How small are atoms? 

I think they stole her hair for an experiment, idk why and how they would put a real lady under a microscope

Man it's uber difficult to stand so still that someone can zoom into the nuclues of your hair atom. She should be paid more money.

True man, she has a *mountain* of patience.

@@myriadYT Don't trust him he's lying she wasn't even there, it's just a photo from Google

​@@Bilal_is_jokingthats my sister 😡

I think a human is about the size of the Milky Way to an electron

Antman vibes

​@@hmu05366What does that even mean?

My theory is that our universe is a living being. And each of us are our own universes 😅

@@facelessandnameless it very well could be. Maybe what we will see beyond an atom.

*Gets trapped for five hours, sorry, years :)

💯😂

Ant man tried it too

hehehe!

Imagine whole civilisations living down there totally impervious from our giant macro world full of instability and wars.

or my profile pic

This doesn't have anywhere near enough upvotes

Yeah because it's all cartoons anyway.

Challenge accepted

“Pleeeaaase be a normal field trip…”

Plank length -- that's about eight feet, isn't it? 😉

@@Milesco My guy my Plank is green, one eyed, live under the sea.

@@Milesco it's actually black, 7 eyed. live in mars

Planck length? I believe that’s about 10^25 times smaller than an atom.

​@@Landon-_ that's as small as the intelligence in Washington DC.

One quadrillionth of a meter. A millionth of a millionth of a thousandth of a meter.

@@chesterdamolester6990thank you, that’s much better

Process 😂

One other way to look at this is use time as a scale instead of length. A picosecond is to one second as one second is to approximately 31,689 years. (Wikipedia). It is small but I think we can relate better to a second then a millimeter. Then multiply pico x 1,000 to get to a femto. If m not mistaken a. Crew at MIT was able to achieve either a pico or femto pulse with a laser.

@@danieljohnson2662 and laser exceeded the speed of light in a rare case when gone through cesium steam

As small as my pp

Then you’re getting it right

Teensy

The size of your brain ? (We'll, it's a joke, you know !)

Well you’d need VERY small hands to grasp an atom

Bruh

consciousness is not atoms though

Consciousness is immaterial- one of the proofs that God exists

And electronsand quarks and cellphone

And electrons and quarks and cells

The fourth film could well be the men in black "fleeing" the universe and going to meet/face these giants 😂

Not really

For some reason, I think about that scene often.

That was fantastic.

I always thought what if that’s how the curvature of space actually works? That as we zoom out from our planet its no different than an atom in the spec of a strand of hair. But this fold is in a multitude of dimensions and time so rather than travelling to another location in space you could just shrink.

It's used on bombs making

Small? U call that small? Get a grip on life!

​@@Z1bi Its used in more than bomb making, it helps us to create electricity and chemical reactions

​@@nemiw4429 we know, we know. Nothing beats your pp for smallest thing in the world.

​@@Z1biIt's used in literally everything. Atoms make up everything you see. What you think of is likely nuclear fission.

If that’s the case, I wonder if our atoms hate each other? Do oxygen atoms hate carbon atoms? 🤔

@@spyterusI see what you did there

The scale of the universe compared to a human is even more unfathomably vast than the scale of a human compared to an atom.

As above so below. As within so without. As the universe so the soul...

@@bovice5072 how many footballs field / hot dogs more vast shall you say it is?

😂😂😂😂

Fr😂

🤣

And that's how you have it: Barberheimer cinematic universe 💈

@@a-dwido you know what a pico-meter, nano-meter, pfinto-meter is ?! Good, back to school 🤣

You're a walking multiverse.

👁️👄👁️

Nah more like 1 or 2x the size of the moon. Definitely not the size of the earth.

Nah is would be the size of a football stadium with the *nucleus* being the size of a basketball

I don't want earth-devouring water bears, thank you very much !

@@kbxbrdr1 times the size of the moon is the size of the moon. The math isn’t mathing for you.

😂1 x the size of the moon!!’👀😳🤨😀 That’s great. I ❤it.

I still can't believe that a meter, being about 3 feet long, contains enough space to contain a million hairs parked side by side, That floors me I didn't think it would be a million, maybe like 12,000 hairs would comprise a meter

No you missed the point as usual The point is God is amazing and you should be thankful everyday

​@@oscarm.4078god, you're annoying.

Both are true

​@@oscarm.4078представляю как бог создаёт каждый атом вручную😂

@@markmaslenn9256 hjghbcvxu1276uew keusgveqisllxxx5443hwg kaishbe iwish12usg oorn widillw098jwhb

​@@raymacouttinho3524 ?

Ant man is f*cking your mind!!!!

ru-vid.comJdTHYzz3BKE?feature=share

​@@y...salvador...y1497daddy chill

Only 0.03 % of universe is made of atom

Why is the vid paid by the Chinese government

We're medium sized

​@@johncharles.5087Phoenix A 💀

If the universe is infinitely big, why can’t it be infinitely small? Solar systems, galaxies act a lot like protons and neutrons with electrons orbiting them. Maybe there’s little planets living in each of us lol.

@@musicman0423 probably because the idea of “size” and length starts to break down on a subatomic level.

Yes very interesting

saw it too

Who else 😢

Check out quantum computers and mechanics and you see the multiverse probably does exist. Which makes antman even cooler to think about it being based on real science

​@@sir_squonks_alot_castro4438do u hv something called sense of humour ?

​@@virendraverma8082He's just showing his faccts. Speaking of which, where are your faccts?🤨

They really should give physics lessons in the credits of those movies. Pretty sure every fan would stay if Morgan Freeman narrated it.

​@@sir_squonks_alot_castro4438atoms can't be shrunk down even more.... that is simply how the physics of it works...

*a grain of sand, not a ping pong ball

@@side5029 relationship is ~0.6-1.1angstrom to ~1.7^-5Angstrom. So roughly a factor of 15000. Very coarse sand is around 2mm. So your baseballfield is about 30m.

That's why neutronium is so very heavy.

Is it safe to say that there are smaller things going on in the nucleus? Is it an infinite inward way of smaller atoms, in the atoms?

@@abc123lov7 Atoms are made up of three main subatomic particles: protons, neutrons, and electrons. Protons carry a positive charge, neutrons are electrically neutral, and electrons carry a negative charge. Additionally, there are other subatomic particles such as quarks, which are the building blocks of protons and neutrons, and higher-mass particles like mesons and bosons, which mediate forces between particles. Over 200 subatomic particles have been discovered through particle physics research

Wait that's not exactly accurate. Isn't it only the uranium nucleus?

​@@WeyardWiz uranium and plutonium. Fission occurs when these atoms are split, generating enormous energy. Still quite crazy how that can happen.

​@@TamaraKane The growth boggles the mind. That the smallest thing can make the biggest thing; feels like an understood universal law AND a silly wizard's joke all at once.😂

@@TamaraKane Right so not all atoms then just those two

@@beetlebob4675 haha. Yes! Science is magic to me! I really don't understand why or how our universe happened or what it's for, but it's all incredible.

Wow, I did not know that. Guess I got something cool to tell to others.

wow

Sounds like there is infinity in both directions.

@lrayvick probably, the bible says, "In Him, we move and have our being." If God is infinite, then this adds up to me.

Pretty small

fr i think the people making these videos just grab their concepts online and are mostly just editors making videos interesting for the people.

❕️

People are catching up.

If to be exactly concise, protons and newtrons mustn't have a clear boundary either. But this's good enough.

They don't actually have a color either

Well thought out models to explain experimental results, and well thought out experiments to validate said models.

Careful measurements of chemical quantities and ratios lead Dalton to firmly state that atoms exist. Dalton’s cathode ray experiments showed that atoms had parts, starting with the electron. Rutherford’s gold foil experiment showed that the positive parts were in a nucleus which was many orders of magnitude smaller than the atom itself. The SLACC experiments at CalTech in the 60s showed protons have parts, the quark. And many many more experiments. We can now actually see atoms using atomic force microscopy.

I think we have gents from the North of England to thank for that. JJ Thompson and James Chadwick were from Lancashire/Cheshire. They both worked with Ernest Rutherford, although technically from New Zealand his father was Scottish and mother from Essex, but we will forget about the Essex bit!

@@patricksmith4424 Although they had put their hard efforts to do research on these atoms only Bohr's(Danish Physicist) Model was widely accepted.

@@Ketchup_zzz between the 3 of them they discovered the electron, neutron and Proton, basically the atom as we know it. Bohrs is still a theory and basically involved how the electron moves around the nucleas in orbits. The players in the atom had already been discovered.

Well I did have pretty big lunch 🥪😮‍💨

Wow!😮

- IQ

props to the guy who was there to measure it

@@sinajakelic big props

There is no such thing as electron orbits, electrons is in superposition it is everywhere and nowhere at the same time. Its like a wave around atom. And you cannot predict exact place till measurement. You may only assume probability of its position. The closer to the nucleus of an atom, the more likely it is there when we measure it. Nano world is not like things we could see by eyes.

Seeing this really hybridized my p orbital

Why black hands, it's irritating

I was looking for this comment 😂

Dang your so creative and witty! How do you come up with this kind of material? 😮

How tf you grow tiny??!

​@@crossangels9772It's a meme

We can't see any element's atom till now.we don't have this type of technology. This is only a animation

​@@mdraishansari4663he is saying sarcastically fool

@@crossangels9772 grow does not only mean become larger, it can just mean become. "He grew tired"

Except all the concepts of measurement & stuff breaks down eventually, this is the Plank length

I thought atoms are the smallest point?

@@MinecraftKing-nd1zo nope atoms are the current smallest point however it's fairly simple to understand atoms are made of something.

@@user-qr3nz1wi2j current measuring methods and viewing beyond our current capabilities are the only thing standing in the way of identifying and classifying smaller materials

The concept of understanding infinitely smaller materials can be understood simply by cutting a piece of paper in half, then cut that piece in half and continue to cut each half in half, there is no point in wich the paper can't be split into two pieces regardless of how small the particles are by cutting it in half you can always be 100% certain that there is an equal amount left to the piece removed, it would be silly to think you could ever remove something by taking only half, there is an infinite amount times you can do this, therefore understanding that it's simple to see how we can infinitely zoom in smaller and smaller, so long as we have the technology to view it.

Will end up in pure energy

@@josephantony3296 nice. I like that.

Yeah they don’t really talk about that in intro

Similar fact: there are more possible games of chess than stars in the observable universe.

That means I'll never be able to play every game of Klondike Solitaire! I'm sad.😢

​@@danielholland2988that doesnt sound right

@@lukaswilliams5851 google my frien, I can't explain the entire thing as I'm not a mathematician by profession but there are 32 pieces in a game of chess and 64 squares to move on, add other variables such as certain pieces being able to move any number of spaces they choose. And remember you could have at least several hundred games that were the exact same except for one move.... It's a very large number my friend like billions of trillions

@@lukaswilliams5851 It's not right. There are more possibe games of chess than there are atoms in the universe, by far.

in mass, but not in size. A proton is 1 fm, but an electron is 0, however if you confine it to a space smaller than a hydrogen atom/137, it will generate antimatter.

Was looking for this

He got a lot of experience on set with the antman movie 🎬

An even smaller thing is yo

Wat is e 😊

Lol

Fr bruh

I like the way you worded that, very interesting

Maybe life is just a way for the universe to know itself. 🤷🏼‍♂️

​@@WhoThisMonkeyWhy would it need to do that? Any logic behind that or are you quoting some scientist who was just trying to erase theistic notions by implanting their own head canon into reality and expecting us to be intrigued?

@@WhoThisMonkey This implies a sentience to the Universe, we don't have sufficient evidence to reach such a conclusion. You also made an active claim that have encumbered you with the burden of proof.

@@Goujiki Notice the key word 'Maybe.' I made no active claim. 🤦🏻‍♂️

Amazing that we continue to break the building blocks of our world, knowing full well that once broken, these decaying atoms can start other 'normal' matter (atoms) decaying! And we can't stop the atoms from decaying, or fix a single one! The end of our world will be because we have done this.

Because CGTN is a chinese news site that is partially or completely funded by the chinese government. CGTNEurope is the European branch of said news company. The fact that it specifies "Europe" should actually be what tells you that it's not a European company, and that it instead has European satellites. Specifying the national origin of the branch of the company that is producing a thing is common when dealing with news companies that are based out of non-European and non-American countries.

Probably to let you know not to trust it. China likes to spread misinformation and negativity

What don't you understand about "Chinese Global Television Network?"

@@michaelwoods8654 The part that doesn't actually say "Chinese Global Television Network" AT ALL, but instead says "CTGN Europe".

​@@clairetellkamp6253 and why don't they show that scary warning on the BBC site which is mostly funded by British government? Or on MSNBC is or other channels which make money off of wars directly by the US government?

There are different Atoms? It depends on the subatomic materials, the Electrons, the Protons and the Neutrons, what material they form.

Woah👏 this is underrated

Uh no

uni verse = one song ❤

The word creation implies a creator, we don't have sufficient evidence to reach such a conclusion. You also made several active claims that have encumbered you with the burden of proof.

Hair forms from stem cells. It's made up of "keratinized cells".

And? Still made of atoms.

Another NPC just has to speak. Smh You know your dialogue is restricted but you just speak anyway. Poor NPC.

​@@goodcitizen3780what the heck are you saying

@@Dacentrurus I can sympathize with your curiosity. All I mean to say is that OP clearly doesn't get it. OP is hyper focused on a specific term that OP imagines has only one definition, that only describes one very specific thing. OP imagines that they are clever and wise, that they are in some way, minor or otherwise, smarter than others, quicker than others, or that they may perceive things more deeply or clearly. In reality, OP's mind is sluggish and their vision is cloudy. Moreover their perception is lacking both outward and inward. I called the OP and NPC because in certain cases of simulation theory there are NPCs, just like one might find in a video game. The NPCs don't necessarily realize that they are NPCs but instead carry on through life bumbling about thinking that they understand this or that but when they speak it is apparent to anyone with a modicum of intelligence that they are just running off of their basic programming. No depth. No real reasoning. Just the idea of something and they can't explain how they've arrived there or even what the logical conclusion might be. Furthermore, even when presented with indisputable fact from uncorruptible sources, they refuse to abandon the nonsense that they previously proffered. So they may be referred to as NPCs, bumping off of the walls and carrying on their dialogue scripts even when it makes no sense contextually, or even when the content makes no sense. Obviously it goes deeper than that, and I have other meanings wound into this theme but you'll get the gist from this interaction. Cheers

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

@@Luketa1978 just go n check..... then do Ahahaha....🤣🤣🤣

Riiiiiggghhhttt.... I was gonna say the same thing

Larger bro. Larger*

@TheBlackmanIsGod this is just wrong, though it's an easy mistake to make. The exponents you listed are correct, but when considering negative exponents the "more negative" exponents means the measurement is smaller. For example, cm are 10^-2 m while mm are 10^-3 m. So, yes, the video WAS correct

MINUS!!!!!!

Chemistryyyy

Now prove that molecules formed proteins by chance 4 billion years ago, as well as carbohydrates in the exact same place on earth as a fuel source in order to spontaneously emerge as the first living cell Waiting for the proof that such a thing occurred naturally without human interference

It is an animation. Don’t be dumb.

Crickets....