How short landing performance takes Dassault’s Falcon places other business jets can’t reach - AIN 

It's a Dassault... I wouldn't expect anything less. Great aircraft manufacturer.

Love this airplane. The fighter plane heritage is something other jets can't match. And it shows in this jet and other of its kind. Love this jet allot. Well done Dassault.

I am praying that Dassault soon announces a competitor to the G700 and Global 7500. A jet of that size and capabilities, with the signature falcon tri-jet and silhouette, perfection!

I felt that landing.

This is the solution to my travel problems. Which now raises many other hurdles.

I've watched this a dozen times, and It's always the same...... Awesome!

Love the look of a tri-jet. These days they all have two.

I really enjoyed the video, a plane that size able to land on a short runway like that great. Just shows you the quality of Dassault Aircraft.

Beautiful looking jet!

Good lord, a large jet landed in that distance without a tailhook.

This plane looks and flies like a dream, I have to get me one of theses some day.

Truly the best!

beautiful airplane...landing distance is A~mazing!!! ..... from seoul

I'll have one of those. Thanks

That's pretty darn impressive

Performances, confort, élégance et qualité de fabrication...voilà en résumé les principaux atouts des jets de chez Dassault ! made in France...

Great video of this incredible jet

Great plane!

Marvelous!!!

Maravilloso Avión!!!. Felicitaciones Dassault!!!.

Beautiful bird!

magnifique

Great presentation, this looks like a great aircraft for international travel. I am totally liking the tri-jet configuration.

Definitely the Best Jets manufacturer.

J'en prendrais 2 s'il vous plait.

Fantastic aircraft.

Beautiful

Beautiful jet.

Rich families prefer 3 engines for safety.

Featuring three powerful and fast engines this rocket.

3:44 seems to be a hard landing.

Very impressive

Good, Now try landing on lukla airport

Beautiful!

Awesome

Pretty plane!

8X is my favorite large size and then I like the citation X elite for smaller size. Kinda like an SUV and a sports car

I was surprised to see that plane at Vatry, just drove by the airport...

i am trying to see if this could land at Kapalua Airport

Thanks,lovelly plane.

So you land on 700m, how do you leave? Take the bus? Dassault Falcon 8X Take-off BFL 6,000 ft /1,829 m Landing 656 m 2,150 / ft 656 m Pilatus PC-24 Take-off BFL(MTOW, sea level, dry paved runway) 2,930 ft / 893 m Landing distance over 50 ft (15 m) obstacle(MLW, sea level, dry paved runway) 2,375 ft 724 m. Plus it can do it on an unpaved strip.

A scale sized L1011 Tristar. Based on a great plane.

AND YOU WONDER WHY THE"RAFALE"IS A MARVEL.....????

Thanks for beautiful demonstration they provide a lot of positive data and feedback cuddles to our teams James Dean Williams Omegan

Loved how he planted it on the runway. It wasn't the time to finesse the touchdown. As the french says "l'atterissage c'est la science des ânes"

2:51 There are NO aerodromes in Switzerland (or any country outside of the USA) of which the declared runway lengths are expressed as feet and inches. METRES please!

How are they going to take off from a 1km runway since takeoff distance is 1.8 km?

Just waiting to see it land on a carrier

How will they be able to take off from that runway? Doesn’t the aircraft require somewhere near 5500 ft of runway for take off? Correct me if I’m wrong

Does the convention tail lose some of the PIA handling problems of a T-Tail?

Honestly I am just happy it doesn't have those hideous Gulfstream oval windows...

Muy bonito avión cuando sacan un hipersonico

Can it get in and out of Mountain Air, North Carolina?

if i get so much money i will def buy such a private jet

Just wonder why they still stick to the PW-engines. The market has way better engines available

Nice , but what was her fuel load a gross weight ?

I will make enough money to afford a jet made by Dassault someday

Test the stopping distance at load capacity! Then make the video again.

when can I fly one ?

This is a nice plane now really nice but what can you say it's a falcon

What were the weights fuel baggage souls etc.

slip it In. ... Hmm. Mike from Adelaide.

Was the 8X made to compete with G600?

Do the computer systems keep track of short landings and adjust brake maintenance accordingly?

This plane can probably land on an aircraft carrier

Making short field landings are relatively easy if you don't mins abusing the brakes and tires. You make landings like this very often and the cost of changing brakes and tires could be amazing to say the least. Not denigrating the airplane, am sure it is amazing, but these landings are not normal for any airplane. The Boeing 727, pound for pound, had the best brakes I ever used in any airplane, including the 747. But either airplane, depending upon weight, could make very short landings but you had to wait on the ground 45-60 minutes for the brakes to cool enough to take off again. Obviously, these are much heavier planes than a corporate jet but the principals are the same. I could go on but mercifully I won't. LOL

Unless an emergency, landing data is not as relevant as take-off data, that is, if you want to go places..

I noticed a hard landing here.

Can somebody name the song that starts at 2:00?

No thrust reverser?

Good video ! Next time though Matthew try and land on the CENTERLINE !

Ok, 8x can land where it can't take off. So what's the use?

What about the pressurization system? Does it have a maximum cabin altitude of 6000 ft AND humidity pumped like the Dream-liner???

So gulfstream 650er and bombrdier7500 cant do like this short landing in small runway?

Very nice airplane but the performance is easily matched by the Bombardier Global line. The only real advantage the 8X has is the smaller visual footprint. Some public companies are wary of optics.

What song was used in video?

I wish I had the mucho dineros for such a plane.

This is all great, but as someone below pointed out, Dassault needs to create a real competitor to not only the G700, and Global 7500, but also the G650, and in some ways the G500/600. I say that his because the 900 can’t do what the 500 can do. The 7x can’t do what the 600 can do and none of them can do what the 650 can do. They may be able to fly the same distances (in some cases, and at much reduced speed) and get in and out of shorter runways, but 99% of the time, runway length is NO factor. When we look at cabin size, and long range cruise speed, the Falcons, as good as they are, don’t touch the aircraft mentioned above.

Flying is safer than driving ; do you applaud at the end of a car trip ?

its a beauty but i think that a 3rd engine is not necessary

as trijet i guess its much more expensive too...

👍🏼

Good airplane but also a great pilot....no much margin for error.

Ouch

It just needs to be the size of a md80 and it would be perfect ;)

3:45. If an airline pilot crossed the threshold this low and touched down this early he could well be fired. This is a misrepresentation of the airplanes capability.

What is on the nose?

Not the same size, but the Pilatus PC-24 don't even need a paved runway.

Air fuel?

Trijet config is somehow has a lot of disadvantages especially for safety issues ,fuel efficiency is higher , lifespan of air frame, noise issue, operating costs ... etc... for example: safety issue : if the middle engine catches on fire , it will probably affect other engines too lifespan of the air frame : in trijet config the vibration in the small area of the tail section is considerably much higher than twin jet config and it makes high momentum due to S duct and the air frame is in high tension forces and it would have a lower life span and higher operating costs comparing to twin e.g. there are plenty of air worthy twin private jets made in 70's on the market but few reliable trijet on the market and yet no customer to buy even for late models. noise issue: S duct makes huge amount of noise in the cabin so manufacture should solve this issue by adding more isolation in the tail section till half of the cabin so it will cause more extra weight and reducing cabin storage space... just do a compare! trijet is known and very famous for higher fuel consumption by over 30%. operating cost of trijet is a least 25% higher than twin e.g. imagine if a mechanic should check 3 fuel pumps rather than 2 at the end the only reason Dassault’s Falcon makes trijet is that they don't need to go to a lengthy and costly processs of designing,manufacturing and certificating a new twin jet model so they improve their previous trijet models and try to look for the advantages of trijet config

Perfect for short landings and take off in drug cartels!! Really smart of them to be thinking about their clients

Ola! Is the lust over this jet a sin?? Dammit !! It is......sob......sob... JD/82ND

Good Lord! Where are the fuel tanks?

Metric et mètres si'il vous plait !

Hard landing

The life of rich people is different.

An aircraft to be with fly by wire system, first it has to be an unstable flatform

Service is a joke on this. Never-ending maintenance by honey-well.

💸😎✈️

Must of had the smallest amount of fuel on board to do this.