How the Apollo Spacecraft works: Part 3 

i will personally translate ur meanings into chinese, if that is ok, i will try my best, also can i make a friend with you in return? ur awsome. email: haoyang.cai1707@gmail.com

hope you appreciate it

Great work... You should do remake for half-century anniversary (and include few missed details)... Good luck!

Why does your videos have to be so short

I did in swahili you can review it

I'm sure the astronauts were pretty nervous as they prepared to launch off the surface of the moon. That would have been sad to get to the moon but not be able to return home. Thanks for your comment - this is good info!

CountArtha Fucks thats crazy to think about...just three men stuck in the moon

I heard that Buzz Aldrin accidentally broke off the switch that fired the ascent engine! (Bumped it while wearing his EVA suit.) Had to stick a pen cap in there to make it work. Now THAT would make me sweat.

The other interesting fact about the ascent engine was each engine was assembled and installed without testing it. The corrosive nature of the fuel meant that the engine would have to be rebuilt after firing, so no testing was possible. In other words, the very first time the engine was ever fired was on the ascent module, by the astronauts who were depending on it to get them home. Just a bit of pucker factor.

Yea right! LMAO Jared you are a genius, but this is one of the many great hoaxes of the 20th century!

Cycling Cycles totally. Add to that, the editing was done well. It looked like live footage was cut the way the best editors do

Yes

I sure wish guys like you could talk some sense into these “the landings were faked” people. They are right up there with the flat earth people with regard to their absolute inability to accept reality.

what are the chances

@@yutrewoyaGD like 30%

Lets forget about Apollo I

Woah

😁

YES!!

I did a report on the shuttle US back in 1980 more like a research paper was working on degree in applied science got a A for it but interestingly they never gave me back my paper but in my report i wrote that this. Craft was doomed to failure at some point due to not only its complexity but the fact that this ship was very fragile those boosters an example & just the whole design, structure the materials used the vulnerability to extreme climate made it a ticking time bomb add to the fact that it was expensive to operate & maintain for those reasons were probably why they kept my paper did they think i might let NASA know? & that i was right all along.but they said it was a good report may be too good.will never know.

@@ndhzbhhdhhs668 I wouldn't trust a report that was written by a guy named Ndhzb Hhdhhs and has not-so-good grammar.

Yes do and explain how constant force supersonic nozzles control a mass m of inertia I about its mass center.

Ndhzb Hhdhhs r/thathappened

Play kerbal space program. You will understand and start to hate these processes.

ALT + F12 done

SuperDboy4, Hahahahaha you can hyperedit tho.

Robert M. Cheat much

Well but Apollo 13's crews are lucky guys. back to earth with moon lander!

Thanks Everett - that's neat that you actually got to work on it!

Crayfi

You’re such a legend for working on that absolute beauty of a rocket. My heroes are the men and women who built that rocket. So this then makes you one of my heroes, Mr. Everett. Thanks for sharing with us!

.1% = 5,600 ………. That is mind blowing! Every single individual piece , every “insignificant” wire, rivet or nut, had to be as good as humans could make it. Amazing.

Thank you Gopher! I appreciate your comment

The most concise and informative four minute cartoon you ever watched. I can't imagine thinking this was informative or concise. Comical at best is how I see it.

@@shealdedmon7027 Of course you "Can't imagine". Seems you drew the short stick when it came to IQ's. "How I see it" yet you see nothing. A channel for over a year with two subs, your mom, and your dad. At least they believed in you. You probably hate them. There is nothing you have ever done that others cannot do better, besides maybe a video game nobody cares about. But if you actually got educated, your world would open up, and you would end up with many friends that are intelligent. Your lack of belief in what is possible only stems from your own inadequacies. Learn more. Do more. Be more. It is inside of you, and the only one that can stop it, is you. Grow up, read a book, and prosper. Your current state is conducive to nothing. Change it. You are better than you are behaving.

If you think it was difficult 60 years ago, imagine doing it now. Too bad we don't have 1960s rocket tech and 1960s cameras so we can go to moon again am I right? Today we also have to account for the deadly van allen radiation belt. Something that was conveniently ignored in the 60s and this video

@@johnf817 www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis/

@@johnf817 Stop doing drugs, bruh. As a musician there are certain microphones made in the 60's that cannot be replicated today. Tech gets lost when not used. That's a fact. Cars used to last many decades, but with "Modern tech" in a couple of years they break. You have zero clue what you are saying. Again, stay off the drugs.

The truly powerful computers were inside the skulls of the engineers.

You don't need stinkin' computers when you've got sliderules!!!

Yeah, I find it stupid how people think that because the computer and technology was hundreds of times less advanced than now that they say "hOw thEy gO tO mOOn iF coMpUtEr noT goOD?". The computers were designed specifically to get them on the moon. Our phones may be more powerful but they aren't made to get man on the moon, they are simply programmed to entertain us.

@@salt5605 i like your pfp

@@redshark9537 yeah !

...Mr. Armstrong said it incorrectly though...picking on him, of course...he missed the 'a' before 'man'. So, technically, it was an incorrect grammar for spoken English. :)

Fahad Faisal that’s oof

*thats one small step for man, one giant leap for the mankind - Neil Armstrong

@@fahadfaisal7855 no he said A man but you can't hear it because of the bad quality

A giant Fake Show,no more!

Neat!

Jay, hope you got to tour the ship's bridge (wheel house) and below deck crew quarters. I am kinda spoiled that I live about a half hour from Alameda and visited it several times.

Awesome, man!

Tell us more please!

This didn't happen until Apollo 15, Al Worden was the first, followed by Mattingly and Evans. Collins, Gordon, (obviously Swigert), and Roosa did not perform one.

Future astronaut... 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

Don't forget to tell him that on three missions, the Command Module pilot did an EVA halfway between Moon and Earth!

Imagine the relief when they splashed down! I imagine it would feel like a million pounds being lifted off of your shoulders.

@@cooperharris136 Absolutely

Thanks Thomas! I hope to do more on the Apollo Spacecraft in the near future

But what about the NASA videos?

Spritey remove them too this is simpler

have you tried Kerbal Space Program? Its a great game and you learn more in dept things about rockets.

Nah, Spaceflight Simulator is much more simpler and easy to play.

LOL me too, this got me started doing RU-vid searches. This one was great. The kit was a fun build!

Did you know the LEGO set has 1969 pieces? The year Saturn V launched

Thanks!

It burned up in the atmosphere

Thank you for your kind words!

But that just brings you to the right hight, at the correct time, but how did they manage to be on the same (sorry not a native english speaker)trajectory, and not say 20 Miles to the left or right, or not even on the same perpendicular path.

ytwos1, m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-e8L2rIoVMY4.html

I agree!

Why is a 1080ti commenting on youtube

@@salade2760 lmao

Great suggestion - I will make sure this is on my list

Jared Owen OMG YOU ACTUALLY SAW THIS i am a huge fan!

Yes and a big reason why robotic missions are the preferred method of space exploration. Space travel is outrageously expensive and manned space travel is grotesquely outrageously expensive. Now that two shuttle crews have been killed, the need for safety in manned missions might just be too overwhelming for NASA and whomever is in office at the time to actually get anymore of them done but time will tell.

Thank you!

bfjb70 up thumb? Ur so British

Bruh it’s called the thumbs up or like button

@@davester5234 Said the guy with zero upthumbs. Sixteen and counting bruh. Ohhh yeah.

Not sure if you’re aware but Kevin Hughe’s has done videos about the probe & drogue system. First one does an excellent job of showing how it all worked. I’ve read about it numerous times but the visual representation is so helpful. The 2nd goes into great detail about the issues they had with it on Apollo 14. He might be a bit young to understand it all but I’m sure he’d still find it interesting.

And having those massive Balls to get out there

@@scuida2730 What is the massive Balls ?

@@anltube35935 The massive balls from the astronauts, to leave planet earth by not only going into the orbit. i dont even know until today, how those giant balls fitted in the saturn 5

Paul Snape I thought great work in the video , but just because some of us doubt and question the nasa evidence of man on the moon doesn’t change the phenomenol engineering of space flight or make us all hoax nuts , there are some legitimate doubtful claims in the space race in relation to manned landings

Pretty sure most people who doubt the moon landings could be flown up to the moon, have their head bounced off the LM decent stage and would still not believe it. They start talking about how it was put there later and we didn't actually go in the 60s and everything is just an elusion and we all live in the matrix. At some point you have to take into account the overwhelming mountain of edvidence that points to the fact it did happen and stop focusing on some minute thing that can neither be proven nor disproved.

God, no, we don’t need their kind around here..l

Nope. Good day.

Paul Sharpe: Hi guy! Tell me where I am wrong and provide evidence: Where is the video showing the inside of them LEM with the astronauts in the moon suits and attached with the bungee cords. They had a periscope in the CSM and LEM for navigation, but for some reason there are no pictures or videos of stars. The second moment changes as the fuel and oxidizer gets used, but somehow these 4 groups of steering motors kept the LEM from crashing. No remote control or autopilot test landing to verify the LEMs control system and steering motors, with the sloshing fuel and oxidizer and water, but somehow they got it right the first time. The LEM simulator Neil flew and crashed obviously did not have the same second moment as the fake studio LEM on the moon stage. No radar stations on the moon to verify the unknown orbit of the fake CMS, and the ignition time of the LEM, and track the fake LEMs altitude and range as a function of time for descent and ascent. For the moon suit sublimator what blackbody absorber temperature did they use for outer space and the maximum power flux from the sun from the ultraviolet to infrared wavelengths. Same with the engine jet landing on the moon and the missing dust cloud and nobody afraid of rocks piercing the LEM or damage to the antennas, steering motors, or landing radar. They could have pointed the cameras up away from the moon instead of golfing on the moon stage but they decided not to because they would have taken pictures of the stage guys on the catwalk They also drove the moon buggy with lots of dust in the vacuum of the moon studio. Where is the video showing the astronauts in the LEM on the studio mooooon putting on their backpack life support. The clown did a fake spacewalk in the non gravity simulator in the airplane, but for some reason no stars in pictures or video from that. Their studio moon suits were contaminated with moon dust, which likely is radioactive, but no problem to put a Geiger counter next to their suits to verify there was no radiation hazard.Neil jumped off the studio LEM, but since it was live they could not slow down the speed by the square root of six, like the Six Million Dollar Man slow motion, because that would put the rest of their studio acting out of sync..Astronauts could not get more than 6 inches off the moon as they were hopping and walking and pretending to be on the moon stage. Radiation heat transfer on the LEM so they used a glycol cooling loop to radiate that heat back out into the air conditioned studio. Total hoax.

Or the People WHO believe the Moon landing is fake

It is flat. Don't travel too far

Stolen

Gino Asci just like your butt

Gino Asci like your encephalogram

With the latest DLC one can make a pretty realistic looking Saturn 5 replica. I did this the other day, but I ditched the 3 ascent stage as it simply wasn't necessary and would have made the rocket unnecessarily complex, maybe the engines in KSP are too efficient. :P

Yep. Though when I try to dock the csm head to head with the lm to "pull it out," as it says in the 2nd video, I always forget to turn off the shroud option for the csm rocket engine, so it always blocks me when I try to dock and it sends the lm flipping around like crazy.

@@hakont.4960 Ksp is pretty unrealistic, earths gravity is smaller and last time i checked earth doesnt have 2 moons.

@@loserx8910 I would not say ksp is unrealistic because it uses a different solar system. It is still a game and it would not be fun or beginner friendly to use the real scale and minmus is a good addition as second moon because you can use it to learn interplanetary missions. And if you want the real earth there are mods

Don’t ruin perfect likes

Good luck.

Well the reason for me is that how do i land on moon and doing the docking kind of stuff

Hahaha same here

What's your point? I'm genuinely curious

No

*whole

Sorry

@@AED10 starship.

🤔

Hi Everyone - Thank you for your kind words! This brought a smile to my face as I read all of your comments. I will be making more videos soon about rockets and maybe more about the Apollo spacecraft! Thanks again for watching my videos

Nice! Yeah that be pretty scary, cross your fingers that the engine turns on or stuck on the moon

Just wanted to point out that they did have some redundancy with important controls and electrical systems. If the pen fix hadn't worked, there were people on the ground already working on another solution with the electrical system although I can't remember the details. The built in redundancy NASA insisted upon was a big reason why Grumman was having a difficult time keeping the weight of the LM within the tight guidelines.

Saber Tig: Nobody went to the moon, particularly with a 1960s computer and changing second moment with 4 groups of constant force steering motors... Knowing how to evaluate evidence, or lack of evidence, is a good first step to revealing what a hoax it is. Having an engineering degree is helpful but not necessary to know what questions to ask or find huge inconsistencies in the moon hoax. Big problem for them is what were graduate level courses in the 1950s and 1960s are now undergrad courses, so there is not much of a mystery to use undergrad courses to ask questions they cant or dont want to answer.... Where is the video showing the inside of them LEM with the astronauts in the moon suits and attached with the bungee cords. They had a periscope in the CSM and LEM for navigation, but for some reason there are no pictures or videos of stars. The second moment changes as the fuel and oxidizer gets used, but somehow these 4 groups of steering motors kept the LEM from crashing. No remote control or autopilot test landing to verify the LEMs control system and steering motors, with the sloshing fuel and oxidizer and water, but somehow they got it right the first time. The LEM simulator Neil flew and crashed obviously did not have the same second moment as the fake studio LEM on the moon stage. No radar stations on the moon to verify the unknown orbit of the fake CSM, and the ignition time of the LEM, and track the fake LEMs altitude and range as a function of time for descent and ascent. For the moon suit sublimator what blackbody absorber temperature did they use for outer space and the maximum power flux from the sun from the ultraviolet to infrared wavelengths. Same with the engine jet landing on the moon and the missing dust cloud and nobody afraid of rocks piercing the LEM or damage to the antennas, steering motors, or landing radar. They could have pointed the cameras up away from the moon instead of golfing on the moon stage but they decided not to because they would have taken pictures of the stage guys on the catwalk They also drove the moon buggy with lots of dust in the vacuum of the moon studio. Where is the video showing the astronauts in the LEM on the studio mooooon putting on their backpack life support. The clown did a fake spacewalk in the non gravity simulator in the airplane, but for some reason no stars in pictures or video from that. Their studio moon suits were contaminated with moon dust, which likely is radioactive, but no problem to put a Geiger counter next to their suits to verify there was no radiation hazard.Neil jumped off the studio LEM, but since it was live they could not slow down the speed by the square root of six, like the Six Million Dollar Man slow motion, because that would put the rest of their studio acting out of sync..Astronauts could not get more than 6 inches off the moon as they were hopping and walking and pretending to be on the moon stage. Radiation heat transfer on the LEM so they used a glycol cooling loop to radiate that heat back out into the air conditioned studio. Total hoax.

thank you!