How India's Leader Is Preparing for a 1,000-Year Legacy | American Reacts 

RSS was negatively portrayed intensionally to kill all freedom fighters who opted violence for freedom

There is no dark history of rss there is only propogenda

Especially nehru's idioticity and how much he damaged INDIA.

​@@ashishborekar8360yepp, historically, no hindu, expect for jaichands never did any bad against India

Exactly

Perfect

Ok, let’s tackle all your points one by one. You’re right, Muslims are not the minority, but are discriminated compared to parsi community. Why? Because the majority is feeling threatened that they will overcome us. And this Muslims along with Dalits are at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder. How many Muslims leaders can u count in parliament? How many does bjp have ? That’s what the problem is. There is hardly any representation of Muslims in parliament. Everytime owaisi raises issues related to Muslims, he is told to go to Pakistan. So yeah in that sense Muslims n Dalits are the minority. 2. The issue is not about ram temple construction, but the issue is blaming and discriminating Muslims for it. Yes Mughals were Muslims, but they were invaders first, just like many other invaders in that era. Second, babri masjid was attacked and idols were placed in there before any survey was done or the case went into court. And that’s where the problem is. You people don’t go to court first, you directly attack based on mere suspicion. Be it lynching someone for carrying beef or mosque. And this is a common scenario everywhere. In Pakistan the majority does this to the minority. 3. CAA should be meant only for Hindus, no one else. The fact that only Muslims r excluded proves it is discriminatory. In Pakistan Ahmadis are not considered Muslims and Shias are minority. And they didn’t specifically asks for a separate country. However, Jews, Christians and Buddhists have many other countries they could choose, just like you say about Muslims. So why were they not excluded from it ?

@@9Rehankhan19 Let me make the facts straight... 1. Regarding your comment on Muslim and Dalit(I don't get the meaning why you added dalit but I get the intention you had adding it) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Don't play the Dalit and muslim card with me, I come from a Dalit community I know the situation better than you about my community. So no need to play the bheem-meem card with me, it won't work. I know what kind of politics is at play here, I am from UP. Regarding Muslim representation in the parliament with BJP seats, now how many muslims vote for BJP, so that BJP will choose a Muslim candidate to contest the election with. Its minimal, not enough for BJP to have a Muslim candidate. Muslim always vote for Muslim parties, Congress (which has become default now or was always), and other regional parties. We saw in this election as well, when asked who the muslims are going to vote they said (even though they get all the benefits from the Central govt. [per person free ration, subsidised gas cylinder, ayushman yojana, housing scheme]) or rather majority said they will still not vote for Modi but someone else (anyone but Modi). 2. Regading Ram temple -------------------------------------------- The first excavation was done around 1970s where they found 8 hindu temple pillars. The muslims were ready to give up the Ram temple land, but your communist friends intervened and declared that no such structures were found underground then the Muslim community refused to give up the land. Prof. B B Lal from (Archeological Survey of India) and his asistant Mr. K K Muhammed confirmed that they were the ones who did the survey/excavation and they found temple pillars underground. But the matter was swept under the rug for 10 years. Shah Banu case happened Rajiv Gandhi(then Prime Minister) reversed the Cour judgement which was in favour of the poor woman (Shah Banu) just to apease the Mulla and Maulana of the Muslim community. So, to balance it out with the Hindu community he order the opening of the Doors of Ram Temple. Survey report surfaced again, negotiations began with the two community. Hindu asked the Muslim side to give up 3 off our most holy sites (Ayodhya, Kashi and Mathura) and we will give up our claims on the Thousands other temples that were destroyed during the Islamic invasion period and had Mosques built on top of it. One Maulana said to the hindu side "Khairaat nai hai kuch nai denge". Many negotiations were attempted all failed. Then 1992 happened. Then ones again the survey was done this time with the "Ground Penetrating Radar" and 17 temple pillars were found. This Ram JanamBhoomi matter was in court since the British times, so it was an ongoing case from before Independence. After the second survey where 17 pillars were discovered, many more surveys were done and more than 50 temple pillars were found buried in a grid formation in the ground. Facts and evidence were established and taken to the court and was prooven that a Hindu temple existed where the mosque was built, after destroying the Ram temple. The destuction of the temple was ordered in 1500s by then Mughal ruler "Zaheer-uddin-Babar" . 3. Regarding CAA (Citizenship Amendment Act) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- you said "CAA should be meant only for Hindus, no one else." I am going to be specific here, partition of India was done between Muslims vs Non - Muslims (and not Muslims vs Hindus). Muslims demanded a separate Islamic nation for themselves. So, it was divided between Muslim vs Non- Muslims. Non-Muslims include Hindus, Christians, Sikh, Jain, Buddhists, Parsi, Jews. Non- muslims in "Pakistan" in 1947 were 23% now 2024 its below 2%. non- muslims in "Bangladesh" 19% now its 7-8%. The less said about "Afghanistan" the better, I doubt they have any non-muslim population. CAA is for the minorities (which are hardly left) of those 3 Islamic nations, to get citizenship of India. you talked about Ahmadis and Shia not considered as muslims in Pakistan. The Government of India considers all of them as Muslims, what Pakistan does to its own Muslim citizens is not our concern. Our concern is only for the persecuted minorities or whats left off them. For your knowledge ... Ahmadis were at the fore-front of the partition and extremely supportive of the partition, they got what they voted for. Now what happens to them is not our concern they chose the country where they wanted to live. There are 52 Islamic countries for all Muslims (you talk about Muslim Ummah) There are 150+ Christian countries for Christians There is 1 Jew country for the all the Jews. But there is no country named as Hindu country by constitution for hindus, sikh, jain, buddhists, nastiks. India is a Secular country by constitution. But this is Bharat with its culture that goes back to 20000-25000 years and is a continuous existing civilization, along with its Sanatan siddhant.

Great explanation ❤

Bhai tumne to uska muh band karwa diya 😂😂​@@grve_wlkr

We got it, so we don't need to justify again to them

45 Years!

India was always divided on religion. Remember 1947.. India was divided on basis of religion. By obvious outcome of that partition, Hindus of the world need a Homeland. India is that homeland. If you don't like it, you can f k off to some place that likes you