How Powerful Zircon missile 

' NOT important to put currencys in here about arms weapons

May God bless the missiles

@@bestamerica it's very important

@@bestamerica, To a country the size of Russia with the economy of Italy the cost of weapons is incredibly important. To the west, not so much. The west can afford it.

@@pedrobacchus6986 hi P.... ' GOD did not bless and not make the missiles

You are correct 🇷🇺👍

Yes it's like Fighter jet vs bike

До 30 км в час..

🤣🤣🤣🤣

вы правы томагавк существует, циркон просто мультик :) ракеты калибра на всех выстрелах, где настоящий циркон? никуда, мультяшная ракета :)

бугагаггагагагаа

Well, but it still needs to hit. with a warhead, u just have to get close to your target.

Ne-bantsak-a-cirkon-raketakat!Vlagyimir-Putyin-szomoru-lessz.

@@Phil_1909 It's hypersonic.

@@djkinetic2020 yes, and even with a hypersonic projectile, you have to hit your target for a kill. with a warhead, you have thousands of hypersonic shrapnell projectiles.

До 27 махов..

@@user-fr7bf4br3o я слышал 620 махов 😄😄😄😄😄

Well, but it still needs to hit. with a warhead, u just have to get close to your target.

@@user-fr7bf4br3o hi bro

запущен авиа двигатель и пройдены испытания на планёре двигатель с ядерным топливом---14 махов....и северная корея произвела испытания циркон---9 махов....система рэб ---возврат----работает по полной---журнал.... красная звезда....

Disgrace

@@sfedosenkoo позор вам предателям..

Работаем, брат-словак

@@brandbmw6642 Я уважаю Ваше мнение дорогой господа. Да, власти предательские, ну я русских всегда уважал и буду! 🙂

Добра сербские и словенский мне брат ,мы не аставим сербов , больше одних,как позорный , Ельцин,вы не одиноки братья Сербы, победы вам братья,над вашими. ,предателями ваших интересов в мести мы сила, Европа умирает, Славяни всех стран обединяйтесь

that is two edge weapon since plasma cone blinds any EM radiaton making impossible radar, IR either optical guidance to target. Blind and stupid missile, like Russia itself.

Exactly!

Turns out that advanced Russian technology was myth. We can then Ukraine for debunking that myth.

@@terjeoseberg990 you gotta pretty stupid to use ur best weapons in such a useless act.

Fuck imperial units!

@Nordav Devito We only have 1,365 deployed, we've been working with russia for 20 years in reducing nuclear stockpiles, we have a total of 6,185 WARHEADS (not missiles) 2,385 have been retired, and 3,800 are awaiting dismantling. We've also reduced our maximum yield and have phased out massive strategic warheads of larger than 1.2 megatons (or 15 megaton MK-17 warheads...) due to how much collateral damage they can cause, after the Castle Bravo incident, where the fallout was much greater that predicted. Our primary warhead the W-87 is only 475 kilotons though they are small enough to be used in a MIRV. Russia has the same capability though in their SLBM, carrying up to 4 500k warheads, or 12 100kt warheads.

@Karl Ruane He has the last name of a midget, what do you expect ?

@Karl Ruane The defeat the U.S.A , just keep sending them wokeness , it's doing the job better than any missile can do .

@Karl Ruane Still has the "dead hand"

@Nordav Devito America is strong only when it needs to bomb small countries, Serbia, Iraq, Libya ... when they plunder sovereign countries and kill people all over the world. But when it comes to Russia or China, then for fear of retaliation, diplomacy is valid and nothing more. The whole world knows that America is plundering small countries with false propaganda and force, but everyone is cute. How long will we see because Russia and China are getting stronger.

@Nordav Devito game change

​@Nordav Devito Мы, в отличие от некоторых, не идиоты, чтобы просто запускать цирконы. И если мы начнем, будьте уверены, что сама Невада превратится в стекло через 20 минут.

​@Nordav Devito Russia have systems to send back enemy missiles​!

@Nordav Devito oh really. We have just as much if not more. You launch one at Russia, you will receive just as much IF NOT MORE. So stfu and get lost.

Are you within this namber? Hello from Russia!

​@@user-zr1tk1fl7c полагаю.

@@Swyatogor.7526 если честно, я плохо знаю английский и перепутал слово «sane” со словом “insane”. А с этим словом предложение имеет негативный контекст; я подумал что ты хейтер-попытка оскорбить россиян патриотов( к коим я себя причисляю).🤝🇷🇺

@@user-zr1tk1fl7c Я его не знаю вовсе,а за оскорбления нужно наказывать.

If by sane you mean chauvinist, jingoist anti-American, pro-Russian partisans, your statement is accurate.

At least by detecting the incoming missile, the enemy can have enough time to say some prayers. 😊

Yes it is problem because of plasma stealth which apparently this missile type can achieve. Yes it is a thing

yeah well apparently old PAC2 Patriots intercepted hypersonic missiles much quicker, so that doesn't seem to be the problem. The speed issue you describe is onyl valid if the air defense is not shot at head on, but actually from behind, which is extremely unlikely.

@@terribrad24yes been hearing this that hypersonic missiles are ultimately downed head on just fine so the future is with stealth missiles

@@terribrad24 , there is no clue that patriot shoted down a hypersonice missile

god bless Russia YPPPAAA !

Donald T, is that you?

Здоров!

@@vn3946 Hell, if you are from USA don't forget BLM. 😄😄😄

Proud and have no money because of the sanctions. Ha ha ha, vatnik jobanyj.

😂 lol

Like your mustache

@Nordav Devito you know that russia has 6000 nuclear warheads?

@@jaf8016 bro more then 6400 nuclear warheads 😉

@Nordav Devito US puts money on useless military things while Russia has more effective weapons. Some guys said that america have better air force, which is true, but Russia will have more and more su-50(stealth fighter) while america is not building f-22's anymore, and Russia have best anti aircraft systems s-400

prefer this Russian videos than the stupid instagram of the everyday happy posers.

The ONLY GOOSEBUMPS you have is down there 💯 🤷🏻‍♂️

Turns out that advanced Russian technology was myth. We can then Ukraine for debunking that myth.

just low cloudness)

It's can't maneuver, it's own patent states so. "Russian patent number 2579409 relates to the field of rocket technology, and more specifically to hypersonic cruise missiles equipped with a hypersonic ramjet engine. The invention describes a method of application and device hypersonic cruise missile (CRPD), allowing to solve the problem of performing a combat mission to destroy ground and surface targets of such a missile. The described invention is designed to maximize the combat potential of the CMP with the scramjet. The design mode for the scramjet are high-altitude cruise conditions while maintaining the estimated cruise speed, and the need to reduce the altitude and flight speed creates difficult technical problems due to the fact that: an engine designed to perform a hypersonic mid-flight at high altitude is not able to continue to work at low-altitude trajectory sections associated with a decrease in the flight number M, hence, the rocket must approach the ground or surface target with an inactive engine; characteristics of sustainability and controllability of CRPD with inactive scramjet significantly deteriorate, loss of stability becomes possible; there is also a danger of destruction of the scramjet design due to the increase in pressure in the flow part of the engine while reducing the CMP from the march height before hitting the target."

@@ThatCarGuy To defeat the U.S.A , we just keep sending them wokeness , it's doing the job better than any missile can do .

@@ThatCarGuy That was 6 years ago.

@@antoni8118 What are you trolling on about? It's the literal patent.

Это ты их по телевизору see.

Why did Putin betray the Russian people in the Donbass?

@Duke Wayne Destroyed cities and thousands of dead Russians mean what? Indeed, Putin does not even have the courage to recognize the independence of the Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk. And if Crimea were not strategic, it would have the same fate as Donbass. By the way, it wasn't just Crimea that the communists donated to Ukraine, the Donbass too.

@Duke Wayne You didn't question what I said because it was true. Talking about the 90s, communism was mainly responsible for the catastrophe in Russia, not just Gorbachev/Yeltsyn. Legacies of communism: the genocidal alcohol and tobacco industries, high rates of abortion and suicides, ethnic conflicts.....How many millions of Russians did communism kill? Remembering that it was still the Soviet Union when Gorbachev started the anti-alcohol campaign in 1985 . Communism never again: Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev......in hell.

@@kildarealeksen4140 iraq, syria, and people khadapi ?? Military USA idiot

Don't give up all the secrets! Let the enemies believe that the rocket flies only 500 km ;-)

так он так же и сказал...

Declared... not confirmed. Still haven't seen a single video of a real zircon missle

@@randybobandy9828 "Кинжал"(Kinzhal) видели? Ну так вот, "Циркон" раньше появился. Не видеть, не означает что его нет, вы много что ещё не видели и не слышали даже.

@@randybobandy9828 когда-то вы и про калибры, свой рот открывали! А сейчас их пускают по нацистам и террористам как пирожки

Which will undoubtedly lead to global warming. (sarcasm)

It will also jam its own comminations also different radars can deal with that

Turns out that advanced Russian technology was myth. We can then Ukraine for debunking that myth.

I doubt it. Russia is under sanctions and their s400 system turned out to be garbage. This is just all fluff and Russia is just a paper tiger

They always parade their stuff and look at how they look now.. they are not a real threat

@@DanielAkinkajou considering USA 🇺🇸 failed to defeat desert bandits for 20 years that's rich 😂

@@DanielAkinkajou western coper lol

Turns out that advanced Russian technology was myth. We can then Ukraine for debunking that myth.

Most likely because its bull shit.

Missiles do indeed get a plasma coating moving at certain hypersonic speeds, the issue is it causes something called plasma blackout, which actually jams the missile from receiving communications. The plasma does not make it invisible to radar, if anything it makes it more visible since it's hotter, showing up on thermal imaging easier. It also can not jam radars otherwise how would it get it's signal out and know where to go? Russia lies all the time. It's rather easy to catch them.

hypersonic missiles were already in the US blueprints since the 80s...being the heat a major obstacle to have guidance electronics embedded and so the project stalled....maybe the russians finally managed to sort this out...

@@AlexTorres-qv3hv The US had active hypersonic missiles since the 60s and I dont mean ICBMs. Google aim 54. It flew on the F14s.

@@ThatCarGuy , "Russia lies all the time." - No, it is your English-speaking people who are biggest liars in the world. You simply have more money for your propaganda lies than Russia has.

Turns out that advanced Russian technology was myth. We can then Ukraine for debunking that myth.

​@@terjeoseberg990 lmao

Заваруха начнется,твой диван тебя не спасёт,даже пёрнуть не успеешь.А пепел,он и в Африке пепел.

@@anatoliychernov5515 ты ссыкун или уже дристун?

Ты серьезно только что назвал Атлантику лужей 😑

The coronavirus was stronger than Zircon. @5:56

You don't have to shoot it down, just jam it. It that speed, it has to be absolutely accurate or you could miss by miles. Jamming will make it much harder to hit anything..

@@germanicus7880 I think that the problem is not the accuracy these missiles are an upgrade to older missiles like brahmos which were proven decently accurate jamming is not something as simple as you might thing and it doesnt work against multiple of missiles you cant count on passive defenses to survive the fact that it moves very fast means that you have very little time to jam it and to make it change direction if its already locked on your ship with a speed of 3000+meters mer second your decoy deployment wont make it switch target the last 0.5 sec before impact if the missile is well aimed in the first place you have very little chance of actualy making it miss with passive defenses

But Brahmos was not proven accurate against any target that was defending itself. No hypersonic missile has EVER hit ANY target defending itself. When I see them in action I'll believe it. In the meantime, its just Russian again claiming everything they make is amazing! stupendous! Marvelous! with nothing to back it up.

@@germanicus7880 I hope you won't see them in action.

@@lunotarr He won't because the speed of Zircon wouldn't give him enough time to even repent before joining his MAKER.

If you see a mushroom cloud ,it will be the last thing your family and friends will see

@@briansilver6196 yes, the same thing to all people on this small planet. 1 mushroom cloud which is not test = - all population on this planet. Dont forget about this. In nuclear war will be no winners/losers or just watchers. So better dont mess whit Russia,China,Iran,North Korea bacause nobody will win in that situation, but US still think that US is some policeman on this Earth and think that everybody must to listen what US speak. It is not Hollywood films where US are heroes of all planet - it is reality.

Mac9 i think you will not see.. just change from life to after life status

Это Россия Матушка

I doubt it. We will just avoid attacking certain countries.

Bravo 👏

@@jsmariani4180 Ja , ja , ihr könnt nur schwache Länder angreifen. Amerikaner bringen Menschen nur Unglück . Hört damit auf ! USA muss zerstört werden , dann haben wir viel mehr Frieden auf der Welt.

you mean israel wars

Someone is sensitive to opion. Snowflake councilors must be making a killing these days.

Nobody doubts Russia’s engineering prowess, what isn’t taken seriously is it’s military budget, it has an economy smaller than France, smaller than California, a single US State.

@@thomascrabtree I am sorry but it seems to me that you really do not understand reality. Hypersonic missile produced in Russia has price tag of about 1 million $, what is a price tag for a "formidable" aircraft carrier? Russians have world most sucessful and most advanced air defence systems tested and proven every day in Syria against Jewish swarms of cruise missiles where they destroy about 80 - 90% of all incoming missiles and compare that with total ineffectiveness of Patriot Pack 2 & 3 in defending Saudis oil refinery where a shield of 70 Pack systems did not shot a single Yemeni cruise missile and save it from destruction. Why Saudis asked Russians to sell them S-400 and Pompeo's and Trump had a fit after hearing that. You see Russian weapons are real McCoy and that is making them winners any time.

@@thomascrabtree And despite the fact that Russia has limited budget for military and small economy it can still wage a war against all NATO members with its nukes. 😁😀😇

@@thomascrabtree Your comment would be valid if Russia's military industry is spending money in a same way as USA's does but there is fundamental difference between them. Russia is able to produce excellent military hardware for fraction of the price of US's weaponry! Russians also don't need vast amount of money to fund countless bases and invasions world wide. Last and very important thing is word "asymmetric". Russia learned it's lesson from cold war weapon's race and don't want to follow US "symmetrically". USA is having huge navy, very very expensive thing to own. Russia is making anti ship systems for small fraction of US's navy price. Almost every Russian vessel can fire all of those systems. Problem solved.

If it's so well done, how come they haven't defeated Ukraine?

@@thomasjust2663 And, you think logically. If Ukraine were not part of Russia itself, Russia would completely destroy the whole of Ukraine with just one missile. But, since the Ukrainian (Russian, Slavic) people suffer in Ukraine from the Nazi regime in Ukraine, which has been killing its own people for 8 years, then draw your own conclusions.

These filming have nothing to do with real tests. Missile range "Zircon" 1000 km.

Очень жаль, что вы не в курсе чем карта отличается от глобуса.

These filming have nothing to do with real tests. Missile range "Zircon" 1500 km.

Turns out that advanced Russian technology was myth. We can then Ukraine for debunking that myth.

Many tank shells have an initial speed of 5 Mach or even more, so this is possible, and it is likely that the zircon reaches its maximum speed at the terminal stage

Облако плазмы......

Meanwhile, Exocet proved its efficiency in Falkland's war. and now there are stealth missils (ie. SCALP-EG .. a stealth cruise missil with 500km range) heh ... a fight of dicks will always lead to nowhere.

@@KahlieNiven go and watch anime you mor0n 🤣

@@KahlieNiven As Trump says so beautifully: fake news

Turns out that advanced Russian technology was myth. We can then Ukraine for debunking that myth.

Not really. If zircon is going Mach 5+ it will not be able to use radar or any other guidance system. So the aircraft carrier would be shooting a Mach 4 missle max

@@combatmuffin3192 Zircon fly at Mach 5 -9. All of them can maneuver and evade during the flight. How? It's most probably classified. But they do. Wanna know more? Learn Russian then you will have access to more information not only the small bits and pieces. I am not Russian but do speak the language and recommend you do.

@@marcelnowakowski945 No you dont get what I am saying. A scramjet can not fly at sea level at hypersonic speeds its just physicly imposible . Scramjets can only fly hypersonic at 80,000 to 120,000 feet. The biggest advateage the zircon is it decreases the area of uncertainty. Which is the time a ship can sail out of the missle range which is a big problem for subsonic cruise missles. The zircon will allow russia to launch farther with a greater chance to reach the target. Its a good missle but it is no easier to intercept than a high supersonic cruise missle (mach 4)

@@combatmuffin3192 Thanks for stating the obvious. There are technical, classified details which are critical to successful deployment of the weapon and the public does not know. Just look at the Kalibr cruise missile: in the last phase it accelerates to Mach 3+. ! km / s, very low. Good luck with intercepting that! The speed is of great advantage of those missiles but their major advantage is their ability to detect and evade threats. AI at work. The truth is... it does not matter how smart these weapons will get because any confrontation Russia - NATO will only end up as a nuclear war. They are already way too smart for the stoned, sandal-wearers of the Middle East. No-one will be flying around in F- 35 or Su-57 shooting rockets at one another. This is just a childish, unrealistic concept espoused by immature , geeky gamers. There will be fast missile exchange between the continents and that's it! The total of 1 to 2 hours of war and it's over, the world is done for good. Airplanes, tanks, small missiles do not matter at all in the great scheme of things. Probably the most important thing is the Sarmat warheads can evade the interception, too. Either way... there will be no winners so no need to get excited about a new conventional weapon. It will never be used against another super power.

@Carl Sagan you have zero clue about how radars work. it won't get detected.

He was talking about the infrared detection system (often on satelitte, but also some on the ground) not radars. Those can detect infrared emitted by an object. At ground level, mach9, it will probably be detected. Other type of glider and missile have some way around that, but point is that he was not talking about radar.

@@Gullshunter first of all, it can't. it's way too small. also, even if it was that's completely irrelevant. it can't be targeted.

@@riskinhos lol nothing is invulnerable and nothing is untargetable. Stop trolling.

@@rjlee7143 you can't target manoeuvrable hypersonic missiles. there's no such technology available. educate yourself. people like you are a danger to society

Оказывается, передовые российские технологии были мифом. Можно тогда Украине за развенчание этого мифа.

@terjeoseberg990 of course, it's a myth, because Russia only has shovels. But why do nato and the americans continue to whine loudly and fear Russia? Apparently good shovels 🤣

Oh my) Russian tax payers just don't have so much money as usa ones)) the military spending system is really the same

Rockets and drones are 2 most essential craft 4 war

You need to read more about russian Uralvagonzavod the only one monopolist tank builder in russia.

@@dswrfwefw There are noticeable differences. We have little money and we need the maximum result for every ruble. There are no long chains of intermediaries, no consultants, advisors, etc., lobbying in Russia is recognized as corruption and a criminal offense. All movements of money are under the control of prosecutors and with every order for weapons, several people go to jail for financial violations. To make a profit, the manufacturer has to stand on his head and turn inside out.

What are you talking about? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Jippie! Cold War 2.0

Russia is a joke like u

@@michaelesq.atpcfii.9862 the only joke here is your appearance 😘

Russia... The only country that becones poorer and poorer

@@augusto8821 😂😂😂😂 really? Who told you? CNN?

Zircon can't be intercepted at mach 7 speed not even teorethicly

@@notimportantperson6382 For now.

The only thing that can try to stop hypersonic manouvrable missile is a laser weapon. But, nowaday, it didn’t exist.

Are you delusional? There is no power even close to that of the uS. Funny thing is your on an American company right now lol

@@lukewilson9466 there are parts that Russia is on par or even surpass the american military, some dont. Examples i can give is nuclear arsenal and MBTs. And what are you talking about an american company?

👏

@@MFPRego RU-vid is Google owned.

@@bruceli9094 i see. Yeah, right! Still, isnt google a multi national company now? If things get too heavy in US, they probably move to another country more favorable to them

Its unstopable for everyone and in max 2 years everyone will have them,including europe 😅 future seems bright 😅

@@psychoticchannel3244 That's how the game is played. You have to keep up in order to keep the others in check.

😂😂

Brahmos 2 made by Russian-Indian joint company and it is believied to be simplified Zircon with cutdown performance.

@@MichaelSmith-jg1ko Cope

🤣🤣

Admiral General Supreme General Aladeen was the one who ordered round nose for submarines instead of pointy fish streamline one

And equip it with 100 megaton warhead general aladeen recon's these are the dogs boxxxcks if they miss by many miles they will still destroy badly. And wants to buy 5,000,000 of them very quickly he has countries to wipe off the map.

Funniest thing ever online. Seriously 😂

а у вас правда все предметы соединили в один? успеваете ли вы пройти всю программу, по физике, химии, биологии, информатике и других?

Efficient money management.

US military budget also goes towards its many wars and 100's of international military bases.

They don't... The US has the fastest hypersonic missile in the world called the ground based midcourse defense capable of mach 33. Russia is still using 1950s tech PESA radars on their fighters, the SU57 was their first modern combat jet with an AESA radar. "The GBI consists of a 3-stage solid rocket boost vehicle which can place it's payload of an Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle outside the earth's atmosphere. In order to do this the missile must reach an escape velocity of more than 6.9 miles per second. This hypersonic speed is several times what a 7.62mm bullet travels leaving the muzzle of a gun. To put it another way, it reaches a speed of approximately Mach 33."

@@ThatCarGuy The US military has no hypersonic missiles in service. Some are in test stage, but are years behind Russia. Ploughed nearly a trillion into an obsolete missile defence shield, but largely disregarded offensive weapons.

Yeah but with conventional army you can't even fight ukraine

Да кому вы нужны, так уже от вас шарахаются как от чумы, ето вы везде как тараканы лезете ко всему

but only based on russian specs. And you cant trust them. So basically he is talking about a paper tiger weapon

@@schwanzuslongus4638 don't believe you.....sorry dude !!!

@@antoniovelez5518 you rather believe Putin who is lying all the time to justify his war in Ukraine and make russia look strong?

@@schwanzuslongus4638 What I want to believe is none of your business, and don't believe "you", ....understand ?!?!

@@antoniovelez5518Youre getting brainwashed my guy 😂😂

The warhead cold and should be a nuke, takes care of carrier group.

@@juanfabiani6162 problem with nuclear tipped warheads is that it is impossible to control environment damage nuke would make in order to take out a aircraft carrier strike group it would require multi megaton thermonuclear warhead. This kind of vapors are extremely expensive and there is a limited number of them. Besides that do not forget that in case of using nuclear weapons the affected side will have right to retaliate. For the price of ten megaton thermonuclear warhead Russia would produce at least couple of thousands of hypersonic missiles. Acording to experts just four such missiles would completely destroy the latest US aircraft carrier which is probably 1000x cheaper than thermonuclear warhead. So it would be unvise to use nuclear weapons if just a blank steel warhead generates incredible kynetic energy practically without any explosive in warhead.

@@Blaster53 Not to sure about a couple of thousand's hypersonic missiles for one 10 MT nuke, besides they do not have to build them they have about 7,800 of them.

@@Blaster53 Most important the use of 1 nuke signifies that all 7,800 Russian and 6,500 american nukes will be used, so environmental impacts is the least of te problems. It means the end of all life besides the cockroaches (read they are immune to radioactivity) in the planes, and the lucky ones will be the ones that die in the first exchange.

@@juanfabiani6162 Yes your comment has a very valid point but you have to understand that nuclear weapons has different designs and are not interchagable. They have to be redesigned and rebuilt because some trigger mechanisms would not sustain frightening acceleration and would very likely trigger detonation. You can see how the USA is spending billions on " modernising" of their arsenal, which means that they destroy old weapons and rebuild new more effective with variable yield in order to preserve as much as possible land for later exploitation after occupation. Besides that Russia has only over 700 nuclear warheads deployable by ICBMs and that is the number allowed by START. Russia does not want to breach treaty by "modernising" nuclear arsenal as Americans do because they can do it with impunity. Russia has no leverage to force them to do anything because Russia is economically underdeveloped country and can be and will be easily badly hurt by sanctions. Russia will not start the nuclear war just because their economy collapse which is actually result of oligarchs and corrupt politicians looting Russia to the bone. That is why Russia needs thousands of hypersonic missiles to become relevant conventional military force which is now a light years away. By being conventional superpower the sheer number of weapons and other assets become very important. Russia is now technically and technologically the most formidable defence force. However, country's defence based on MAD doctrine cannot stop western sanctions because no one believe that nuclear war will be triggered because economic sanctions. It will be 100% conventional war because even looser still has chance to survive and recover destruction as we Germans and Japan can witness. No adult villain will ever attack a small child who has a suicide vest and holds trigger in hand no matter how many times is stronger than child. Now replace this child with grown adult but without suicide vest and you will see how all of a sudden villain will become aggressive and ready for fight in particular if he believes that he is stronger. He will probe his opponent to see if he can take him on or not. If the opponent is visibly more muscular with nonchalant posture which indicates massive degree of self confidence, villain will become unsure and very weary that he will be badly beaten if he continues with provocations. Hope you get picture why nukes are very bad idea and only conventional superiority will assure respect from opponents. That superiority is reflected by pondering efficiency of the military systems. For example; Russia has by any stretch of imagination the most formidable air defence systems and the USA has 20× more combat planes. This difference in planes does not gives any advantage to the NATO if Russia has absolute superiority in sheer number of the air defence systems. Unfortunately we cnow that this is not the case because the USA and NATO are rapidly increasing a number of very cheap armed drones. Now the serious problem with Russian defence is that if nukes are taken out of equation then it becomes very clear that Russia with handful of anti air missiles S-xxx and all other AA assets will be destroyed in a matter of hours because it has no money to build sufficient number of defence systems to prevent NATO from overwhelming Russian defence system with massive and cheap drone attacks. Imagine hundreds of drones with small bombs attacking Russian anti air defence posts and just by sheer number of chess drones they will easily destroy S-××× defence systems. Only way out of this pickle is to by force kidnap all of Russian oligarchs who are living abroadand and force them to return stolen money they hold abroad. Russian Central Bank has figures demonstrating that during Putin's rule oligarchs "exported" 2,4 trillion US $ and hold them on offshore bank accounts. This amount is 40× bigger than Russian annual military budget. Now ask yours how it was possible to happen if Putin during every election campaign promised to the Russian nation to deal with oligarchs and yet all that happened is that they become even richer than ever despite the fact that USSR did not have anyone who would be a multimillionaire and now has 101 extremely rich multi bilionaires and most of them are "close Putin's friends".

BLM America better forget about rockets and carries

Who died? Can you translate this for us into ordinary English there bub?

Who is the US in deth too? Why the US citizens themselves own 90% of the US deth, so china can sell all of its American deth and have no affect on the US. An dude at the end of WW2 the US had twice the deth it does now, not a problem.

@@Delgen1951 your midnight wet dreams, internal debt only on 30% owned by the us citizens

Word salad. Take a sec and read what you wrote. deth isn't a word and 'off its edge and country' makes no sense.

LOL

Because that is what Russia tells us.

@@germanicus7880 You're wrong! Only the USA TALKS about its power, Russia SHOWS its power!

Уже сделано! Для начала защита от космической радиации. Т.е. своё магнитное поле у космического корабля для дальних перелётов. Ну а всё остальное впереди😀

Dude, it flies more than 100 miles in a minute. 12 minutes is enough.

Russia already solved that, they even used it as its own anti radar shield

@@sergeantblue6115 What a litteral crock. pressure wall temp > 23,000. IT'S A PLASMA, and thus a perfect radar target so, no anti-radar shield

@@hellstromcarbunkle8857 "Plasma surrounding an aircraft might be able to absorb incoming radiation, and therefore reduces signal reflection from the metal parts of the aircraft: the aircraft would then be effectively invisible to radar at long range due to weak signals received." u blind?

@@sergeantblue6115 Nope. Plasma is as conductive as most metals, forming a well defined RF boundary. Where DO you get this nonsense? Physics 101 should have taught you to think before you type.

Вопрос не в обнаружении, а в быстроте решения. К тому же на тех высотах нет систем обнаружения. Они не придуманы ещё.

it is too fast and unpredictable to react

@@EpuMuT Satellite

Another expert

no one

S550

@@PraveenKumar-cj4mu only on the paper. You should be very supicious towards everything a cronic liar like Russia is claiming

Only with lasers. But actually there is no laser weapon in active duty.

😂

Mach 9 converted to KM/S is about 3km/s. Say your target is 600km away, at 3km/s it will take 3:33 minutes to reach its target without taking the time it takes to reach max speed into account, so over 5 minutes, to which any crew will be able to see,track, shoot down, or move since hypersonic missiles can not maneuver in their terminal phase, even according to the zircons own patent. Hypersonic missiles are only good for first strikes, nuclear strikes, or short range under 200km, where you then have almost no time to defend. "Russian patent number 2579409 relates to the field of rocket technology, and more specifically to hypersonic cruise missiles equipped with a hypersonic ramjet engine. The invention describes a method of application and device hypersonic cruise missile (CRPD), allowing to solve the problem of performing a combat mission to destroy ground and surface targets of such a missile. The described invention is designed to maximize the combat potential of the CMP with the scramjet. The design mode for the scramjet are high-altitude cruise conditions while maintaining the estimated cruise speed, and the need to reduce the altitude and flight speed creates difficult technical problems due to the fact that: an engine designed to perform a hypersonic mid-flight at high altitude is not able to continue to work at low-altitude trajectory sections associated with a decrease in the flight number M, hence, the rocket must approach the ground or surface target with an inactive engine; characteristics of sustainability and controllability of CRPD with inactive scramjet significantly deteriorate, loss of stability becomes possible; there is also a danger of destruction of the scramjet design due to the increase in pressure in the flow part of the engine while reducing the CMP from the march height before hitting the target."

@@ThatCarGuy bro you are wrong. Earth is not flat. That is all I will say if you are not an idiot you will understand the meaning.

@@ognjenognjen0013 lol blocked troll someone else. Math and Russias own patent and you still decide to troll me.

@@ThatCarGuy lol, who is going to see it at the range of 600km? )))) aircraft carrier max detection range 370km with aircrafts, main body max detection range - 45km!

We are making them to stop possible interplanetary invasion

i wouldnt trust russia anything. This is most likely a paper tiger