How Old is Written Sanskrit? 

they would have deciphered and used it for their own benefit or neglected it because it did not benefit them.

I think they have been deciphered. Read it somewhere

Look up for Sue Sullivan and her deciphering system She says that it is Sanskrit

@@b.m.5068 I think it would be closer to Tamil, which is older than Sanskrit. Cos it has now been proved that the Indus Valley civilization moved southwards in India towards Tamil Nadu.

That would unfold a world of ancient knowledge. We need another like Rakhal Das Banerjee.

It’s a dead language. No one speaks it and no one understands it either. It’s comparable to Latin which is also dead.

@@NoName-ny1bt learning Sanskrit is super beneficial to intellect and if one can learn Sanskrit, they can easily learn most languages in South Asia.

We some are learning & interactive with language Pali & also well versed with bramhi script. That doesn’t mean these languages are alive. Off course they are dead language. It’s our personal interest for which we are taking part.

@@palashvijay4814 but most of the mantras they chant is in sanskrit.. so.. obviously they'll have to use the language.. but yeah they can misuse it and do scam people...

@@NoName-ny1bt it's not dead language bro..😂😂😂.. I can read sanskrit..

Yes , the reason they used to heard that , as me used to believe that crap too.

@@shahidachoudhury6925 then there are idiots who think Rigveda didn't exist before 400 CE

Nasty bruh 🤣😂🤣

@@rishavkumar1250 😁 I know them

@@rishavkumar1250 Pali prakit predates sanskrit. Sanskrit is fake news 😂 kuch bhi aake gapod do paper pe. Sabke proof mil Gaye bas ye brahman dharam ke proof nahi milte na ramayan na mahabharat sab bas fek rakha hain paper pe. Abe andhbhakto jake R.s Sharma ki ncert hi padh lo ek proof nahi de rakha hain kahi pe. Indus Valley civilisation mil gayi Buddha mil Gaye written form me ashoka mil Gaye Pali prakit mil gayi brahmi script or dhamm script me Gupta ke inscriptions mil Gaye sabke mil Gaye lekin brahman ki comics ka ek proof nahi mila na kisi ashokan pillar pe na megasthanese na dusre traveller me. Brahmano ka sab kuch Mughal ke time likha gaya aur 1000 saal se purana hain hi nahi kuch . Aaya samaj wale bolte hain lakhs of years old haan shayad dinosaur ke saath daudte honge brahman. Sarasvati river ka mention hain Abe gadho koi bhi kudhai me proof nahi mila tumhara jaha sarasvati river Bol ke khoda vaha bhi buddhism hi mila. Koi kaam me apne kuch bhi bolta rahe to wo Indian culture ho jayega kya. Indian culture wo hota hain jo logo ka culture ho sari dynasty sab log Pali prakit ka use kar rahe hain. Brothers ne aake khoja Indus valley civilisation ko Ashoka ko aur brahman claim karta hain hun 5000 saal purana hain abe 5000 saal se tum log ek dusre ke jaan ne bolke aarahe ho Sanskrit to tum logo to pata hi nahi tha Indus valley cilvilisation ka na ashoka na. Ashokan pillar ko shivling bol ke paisa kamane lage kahi par hanuman ki gada bol Diya pillar ko. Brothers ne aake decipher kiya Pali prakit ko. Tum logo ki Sanskrit Pali prakit se hi evolve hui hain 7 th se 8th century ad me aur classical to aur baad me aayi hain mughals ke time. Ye fake news mar failao ab sab pakad me aagaya hain.

Yes khmer were Hindus so they used sanskrit is thier religious prayers etc. u are from Cambodia??

Didn’t expect to see Cambodia mentioned! I get really excited when I learn more about my parent’s country

Khemer were Buddhists. Hindu is Persian word meaning Black, Dacoit, Thief, etc. Hinduism didn't exist when Buddhist monks or Buddhism arrived in Cambodia.

@@user-mj5yv2xy9j my family is half buddhist

@@user-mj5yv2xy9jHindu is derived from Sindhu river called by then Greeks. Also Buddhism is way neo then original Saharan (current Hindu). Gautam Buddha (Siddhartha) was a Hindu before his followers started calling themselves Buddhist.

It's hindu gods communication language 🙂

@@ghosthunter8664 and also the language of most ancient sages.

Kindly. Post photo of PALLAV alphabets

Pallav Script associated with Pallav Dynasty of South India is very similarly arranged like the Devanagari...

sanskrit has no written script. Pallava is Tamil script

It's physically impossible to travel back in time, although there are theories on how it can be achieved but that would require unimaginable levels of energy and technology which would require millions of years for humans to achieve. Although I remember reading that New York Times said in an article in 1903 that it would take 1-10 million years for man to achieve technology to fly and 2 months later Wright Brothers invented airplane, we are just one breakthrough away from becoming intergalactic civilization, who knows maybe the next Einstein is sitting somewhere in the world looking at the sky and wondering why we see stars in the past.

@@caseyclover1647 most likely we need an alien material to achieve it.

Here is the thing we lack in India. We are willing to build a god damn time machine and use it to go 'back' in time, just to prove a point. The day we start thinking, to use that same time machine to go ahead of time, may be we can contribute to make this world better..

Just imagine how many historical questions and mysteries time travel already created! =P

@@karthikpaniyoor5348 that is an incredibly stupid way to think! People thought going to the moon was wasteful and stupid but the resulting technologies helped our civilization tremendously. Going forward is physically possible and quite simple in theory anyways, you just have to travel as close to the speed of light as possible and time and distance will slow down considerably for you, meaning you could theoretically travel to the nearest star and back in a matter of months or even days but due to time dilation 4.5 years would have passed on earth, that is according to theory of relativity, this would however require unimaginable amounts of energy to reach close to light speed. Traveling back in time is currently considered impossible since you theoretically have to travel faster than light speed but that is impossible due to laws of physics as we currently understand them and if anyone could come up with a valid way to do that then I would say they would be the most important person in the history of mankind. Greatness isn't achieved by discarding impossible challenges. As for India I've seen quite a few Indians boast about their scientific achievements but those same people don't even understand basic scientific concepts and are not proud of the achievement itself but rather of the fact that "we did it" Which is incredibly unhealthy way to think about science.

it was not rigvedic Sanskrit instead vedic gods name in syria & some Egyptian contracts. it means before Sanskrit we spoke something else.

​@@asura2600ji woh sanskrit ke words hi uss hue hai uss inscription me . Uss inscription ki language hurrian hai par uss inscription me bahut se words aise hai jo ki sanskrit ke hai naa ki hurrian language ke 😊

@@NishantKumar-ry9rp words Sanskrit k h per script or language alag h ye muje pata h.

@@NishantKumar-ry9rp these gods & deities are of pie origin

@@asura2600 ji iss video me hi bataya gya hai ki lipi aur bhasa me difference hai aur Sanskrit ko kayi lipio me likha jata tha pahle aur aap ek baar acche se mittani kingdom ke baare me padhiye unke naam bhi sanskrit me the aur unke inscription par sanskrit ka bahut jyada prabhav dikhta hai saaf saaf.

I personally prefer the Devanagari script though all Bengali Hindu religious scriptures use the Bengali script and Odiyas the Odiya script for Sanskrit. I am a Bengali.

Bullshit technology

Okay ... Please tell me then how 👉 OM 👈 👉ॐ👈 the divine sanskrit/hindu word is written in any other language other than sanskrit .. let me clear you on this 👉ॐ👈 is written like this in any other language of the world because om is not just a word but a symbol 👉ॐ👈 Until we don't write om like this it's not considered to be divine .. in india many people keep there name om but they have write their name like this 👉ओम👈 & they are not allowed to write their name like this 👉ॐ👈 because om is not just a word but a symbol & this symbol is in sanskrit ... Sanskrit is 1960831121 years old & next year on the auspicious first day of chaitra navratri it will be 1960831122 year old

Show wat u learned, simply it helps whoever in power just lick their boots for filthy survival 😀😂😂😃

Sorry dear, Rig Veda is not first text, but Adharva Veda. It originated before 10000 BC . So all assumptions about the origin of languages are in different ways, and not just as said in this Video. Rig Vedic period was above 700 AD. So this is the last one. Adharva Veda's root subject was Black Magic. It originated for the safety existence in that time. So we must rethink about the origin of languages.

Nope Sanskrit never evolve

@@Saikalyan19 Classical Sanskrit has the subset of the same grammar rules but new vocabulary (borrowings) albeit smartly adjusted to the Vedic phonetic rules. And the vocabulary set of BHS (Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit) is one more else with grammatical rules still more reduced to the basic aspects. I can read and understand Mantras, Dharanis and short Sutras in BHS but I can't virtually understand Vedic Sanskrit. The same with Latin - I can read and understand medieval historical chronicles, legal documents and magical incantations but from the Classical Latin I barely understand Julius Caesar. A simplified subset of the same grammar but new and smaller vocabulary similar to the modern languages.

@@Saikalyan19 It did evolve. You might have heard of a product of its evolution, it's called Hindi.

@@theodiscusgaming3909 Sanskrit never evolved . It was created to be rigid and not changed . Hindi is not evolved Sanskrit it is mix of Prakrit and Indo -Iranian languages .

@@JohnDoe19991 Vedic Sanskrit is a little different from Classical Sanskrit. The Sanskrit which we study today has many new or changed words and grammar.

I am indoGreek

@Games Account that is Indica

The travel diary Indika of Megasthenes the Greek ambassador (of Hellenistic period) to India during the period of Emperor Chandragupta Maurya

Very nicely packaged heap of crap. An honest history of language is the need of the hour. When these unbathed unkempt murderous villains showed up on our shores in the 1500s they didn't know how to spell grammar studies. Now they're telling us their ancestors taught us! What a ludicrous egotistical statement. Luckily Indians are questioning the basis for their assumptions and all will be revealed in time.

Hey did u know that Bhaarat was called INDIA by Greeks. Thank you.. But now this name is used for political conspiracies by Fools 😂😂

Nice Video, very well explained Don't worry about the comments here, they just want to listen Sanskrit is mother of All Languages for 100000000000000 B.C.

Islamic Invader disrupted .. actually Sanskrit written in South India modern ... Old Sanskrit u can find on leaf Orr copper leaf ..

@@saadansari2241 🤭😂🤣

👍👍👍👍 great Sanskrit not oldest language It's just 100 bce

@@sethuvignesh3681 100 bce that mean older

Bother don't forget Tamil and Sanskrit both have Brahmi which many politically motivated person called Tamil Brahmi which is the same thing

@@gituparnasarma _/

Saaar Tamil older saaar😢😢

True

Why

@@mol-lyn why not

@@mol-lyn Because too many people, culture, country think these days, they are very special, they inventrped the wheel, when they are probably very likely,even if partially, influenced by something earlier, something not so purely "they as they think". And this shows a web of connection between us.

@@kuldeepgaurav1419 Farming was around long before the Egyptians. Medicine is not culture nor an invention. Neither are math or astronomy. Printing would turn out to be a necessity and it would have been developed whether the chinese had technology for it first or not. You cannot patent nor invent a natural phenomenon or an evolutionary trait, so I don't know where you're getting the lucid dream and meditation parts.

Bo Bo Black Sheep You're right. Our languages aren't random (finite)collection of symbols, each witrh a sound, that might change too.

Does any other language contain the scientific structure and vibratory efficacy of Sanskrit? perhaps not? Sanskrit is very unique and original to India just like the concept of zero!

Hindi and Odia are not much similar But Odia pronunciations are really tough for Non odias.Odia is a Classical language, odia has such sounds that doesn't exist in hindi

We used mug up sanskrit dhatu (odia lipi) otherwise get beaten and thrashed by our sanskrit guruji in school.

@@alexparakan i don't know its just Indian education system , completely outdated.

I was taught or told like Sanskrit is the oldest language of earth and every language on earth evolved from it. Now after watching this video i'm speechless

@@theinevitable8000 so what have u lernt now that sansikirt is it self drived from other older script and its not the oldest one .

@@doityourselfpakistan6535 yes it is derived from other languages

@@theinevitable8000 marathi, bengali, punjabi and hindi all North Indian languages evolved from sanskrit

@@theinevitable8000 no it is not derived from any languages other languages has been derived by it

What is the Nepali origin? I'm guessing you derive ancestry from Indo-Europeans because your language and customs are Sanskritic but also more Chinese-looking features than someone from Bihar or UP.

@@elborrador333 Our history is diverse... Some of our ancestors migrated from indus valley whlist some of us have mongolian/ tibetian origin... Just like hindi, nepali language is derived from sanskrit too... Some people believe that nepali language was actually derived from Khas language which in turn was derived from sanskrit...

@alan hembrom no not all of us... i think we know our history better than you, thank you...

Nepali is Mix up of Sanskrit Pali and Brahmi..... Khas language is Similar to Eastern European language

@alan hembrom you said "nepali are indo aryan" so i thought you were referring to the nepali people... but yes sanskrit language is an indo aryan language

Tamli not tamil brahmi, Prahmi kirutham 2200/2300 old Greek mythology king names time. Already tamili languages before 2490 times

@@francisrajanlobo2698 brahmi is term coined and agreed by scientific community. Brahmi is borrowed from Phoenician alphabet around 1200-800BC.. English/german Latin alphabet also evolved from Phoenician alphabet. Tamili is referred in pali literature to denote tamil scripts. Tamili is not scientific term, it's regional term.

@@manikandan-ml9gd 1200 - 800 bc not any proof have. Pali not related with tamili. Even paali word of school. Change in pali language like. So proof have in scientific. Science proof only world accept too not in religion way. UNESCO told 1430 ad times record make it. Approved.

@@manikandan-ml9gd phoenician alphabet around both side coin. Greek king name antides have. Antides have 1,2,3,4 . Greek antides long year only give too. 2200 or 2300 times not in 1500 - 800 not like? Greek carbon dating 2200 / 2300 times only. Pali or tamli you can not read or speak directly but later bali word loan get it. Seven PODAGOAS times relationship with east asia time. Indonesia, sumuthara, java settle people.

@@francisrajanlobo2698 please don't blabber and waste my time.. 🤦

I don’t know his job but I know in a video he says he studied religion in university but he is basically a teacher with this channel

@Tian Wang he himself needs to learn more..

@@wennick4859 gud point.. He learned it coz they need to learn or else he can't Fool others.. Even he doesn't know much what he was talking abt..

@@desilonda9857 He has a PhD is languages and religion. Read his about us page. Stop doubting him. What are your qualifications?

@@edwardspencer9397 he may be PhD Holder in his place.. Coz of that still he is in doubt. Edward.. Brother.. English is newly Born.. I mean to say when ur/his ancestors were living in caves, my ancestors explored abt universe.. Wrote Vedas , Purans n etc.. So don't try to be judge here.. He has done PhD in missionary.. Edward what u understand by "Vedic science" ?

there is no geological findings.

@@Tamilhistoryguy there is.

@@kunalrao2134 No, there is no evidence that has been peer reviewed. I understand that post-colonial states feel a sense of shame and consequently hype up their native histories, but at some point you’ve got to be mature and objective about things.

🤣🤣😂

@@Kolgai again, there is.

Panini is carved in stupas built by Ashoka in Jataka stories,so yeah he must be dated before ashoka

Arabic numerals originate in India - It's interesting, many of the Indian writing systems shown in this video have their own corresponding number systems, including the old Brahma script ("Hindu-Arabic numeral system " on Wikipedia has a table of them). Eventually a set of numbers was modified for use by the Arabs, and this system was popularized in Europe in the early 1200s by Fibonacci. I would assume that the number systems evolved in a similar way with the other Indic scripts.

Originated in India translated in Arabic and reached europe

No, they’re Hindu-Arabic - a combination, not derivation

Jared Bowden Correct

@J D Dear friend, I understand your emotions, However one must be vigilant of the times he is in and hence act accordingly, not forgoing the truth but with the times. Therefore I do not confirm with you as per. It is true that, out of all the existing civilizations, India is the oldest and hence it's not far fetched to assume all other civilisations must have borrowed from India on the simple basis of logic and reason which is also supported with evidences, however civilizations develop in tandem and borrow from one another. In the case of India, the earlier and contemporary civilizations from which India had much give and take are extinct and there remanants have formed the newer civilizations who also have cooperatively developed with India albeit borrowing much and giving less, which would be a normal course of events for Senior-junior. The Indian development has categorised these phenomenon of holding the truth but respecting the times, as 'Shruti' and 'Smriti', The Indian civilization of today is not outside of time or of natural course of events and hence is subject to all the natural developments that occur for a civilization. This cycle of time has all the ingredients as described through unravelling of Historical development of this world and India is a part of it. Nonetheless I agree with you on the Spiritual level, not forgoing the truth. The Shruti are timeless and so is the Sanatan Dharma, once cycle leads to another and the repitition goes on but for one who has attained 'Moksha'. The smritis however are bound to this timeline and true only for this 'Manvanter'. Shree Rama, Shree Krishna are the 'Avatars' within this Manvanter, that is with the times.

The number system we use today is called Hindu-Arabic numerals originated in India at around 5th century by vedic scholars and mathematicians such as Aryabhatta and Brahmagupta, later on through trade the knowledge was shared with Middle Eastern traders, and mathematicians especially al-Khwarizmi and al-Kindi, who further introduced it to Europe at about 12th century.

Very correct argument! It started in the Southern India and went to the world. Even DNA, migration supports this claim.

@@kuldeepgaurav1419 I hope you are all from India or Speak Tamili

Brahmi divided into two parts. One is north Indian Brahmi and the other South Indian Brahmi. Ashoka the great used North Indian Brahmi. Think about it... Tamil Brahmi is called Tamil Brahmi because it derived from Brahmi.

What he said is fundamental analysis were correct ! It's has no origin letter continuation derived methods ! If you see in Tamil Current letters derived from vattezhuthu Than vattezhuthu derived from his own indus sign.. This language survived because it can drive by it own without any support from other languages ( by any means) Archaeologist found so many Indus description as well southern part of India, they seen the many evidence proof these people used same letter... Few years back in arcot founded stone axe dated 5000yrs same letter ..many things are there but this govt not willing to excavate to bring this knowledge to public ! Keezhadi also the best eg... They found indus letter in that pot..

Moreover let him explain from where the Aramaic derived !!! Korean has 1600 word similar to tamili... Eg , In Tamil for mother and father we call as Amma , appa Korean language also the same for sound

Just tell me one thing, did he gave any solid reference anywhere in this video supporting his claims?

@@theidleguy9041 So, his statements are baseless?

@@su-mu Ofcourse. He gave little or no references for his claims

​@@theidleguy9041Agree. I wish he gave some references somewhere: Did not find any in the description either.

This video is not fully informative 😐

...and historically and linguistically ACCURATE too. Not based on personal emotions, cultural baggage, myths and legends

@@thetruthseeker5448 the speaker begins by suggesting that original Sunskrit [which he knows not how to pronounce) is "probably" from Aramaic. By the end of his presentation even he himself doubts his own original comments. there is the suggestion that Sanskrit may have been invented by someone,, May i suggest that "Like the table of the atomic elements" Some great sage received it in his consciousness and it continued on, Too many linguistic connections show that it existed long before any middle eastern languages, In the indus valley archeological discoveries of recent years the skeleton of a Yogi in Lotus posture has been dated at about 7,000 years - how many millennia prior to that was required to develop this advanced science and what language did they speak?

@@federicoparente3310 He said Brahmi could be a new invention, not Sanskrit...

@@federicoparente3310 dude, he never made those claims, he said language isn't the same as script (and it isn't, otherwise German and English would be the same thing as Latin), and that the sanskrit language is ancient and rich, there's just no evidence of it being written down before it came in contact with Greeks and Persians. He never claimed Aramaic is a linguistic ancestor of sanskrit, he never said anything you claim he did.

It comes from the pallava script witch it descendent from the brami script

Pali originates from Sanskrit btw

@True Light even murayans and guptas did, u ll find beautiful hindu - Buddhist fusion in entire sea countries. And we know that ashoka spread buddism in sea countries

Yeah, it is strange that he only did partial research on this topic... Why would anyone talk about something so complicated like sanskrit and risk making mistakes - like the one you mention. There are many other mistakes in this video, so it is clear that youtubers just dnt have the respect for foreign history, systems or culture.

@@summergram Plus they read more from colonized British fake history of Aryan-Invasion Theory, so anything Indian has to be imported from middle-east and Central Asia. :-) The Indus valley civilization and following Vedic civilization are a nightmare to them. Because other older civilizations like Babylon, Egyptians, Roman, Mayan are destroyed easily by the European, but only Indian and Chinese civilization stood tall to those invaders and still thriving.

There are Jewish burial tombs around 300bc in South India. So contact with middleast and india is very old. They might have introduced early version of ibrahim script. Writing systems are adopted based of ease of writing. Just like we use english alphabets while texting in our mother tongue using phones. Becoz it is easier to type. It is very possible Indians might have dropped native scripts for foreign ones. We still haven't deciphered Indus script. Until then we can only make conclusions based on evidence we have. i.e. brahmi might have roots in Phoenician

@@bineshsukumaran1994 What exactly is this evidence that you mention. I am much interested. Kindly share it.

soo true , i waa going to comment the same but don't need to now😬👏

Mr P you have mastered the art of ass kissing. You will do very well in Indian politics

@@ajazio ok Al Haramain perfumes Hyderabad

Good point

Are u fool? Prakrit has descended from vedic Sanskrit

@Nihilist Seeker well current Nepali bhasa is also standardized from khas bhasa . I am no expert on this I am sharing this from someone else view which I thought was legit .

@Nihilist Seeker Sanskrit can't be a common man's language buddy lot of work is done to make this scientific language. It's a work of geniuses not a command man

@Nihilist Seeker so you think Sanskrit was comman men language? It just doesn't fit with evolution does it? I believe some cult of geniuses made it from lot of hard work

Ancient Egyptian phonetics is also thought to be based on primary units of sound, without any representation of vowels

@Star Star Although, cuneiform is a mostly syllabic writing system with really abstract shapes, that would have been even more abstract by the time the Phoenician alphabet was invented

I wish u give up your religion and come back to Sanatana Dharma ...

@Moon Cahn ok.. I'll take the challenge. I challenge you to give me evidence of these so called 'Aryans' first. After that we can talk on lengths about Saraswati river. Challenge accepted

Deep Underground, Now How Deep It Is, And How Wide, How Much Distance From One Point To Anonther Point ?. And Saraswati Is A Hidden River From Everyone Eyes. It Is Not Above The Ground To Be Called Saraswati River, Then Who Name This River ?

He's wrong about the dates.

女性愛理ん your point is very true.. As anthropologists we often struggle with the question when human "language"-like communication started, since our vocalchords did develope a quite late, but socialization needed a form of language and this could go back in time as far as 70k years ago or even further

There can be whistle register out of it or a finger flicking register ...

IIRC the definition i learnt uses the word "Medium". For comunication the language is a "Code" and the sounds are gestures the "Meduim" where that code is transmitted. It's a good model, is adaptable for a LOOOT of different times of communication

Mam what does this signs mean? 👉 --------- 👌

tamil may be as old as sanskrit but it doesn't have same impact as sanskrit

Although you are correct, the current version of tamil is quite different to classical tamil.

@@utubetruthteller Dude, I don't think so. If you find clearly about the history of Tamil language, it had caused far more impact than Sanskrit language. The history that we are learning about languages of India is been biased and deceived by current ruling system.

@@shanmugamshan2459 mere rhetoric wont convince people, if tamil was so great why dont tamil priest dont use tamil mantras for puja, sanskrit grammar is superior to any other indo European languages like Latin and greek, English let alone tamil language, its quite futile to argue against that.

@@utubetruthteller Yes true but no worries, one day the truths will come out.

*Inside India:* We invented nuclear weapons in 7000BC. We wuz kangz!! Bharat mata ki jay!!!

Broooo 😂😂😂

@@KhukuriGod what an absurd headcanon claim... Lol.. Whatever dude.. Whatever floats your boat...

@@KhukuriGod idea of nuclear weapons and aerodynamics is in the indian scriptures. Bharat mata ki jai is permanent.

@@KhukuriGod savage !! 😂

Hi

The modern writing of Sanskrit like devanagari and bramhi might be younger. But linear A, b and IVC script itself was writing Sanskrit only and that makes it the oldest written language. The transformation from surviving IVC script (which are just seals with name of the person) to brahmi to other Indian written languages is quite apparent and impossible to unsee once you see it and the only reason 'experts' are not making the connection is dishonesty and agenda

@@deepika2440 but most scholars argued that the Brahmi script had originated earlier than the 3rd century BCE. This claim is based on the composition of a set of texts, the Brahmanas, which were attached to the Vedic literature during the 6th century BCE. The Brahmanas are the only section of the Vedic corpus written mostly in prose, unlike the earlier sections of the Vedas which are hymns for recitation, specially designed for oral transmission.

@@deepika2440 Sanskrit was the language spoken by the elite as early as at least 2000 BCE and Prakrit was the dialect of the masses. Both Sanskrit and Prakrit were written in the Brahmi script.

@@deepika2440 Sanskrit (or Prakrit) belongs to Tamils and has been predominantly used by Tamil kings (Chera/Chola/Pandias - Devars - Lords) to promote unity, culture, religion, economy, literature, knowledge, and science (Linguafranca). This can be gauged from the fact that these kings not only ruled the entire India but also the world. They have been the once dominant world power and are the true natives of Indus Valley Civilization. Later Sanskrit has been adopted by various other kings and dynasties of Indian sub-continent.

@Chitragupta if it were easy, then it would have already been cracked

Far greater minds have failed to do it.. I doubt this guy can

I think already done by Prof U R Rao

@@WangJinZhu that was sarcasm my friend

@@Ss-tt9pp OKK

The Chinese and Japanese script have no relationship with the other writting systems discussed. The point of the video was to show how most writting systems descend from Egyptian Hieroglyphs thanks to the spread of the Phoenician Alphabet. The Han Characters were a Completely independent development. Just like Sumerian Cuneiform, Mesoerican Glyps and many many others

Well explained! Great video! Thanks !

Look into Dravidian scripts used in India, they must have evolved from a ancient script/ language (idk which) that existed in Southern Asia, which later evolved into Southern India as proto - Tamil and other SE Asian countries as their own scripts. Also it's strange that a lot of Korean and Tamil worlds seem to match, despite the two countries (India and Kor) being nowhere near one another. Could be due to trade which we know the Chola empire with their massive navy would thrive on trade with ancient China/ Korea and other East Asian countries.

@@JOJO-of8vl Another possibility... One of the ancient Korean royal family was from Ayodhya in North India. I got to know very recently but was surprised that some Koreans are aware of this. I don't remember the details but there are a few RU-vid videos on the subject.

@@anilvashist6758 the story of queen Heo Hwang Ok and King Kim Suro.

Likely

British no "er" you don't call Indians indianers do you?

@@ANTSEMUT1 you wanna fight English ? Ok . Let me tell you why Britishers is correct . 1) my autocorrect didn’t highlight it 😂 2) The British = the term ‘Britishers’ . The British called it Orissa = Britishers called it Orissa .

@@siddhantmishra3598 We call them Brits, not Britishers

@@siddhantmishra3598 The correct term is Brit’s.

From where did you get this 5000 year old script? Is it kept in some museum? Have you seen it? Can you tell me the names of this British researchers or where are their research papers published? Please send me the references, if you have any. I won't accept Whatsapp university forwards as evidence 🤣

@@paragdesai1370 so u r trying to say that u don't accept sources from what's app University but u fully trust British sources..... r they ur forefather's or what 🤔

@@er.abhitwankhede4143 Just give me any evidence which proves Mahabharta/Sanskrit being 5000 years old. Any evidence which can be verified is fine.

@@paragdesai1370 unfortunately the can't link WhatsApp forwards

@@darali568 see Nilesh oak's video to get ideas about what he is talking, converted fool