How I Play Heads Up No Limit Hold'em 

As a heads up - I see what you did there...

Doug Polk Poker will you join forces with Ike, Sauce and Jungle to rematch the bot if it wins?

Shoving must be a way to abuse the bot no? For example if you play 1000 hands standard and then shove 90%+ hands pre/post flop the algo might take some time to average out your new playing style (develop a trend) and might just fold out unless it has premium holdings worth calling an all-in (minimal likelihood). If you find out how long it takes the bot to develop a new trend in your play style you can abuse it for trendlength-1 and then go back to standard play and repeat.

Christopher Arksey Good point. It would have to be good AI to catch on quickly enough.

Same AI program vs same AI program I would think would end up with eqeual stacks after an infinite # of hands. This is why human players try to deviate their play styles to not be predictable. So I would assume the way an AI would be programmed would be part "I know how to play standard...pot odds etc" and part "I know how you play given hand history". The second part would be the edge and this reading of the other player would have to be able to adapt relatively quickly to changes in an opponents behaviour to prevent the bot from behind exploited...I just don't think it could adapt very quickly especially if you limit the amount of times you let the bot see your cards at show down. If I were Doug I'd record the hands the went to showdown (hands the bot would be 100% confident in how the hand played out - where the bot heavy weighting will be on its perception of Doug) and get an idea of how the bot think doug plays. For example if every time Doug got to showdown and had the nuts he called called and went all in...if would have basically taught the bot to fold - giving him good odds on a bluff line in a later streak. I think a call and turn all-in the bot wouldn't read as much into and would be less of a bluff line for doug on a future hand.

You have been helped like to activate

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fWl_5mq0YtM.html

Sometimes you have to check, raise and fold simultaneously.

All in with 2 7 off UTG to balance your range.

@@erikseidler793 wtf.

If you plug it in a solver, they’ll usually say multiple plays are fine. You can call here or raise. There’s not always one correct answer, but there are clear wrong answers

@@elyastoohey6621 robots we are playing now days ^

yes yes yes

Pyrochaos That would be epic. Dan is a an underrated heads up player. but Doug us world class and would clean up under 1200 hands.

Yes!

Pyrochaos Doug would fuck him up

It honestly wouldn't be that interesting imo. I think most of Doug's viewers have better things to do than watch him slap around some fake pro for a couple hours.

:o You can't be all loosey goosey, having a sandwich! Hoo baby!

That's the nuts!

But don't forget: Everything you do at the table conveys information. lol

This aged like fine wine.

Jason Mercier .|.

is that really u? ;-)

fake idiot's

Donald Trump I also know that you dont want to legalize online poker! You will never get me alive

Jason Mercier

dammit

So it begins

Great pod yesterday, that Marc Klang story is unreal.

the point is that you are supposed to play a mixed strategy.

proceeds to go all in every hand

please explain how you got that please?

I think he is referring to the team behind the last AI vs human challenge in heads up no limit declaring the slight loss a statistical draw. Could be wrong though.

Patrick Laffey I

Did you ever get in the lab?

@@goodfractalspoker7179 legend has it yes

@@adaniel2224 time for me to get in the lab myself!

a0kca1p I don't get it

I buy a lot of apple.

😂😂😂😂

Me too, I snapped it. There are 119 straight draws alone, and he rarely has a non ace pair here like Doug said. Pretty clear call with the price and the read, and the hand. It looks like he is trying to make it look like he is repping the ace with his c/c, c/c line. 56 is also more likely than other draws because it's a mandatory lead as played to get hands like T high, 9 high, and 7 high to fold, and he can still put US on a draw. Admittedly (at least I think), if Doug had opened the hand up with a darker, more disappointed voice, I likely would of felt differently about the hand as it went to the river because of subliminals, and would of assumed he lost with the call. Regardless, if he had a set, you and I would be trying to defend Doug with the call with king high in the comments, and would be told we were exploitable stations, calling too often, etc, or worse, "he is never bluffing here".

but high stake pros have polarized ranges, they mix shit up every now and then to not be obvious if this is a line he would take with draws and bluffs he has to take the same line with some two pairs and sets as well even some aces.

what is this meme about?

The Sun made a mistake calling him that

Theregentification Egos

I’m thinking 4

why are you playing $16 blinds with $250 between you

ill play you HU