agreed to that project ?

nobody cares

@@PakBallandSami i care bro

@@PakBallandSami I carw

@@Ian-lh9di wow really? Highly polished work there!

Thank you! :)

Yeah, just ask them you might be surprised that the majority don't hate on each other.

The reason isolationism worked is because European politics was built by thousands of years of history of conflict, post WW2 some of those conflict were let go off and suddenly friendship boomed between nations of Europe especially West, the only real unhappy one would be what Italy towards France because Nationalists wants Savoy Nice and especially Corsica but no one cares about them, and Eastern Europe is merely due to the Balkans where im fairly sure its still a cluster-f for obvious reasons

Just as European nations were focused on the rise of Hitler before Japan took advantage and expanded its war with China into the Pacific? I fear that ignoring the XXP's military expansionism and the Vlad-Xi bromance might prove short-sighted. After all, aiui, a Chinese SOE runs Piraeus, the Mediterranean's busiest port.

@@compassroses As a Russian, I can tell you this bromance is quite fragile, it's a pragmatic alliance-ish between two countries that overall don't like each other that much. Overall, I'm waiting until the Russian people take back control of our country so we can join the west in dealing with the real enemy, which is China. And not just mindlessly pursuing Putin's delirious ambitions

@@macanaeh 😂😂you colonisers are at it again like your ancestors 😂

@@macanaeh Well, although I agree; his ambitions aren't delirious. Russia's mainland is very much exposed after the fall of the Soviet Union. What's to be done about it? Well, the most peaceful solution would be being a bit more friendly, but eh, "trust" isn't an easy thing. Wanting a safe "buffer zone" isn't weird from a historical perspective. I can understand Russia's foreign policy in that context entirely. I do, however, also do believe there are other viable options to safeguard it heartland... In that sense we can also understand why Russia feels drawn to China as an ally as well; even though they compete in Central-Asia and China has ridiculous territorial claims in Siberia. The main threat to Russia is China becoming a senior member in a military alliance or building influence in the arctic; as these are things that would be unavoidable if Russia choses to side with China.

@@ewoudalliet1734 I entirely agree with everything you said, but that's the thing about Putin's ambitions, obviously it's quite dangerous potentially having Moscow (my home city) and Russia's heartland so close to the border, but it's important not to forget, like Putin often does, that we live in the 21st century Europe. Conflicts are no longer fought on the ground here. All the military conflicts against Georgia and Ukraine has done for us, was diplomatic isolation and escalation of the conflict with the west. In the EU right now any sort of tightening of ties with Russia is unthinkable, at least from a PR standpoint. If not for these blunders, if he acted less "army marching go brr" and be smarter and more diplomacy oriented about it, we could've positioned ourselves as that non-isolationist alternative to the US Europe so desperately wants. Of course it's a stretch because of oh so recent Soviet history, but there was a chance to "pull a Germany" if you will. That, combined with how his regime handled our economy over the last 20 years, with widespread corruption being the literal core of this regime, leaves us with out reliable allies, as China would stab us in the back given the opportunity, especially if we'll become overly dependent on it, leaves us with a stagnating economy, an inefficent administration and a population that becomes increasingly unhappy with the current state of affairs. So putting (hehe, pun) all these things together, Putin is, while not delirious, is either quite incompetent or doesn't really have Russia's interests in heart, doesn't care about living up to our true economic and geopolitical potential

Because he makes a lot of mistakes.

Us europeans have to unite to survive, it is the only way to keep our status

Economy of scale should be studiet in kindergarten!

White people cannot afford to force their colonialism on the world forever no matter how much they unite

@@galacticguardian2783 Nobody on citizen level is pushing for fn colonization of people that have different skin colour. It just that West plus Asia are most developed countries and can basically dictate trade terms to other nations. Those nation happen to be in Africa or South America for some reason /s

An ever deepening union with larger and larger EU institutions such as a shared army might seem good in the short term, but it would lock us into ever increasing budgetary constraints as the military complex grows and builds influence, preventing funds from flowing to useful causes in socio economic development. Being a superpower is not beneficial. We need to keep the EU as a shallow union that merely protects free trade and supports underdeveloped members to prosper

Brexit (and the "exclusive" anglo-saxonic interests) was a blessing for the multicultural EU that can rise, as a whole, as regional potency, less depending on others and a ill-faded NATO after the collapse of the Berlin Wall and of the USSR

"Multicultural EU" lol Europeans don't want the new society being pushed on them. Europe is for Europeans.

@@AngloSupreme yes.

@@AngloSupreme yes.

@@pedromiguelalmeida4446 the eu will never rise and is already falling. The eu will so long as its comfortable be content with relying on others.

Thanks for the feedback, still figuring some stuff out animation wise, so it will get better! Cheers, Hugo

Then take a second look on what the USA does. This makes the EU look like a saint in this matter. Is there one single entity out there on our planet, with higher moral standards and less capitalist greed, who does this better than the EU? Surely, the EU isn't doing a perfect job, but the US fails that one entirely. They obviously lack moral standards.

@@dnocturn84 “A country that demands moral perfection will achieve neither perfection nor security.” Yes, it is a quote by a Kissinger but he couldn’t be more right. The only way to survive in this world and to end up successfully is to be brutal and to adapt, something which America has done in most cases compared to Europeans holding onto their views until they realize the last second how desperately they need to adapt.

@@GigaChadlovesandcares Maybe there is some truth behind that saying. I won't deny that. But every single conflict that the USA initiated after the first Gulf War, was immorale, not connected to "perfection" in any way and didn't provide anything for the US, not even security. The second war against Iraq was insane and build on false proof and wrong accusations. It destabilized a whole region, where terrorists grow, local population suffers, and immigrants start their journey to the west. Syria is a direct result of this. The war in Afghanistan followed and did accomplish nothing. The results are similar to Iraq. Their worst enemy was located and finally killed in Pakistan, not Afghanistan. And actually all (hidden) big players behind the attacks against the US are still safe, like Saudi Arabia or Pakistan. They obviously didn't want to remove the root of this evil and focused on weaker countries, that have nothing to do with this instead. More driven by financial interests and aiming for ressources. The whole Russia story is legendary, when it comes to missed opportunities. Their state failed and the US missed the chance to make peace and start cooperation. Driven by old propaganda pictures and unmeasureable amounts of greed, they unleashed their capitalist swarm, trying to secure assets, instead of establishing a long-term cooperation, that drove Russia finally away from the west, back into old and dangerous behavior. China is the other "success" story. Decades of greed played directly into the hands of the ruling communists there. The capitalist world jumped into their trap, fueled by dreams of short term gains. Now the US finally realized that this is becoming a problem and starts felxing muscles. This was avoidable and should have been prevented decades ago.

Nonono, certain eu member states. Not the EU itself

@@dnocturn84 You act like we want the ME to be stabilized, we don’t. The middle east is much easier to handle when it’s stability is threatened because the Arab states jump into our hegemony for protection. Same with Africa and so many more continents, you act like our failures in Iraq or Afghanistan are a end to our success. It isn’t, it’s merely a temporary set-back. It doesn’t matter if people like it or not, but unless the Iraqi’s are ready to jump into the bed with the Iranians they will always rely on America for a degree. And as for Afghanistan, it is going to get into a civil war sooner or later. At that point terrorist groups will be fighting for control all over Afghanistan, and it will take a while before the civil war is over and before they can strike American interests. The only problem America has for now is Iran and China, China is getting handled pretty nicely with all the alliances getting build up to counter their influence and Iran is getting more isolated by the day with the exception of Syria which is in full civil war and will take around 10-20 years for it to have full working electricity around the country and another decade for the scars to heal. Russia is a bit of a problem, but it isn’t as much of a priority anymore. The true problem America faces isn’t China or Russia, it is Americans themselves who are the problem.

@Nemusis 999 everything that happen in Europe also affects all the world, like how Russian-ukrainian war affected goods price

US is free to leave the alliance if it so wishes. Why doesn't it happen? Because the US greatly benefit from NATO, since it's the main way it still controls Europe and treats European countries like puppet states

Agreed. If it came down to it, I'd choose my own country to help first, then we can assist our allies next.

@Nemusis 999 many other countries, especially European countries, have donated money and weapons to ukraine; on top of that, European countries are the ones who are paying the highest price of this war. Meanwhile, the US benefit greatly from this because it allows them to keep their weapon factories open and it weakens Russia

@@talete7712 in raw numbers, the US is objectively helping the ukrainians more. the military tech in ukraine is also mostly american innovations, those fighter jets ukraine has been asking for have mostly been that of american. The only thing i see europe really "losing" is the status quo.

France has literally been betrayed

@@jonah9905 France failed to meet the agreed upon terms with Australia, and so it turned to other offers. Nobody betrayed France.

@@jonah9905 please explain how France was betrayed

@@alexanderauersperg5149 He cannot explain it because France failed to deliver and got pissed because of it

Thanks a lot! 50k subscriber video coming up soon :)

'...make sure to like comment and subscribe.' Looks like you already did one of those three things ;)

Indeed!

Just think the reason why the USA is developing closer ties with Asian countries is because Asian countries are becoming more powerful and asian country's like Vietnam India Japan south Korea Taiwan Israel Australia etc are actually willing to fight for there home land unlike Europe

Europe need to expand their ties instead of shrinking them. Moreover as NATO may be on the verge of brinking, as it seems to me it's momentum and relevance started to fade after the demise of the the Berlin wall and of the USSR

@@Steve-zc9ht hey Europe is willing to fight (beside a few exceptions) the governements of most of Europe only saw that the US was willing to pay for its external influence in Europe by military might and decided to let go of their military budget,in a way its also partly American's fault for doing this dont throw the blame solely on Europe

Well this is why country‘s are useless in the firstplace.

@@florianfelix8295 why should one culture value an entirely different one? A culture that doesn’t even share its language? Should African nations be ruled by Brits or French? Should Britain be ruled by Americans? How do you determine who should be in charge when they will naturally prioritise the country they live in?

@@florianfelix8295 would you be able to send that comment to me if nations were not a thing? Nah. There’s a reason you live comfortably, and don’t die aged 40.

I agree. Many people here in the US tried saying that Trump was xenophobic for putting America first. When In reality he was just protecting the US. The wall on the southern border for example was made to keep out illegal immigrants that brought in many different problems. I'm not saying immigrants always bring problems into a country. What I'm saying is ILLEGAL immigrants bring problems. Why would someone enter a country illegally if not to do something illegal? As for the Trump putting America first involving Europe topic. I think Trumps actions are justifiable because the US shouldn't exactly be responsible for protecting Europe when they have their own country to protect. European countries don't really help contribute nearly as much as the US does in the military of NATO. I don't think the US should stop supporting NATO with their military. I just think Europe should invest more in their militaries so the US can invest a little less in theirs. I know it sounds selfish because then Europe will need to invest less in their own countries for a military while the US can invest more in the non military part of their country(or relocate military focus elsewhere). All organizations have their own interests including Europe. Keep in mind Trump couldn't have made such demands entirely himself. Trump had support from other members in the US government, so many people in the US government thought it was time to be tougher with Europe. After all the US is drowning in Debt and has many issue's that need to be addressed. So, it makes sense for the US to demand a larger military contribution from Europe. Allowing the US to use some money in different places. I will not say anything about Joe Biden. Although there is probably some discussion to be had about him.

I despise this type of thinking with all my heart. It has brought so much suffering and death upon the world and furthermore it condems Europe to irrelevance and to be ruled by foreign empires.

You too

Thanks, this is literally only the second pro-US comment I’ve seen from a European this whole year. Glad to know you don’t all hate us.

@@theclockworksolution8521 It's from an american though

@@E36333 lol, that explains it. I was thinking it was unusual.

@@theclockworksolution8521 they hate us until they need our help 😪

Nope

And mock over the ones who are paying for their own security.

The uk was there as well when america left they had to

With you much luck on the battlefront :)

@@florianfelix8295 thankss

@@kaliyuga1476 Not trying to be rude, but that's never going to happen. You're population is ageing and population is decreasing in some countries, and your becoming more and more passive each year, while the USA basically represents you on the world stage against China.

@@jamiebrowne5720 We've been worse

@@jamiebrowne5720 Europe is the best system out there. The most happy people on the planet live in Europe. Europe needs a bigger wake-up call then Trump was. So Biden noticed how to achieve this during the Trump era.

Nah this was before the Russian invasion. I'd say Putin shot his own foot, but this is more akin to sepuku If you didn't know any better you'd think he was a traitor

Bot to aouns like trump but unless Europe can put in more effort into the relationship and make more equal than unfortunately we have split

They are friends who talk crap about us behind our backs to their real friends.

@@basilmagnanimous7011 we tried that for centuries. it's called colonialism

The European age is coming to a close, the US doesn’t really have a need for them. That’s why’s it’s pivoting over to Asia. Not to mention they’re so dependent on our military, what do we get from our relationship?

Yeah the US has again proven itself as a reliable defense provider and leadership

No, talk for yourself.

@@skyrask1948 He is lmao

@jko jko What your saying makes zero sense, I myself know that many Eastern Europeans love the American presence there. Especially people like the Poles and Estonians.

@@skyrask1948 He is right. There is a small and insignificant number of pro Russian nationalists in Slovakia who would love to leave NATO, EU just to have a pro Russian dictator installed as they also hate democracy. The major problem is everyone else around them is aware of the plot.

@@Alex-df4lt Ah yes those that don't want USA army in their country because they can remember Soviets army are definitely pro Russian. Nice straw men.

Many presidents have brought up the issue of lack of military spending. Not just trump

@@noahremnek3615 You are correct. It might be just my impression, but it seemed Obama and Trump had the matter higher on the agenda than previous presidents though.

If you really think about American foreign policy on a macro level, there isn’t a big shift between republican and democratic policies. US foreign policy is pretty consistent. Sure there are small deviations, but the strategic goals doesn’t really change. Except for Bush’s Iraq war, which cause confusions for everyone

ЕС должен строить и закупать подлодки как единый военый союз Европейский союз обороны, это отличная идея и не только для подлодок для всего, а также для обучения екипировка солдат, военные развертывания.

Yes, the quality of mistakes is amazing

That's what Russia is telling everyone so they can have a free hand.

Because you think that uniting this after what the US have done will be easy ?

All of the americas, some of the pacific and most of Europe share most of the same values, the real question is why can’t we all unite?

Most South Americans have visa free travel to the EU for short stays and the EU has free trade agreements with many South American countries. Right now the EU is negoitating one with Mercosur as well, which would mean that all South American countries have one except Venezuela and Bolivia. Especially Spain has also many latin Americans living in it. But Latin America can not provide security for the EU and does not need it from the EU, so military alliances would be pretty useless. As for Russia their used to be an unwritten agreement for the EU to not expand to far East, which the EU violated and Russia now is going to the West again. Lets see what happens once Putin leaves office. But most importantly blood and culture does not matter much in terms of alliances. Both world wars were started by Europeans against other Europeans.

The European Union will likely never be very close with Russia. There are too many countries in the EU for which Russia poses a systemic threat, such as Finland, Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Sweden and many other countries. Close ties with Russia are literally only beneficiary for Germany, France and maybe The Netherlands.

@@tempestosfugi9846 Have you studiet the trade increase between Finland an Russia lately? I do not agree with you that the EU should not work on better relations with Russia. We cannot afford to leave Russia to China. About the benefit - Italy wants more trade with Russia. Crete have already great relations. Austria, Serbia etc.

SA has strong economic ties with the EU, but not bigger than China and the US. SA isn't reliable for them diplomaticaly as its track on humans rights, institutional instability, factionalized armed forces brings situations that democratic european leaders need to oppose. There were coups and attempts in Bolivia in 2019, Ecuador 2010, Honduras 2009... and lawfare changing brazilian elections of 2018. See, european firms are part of enviromental exploitation in Brazil even before Bolsonaro. How can you promote yourself as an environmental leader when companies from your country are dealing with illegal logging, polluting rivers, and when your partner does that more than you? You won't do the job of these countries' agencies that are under an environmental-hostile government, right? You're going to pressure them diplomaticaly. That's what's happening now with the EU-MERCOSUR trade deal, it's frozen. Also, if by saying they "share blood" you mean european ancestry, that's not the case in a large number, maybe the majority, of SA's population.

It isn't a submarine deal it is a tech exchange deal so Australia can buy most likely UK submarines. Frances sub deal has been dead for months now. It was well known and well promoted in Australia well and truly before AUKUS agreement. Aukus isn't a tripartite alliance against China is is simply Australia seeking most likely UK submarines and has to have the US approval due to the UK/US nuclear agreement

The US empire is over once it loses europe. Game over to the USD. We provide you with entrance to the main land of the globe. Africa/Eurasia. But we do not further ruthless imperialism that comes from few greedy people and at the cost of Americans and other people on the world. We want to create complete interdependence because that would prohibit a global war which ordinary people like you have to fight and never the people that caused it. Europe and USA always should need each other and both should check and balance each other. No power should do and rule the world alone, because sooner or later it will be abused.

When Europeans keep saying that they should not buy the F35 or other US weapon systems do you think that inproves relations?

@@jerrymiller9039 I looked it up because I had no idea about this, of course everyone has their own interests to promote. In a world where the US is not a country but a Union like the EU, I wouldn't be surprised if people encouraged the purchase of systems originating from that Union. This would be a question of supply and demand, whoever has the best deal wins the trade, as opposed to the hidden shenanigans that the US, UK and Australia did with the submarines

@@Hoera290 What hidden shenanigans? Did France tell its competitors everything it said and did? the French are just angry because somebody else acted like the French.

@@jerrymiller9039 If you think that's the way you treat allies and supposedly close ones then you will soon have no allies anymore. A relationship even between states, especially allies, lives on communication and trust. And if you lose the communication you will lose the trust along with it.

@@dakufokkusu2702 Thanks for verifying that you could not find any shenanigans. As for the French if they do not like other nations behaving like them then the French should change their behavior. The Australians were well within their rights to go with nuke over diesel subs and the French should have tried listening to their customer

I have no problem with the idea, but an European army would have to be 100% committed to the defense of individual member states. For example, if little green men sneak into the Baltic States I want the European army to be there in full force without delay to kick their asses out. No discussions, no consultations, no vetos, if any member is attacked or even threatened the the full force of the whole European military should react immediately.

@@X3h0n yeah the UE need to be have an army to protect all member.

@@X3h0n I totally agree

@@X3h0n Very good point. As we have seen it time and time again, the US is only willing to risk it's soldiers and resources on countries that they have strong market ties with, they would never go to war to help out let's say Romania or Estonia. The EU must stand up for it's own interests, and that can only be done efficiently through a proper joint command, which requires other member-state independent EU institutions too. A federation would be a dream come true, but even a compromise could be a good start.

And this is why were divided. You Europeans have your egos much larger than your capabilities. Imagine a war with the Russia and the EU. The EU would get decimated, Germany isn't even ready for basic combat anymore.

Nope, it's not pronounced like a "y" in English. It's a phoneme that doesn't exist in English.

It’s kinda a tradition, anglicanising EU leader names. Nobody pronounced Donald Tusk’s name the Polish way.

idk, coming from Napoléon, it sounds weird

That is the present situation.

Russia have century long history with European allies. Russia have been invaded numerous time from Europe. We need to be real about who is a threat to who. We absolutely cannot afford to leave Russia to China.

@@mortenlund1418 "we can't afford to leave Russia and China". Even if that statement is correct, we should at least try, since the Russian and Chinese governments did horrible things to their citizens

@@georgewright4285 First of all, the world is not black and white. By diversifying ones sources of information - the world will look more colorful. We in Europe are civilized and always hope for the best. Dialog is better than conflict. We will increase cooperation with Russia and with soft power show the Russian population how it can be done. This is not months work but decades! We will dialog!

Trump would have gladly thrown you under the bus if you had come into conflict with russia.

@@kkpenney444 lol

"Helped"

Because this channel is misleading. I will repeat this all the time

Australia might not be in NATO, but it’s hard to deny Australia’s close connection to the US. The fact is that Anglo’s have influenced most of the world ever since the collapse of the French empire, and when the British empire fell the US took over the position.

AUKUS was honestly just the French scamming the aussies. They paid over 3 BILLION and have received nothing for all the time and money. They need those subs as soon as possible and a contract with America guantees cooperation in the Pacific. Does France even have a base in the Pacific?

@@Americanpride555 France have some overseas territories :French Polynesia, Nouvelle-Calédonie. But I don't think that they are considered as a main naval base. The nuclear testing site for french atomic bomb was in French Polynesia but this location has been abandonned if I remember correcly. Sorry for my English I am actually French and I don't blame Australia for the submarines, the Us are much more presents than France in the Pacifc and Australia did the best thing for it's national defense.

@@Americanpride555 lol and how do we know the Americans won’t scam the Aussies? Current estimates say this AUKUS agreement is going to take decades to actually result in Australia acquiring nuclear submarines. Aside from that Australia has just isolated itself from Asia as a result. Their closest neighbor, Indonesia, has already voiced disappointment at this arrangement and a summit between Australian and Indonesian leaders was cancelled as a result. Malaysia was similarly disappointed, and New Zealand voiced its opposition because they are against countries building up nuclear technology like this. The US is using Australia right now to stir up trouble in the Indo Pacific. If any conflict breaks out Australia will be hit first while the US has the privilege of being far away. Like it’s so easy to see the scenario that the US is trying to instigate but people are pretending like they know nothing about it. And also yes France has a presence in the Indo Pacific region. There’s French Polynesia and New Caledonia.

@@Vivian-fq8yf You do realize that there are American troops located in Australia and that it's part of five eyes right? It makes sense why Australia went to America and Britain, the French mismanaged it and were already running late so they decided that it was better to find someone else

@@GigaChadlovesandcares It’s not that the French "mismanaged" it. France could have provided nuclear powered submarines if Australia wanted. But the Australians decided not to even consult the French about it or tell them anything about AUKUS beforehand. Making reckless and unpredictable decisions like this constantly will certainly start to create a loss in trust between the French and the Australians. And yes I know Australia has proved itself to be a vassal state of the US and UK. They were only granted independence in name only. When the British developed nuclear weapons the Australians were happy to let their territory be the testing grounds. They literally call themselves "America’s deputy sheriff" in the Indo Pacific. If you look at their media you will see them accusing New Zealand of betraying Australia for the Chinese because New Zealand doesn’t do everything the US wants. Pretty much every single war the US has entered Australia has followed in its footsteps. All I can say is it won’t end well for them, speaking English will not give them any privileges if a war with China happens. The US has a long history of backstabbing it’s allies(look at what happened recently in Afghanistan) and Australia is no exception. They will be used as human body shields to offset the casualties of the Americans. China is by far Australia's largest trading partner, yet Australia wants to sabotage it's own economy and welfare for the best interests of the US. You can watch this video if you want it’s just a comedy of how insane Australians are acting, but it’s going on in real life unfortunately. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-MTCqXlDjx18.html

Who told you that?

@@Alex-df4lt probably everyone in this comment section.

@@za.monolit Comment sections are very misleading. Go to see Tucker's interview with Orban and you would get impression all Americans love Mr. Orban due to all the praise he gets there. While Western EU tends to be quite socialist and anti-American, Eastern EU is the opposite.

Yeah go take care of Taiwan bro, we will handle Europe ourselves lol

maybe you will be treated on equal footing is you pay your members pay their 2% in NATO

_"shared civilization"_

I hope the SPD or who ever wins isn't going to make Germany suck on Russia's tits even more. Another Schröder might just be the end of the Union.

@@X3h0n now that you reminded me, what's the SPD stance on russia?

I sincerely hope that Baerbock will win, with her, Macron, and von der Leyen at the heart of Europe we will be living a true European era.

​@@andrasadam8256 i just hope in italy we do not mess it up by electing a rightwing eurosceptic coalition...

@@X3h0n yeah the EU needs to set a harsher tone on Russia and China. Especially since Russia is currently hacking into German government accounts and threatening the elections.

Oups 😅