How SC order blunts Rajiv Gandhi’s '86 'ShahBano' Act denying Muslim women alimony under secular law 

lol even the NYT prints more truth that this foreign funded blatantly anti India print. Gupta's going rate is just a few lakhs.

BJP chamcha

More stereotyping Muslim women by showing hijab picture. Most Muslims don't wear a hijab. Just go the Bengal for example

@@grapeshott yeah, most muslim women actually help their muslim men molest non muslim women, they have no morals, Bengal is best example.

When im bored and want to read biased, illogical, and complete lies, for fun, i see what theprint has written.

Women are still sex slaves in Muslims

it was because his mother was screwed by many moslem men, hence he new the beauty of the religion first hand.

Peaceful community never disappoints

Its called politics.... from rule book of British... Divide and rule

You are stupid to think people care about the past when they feel existential threats today.

Nah it can't happen with 99 seats😂

@@ChandranPrema123 but in madarasa 99 is greater than 242.

@amitavasaha2851 Yup...Now Cows are more important than women...😌

Oh, let them be. If their faith is more important than the welfare of their family ... Vinasha kale bibhareeda buddhi

Cows to women is no good for sure …..but women to crap is more than despicable 😢

What is the use of UCC if there are hundreds of exception clauses are going to be there.

Time has come to declare the waqf properties as encroached properties.

The Central Government/ NDA government/ Modi Sarkaar have no guts to carry out any drastic changes..no point expecting anything positive from these Secular Hindus..bunch of cowards who bow down to M K Gandhi and appreciate Nehru selectively..this constitution is anti India anti Hindu, we need a leader who can claim that this constitution is not acceptable and should dump Gandhi Nehru and Ambedkar

No. He will tell the Maulanas to keep quiet. He will think protest against this will strengthen Hindutva.

Maulanas will ditch Rahul then .For them Rahul is not above Sharia.

​@shubhamkumar-nw1ui Yes, Even Sanghi Modi also.

He wanna but cant..

They can try and watch there fate ​@@sohebrehman5967

Exactly but the Kukis in Manipur will revolt because you know😅

Actually in my view modi should never bring UCC bcz if someone wants to be in shit I think we should let it be.

⁠true..I also think if a community wants to live in gutter, let them live..!!

Modi Govt. need not take any action. SC has invoked Section 125 Cr. P. C for all divorced women without religious discrimination.

@@satyasingal modi should bring an amendment to overturn it, people don't need something that they don't understand or desire.

Dumbo what changed constitution

No this judgement is a big slap on BJP. This judgement says that the 1986 Act is just another option to seek maintenance and the divorced woman has right to seek maintenance under old law or new law or under both laws.

@@rajshekhar1147 don't misguide the judgment clearly states that if she doesn't get enough Meher after iddat period from her husband she is at liberty to opt for 125 Cr.p.c which right was taken away by Rajiv Gandhi by enacting the law

​@@Avinashm7 either u are a big fool or think everyone else is a fool😂😂 Anyways every congressi is like that, you are no exception. Typical "Jaahil"

​@@rajshekhar1147😅🤣😂

Read quran...Muslim still lives in 6th century...if you don't beleive hit a like for an ostrich

see his laadla, even bigger trips

He was a much bigger pappu than the current pappu. Its just that people of the times did not have this kind of awareness due to lack of technology and social media

Rajiv screwed Srilanka...he did muslim appeasment...and his Wife Nazi daughter forced PV narasimha rao to bring Waqf...pwct

@@satyasingal If the highest person in the hierarchy of power incites against a group in society, then what religious discrimination are you talking about? Modi said ‘Those with more children’ During an election rally on April 21 in the western state of Rajasthan, Modi claimed that if the Congress party came to power, it would distribute the country’s wealth among Muslims. “When they were last in power, the Congress said that Muslims have the first right to the nation’s resources. What does that mean? If they come to power, that means they will collect all the wealth. And who will they give it to? Those who have more children. To infiltrators.” Yogi one of 7 kids Modi one of 6 kids Advani one of 8 kids Togadia one of 9kids

@@mohamedali2858 🤣🤣🤣since Modi is one of 6 kids why are you worried? shameless and pathetic to core.

@@mohamedali2858 I didn’t like Modi’s speeches in the campaign for general elections. I had commented that the BJP will not get majority.

Also Halala , and fluid relationship

@@GoodCitizen-eh1id Polygamy is such a lovely idea. I wish all countries had this law.

And that TMC lady shout also shout that how even court has become fascist because she only sees fascism everywhere.

Maulana Rahul Khan

Bade bewaloof aadmi ho yarr .

LOL. He will also say save constitution from the Supreme court. How ironic.

@@thecomment9489 his father did the same thing 4 decade ago

Shame shame

…a secular country, where the prime minister also acts as prime pujaari!

I think in time Hindus will have to demand a separate country.

@@paulm.k.8740 when previous PMs put skull caps & attended EID were they pujaris too? or Indian PM hosting terrorist Yasin Malik?? religious fanatics like you are a curse to India

@@paulm.k.8740 A secular country where Waqf board(religious Intuition) hold 3rd highest land and real estate in nation

Whether it is Congress or BJP it is always about Muslims getting a better deal in India. What about compensation for Kashmiri Pandits??

If u marry and girl wants divoce and takes ur half wealth as alimony is that fine ?

@@junaidbhat06if the girls wants divorce she can take half the earnings you have earned, not your parents. She has equal share of your earnings. Is that the reason why Muslims relegate girls to kitchen and not be earning so you can financially crush her?

​@@junaidbhat06 point is that law should be same for everyone. You can't be treated differently because of religion. It causes social divide.

​@@junaidbhat06there is different in muslim community that women cannot give divorce to men so muslim men should give half of his property and monthly allowance

@@junaidbhat06 That is in every western country you love to emigrate.

@@Xen-wy6bo Islam fought against the Sasanian Persian Empire, the Eastern Roman Empire, Byzantium, the Western Holy Roman Empire, the Tartar Mongols, the African Ghanaian, the Abyssinian Empire, the Indian Goeta, the Austro-Hungarian, the Serbian, the Russian Caesarean, the English, the French, the Castilian Spanish, the Portuguese, the Dutch of Orange, the Crusader Alliance, the Vikings, the (Fatimid) slave state, the Qarmatian , the Visigothic kingdom, the fascist Italian empire...etc. And many others, and there is still an idiot who thinks that he will reform & destroy Islam & thinks that it’s history is shallow .and The high rate of rape in Delhi is evidence of gender inequality.

Yes. I agree. That's the only way since the muslims are so reluctant to accept any change in islam. Such blind adherence to a book is going to be detrimental for them.

Totally agree with you.

@@niharikakhare8763 Do you accept that some Muslim judges reformulate your religion? Are you aware of what you agree to?

Not happening it's their core vote base it's modi who should stop muslim outreach and treat everyone equally with more focus on his own core vote base of he wants bjp to go past 300 in 2029.

​@@swapneelbehera260 Modi maynot complete a year in office.. As per current trends. It's my opinion.. no bias

They should definitely promote compulsory education.

@@joshuacherian6718 well I know for a fact you are/will be proven wrong no bias.

@@swapneelbehera260 Lets see..

Though I diasagree with your interpretations on BJP's rise and policies, I couldn't agree more on respecting judgements and rule of law. We need bipartisan support on this and happy to see folks from Congressi side too recognising the need to uphold justice :)

Did Sonia reverser that "Rajiv stupidity" in her 10 years of rule? So how are you sure she was opposed to it? If she was opposed to it, she would have reversed it in her rule.

Na BJP's rise was for them being an outright better party than congress well mostly.

Ek baat bata. Tumlog Auraton ko haq milane se khush hota hai ya fir muslim mardon se wo sab chheen jaata hai, jo tumlog nahin kar skat, usase? Waise thoda padh likh le. 4 wife agar ish judgement se pahale wo rakh skate the to abhi v rakh skate hain. Matlab kuchh samjhana nahin hai, bas Dialogue maar dena hai.

Now Muslim Marriage act is practically useless Lol Lol😂

​@@HistoryOfBharatyou are in India not Pakistan

@@ChandranPrema123 Tum Pakistan me hai kya?

kyon payal, gauri, kareena, sonakshi, sharmila kama hain kya. paise ke liye to koi bhi kafir laundiya khol deti hai.

Please understand that when the muslims consider islam as higher over Bharat, there are no Bharat muslims, only muslims and they dont respect Bharat, and never have.

Rahul Khan 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 His party was also involved in thirst state sponsored pogroms against the Sikhs as well. That was probably the first such situation in any part of Asia.

His constitution saving is only selective.

Because in India if a law is made in parliament then it cannot be overruled. This is my understanding of how our constitution works.

@@thecomment9489 , as far as I understand, after the parliament passes a law, it goes for supreme court approval.

They also see political climate before passing laws. See all landmark judgements and the governments in power at that time. So much for sanctity of supreme court.

This law isn't against constitution.Same way the different age of marriage isn't.

Basic human right is different and marriage protection right different.

Why less Indian muslim women wore hijab in 1950s, 1960s, to 2000s? At most they would cover head, now face cover has become more n more prominent? WHy this change? I m bengali, ask you grandparents- how many muslim women with face cover they saw during their youth, even in muslim dominated areas, and how many we see today?

because secularism prevails only when it is against women.

For Congress Vote first Country NEVER

WTF

Shekhar Gu jis narrative keeps changing as per the propaganda he is doing.

Even to this date there is not one single person in the royal family who can speak the most spoken language of the country perfectly. They all speak as if some foreigner trying to speak Hindi. And they claim to represent the country.

You are disrespecting the termite !

Fascist government

Well yes in modern times this should be given a thought.

This judgement didn't contradict that law. It says the choice is with the woman because Rajiv Gandhi's law DID NOT MAKE IT EXCLUSIVE. Nowhere is it given in the Shah Bano law that the muslim law CANNOT use another recourse and have to follow ONLY their own religious personal law. Also, CONSTITUTION being the king in law, Rajiv Gandhi's law violates the fundamental rights because ALL citizens are equal before the constitution and hence, one citizen CANNOT be deprived of his fundamental rights because he follows a particular religion. So, ultimately, if a muslim wants to remain within the purview of his personal laws, Rajiv Gandhi's law permits him BUT if he decides that his personal law is unfair, by the above two reasons, he can approach the courts. And anyway, it is hypocritical for muslims to claim Sharia law for civic issues but Constitutional law for criminal issues and then cry when Afzal Guru or Kasab are hanged after due process of law under Constitution. If they were under criminal Sharia law, a lot of taxpayer's money would have been saved. Also, hypocritical that temples pay gst AND INCOME TAX but Waqf board does not and the whole population has been subsidising the haj since independence, even though the religious rule is clear that a muslim has to do Haj atleast ONCE in his lifetime and that WITH HIS OWN EARNINGS. My lab technician is preparing to go for the 3rd time and he is only 48 years old. And he received subsidy the previous two times. AND SURPRISE, HE CLAIMS HE DOESN'T KNOW HIS TRIP IS SUBSIDISED. ALSO, HE CLAIMS MUSLIMS DON'T HAVE RESERVATIONS WHEN OUR STATE HAS THEM UNDER BC-E CATEGORY SINCE ATLEAST 15 YEARS. And he doesn't pay IT despite his father having been a government employee. You get what I am saying? One narrative in private for fellow muslims of the Quam and another narrative for the gullible worthless Kafirs. If that is not lying & cheating, then those who believe so are psychopaths.

Alimony is needed. Dowry not.

​@@tushar_ranjan7 y if u get divoce and ur wife takes ur wealth y