Thanks a lot Ma'am, not just for this particular video but for everything you are doing for the UnderStand UPSC community. And also, your hindi is completely fine, infact what I appreciate is the efforts you're putting despite it.
Went to sleep bt got remember that RC's vedios are pending ,so watch it now .And wanna thank to u mam for such great effort and nice way of explanation .So clear and so simple. Helpful to boost correctness . थैंक्यू ❤😊 .God bless u 😊
Ma’am hats off to you for this video. Please help me/us with one more thing i.e. pressure management during exam. We often tend to mark wrong despite of knowing them correctly. Please share your insights on this as well. I failed CSAT 2023 because of this single reason. Thank you for this goldmine video.
Thank you so much ma'am, for providing such a wonderful content, this was really helpful for me, Earlier i was able to correct only 15 questions' of CSAT passage but now i am able to correct 24 questions.
Mam, your explanation for the RC is really helpful for me, as i have been followed you in the understand upsc channel. Thank you & please continue with the initiative
Mam some of the student from non Hindi belt can't understand. Please make separate video for Hindi or maintain english for all because it could be understand every one thanks
Thank you mam , this video is seems really helpful . Always facing problem in RCs hope after implementing your technique I will be able to solve . Thank you mam
Hello ma'am. I had a question during RC practice. I am attaching the PYQ passage and the question for your perusal. Would really appreciate your opinion on the correct answer and why- The need for Competition Law becomes more evident when foreign direct investment FDI is liberalized. The impact of FDI is not always pro-competitive. Very often FDI takes the form of a foreign corporation acquiring a domestic enterprise or establishing a joint venture with one. By making such an acquisition the foreign investor may substantially lessen competition and gain a dominant position in the relevant market thus charging higher prices. Another scenario is where the affiliates of two separate multinational companies MNCs have been established in competition with one another in a particular developing economy following the liberalization of FDI. Subsequently the parent companies overseas merge. With the affiliates no longer remaining independent competition in the host country may be virtually eliminated and the prices of the products may be artificially inflated. Most of these adverse consequences of mergers and acquisitions by MNCs can be avoided if an effective competition law is in place. Also an economy that has implemented an effective competition law is in a better position to attract FDI than one that has not. This is not just because most MNCs are expected to be accustomed to the operation of such a law in their home countries and know how to deal with such concerns but also that MNCs expect competition authorities to ensure a level playing field between domestic and foreign firms. According to the passage how does a foreign investor dominate the relevant domestic market? The need for Competition Law becomes more evident when foreign direct investment FDI is liberalized. The impact of FDI is not always pro-competitive. Very often FDI takes the form of a foreign corporation acquiring a domestic enterprise or establishing a joint venture with one. By making such an acquisition the foreign investor may substantially lessen competition and gain a dominant position in the relevant market thus charging higher prices. Another scenario is where the affiliates of two separate multinational companies MNCs have been established in competition with one another in a particular developing economy following the liberalization of FDI. Subsequently the parent companies overseas merge. With the affiliates no longer remaining independent competition in the host country may be virtually eliminated and the prices of the products may be artificially inflated. Most of these adverse consequences of mergers and acquisitions by MNCs can be avoided if an effective competition law is in place. Also an economy that has implemented an effective competition law is in a better position to attract FDI than one that has not. This is not just because most MNCs are expected to be accustomed to the operation of such a law in their home countries and know how to deal with such concerns but also that MNCs expect competition authorities to ensure a level playing field between domestic and foreign firms. With reference to the passage, consider the following statements: 1. It is desirable that the impact of Foreign Direct Investment should be pro-competitive. 2. The entry of foreign investors invariably leads to the inflated prices in domestic markets. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 As per the key in the book=> ans is (a) I marked it (d). I thought that since the 1st statement is not explicitly mentioned thus it is wrong. Please correct me if I am mistaken.
"Most of these adverse consequences of mergers and acquisitions by MNCs can be avoided" implies that everything mentioned before about non pro competitive FDI, takeovers etc are adverse undesirable impacts. doesnt 'invariably' lead to inflation. it is one of the adverse effects
Ma’am, in questions containing assumption and inference as a keyword, I am getting these questions wrong and mostly on tougher side. Can you explain these terms also in coming videos.
Last me jo aapne bola nahi nahi logon ki madad krni chahiye ❤ use sunke hamare favourite satyam sir ki yaad aai he is really amazing 😍 and offcourse you are also..
Ma'am considering today's RC the question was to give assumptions made in the passage. So the option b) only 3 was correct. In such type of questions the words used in the option might not be in the passage, then how should I approach such questions. Because as per elimination technique I think about ki there's nothing said, or nothing is mentioned in the passage relating to this and I mark the wrong answer. Hope you understand what I am trying to convey.
