How Other Games Compare To Ghost Recon Breakpoint - Breakpoint vs MGSV and Ground Branch 

I'll be goin over the gameplay features of 2 tactical games +1 FPS tactical shooter (And just to be specificaly clear once again...I am talking about A.I smarts, reactions and character movement. I know that breakpoint offers possibilities that phantom pain doesnt.) One game made to run on older/weaker hardware that dates to 2006-2007: Metal Gear Solid V, which was also released on ps4/Xone/Pc, and the other game beeing Breakpoint released on ps4, Xone and Pc. This video is basicaly about me pointing out that, the "harware limitation" excuse ubisoft gives us, as to why many features are not in the game, make no sense when i point out how fleshed out the gameplay of MGSV sh*ts all over Breakpoint. I would really like to hear an honnest answer as to why a game that was made to run on 2007 hardware is more fleshed out than a game like breakpoint. In terms of gameplay mecanics, A.I smarts etc.

Really puts Ubisofts general lack of effort into perspective

fun fact everyone, even splinter cell had the feature of enemies dropping to the ground when shot in the leg

Games nowadays really make me appreciate gems like mgs5. Kojima production is a god damn treasure of the gaming industry

MGSV is undefeated when it comes to gameplay.

You can't compare fox engine to anything else it's literally the code that's hundreds of years ahead of its time.

Bro, i cannot explain the relief from seeing this video. It expresses all my concerns with how UBI designs their games. Honestly, there is nothing tactical about ghost recon as it is right now. I don't understand how they seemingly got away with it. Yes the game flopped but people still defend it as if UBI actually supports it. The game is fundamentally flawed and cannot be fixed, everything they add is merely cosmetic and quality of life stuff that doesn't matter. They advertised a squad based tactical military shooter which had no squad, barely any tactics and the only thing identifiable as military is cringe dialogue and cosmetic gear. They added teamamtes but managed to be the worst teammates even compared to linear games like call of duty which are scripted. The guns for hire from Farcry are better than a supposed tactical shooter. Heck even the weapons and tactics from any Farcry are better. The tactics in Breakpoint amount to random 'abilities' and environmental settings. What would be a smoke bomb is used ion a different animation and they call it an ability. Loading 3 high caliber bullets is suddenly and ability. They add things like reloading enemies and 'darkest night' and call it a tactical update. Darkest night means nothing to the game, the enemy still see as they did before, they don't even try and compensate with NVGs or anything, so now i can't see shit but the enemies seem to see better. I swear if you took out the meaningless gear you would not know this game has anything to do with tactics or military. You would think its an action adventure futuristic looter shooter which is exactly what they wanted it to be so they could funnel you into micros. What pisses me off the most is it's not like they can't do any of these things, they just won't cause they don't care and are greedy. Honestly F UBI.

Ubisoft doesn’t hired neither skilled developers or skilled programmers to work with their game designers. The company uses script kiddie, or “skiddie,” who is someone who lacks programming knowledge and uses existing scripts or program from previous Ubisoft games to develop new games like Ghost Recon Breakpoint, they relied completely on Ubisoft proprietary game engine which is a collection of programs and scripts for game development. When it comes to developing and programming Ubisoft employed juveniles who lack the ability to write sophisticated programs on their own that fully exploits AI behavior development like Metal Gear Solid. Ubisoft Script kiddies rely on Ubisoft proprietary engine software written by others and dont possess the knowledge or know-how to modify or produce their own software to supplement their in game engine. This is why enemy AI is so stupid, your sniper scope is limited to only 6x magnification, this is why Ubisoft games have more bugs than any other games on the market, and this why it takes so long to actually fix and update any game at Ubisoft studios, this is why all Ubisoft games feel and look the same, it’s not software nor hardware limitations, it’s programming and development limitations imposing by Ubisoft itself by employing scripts kiddies. Secondly Ubisoft have that stupid policy, if a skilled programer develop something new at Ubisoft it becomes sole property of Ubisoft. Therefore no real programmers wants work at Ubisoft. The Metal Gear Solid V was made by a handful of developers, the programmers who actually built the Fox Engine work in the game development in contrast to both Ghost Recon Wildlands and Breakpoint.

Thank you for taking the time and making the effort to create this comparison. Very informative.

Well said. Ubisoft is just pathetic compared to these two companies. I love their games, despite them being lazy greedy bastards!

GR could be great, but all dev time went into cosmetics and people seem to be just fine with it. Disappointing and frustrating.

Great video, thanks for your time to do this, everyone will apreciate your work!!!!!

Thank you for offering legit backwards compatibility playable content in your video we have been waiting for this for a very long time.... SUBSCRIBED

Nice vid. I feel happy that I am not the only one seeing Breakpoint lacking some very basic things. Keep up the good work! [Long videos gang!]

Them dudes on Reddit had a complete meltdown when I brought up the lack of effort in breakpoint compared to even the classics like SOCOM. It was hilarious. I wonder how many people bought the new clothes which required real money. I’m not going to lie I spent a lot of money on breakpoint. And I can’t play for more than 20 minutes before I’m just irritated with the ppl I play with or more often the lack of entertainment. I have never understood how a company could have such a series with massive potential and they ruin it from all angles.

Awesome video man, keep it up 👍

This is what I'm talking about... I like the content my friend!

Wolves wear ballistic helmets that have an animation for being shot off, but they also die as soon as you do this. If you want their encounters to be unique, you can make use of existing code to make them react differently Breakpoint is capable of handling AI consciousness, as it happens when enemies with intel or civilians are "killed" (but not with a headshot). The circumstances surrounding it are just as contrived as physically possible Not only does taking a hostage not affect enemy behavior, but it doesn't even cover your body. You hold him off to the side, completely defeating the point of the action in the first place. This animation was replaced from Wildlands -- why? No matter what, the detection time is always the same. It's doesn't matter how close you are, how alert they are, or what you do while under line of sight. You could stand directly in front of someone, kill 3 of his buddies in plain view, and then scurry back to cover and all you'd get is a "kill witnessed" because you'll have plenty of time to do all that. The only thing that seems to matter is enemy type, as wolves and red wolves detect you faster and near instantly, respectively Not only do flashlights shine through walls, but they never turn them off until the sun comes up, giving away their position at all times. Tracking enemies under darkness is basically the same as with 3D HUD markers, because you can always see where they are The radioman enemy type is only capable of calling Little Birds as reinforcements. If you shoot the helicopter down without killing him, he'll call another one, and so on and so forth. This will happen quite frequently because it's a top priority target as soon as it gets in range and circles around and around your cover in a really annoying way. You can also use this method combined with trapping him at the bottom of a ladder to generate infinite helicopters COD Ghosts had (inconsistent) dual-rendered scopes, and that ran on a PS3. I don't understand why this technology hasn't been adopted elsewhere, even in the same series. MW does a fake parallax effect, so it's clear they want to make it look more authentic, but they don't go all the way either Shooting under magnification while leaning is not a great idea. The engineering and calibration of the optic to line up with the round's trajectory along the boreline is working against you because you've taken it off axis, throwing the zero off down and to the side. The holds are not helpful anymore either because they point diagonally instead of vertically

Just finished mgsv with 100+ hour still a masterpiece,going for platinum 5 more trophies to go

Love to have found your channel, subscribed :)

Great vid!

I mean MGS V is one of my most fun games but they did have a huge budget mostly going into small details. Like the fact a water bottle ACTUALLY CONDENSATES in MGS V.

metal gear solid has always been years ahead of it's time...

The solider showed saddens when his buddy died

Great video man! Can you tell me how did u get that balaclava in metal gear solid v?

Really great video! Thank you for making this. I agree with your comparison! I think the only issue I have with metal gear solid is how cartoony it feels.

Good video pal , Ubisoft need to see the 1st 10 minutes of this video

Wow.. This make me nostalgic... I have more than 1000hours of mgs on steam. Playing Wildland and breakpoint is like microwave food whit no taste.Nice video and hello from frence✌🏽✌🏽

This is sad, that such brilliant work has so low views and likes :( But MGS in Breakpoint or Wildlands environment/setting would be the gem.And they were only need to add good AI and radio chatter FSM, and strategic overlay like in mgs when you do some covert ops on helmets and armor supplies. For such things in Breakpoint I was even ready to pay additional 20-40 bucks.

Nice video man!! Got a subscription from me!

Nice job.

Gr8 video M8

Congrats on this awesome video my dude !

For a channel as small as this, this is quality. Speaking of blind, I do remember at times in MGSV where I would lay on the side of the road and enemies would walk right past me, but it's only that. Also, do you think I should get Breakpoint? I'm not that of a stealth person and going guns blazing, plus the customization looked really attractive.

4:04 why put a feature like this if the enemy will just shoot you without caring for his teammate, this really bothers me since playing Wildlands

Hey, c'est cool, ta vidéo tourne pas mal, je suis content pour toi GG, je l'ai vu passer sur un discord communautaire :)

Just subbed and liked mate, I'm subscribe number 94, But like Patrick McGowan said in the TV series "The Prisoner" I'm not a number, I am a free man!!😂👍

If you ever decide to do one on the ai teammates, you should use the brothers in arms hells highway as a comparison. Since that was only published by Ubisoft and not developed by them.

Hi you did a great video, editing is fine. I watched half of it, then it made me want to reinstall mgsv on PC. And wow it made me realize how good that game is when it comes to freedom of stealth and of course Ai immersion. Previously I was playing GR wildlands, co op. While also having been playing WD legion on ps4. And it is disappointing to see ubisoft does not do enough for quality ai. What you showed in breakpoint is what I've seen in 2 of their other games, with very little difference other than character models, id even go as far as to say far cry also uses the same ai. Its the same low high detection meter. They most likely re-use same ai throughout there games, it cuts cost. So in the end, lazy development, quantity over quality etc. Makes me think they cant make a new splinter cell, as it will show the flaw of their ai's, especially when the whole game is focused on stealth, noticed also their open world games just give you an "option" of stealth, to distract you from the other 100 collectables and side missions. In essence Ubisoft do not know how to make stealth games or worse they bastardize the open world genre with the same gameplay loop.

The first gameplay, is this game on console?

my attention span wont allow me to watch the full video but the editing in beginning was decent indeed, especially for your first time, also it addressed something that has been bothering as well, in GRBP enemies die instantly from a leg shot even tho the game has the mechanic and animation for an enemy to be incapacitated, yet it only triggers for enemies that carry intel, like wtf, the intel is keeping you alive?

How the hell doesn't this have more views

My experience with breakpoint AI is completely different. They are way more aggressive, flanking, using frag grenades constantly, way more pushing, way more cover or suppressive fire. Half of those things i see in the video, the AI does not. Wonder if they ironed up the AI with last updates.

You don’t have to be a medic to apply first aid. Everyone in the military is taught some sort of aid so they can make sure there brothers and sisters survive until a corpsman or medic can help them.

the best thing in metal gear if you don't have language intel you can't introgate to native people

crowbat???

I mostly agree with what you said in this video (I watched the whole stuff btw). However, comparing ghost recon to ground branch for gunsmith and MGS V for A.I is like comparing GTA V to forza for driving and Red Dead for immersion. You have two specific games with specific strenghts and weaknesses. For example the gunplay in MGS V sucks, it's terrible. At the opposite end, the AI in ground branch is one of the worst in any tactical shooter. None of those have maps even remotely comparable to breakpoint either and none of these have access to combined arms gameplay (helos, planes, and armored vehicle in the same game). Breakpoint is also the only one on this list featuring real freedom on how you wanna approach objectives (MGS V is pretty much only stealth since getting loud sucks and the AI in ground branch will see you at night as clearly as if you were a walking spotlight). You can also add the fact that breakpoint has an amazing drop in/drop out coop mode, meaning that at any time you can join or be joined by friends, play together on a mission or even being multiple kilometers appart and still being able to play in the same session. It's also the only game among those 3 with civilians (although I enjoyed wildlands a lot more for that), multiple A.I teamates, a pretty solid health/stamina system (it's subjective but it's my favourite among the 3), the biggest gun variety, the biggest overall customization, the better graphics and a lot more. My point is, Breakpoint doesn't suck (not aymore), it's far from greatness but it's a really good balance of the 2 games you're showcasing, even bringing some stuff of it's own. There is a lot of stuff they can improve for sure, the audio for example is terrible and the AI need a real rework I agree on that. But features like Picture in Picture scopes just eats your FPS (you're dropping 10-15 fps just by looking through your scope in the video) and in a game with the scale and graphics of Breakpoint it would simply be impossible for current medium to high hardware to handle this properly. Anyway, great effort, I apreciate the time and dedication you took to make this, I just think it needs a bit of context.

What are your settings on breakpoint? Im on the hardest difficulty and I have to mag dump every guy and the only time I one tap is a head shot.

Hello, super vidéo, comme promis. Je trouve les points que tu développes valides de ton point de vue. Cela dit, il y a plusieurs éléments à prendre en considération. Tu compares GR et MGS. MGS c'est un jeu d'infiltration solo qui récompense le gameplay furtif. Si on doit comparer ça à la licence Tom Clancy, il faut le comparer à un Splinter Cell. si on sort du catalogue UBI, il faut le comparer à une licence comme Hitman. Les mécaniques furtives dans GR sont optionnelles quand elles font partie du cœur du gameplay sur un titre comme MGS-V. Ça impacte forcément la qualité du code des IA et on sait que c'est l'un des gros points faibles d'UBISOFT. Mais c'est un vrai débat... Dans nos échanges, je parlais des limitations technique du moteur graphique. Tu ne l'évoques pas dans ta vidéo. Entre ANVIL et le Fox Engine, les fonctionnalités et les limitations ne sont pas les mêmes. Moi j'ai pas de connaissances techniques dans le domaine, mais j'imagine que passer d'un moteur à l'autre pour un développeur, c'est comme passer d'un OS à l'autre pour un utilisateur comme toi ou moi. Chaque OS ayant ses + et ses - Si on lit la presse spécialisée, on comprend assez vite que le Fox Engine est très "user friendly". Je ne sais pas ce qu'il en est d'ANVIL, mais apparemment, UBI galère pas mal que ça soit en terme de qualité des détails et optimisations graphiques. Si tu ne peux par rendre à l'image une profondeur de champ, des détails, ces limitations vont venir limiter les options de gameplay, c'est évident. J'ai lu des échanges où des joueurs se demandaient s'il ne valait mieux pas développer le prochain GR sous Snowdrop, le deuxième moteur graphique propriétaire d'UBISOFT (TD,TD2). J'ai pas d'avis sur la question. Je suis plus attaché au monde ouvert qu'au moteur. Mais le premier impacte le second manifestement... Pour ce que tu montres dans ta vidéo, le comportement des IA, c'est une porte ouverte. Je veux dire, les joueurs de FC en sont au même stade. Il suffit de comparer le comportement des IA dans FC2 et FC5 pour se demander pourquoi est-ce qu'on a régressé autant entre différents opus de la même franchise. Ma théorie là-dessus, c'est que c'est une question économique et de politique interne. Le marketing a démontré qu'il n'était pas nécessaire d'avoir des IA élaborées pour qu'un jeu performe. Pourquoi faire plus et plus coûteux quand plus simple et moins cher fonctionne ? Ça est les limitations du moteur ANVIL que seul UBISFOT connait explique en partie ce que tu constates dans ta vidéo. Tu peux ajouter à ça tous les dysfonctionnements internes à UBI qui ont amené à l'échec critique et commercial de GRB. (les créa et les dév' n'avaient pas les mains libres, c'est vraiment important de le savoir... Ubi c'est une grosse boîte, elle a les qualités de ses défauts et de gros défauts aussi... Voilà, je pense que ta comparaison a le mérite de montrer qu'il y a mieux, mais le constat qui consiste à dire "Konami y arrive, UBISOFT devrait le faire aussi" relève d'un raccourci. C'est pas le même moteur, pas la même boîte, pas la même culture d'entreprise et pas les mêmes objectifs. Si tu compares l'IA de WL et de GRB, tu verras qu'elles se valent. C'est les mêmes ressources qui sont utilisées. Pour le gunsmith, GB ou EFT vont très loin. Est-ce que c'est nécessaire ? je ne pense pas. C'est beaucoup de ressources pour quelque chose qui relève du détail. Le gunsmith de GRFS était très bien pour l'époque. C'est qui est honteux, c'est d'avoir moins bien que ça dans WL et encore pire dans GRB. Mais franchement, choisir où tu places ta poignée verticale sur ton rail, c'est gadget. (Après, GB, c'est des anciens de Red Storm, ceux de l'époque de Rainbow Six, avant R6... c'est pas étonnant que tu t'y retrouves ;) ). Je pense qu'on peut attendre mieux pour le prochain GR, si jamais il y en a un, mais ça me semble optimiste d'attendre quelque chose de la qualité de ce qe Konami a fait dans MGSV. Très chouette vidéo, vraiment :)

Its pretty funny that a ridiculous game like MGSV is more tactical than breakpoint. I love this video man, Keep on with the good work!!

Put in 100+ hours in wildlands, now 100+ hours in breakpoint (Haven't even gone to dlc yet)

I had MGSV and always intended to play it, then I got Breakpoint and realised just how much I sucked at stealth. There was no point in me playing MGS after that! I do also have Ground Branch, but, it's nowhere near finished enough for me to want to play it yet. Maybe Microprose will help them get their finger out.

21:33 granada iluminativa

Fantastic video. it's a shame MGSV didn't get a successor. In stealth openworld games, MGSV has the best gameplay mechanics and AI. Wildlands has the best openworld and Breakpoint has nothing...

You get a sub from me just for the simple fact making this video. Im a MG fan so Brokepoint for me is like a ok but doesn’t compare.

this game had so much potential to be something great but it blew it all on microtransactions and shitty AI

are they planning on fixing this game?

Um the A.I do climb latter's in this game last I checked

Mgs5 was made.on PS3 and 360 and yet we don't have a game in PS4 gen with complex gameplay and ai as mgs5. I can only imagine mgs6 on ps5.

5:15 eventually I’ll watch all this im sure but right here you are really romanticizing the concept the ai is just not shooting till they can see you while ground units are going to come at you. They aren’t trying to keep me pinned so their buddies can finish you off

Breakpoint was initially a cash grab. Don't forget how it was released.

The human AI are not the best but the drone AI can be just straight pain in the neck on GR

Why couldn't breakpoint have gameplay like this. It would be so much better

It's almost not fair comparing Ground Branch to Breakpoint, GB had at least one of the dudes who worked on the original GR and R6 games.

Virgin looter shooter game vs tactical Chad infiltration game. Not really, GR is supposed to be about a tactical squad shooter, not The Division+Far cry. Really Ubi need to learnt, even if Wildlands was more arcade than MgsV, it was funnier.

I've never played a Ghost Recon game, but I've played MGSV so much that I've seen everything it has to offer so many times. I just want something different. Honestly I'd just go for Last of us 2, but I'm planning on going for an Xbox instead of PS5. So I put my eyes on Ghost Recon since it's the other closest gameplay to MGS. I was hoping it would be a good alternative, but now I'm thinking it's just going to feel like a downgrade

I just tried this game over the free weekend that just past. The game is built to be a looter shooter, not meant for realism. I already have the division 2 for that. Immersive mode is working as intended but has many glaring flaws because the game is not built on realism. Extremely disappointed. Ground Branch looks like my only hope, but I wish it had 3rd person too. I like to see my character in action.

If you played MGSV , how can you take serious games like Breakpoint

You know breakpoint use anvil 2.0 engine and metal gear solid 5 use the fox engine to completely different engines that's why one looks better than the other one and plays better too speaking of metal gear solid 5 compared to breakpoint the developers at Ubisoft needs a big change

To be fair, there is much more going on in Breakpoint compared to MGSV, for example breakpoint has flying vehicles which the player control themselves while MGSV doesn't, Breakpoint also have a wider variety of NPCs, if you compare the environments of both games its obvious

I am going to give you points and then immediately take them away as a fan of both franchises. (Check my vid history) I have played a lot of both, 1. Metal Gear Solid has always had a functional layer based AI system that refines in one engine over 4 generations of gaming not even ARMA can come close... (+1) 2. Ubisoft has always shot itself in the foot by taking other franchises and streamlining them in one engine that works with multiple IP's every other year instead of being a dev that works on one IP every 5 years. (-1) 3. Ghost Recon has been a different beast since Future Soldier and was essentially rebooted on Wildlands. So they are on game 2 with where they want to go from here. (-1) 4. Like most Metal Gear Solid games [all but 1 on PS1] gameplay is the only redeeming factor. It is essentially so good that everything else would be shit and the game "gets a 10". (-1) 5. Wildlands and Breakpoint are good titles marred by having design and concept oversights. (+1) 6. In the past 6 years Ubisoft has been turning every franchise into action RPG's. It has added some and taken some with every franchise. (+1) 7. You compare a middle of the road franchise with one of the best franchises in the history of the business. (-1) 8. MGSV handles the living world really well. Just not OpFor or BluFor sense of presence. It is a great linear game in a never used glorious sandbox. (-1) 9. Ghost Recon would do amazing with a Motherbase and Support helicopter feature. Which for MGSV, fultoning makes everything sort of useless. I would have preferred to have a support squad than a stripper that teleports with a sniper rifle and a horse that is worthless. (-0-) 10. Both games have a better fate than R6. (+3)

Ubisoft's 'appeal to everyone' method is ruining their games. Wonder how farcy 6 is going to be.

Would love to see Wildlands compared to breakpoint. I feel like the A.I. in wildlands is even better.

I knew ghost recon had bad ai but holy shit!! And mgsv ai in most cases is even better than TLOU2, which also has good ai, its scary they achieved this in 2015

Fwench ? Sounds like les antilles par ici 😂

when you shoot someone in the head with a sniper it would instently kill the them regardless if you wearing a helmet

Man do I not like breakpoint. The ai is Brain dead and they have eagle eyes. The stupid thing I hate, I HATE how the ai gets eagle eyes once they are alerted. That just doesn’t make any sense, hiding in tall grass you couldn’t see me BUT now you can?? Now the camouflage, Jesus it sucks so much I have to rant about this crap. Even MGSV has better camouflage than breakpoint. At least in MGSV the camouflage has a purpose. But in breakpoint it serves no purpose, it’s a cosmetic. You have to stay in greenery to stay hidden, can’t blend in with the mud, floor, sand, or landscape? The ai is going to spot you in a certain amount of meters every time, that you cannot change because camouflage is just a cosmetic. That means, laying on tall grass, 40 meters. It’s never going to change no matter what camouflage you wear. He will not get close to you. So you can’t melee him and you cannot change what will make it easier to blend in to make his detection range shorter. He’ll always spot you 40 meters away from him. So you have to find the right flora to hide in. But even still, hiding in those big bushes won’t help you. Somehow they’ll still see you... I get it, it’s a video game. Hiding in low grass in real life, you’d be spotted instantly. But I am talking about a video game. -> Of course you have prone camouflage to blend in said mud, snow, soil or sand. but as much as it is. It’s a hindrance when enemies are all over you with eagle eyes since you can’t turn a full 360. Also In MGSV you can be spotted if you move or run. Breakpoint does the opposite. You can run in front of the enemies eyes and they won’t see you until you reach their detection range. Something I don’t like too. I dislike the detection system of breakpoint. It’s a “oh take a few seconds to let my bar charge and now I see you!” They don’t even investigate what they saw, seeing a figure dash around them. No, I like MGSV detection system way better, crawling while going full speed? Enemies see you and they’ll investigate what they just saw. Now, this may not be my last. But it is something I don’t like too. It’s how enemies know exactly where you are when you fire a shot. You can lay on the ground, miss a shot. And enemies will instantly point their guns to you, barrels exactly on your face. You can be 50-100 or 150-200 meters away and they will know where it came from. The same thing is on MGSV, but I don’t think they know exactly where you are. But enemies in MGSV will put some fire on the location where they think the shot came from. Way smarter than breakpoints AI. MGSV camouflage isn’t the greatest since you’re always going to be spotted 10 meters away but can decrease it by 6-7 meters away by pushing the stealth mode button. There’s a few things I want to rant about MGSV but, it’s a good solid piece of game. Forgot one thing- another stupid thing I HATE. Is that enemies will see you in a bush when you fire a shot. Not only they know where you are, but they see you. You can be a good distance away and still get spotted laying in that bush that covers your full body. It’s so god damn annoying, I don’t know if they want to be realistic or not.

Breakpoint is nice game, but cant be compared with metal gear, never.

MGV is more fun in gameplay but the map is so borring, i Prefer wildland. for the breakpoint it think the control and weapon is still better

Breakpoint is purposely made easier. Ubisoft always want to make the game AI bit easier so that players feel powerful.

The idea of a helmet stopping a rifle bullet is dumb anyway though. Current kevlar helmets are only designed to stop 9mm and fragmentation. Even if it does stop a bullet you'd likely have a concussion

I used to play MGSV before but just got fed up with so much fantasy and stupidity! And running out of suppressors?? Come on... Ghost Recon might have bugs but it's far more realistic in some ways.

Breakpoint sucks. It’s the only game I’ve tried this hard to like but it consistently falls short. I’ve done everything in it too. Lol. Wildlands is incredible IMO and it’s AI is not even close to as impressive as MGSV. They royally F’d up on Breakpoint and Ubisoft has made it clear that they are done having any creativity in their games.

Great vid, it proves ubi just don't giv a fu.. 😂Sadly to say breakpoint is a boring, boring game, with terrible A.I. and story

If you have a problem with the AI in Breakpoint, try uping the difficulty. That adjustment exists in the settings for a reason. Secondly, most helmets are not, I repeat not rated for rifle fire. They can stop hand guns and shrapnel, and even that is questionable. There's not much in the way of body armor that could ever hope to handle a .338 lapua. 3rd, it's a video game. Play what you like. Avoid what you don't. Just because a game doesn't tickle your fancy doesn't mean it's a bad game. It's just different, and not to your tastes. Breakpoint is far and away from a bad game.

I’m not trying to make any excuses but you do know they rushed Breakpoint like hell right? It was nowhere close to being as polished as MGSV on release they shouldn’t have released yet tbh, also Kohima and his team are geniuses when it comes to adding minor details you really expected this quality from Ubisoft in 2019? 😂 you have your own hopes up if so

send this to ubisoft devs pls lol

The only fact here is that BOTH games HAD a lot of potential. Because all of us really enjoyed both games but somehow both games are still trash in the end.. Sadly for the same reason, Poor management by Konami/Ubisoft.

breakpoint is garbage compared to mgs5, only the vegetation is better, the all game is broken like the game is always tearing appart under your footsteps, its a joke and a sad one i tell you

Damn, is it just my eyes, or does MGSV looks better than breakpoint?

I love how he says the draw distance and rendering distance is bad in Breakpoint, yet they are leagues ahead of MGSV's render and draw distances.

BrokenPoint is a Lazzy Ass Cash Grab Kid Writting Story Design Copy Paste Nonsense Terrible Models Liar. You look at those Posters then look at those In Game. Trust me, I have 200 reasons why you should never buy and never want to remember this BrokenPoint game. Even Ubi update, it just still Broken.

Ewww MGSV

Can't stand Konami & their twisted perversion of everything MGS Phantom pain A.I. is awesome , at 1st i thought it was easy until I realised that the A.i learns how you attack bases , when you eliminate a base *its possible that through comms , other bases are alerted. For me MGS is let down through that weird obsession with overly sexualised women (Quiet is ridiculous) , the Cumbersome mechanics & Awful audio , the sound of snake running is absurd & the music playing is so annoying , literally have to cheat to turn it off. World , Storyline & thought from konami with the overall playability of Breakpoint