Thanks for sharing. Love Kent Hovind's teachings! So it only took us 6000 years to discover and use technology in this modern world. Why wasn't this already a thing 300 million years ago if we have really been around that long. Why in just the last 100 years? Why are we so modern now and not millions of years ago if time has really been around that long?Evolution is so full of crap and doesn't make any sense at all. Soon everyone will know there is a God in Heaven when His judgments start pouring out on this earth.
Finally someone with some sense! Right? We would have figured out technology eons ago if humans were really around that long. People don’t really consider how long 300 million years actually is lol
Are you playing stupid? Evolution is pretty much self-explanatory. Humans have been using technology since the discovery of fire. We're talking about primitive technology, as people were simple hunter-gatherers that moved like herds from one place to another in search of food. What you call technology is very complex modern technology that couldn't have evolved without thousands of years of discoveries and research. We learned how to control electricity and freaking atomic energy, do you understand how freaking magical that is? Do you think we could've created the smartphone without rejoicing first at the creation of the wheel some 6000 years ago in the Copper Age? Secondly, the argument in the video was about the multiplication of human beings after the flood 4500 years ago. Even if the flood would've been global and not only affecting some locations, it doesn't erase the rest of human evolution history.
Evolution explains the gradual change of species over long periods. Technological advancement is a feature of human society, not a direct outcome of biological evolution. Modern technology is the result of accumulated knowledge and cultural evolution over thousands of years. There are archeological evidence to support this societal change. The development of technology in the past 100 years has accelerated due to various factors, including the Industrial Revolution. Your argument is a false dichotomy. This presents a false choice, ignoring other possibilities and scientific explanations for the development of human civilization.
It's not coincidence it's just ignoring reality you really think disease and famine didn't alter the population growth numbers? Lol the population can't grow faster than the food can provide for them. You really think there's nothing that affected population growth other than time? The critical thinking of the average Christian is non-existent
Everything in existence is defined by math. Math cannot lie, it is always true and precise. Math creates, such as the Mandelbrot and Fibonacci. The Bible is full of numbers that signify meaning. Math absolutely proves the existence of God/Elohim. PI
@3.ONE4ONE5NINE2SIX5-153 fish i the net. the phrase "sons of God" in Hebrew math=153! so what is in the net? what they should have been out catching to make them sons of God! John 21
Geometry as well. Its cool when you realize structures we see in nature are the same atomic structures we are made of. Proof that god made us in his image, even on an atomic level.
I am a christian but to be fair the only reason the birth rates have increased so drastically was because of the discovery of the haber process which meant the abundance of food increased drastically the birth rates tracked back down support the bible but they also don’t disprove the theory of evolution in that sense because of how prevalent starvation was in the past.
It happens over many generations. Evolution takes many generations in order to become evident, as in thousands upon thousands of years worth. Also if the world population started with 8 people, it would be incredibly inbred. It would take five hundred people to repopulate the world and not have inbreeding.
Uh, what about environmental factors like flood, drought, diseases, volcanoe eruptions, tsunamis, hurricanes, war, birth rate survival, tornadoes, predators, starvation, exposure, etc. I'm just saying this graph looks like it is missing a lot of variables...
Except, at it's most basic, evolution is just the idea that traits pass down from parent to offspring, and there is a random change mutations happen. Parents pass down traits to their children, blue eyes, for example, can be passed down from parent to child. Mutations do happen, and they are very random. Let's say a human, in the prehistoric era, had a mutation where he has was born with worse eye sight, what do you think would happen? He'd be much, much more likely to die, because he can't hunt as well, and predators will be able to kill him much easier. What about a beneficial mutation? such as, for example, he has better eyesight than the average human? Well, he'd be much more likely to survive and reproduce, because he can hunt better and be more aware of predators. Thus, that trait, of better eyesight, would pass down to his children. Now, if we extend that, from the first organism (~3.5 billion years ago) to now, with millions of generations of species dying, having mutations, and reproducing, is it really that much of a stretch to say that evolution is real? Now, onto the population arguement. Disease was much, much more common then, and our methods of farming was much, much worse then. As an example, 1 in 3 women died giving birth in the medieval era, and 30% of children died in childbirth. Not to mention, the black death killed a half of europe, that'd have a major dent in the exponential growth. Population growth only increased when we improved quality of life and made it easier to people to live.
I disagree with this premise. I am a Christian but this premise is misleading. The population does not take off until the 1800s. Until then it was rather static with deaths and births being very close to the same. The population takes off in the 1800s because nations industrialized and food production skyrocketed. This enables the death rates to shrink. Then by 1860s we begin to see improvements in meds further decreasing deaths especially from toddlers. I’m not arguing that God doesn’t exist just that all sides of a debate need to be discussed before blindly following something you want to agree with.
He was always with God and always was God as it is said in John 1:1 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” And later it’s said that the Word became flesh in John 1:14-18
Hey I want to tell and encourage everybody to find Jesus Christ and start living for Him. I was an atheist refusing to believe in God because it wasnt logical. But God revealed Himself to me and now i for sure know that He is real. All it takes is just a prayer with true faith and God will reveal Himself to you. If you want just call out to Him wherever you are and just trust that He is also there with you. This is your sign from God to turn to Him. You may never have another chance and also it doesnt hurt you to give God a chance to reveal Himself. God bless you and remember He loves you unconditionally ❤️
Your god is a walking contradiction. Omnipotent - yet can't say Hello Omniscient - yet lacks foresight Omnipresent - yet nowhere to be seen Omnibenevolent - but commits acts himself that by his moral standards are called "evil." 1 being - yet 3 persons. You are tricking yourself with confirmation bias. Look at reality.
I like the following two statements that give a visual of ignorance in these comments. If ignorance is bliss, then this comment section would be heaven. If ignorance had wings, this place would be an airport.
@@N8riz The one who tested Abraham when he's all knowing and already knew what Abraham would have done? Sorry but any religion based a dude that would slay his own son because a voice in his head told him to is not somebody I model morality around.
@@billy9144 If you read the Bible , Abraham didn’t kill his son , it was a test, God ain’t going to make someone kill their own son for no reason otherwise your right , I wouldn’t worship that God either. However God stopped that, gave an animal as a substitute and took both him and his son to heaven. Just saying , I ain’t trying to argue.
Every day I find something new proving the Bible isn’t lying. It’s mind blowing. I feel so dumb that it took me this long to give it a real try. I hate i use to be one of those smug atheist who thought he knew it all 🤦🏻♂️.
Except this dude has done a horrible job at proving the bible to be correct. He doesn't even know the 101 basics for how populations change over time. And he thinks he can predict populations from thousands of years ago with his naiive model.
@@jaythemachine3845 I don't know exactly what you want me to prove, so I'll explain a bit how populations change over time. I tried linking a graph of the changes in population of certain countries, my comment got deleted. The site was "our world in data", the article was "population growth". If the replenishing rate of resources, remains constant, populations follow a "logistic curve". The birth rate increases directly as the population increases, but so does the death rate. Eventually, given enough time passes, the population will plateau. Of course, there are certain changes that can impact on the amount of resources available, like the industrial revolution. So in order to actually predict populations so far in the past, you need to be able to accurately know how much resources were available to us at every point. The thing is, that there are so many variables that affect the "resource pool", that it becomes next to impossible to model populations thousands of years ago. And even then, it doesn't take into consideration population changes of individual countries (each of which has their own resource pool). It doesn't take into consideration certain events that may suddenly, drastically decrease populations like plagues or wars. So yeah, this guy's model is extremely naiive. It assumes that populations follow a perfect exponential curve (that's only true if the death rate is constant). He claims that knowing the population count at two points in time are all that is required for his model to work.
This is not how you analyze statistics. The argument doesn’t account for the fact that early human population was at a steady state for for a long time. The population did not increase linearly or exponentially. It was a constant rate. Just because numbers can manipulated to fit your 4000 year span, doesn’t actually mean that’s what the graph represents. If you’re gonna do math, do it correctly
Do tell what made this steady state? And not only what made this steady state, also how was it "so steady for all of those "millions of years" that's a loooooonnngggggg time to have a steady state.
@@lauramann8275 In the 1800s, up to 30% of children died before their first birthday, and 43% did not survive past their fifth birthday. If the child lived to ten, they still only had a 60% chance of surviving to adulthood. This was the case for all world regions: in 1800, no region had a life expectancy higher than 40 years. It's really not that complicated.
What about technology. Why did they not advance at all with tools or skills? That's a long time to stay ignorant and complacent, especially considering they likely had similar levels of intelligence as we do today. Monkeys are currently advancing at a faster rate than humanity did apparently...
I actually do believe in evolution and the bible, just not the way science says so with just theory, evolution means change over time, it's a process, one made by God, and like everything else in his wonderful creation it's chock full surprises, it's never exactly like we think, it's mysterious and majestic, we really were fearfully and wonderfully made
@mikepaolantonio4693 Actually, God commands us to not only KEEP His Holy Laws, but to diligently teach them to our children. Most Christians don't. THAT is child abuse because they are not raising a child in the WAY they should go! Science teaches all kinds of lies! It is a false god and will be destroyed! My great great great great grandad was not primordial soup or a stone. He was created in the image of God!
Well I do agree to this to some extent. The one context that is missing is the fact that modern medicine did not start to advance at a rapid rate until the 19th century, so with that in mind there's a limit on how many people could survive in our world with all the ailments and other factors that caused the deaths of human beings. And this limit was constant until the 19th century.
@@CitizenofthenewJerusalem Forget about producing medicine - we couldn't even farm until around 12000 years ago. We had no guarantee for day to day survival, so that was always the focus for us, before we developed agriculture.
Not hating on the father or Jesus but if we’re getting technical the reason for population boom is the advances in medical techniques and science, safer food, cleaner water etc. The Cave men had it pretty rough guys
It still doesn't explain the exponential growth a population has. Even if you get eg. 2 cavemen reproducing they would probably have reproduced a lot, at least 5 to 10 offsprings and therefore the population number would have grown, even if some of the offsprings died.
@@jeniosk1097 Populations only exponentially grow as long as there is a surplus of resources to sustain the current population. Populations follow logistic curves.
There were several technological advancements that allowed us to get to this point. Prior to farming, humans had to move to where the food was. Which was dangerous and didn’t allow for very large tribes. Farming allowed human to put down roots and expand the tribes population. And farming is a relatively new discovery.
Hey, Jesus is great praise be his name, but I think we are seriously discounting the advancements in medicine and agriculture. The death rates plummeted in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s (relatively) leading to a longer life expectancy and agriculture exploded with technological advancements. It makes sense that human growth was supremely slow, especially once you consider that before the Industrial Revolution and long after, agriculture wasn’t super widely practiced.
There are a multitude of reasons why our current population is what is currently is and the least likely explanation is that humans have only been here for 4k years.
God is real, but so is evolution. People died off much quicker back then and child mortality was insanely high. That explains why population didn't skyrocket
@@denverfannin9085 You can't prove a negative. If you are going to say humans have been here only 4 k years when real evidence and common sense says otherwise, the burden of proof lies with you.
He doesn’t take into account the advancements we made in science that have extended our life expectancies and health as the reason why there was a boom in population in the last 100-200 years.
Actually the oldest hominidae is like 10 to 20 thousand years, i think evolution can go with God laws too... science and cristianity doesnt have to be separated. For me.. God bless you all.
I have absolute faith in Prof Dr genius, inerrant, perfect Hovind. What he failed to mention is that the death rate was very high and so the population grew very slowly.
Little question: is there war in this ? Plague? Mass extinction events? As far as I know there was a “little” plague in Europe a few centuries ago named the black plague that killed one third of Europe population, how does this enter your calculations? Also did you calculate how many people where killed in the century war between France and England? I think we would be a few million more if not these events. Did you also count the number of deaths that happened due to the invasion of Europe in the North and South America with plagues and the number of people killed just by the invasion? Did you take in account the number of infant casualties each year by the lack of food in Africa since a long time ago? Calculate all of this and come back later if you still dare test science like that with merely ideas and theories that aren’t based on any scientific evidences
I already did. The population would be 4 x 10 to the 15,111 power if evolution were true. Do you know how big that number is? Truly, do you? A couple wars and invasions don’t even drop it to the 15,110 power. If you understand math. That number is astronomically big. If you were to try to write that number out by hand, do you know how long it would take you? 8 billion is a drop in the ocean to that number. I’m not sure people actually think things through.
2 Corinthians 4:4 New Living Translation 4 Satan, who is the god of this world, has blinded the minds of those who don’t believe. They are unable to see the glorious light of the Good News. They don’t understand this message about the glory of Christ, who is the exact likeness of God.
@@LorenzoReumer075 I just asked a question and now you say I am with satan ? Can I not ask question ? Why should question come with satan ? If you wake up in the morning and ask yourself how can you make good deeds by your logic means I am with satan? I don’t understand. I am first and foremost believer of karma.
@@naosgaming2d197 just come to Jesus christ and accept the free gift of salvation and forgiveness of sins John 3:16 16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. 21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.
As a Christian this guy is stupid. I'm no liberal DEI supporter either. You people don't follow the history of the church as a way of scientific advancement.
There are a number of problems with his arguments. - Populations only temporarily grow exponentially. The growth of a population slows to a halt as soon as requirements such as food and water become a limiting factor. Populations follow logistic curves (not to be confused with logarithms) - What this guy is trying to do, is take recent trends in the population, and assume that those trends perfectly describe populations in the past. Even if you start to incorporate historical data into the model, it still would be next to impossible to predict past populations. - From the discussion in the video, he's not even factoring in vital details, such as advances in technology, especially food production. So, to conclude: population modelling cannot be used to predict populations in the distant past. It's just not something that is possible.
What about Gangis Khan killing many people something like 40 million. WW2 and Hitler responsible for 80 million deaths. Chinese massacres killed 20 million. Afrifan massacres around 100 million. Volcanos have killed many. Plague. Etc many other wars during Greek, Roman times...... population would have been much much more.
Those who believe in evolution in millions years, believe human become planktons..... That is why huge amount of planktons in this earth....😂 Make sense.....🤔🤔
1 abrahamic generation used to live minimum up to 150 years old, at least. Just checked... You need 12 generations of 12 kids.... To get to 200M people... That's about 1500 years. Right around the time of Jesus... Awesome as always ❤
Have you heard of the Black Death? That plague killed about half of Europe in the 6th century. We suffered another Bubonic Plague in the 14th century. The Catholic Church killed about half of Northern Europe in the 30 Years War (1618 AD). I'm not sure where you got your math skills, but maybe you should pick up a math and history book.
Because discoveries and technology compounds.... Ppl tend to equate back then to todays life.... The explosion in population has to do with the combustion energy we have nowadays. Back then we could have a ton of babies, yes, but there was a ton of infant deaths and not a lot of food. Also a sickness would kill you easily... Or an animal atack. You can invent the wheel but is gonna take us to invent a bunch of tools and mathematical equations to get to the engine, and that is after we figured out that we could use combustion - WHICH IS THE REASON WE HAVE THE POPULATION WE HAVE - and you can see it clearly in the spike graph..... At the eyes of today everything looks granted............. Btw a graph anyone can come up with one. I can see he isn't even sincere since he didn't include the drop of the Black Plage. Is just to push his point. But i grant you the possibility of having previous civilizations with technical knowledge and technology that we skipped all through. Graham Hancock has pushed the theory of the Younger Dryas. That explains a ton the flud hypothesis.
Sorry mate, bad argument, population grew after 1800 because of cheap affordable energy that allowed human flourishing and massively increase life expectancy and massively reduced infant mortality. Human numbers grew very slowly until about 1800.
As a Christian, I am most positively sure that math like this does not prove our Creator. Math in general points to a higher being. Why? Because Math backed up Kepler's laws of planetary motion, math backed up Newton's laws of gravity, and math even backs up the Big Bang Theory, made by Georges Lemaitre: a Catholic Priest and Astronomer during the 1930's. Keep in mind, that these men were firm believers in God. Even Charles Darwin, at the end of his book, *Origin of Species*, said that there had to be some sort of Creator. The main problem we have are people brushing Christianity over, thinking that, somehow, it never contributed to science? Despite the fact that science is used to further point to God, and anyone who says otherwise... Well, it's their opinion, and in my opinion, it's the wrong opinion. (Also, stay calm, everyone is entitled to their own beliefs. I only have a problem when you start shoving it down my throat or other's throats, so unless you want your argument to be invalid, don't start being new age antitheist or reddit atheist about it. Fricken New Age cultists)
This guy has no idea what he is talking about and this proves nothing. Source: I am an engineer and studied this exact thing while I was getting my degree. Also, I have explained my position below for those interested. This is a population problem, it’s very common in engineering class. It is used to understand differential equations, which is used extensively in engineering. I will explain differential equations in simplified language so the layman can understand. The population problem is stated as follows. A population starts at an initial value and increases at a given rate, it also decreases at a given rate. When the rate of increase exceeds the rate of decrease, the population increases. This is a dynamic system which means it changes constantly. This means backtracking a population is impossible to do accurately because the information required to perform an accurate analysis would allow you to already know the original population, thus making the analysis irrelevant. Because it is impossible to determine the original population size at a given time, this video shows the creator is ignorant of differential equations. This means the creator is speaking about something completely out of their depth. It is misleading to assume knowledge in a subject you know nothing about and his reputation as a reliable source of information has been compromised.
I don't think that's entirely accurate modern man more like 160 k years not 3 meg. Homo sapiens about 300 k. Prior to that we supposedly share a common ancestor with other primates. We don't know the conditions and other than our intelligence we really aren't exactly the king of beast more likely their food. 😂 We realy are weak and physically enept physically by comparison. And I don't just mean physical power either. 🤔 I'm a believer, a Christian but I don't believe evolution is impossible. Not sure how it all ties in though.
Despite being a follower of Christ, I still believe man was here far longer than previously understood. Cataclysmic events large enough to devastate an entire population aren't outside of His realm of power. 8bn- 7.99999bn is still a number a species can come back from.
I don’t care what religion anyone is, but this man is grossly misinterpreting this data and misinforming all who listen to him. Taking data and skewing it for your religious agenda. There’s so much data he’s blatantly excluded that contributes to explain why this is (forces of nature, volcanic eruptions, disease, famine, conflict). 70,000 years ago, 1 volcanic eruption in Sumatra left only an estimated 1000 humans alive on the planet.
A recent discovery of a dried up river in Europe found writings that detail the sinking of "Atland" 4297 years ago from a great flood!! About the time of Noah.
Medicine and the reduction of infant mortality have a big effect id say. Personally, i think God is powerful and wise, created the universe via the big bang, the universe bound to Gods will and moves to become what God designs. Aiming toward a specific place in time when Jesus would be born and sacrificed. "And the earth was formless and void" Formless sounds like "isn't there yet" To me. Evolution is the effort life itself had to make just to become humans. The life itself is Jesus, the living God, an unending march to fulfill the will of the father. The authority of God, given to Jesus, and Jesus gave us his blood, making us adopted into his family, thus as Jesus stated, through faith you can move mountains! Faith is what grows after you accept his blood, the symbol of his pure divine sacrifice, the lamb of God is worth infinite sacrifice, more than enough for our meager sins.. All planned from the beginning
I laugh everytime i hear some one say the Universe is 3 billion years old. Especially when they say fossils are 100 millions years old😂 and yet its the year 2024😂😂 Read the Scriptures people, you will know it hasn't been no more than 8k years.
When was this video cause there are said to be over 8 billion people on earth not 6 billion as of January 1st 2024. In 1985 there wasn’t quite 5 billion people that numbers rounded up about 15 million. So how many millions and billions are you rounding here to try and get your math right? According to other math done the little over 8 billion alive now only make up 7 percent of everyone who has ever lived. Your math is not quite mathing
While I find this interesting logic, this assumes no catastrophic event in Earths history. It also assumes the same climate (as climate impacts on development as witnessed by the historical developments since we entered the holocene epoch). If you include the Toba mega eruption 74000 years ago and the younger dryas commet impacts 12,800 years ago you can find out when the population resets have occurred. Interestingly there is evidence of a asteroid impact about 5000 years ago in the Indian ocean and which coincides with major flood stories around the world such as Noah's flood.
I'm a Christian and a biologist, and would love for it to be so simple, but that model would be too simplistic. Even if you only have three variables (birth, death and available food) in your model (and there are many more) you can quickly reach a plateau (see logistic growth model). And that is one of the most simplistic model that can be used. We haven't acounted about predation, climate change (like the small ice age), diseases, wars etc.
If u tske in considerstions that their were no cataclismic events, modern medicine , education.... Their are human bones found no more then a couple hundren klm away dating back nearly 60,000 yrs..
The only reason we're able to grow so rapidly is because the advancement of technology. Antibiotics, industrialisation, you name it. If we just reverted to roman time advancement, our population would suddenly decline.
ridiculous, point 1: your assuming the growth rate is even across all history, but enviromental factors made growth extremely difficult, especially until agriculture came along. Point 2: No where in the bible does it say the world is literally 6000 years old, that is an faulty estimate based on a catholic priests interpretation of biblical geneologies, that were obviously symbolic in nature.
Im a Christian and I’m not trying to ruin anyone’s faith but this could be argued against by pointing out any mass depopulation event or something like that. Again I’m not “against” new word creation but I think we shouldn’t act like god can only exist if the word is 6,000 years old. The can be 4 billion years old and the Bible still be accurate. I the argument is a bit useless and there are better ways to go about the god conversation
I trust in jesus ❤, but the human population was bigger even before 4400 years, please only use factual information when u r trying to build trust in the Lord.
In the beginning there were 6 different types of species of humans and all of them went extinct except one and that is the homosapien species... us! God chose us and put a soul into humans because God loves us. We are all chosen people. It took us a long time to evolve. I believe it is certain that evolution is a miracle and gift from God. In the past 10,000 years humans have evolved rapidly due to many factors in the diverse envionments.
What? Why the population in Europe or parts of Asia growed earlier much faster than in Africa? In former times, people died younger and child-death-rate was much higher. And dont forget the diseases who reduced population from time to time.
Thats why as tge lied gives he also rajes away. Life and death are on the scales of judgment to help maintain the balance. So it wouldn't be crowded anyway
Aint this the guy who thinks noah packed a ship full of animals, some carnivourous, and sailed it for a period of time? 😂😂😂Hes like a dumber version of terrence howard.
Wrong. Human population really took off when humans went from being hunter gatherers to farmers. Prior to that we struggled to make enough food and hunter gatherers live shorter lives.
Yeah evolution started waay long time ago But here the thing humans only started agriculture roughly 12000 years ago So prior to that humans didn't have any proper/stable growth in population
Mathematics is the language of God. Mathematics is the language that makes the whole universe come into existence. Humans merely discovered this language. God created the language of math.
Even more convincing when you think about how animals with shorter lifespans are often very fertile while animals that live longer frequently produce fewer offspring.
One plus one equals two proves a god about as much as pointing to a mountain proves a god. I see the problem. You're listening to an actual criminal grifter Instead of listening to people that know what they're talking about
Ammonia from natural gas reforming, potassium from new mining techniques instead of from burning trees, and mechanized agriculture are the main reasons population exploded after being constrained to much lower effective maxima…
I love this man but if over the millions of years the population kept growing constantly and than the flood came and millions died. So it was down to eight that survived. There would have been a restart of civilization/population.
I’m just scrolling for that one comment where someone wants to refute this man. And if you do refute this man then you need deliverance, idc what anyone says lol.
Im Christian and I believe that the earth is 4000 years old but this theory is not very good. Plagues and famines have been around for centuries that is why the population wouldn’t have been so high
That’s assuming we had the healthcare, agriculture, and energy needed to support the said population, an animal population grows only to its environment. If favorable conditions allow a population will explode and flourish. If food sources dwindle with no predators then the population will decline rapidly. A population can stay at a constant rate depending on environmental factors. The Industrial Revolution gave rise to our current population, not time. Just because you have the time to grow doesn’t mean that you will. Just do the research, don’t let others tell you what to believe just because it fits a certain narrative.
Most of the world still lives in abject poverty, much like your said conditions. No healthcare, no energy, little agriculture. Yet they still continue to grow. I don’t think we understand how long 300,000,000 years is.
your presumption is we allow others to tell us what we believe. the reality is that we allow Jesus to dictate what we believe and the Holy Spirit to confirm it's from The Father. If you believe evolution over billions of years then you have allowed man to tell you what to believe.
Your argument seems to be more relevant to the average life span of a population, not its growth. Even if I am sick and starving, I can still procreate. Thanks for the advice about not letting others tell me things. It certainly applies to you.
@michaelorman1205 I believe it was a mix of God and evolution, you are right that it depends on the life span of the population, because if we dealt with similar situations like the black plague, less or even more often beforehand, then that can really stunt the growth and advancements of said species
Being in college for medical, a lot of the students and professors I have had class with believe in evolution. I always tell them there is a cap on science and evolution was never a thing. Just another way for people to be in denial about religion. I never understood why people in medical sciences think evolution is a real thing. Im always made fun of people of my beliefs lol
Not even remotely true. Population started getting bigger due to technological and medicinal knowledge grew. Before that people died a tremendous amount more and their lifespans were very young compared to today.
People have been living as Hunter gatherers for tens of thousands of years. The worlds demography increase wasnt as consistent as it is since the first agriculture systems. It was all balanced, there was plenty of space for everyone because many people died shortly after birth and communities were small
I believe in god ,yeshua is my savior,but this could also happen from an extinction level event or more than one.i dont beed this to believe in god the fact that I couldnt walk gor 5 months and was in ridiculous amount of pain dr couldnt figure out what was wrong and i started praying and meditating to god and in a couple months after im almost fully healed.
Evolution is scientifically and logically wrong and can not be proven. If I want to reject God and find solution for creation then evolution is the suitable answer.
