Тёмный

How To Calculate Segmented Radius For Building Arches - Master Carpenter Secrets Revealed 

gregvancom
Подписаться 201 тыс.
Просмотров 21 тыс.
50% 1

www.homebuildingandrepairs.com... Click on this link if you're looking for more information about building arches, roof framing and construction repairs. Here's another simple and easy step-by-step tutorial that will help do-it-yourselfers and carpenters figure out the radius for a segmented arch used on the interior and exterior of homes and other buildings. Complicated construction math formulas simplified.
• Easy Carpentry Trick F... Check out this old time carpenter trick for arches.

Хобби

Опубликовано:

 

19 май 2020

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 36   
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 2 года назад
There is a mistake in example #2 - where 468 should be 636.025 and thank you Apophis.
@user-ri7ux7oy5m
@user-ri7ux7oy5m 5 месяцев назад
Beautiful
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 4 месяца назад
Thank you
@OKCFittySix
@OKCFittySix 8 месяцев назад
Great information. Knew it was out there somewhere. Just hadn't stumbled across it until today. Thx!
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 8 месяцев назад
Glad it was helpful!
@andypartelle9416
@andypartelle9416 Год назад
Great help, thanks.
@gregvancom
@gregvancom Год назад
You're welcome!
@1time4yurmind
@1time4yurmind 4 года назад
Formula is (h^2 + w^2)/(2h), where h is the desired height of the arch, w is half the width of the opening. Algebra is much cleaner. Thanks for sharing.
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 4 года назад
Algebra definitely looks cleaner to those who understand it. Thanks for posting the formula.
@lancastermick
@lancastermick 2 года назад
(h^2 + (w/2)^2) / (2h) is what you mean I believe.
@1time4yurmind
@1time4yurmind 2 года назад
@@lancastermick w is defined as 1/2 width of opening in my example. defining w as simply the width then your formula works, and is more comprehensive
@Equalshares
@Equalshares Год назад
Thank you. Big long arch exactly 14 inchesx 14ft to work on tomorrow. It's a casing arch over a window using maple hardwood
@markcissell6984
@markcissell6984 4 года назад
Thank you
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 4 года назад
You're welcome
@engwebuildtheworld1178
@engwebuildtheworld1178 2 года назад
very useful video sir ihave ever seen at site frequently face this problem that how can we find arch radius without auto cad at site and you solved my problem brother thanks alot for making this informative video
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 2 года назад
I'm glad it helped.
@tinysand3517
@tinysand3517 4 года назад
I think it should be " 12 divided into 468" or you could say 468 divided by 12
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 4 года назад
I will try to remember that and thanks for the information.
@E.Moralejo
@E.Moralejo 4 года назад
Great video Greg, Here is another way of doing the calculations that does not involve squaring two numbers or needing to write down numbers to then use them later in the calculation. Here it is R = Dw² ÷ (8×Jp) + Jp÷2 where Dw is the door width; Jp is the jamb intersect point (or height of the arch); and of course R is the radius you’re looking to calculate. In your first example Dw=36”; Jp=12” therefore R= 19.5”. In the calculator just type 36 x² ÷ 8 ÷ 12 = + 12 ÷ 2 = {x² is a function key, it appears on most calculator apps by turning your cell phone horizontal} try it love ur videos -Eddie
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 4 года назад
Sounds good and as always, use whatever works best and what is easiest to understand.
@ApophisApr
@ApophisApr 2 года назад
Where does the eight in (8xJp) come from?
@ApophisApr
@ApophisApr 2 года назад
In example 2 you calculated 36 + 600.25 = 636.25 which is correct then under 6 times 2 = 12 you annotated 12 / 468 = 53.02 (468 from example 1). I now know the calculation should be 636.25 / 12 = 53.02. Just learning this stuff and it threw me for a loop.
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 2 года назад
You're right and it looks like I carried that number over from example #1. It looks like you're the first to find it or at least the first to mention it.
@elazhar6174
@elazhar6174 4 года назад
I noticed in each example, you used different height. What determines the height? Is it builder preference or is it based on opening?
@jamesmateush2709
@jamesmateush2709 4 года назад
Builder preference mostly
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 4 года назад
I only use them to provide viewers with additional examples in hopes of making a little more sense out of the information, but as James suggested, the designers will usually provide you with all of the measurements.
@julianpatterson3944
@julianpatterson3944 2 года назад
in the third example, how did you arrive at 14" ?
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 2 года назад
It's a random number used to create a desired look and can be 6, 12 or 20 inches. Some designers have a specific number they use for aligning two or more arches up in a wall and would need to use the same number.
@mavenfeliciano1710
@mavenfeliciano1710 4 года назад
I have a question. What not just use basic geometric principles without numbers, i.e. without calculations? I mean, what is the benefit of doing it this way? I though a master carpenter, or at least a master in the classical approach I guess, would use nothing more than a compass and straight edge (and perhaps a ruler only for determining height and width of the wall) if he were drawing it on a plan. Even easier on a computer, just add the circle and let the computer spit out the final measurements. Recently I’ve been doing no-math geometry and could easily create those arcs with no calculations. If the height and width are given, I could do a scaled down version (just reducing ratios like a triangle [architecture/engineering] ruler does). The only number I might need is the amount to subtract from the center to achieve the desired result (e.g. -3” from center). And I am doing this with pencil and paper. There might be a learning curve doing it on a computer, but once the principles and methods are known, it would be even quicker and more accurate. Even taking your time on paper there is a slight imperfection, even only microscopic. But nothing is truly perfect except on paper anyhow, so to speak.
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 4 года назад
The benefit of using math formulas usually provides you with a faster and more accurate design. As far as master carpenters go, I think I would need you to provide me with your definition of one, before answering your question. There are definitely other ways to design arches like these and you're right, most of the time they don't need to be perfect, just close enough.
@pablolynch1152
@pablolynch1152 9 месяцев назад
Height times 2 is really; 2 times the height.
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 9 месяцев назад
Yes
@mavenfeliciano1710
@mavenfeliciano1710 4 года назад
Also, isn’t the radius simply half of the opening (assuming squared opening like any regular door/window would be)? Just measure the opening edges and divide in half. No simplification of fancy formulas needed. It doesn’t get any simpler.
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 4 года назад
Yes, the radius is half of the diameter and the diameter is the full width of the circle. If you're going to create an arch shaped like half of a circle, then the radius would be in the center of the opening. Let me know if that doesn't make sense.
@steveleach-thebusinesstran7281
@steveleach-thebusinesstran7281 2 года назад
If you could correct your formula would make a lot more sense. Your number divisions are back to front. 24 divided by 468 certainly isn’t 19.5, but 468 divided by 24 is.😁
@gregvancom
@gregvancom 2 года назад
Yes, I think most viewers get it, but it would have been better if I showed the process with a calculator. I might pull the video and remake it.
Далее
Il pourrait encore jouer 🤩
00:23
Просмотров 3,1 млн
The Setting Out Of Arches On Site
23:58
Просмотров 45 тыс.
Elliptical Arch  PART 3
6:51
Просмотров 114 тыс.
Calculating rafter length
9:15
Просмотров 320 тыс.
Segment Arch PART 2
4:56
Просмотров 42 тыс.
Gothic Arches
11:43
Просмотров 52 тыс.
Which water gun won??
0:30
Просмотров 21 млн
Жидкие носки)))
0:19
Просмотров 1,2 млн
Рецепты из интернета
0:37
Просмотров 899 тыс.