Could the disaster been averted? Let us know what you think in the comments! If you enjoyed this video, do like, subscribe and buy us a coffee: bmc.link/worldknowmore Check out the next video on how Singapore is saving itself from sinking: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NgFnPALFGQU.html 5 Reply
You forgot,conveniently, to mention, that besides the crew there were also two local PILOTS on board. To guide the ship out of the harbor. As it is required by law.
I am glad someone made comment about that. They are 100% responsible for the departure. That's their job all they do every day so don't blame Singapore
@@alanmacdonald7435 while it would be fair to say it was ONE Pilot and one apprentice-trainee. Still, a trainee would not have been left onto the ship if he did not know the harbor -in and out-. Though the FINAL responsibility still lies with the captain of the ship and the helmsman. If they both think the pilots do somethign wrong or give the wrong commands it is the Duty and RIGHT of the Captain and helmsman to overrule the pilot. As said, this is the ( theoretical) law. Also,fair enough it is many years ago.And times were different,at that time. But in the case of the (CCCP) Ship Lermontov, they also had the Harbormaster as Pilot on board. The guy gave the wrong command, to steer closer to the coast and the Helmsman did not object. Though knowing, that the Pilot also knew the water was to shallow... The LERMONTOV SUNK; IT WAS DOWN UNDER ( apologies for the pun...) on a pleasure cruise with elderly Australians.. One crew member died. Soviet maritime authorities though convicted the helmsman to 4 years prison and i think it was 30 000 $ -damages-. He should have overridden the Pilots command. There is a WIKI article about the whole story. What happened to the Captain? The article does not say anything...
@@wtIUpITp1E0wMsydV19c0FUmIXvCU or russia or Kim or any other of the usual suspects. But i think the REAL truth behind all that, we will never know. And dont know it it was in your news, another ship crashed into a bridge. And no it was not in Russia,not in China.But in the USA...
Let the US and Singapore experts check through all the records, equipment and datas of Dali and comes out with their reports first. Should not speculates on the causes. These experts need some time to do a thorough job. Meanwhile US should look into similar American bridges at similar risk and improve their structural survivability against modern heavy ships such as the Dali crashing onto them. Barriers, dolphins, etc, can be considered to be constructed around these bridges main supporting pillars. The new Baltimore bridge should be more robust. Better still, consider an underwater tunnel to replace the bridge instead. Tunneling work can in fact start immediately with a TBM! Can be completed faster than a new bridge. May cost more but will eliminate this collission problem forever.
Grace the owner. Synergy the manager. Are liable for insuring the ship and the bridge damage. Maersk insurance pays out damage to cargo as the leasor. Responsibility with negligence applies if determined criminal applies lies with captain of the vessel. Example. Knowingly using incorrect fuel and leaving at night to mask the black smoke.
pretty interesting, the video claims the Dali is almost a tall as the empire state building, undoubtably the video is comparing the length of the dali to heighth of empire state building. It's like comparing apples to oranges, make no sense.
but what surprised me even more and made me think. If Baltimore is such an important harbor, why is the channel or the bridge not more protected? Only 2 of those round -pollards-? Clips shown here of other bridges,also in other parts of the world, are far better protected. SHOULD such an incident happen.
@@janetphillips2875 and now the repair and losses incurred will cost much more? Lets see what the future will bring.After all - we must look into future business-... Will there be also (at least one) tugs required to assist until the ship is safe out into the ocean? Around the new bridge will there be more protection? After all Biden said -* the government, that is the taxpayer, will pay for everything. And will we find out what caused the sudden completer power failure on the ship? Was it a - cyber attack-? Was it negligence on servicing and maintenance on the ship? Incompetent and distracted pilots? By the way,just also a few days ago,another ship( it was in the USA,it was about 10 second on the news here...) another ship had rammed another bridge...
Ships crew did some maintenance work in AUX ENGINE and Main engine. Investigation to be carried out. Blending fuel oil process for aux engine to be checked. In future strictly ask the owner to use DIESEL OIL ONLY not heavy oil or blending oil for AUX Engine in this narrow waters as per California regulations. Bad cheap not well treated fuel oil is one of the causes of black smoke. If the ship crew tell the truth without fear, then only future accidents like this can be avoided. Because of power failure one of the Aux blower of the Main engine might have tripped while the main engine still running. This may be one of the cause for huge black smoke.
Wow! AI generated content is getting more realistic. Not more accurate, but more believable. Still needs work on stock footage selection, but "baby steps" and all that. The contents themselves? Apart from the allision and the bridge collapse; all complete bollocks.
The control and command of a vessel within port limits is in the hands of the port pilot. So its obvious the pilots and port authorities are responeible for this tragic crash 😂
The control and command of a vessel is in the hands of the Captain of the ship, Pilots are in an advisory capacity. The only place in the world where the Pilots are in control and command of a vessel is when a vessel is transiting the Panama Canal.
@christospanopoulos1655 I was not aware of this incident. I have since read up about incident. The reason Pilot was jailed for 10 months was because he was impaired in ability to safely carry out his responsibility as a Pilot because of his use of prescription pharmaceuticals while Piloting the vessel. Pilot was unable to correctly read navigational charts and carry out other duties as expected. Pilot should not have been doing such a responsible job when he knowingly understood that he was taking prescription pharmaceuticals that could impare his judgment as a Pilot. So this was the reason why he was imprisoned. I am sure if he was not taking prescription pharmaceuticals and carried out his Piloting duties with due diligence and in a Professional manner he would not have gone to prison.
If it was not the ship (and its maintenance and operating condition) that was at fault - was it the bridge, then? Standing in the way and not budging?🙃
I don't like your manipulated video. You spin it ghoulishly. It the the sensation al tone you use that is disrespectful and stopped me from listening to the whole video. No matter how tragic a situation is you don't have to milk it to death with the way you portrayed it. I wish you well but cannot respect the way to spin the event. You are intitled to me your opinion but the way you did this video had no respect. Maybe you live for clicks and sensationalism. I don't know but to an average person it was not received well.
Your title makes it as though Singapore is intentionally at fault. And your video has no conclusive evidence. Did you make this video just for the view?
The key lies in the ship veering to the pillar as it was approaching the bridge , A ship having an 8 knots momentum could not have suddenly veered because of a loss of propulsion , It could have only caused by action taken by the ship, like giving an astern thrust , dropping the anchor , to stop the ship, Moreover the current was at a low 0,2 knots & the winds light , ideal departure conditions, that could not have any adverse effect,,, The truth of the crash may never come out lest insurance/compensation be denied for the erranepus action taken by the pilot/officals , when faced with an emergency , by changing the focus from the contracted safe passage to try saving the bridge , only ended up crashing it,
You too Brutus ? As as Engineer he is no authority to speak about ships behaviour other than engines, for the reason of maybe, maybe not, maybe I dont know,
@@abrahamphilip6439 Listen to what he says especially about rudder control, or lack thereof. It is the engineer that maintains propulsion and steering, no propulsion, no steering.
I believe it was the shipping people that knocked out Bridge down with new ships being made that bridge wasn't High Enough or deep enough and I bet the federal government new think about it only four people died on that bridge somebody new above our pay grade
its tragic and all, just came to hear what happened, not listen to a narrator thinking he's gonna get some award the more dramatic he makes each word sound -.- ffs
TALL AS EMPIRESTATE BUILDING,MYB EMPERIALISM,pOLLS ELECTION,maurotius port louie,many trespassers now,buying properties n maurotius,foreigners,bcz cityhall salary 24/7,neglect of obligation
bound forsri lanka,myb just electronicsandsrilanka elect company overlaoad brown out,causing house fires,and unnecessary bikes,cars,oil deficit has qouta only,daily consumation,shall not exceed
This song called TRAGEDY ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-lk0alJGhSp0.htmlsi=BctPH6Z8NN_TuYIc . . . goes perfectly with the title of this video. Your welcome.
