How To Dominate At 1/3 An Entire Session Review | $100 - $100,000 Bankroll Challenge Poker Vlog #83 

The value is crazy, but unless he hires someone to start pumping out shorts, he’s just not going to blow up. Bluffalo is a poker channel for poker players, most successful bloggers are mostly catering to the general gambling population.

oh yea the theortical growth kinda assumes an increase in production value but they usually happen at the same time and he's literally still trying things out. on a spectrum of production value from wolfgang/rampage to other large channels by straight pros like andrew neeme and others i don't think sam has to aspire much higher than a new camera and an editor/solid editing software with a style update to really just set and forget the video making process. @@Andrew-fb4vn

Thanks fella! Not 120k just yet, but happy to just keep doing my thing and watch the channel grow organically :)

sam ur so cool lmao i hope to play with you one day lmfaoo@@BluffaloSam

The growth will come exponentially

What did you have if you don’t mind?

It was good to meet you too Ron! Sorry you ran so bad that session, we'll have a rematch next time I'm in Austin!

@@BluffaloSam its Rob but close enough brother 😂😂. Best of luck to your 100k challenge and good luck in those live stream games!

@@Andrewrules3 My bad dude! And thank you :)

@@Andrewrules3 Can we ask what you had? My guess is QQ

Ooo I did like doing that, thanks for reminding me! Next one I'll get it in there :)

Yeah, you see that quite often. Get a scary Flop like that and 2x pot the flop. Just bet small and figure it out

SPR is getting lower, and the larger you open the less hands you are able to play. Suited 1 gappers don't like 10SPR pots

Upswing

@@BluffaloSam thanks! The lab? Or any specific course? I saw they have a new live course. Thanks for your help. GL

@@adamgrosvenor418 Lab until you understand general principles and theory, smash live cash is very good once you have those down

I'm not jamming for value there, trying to get a hand like AK to fold with that size.

With a Flop like that the only wrong move would be to fold. If you never have flushes in your check range it can be a bit disastrous as well.

He called a 4b OOP. It's basically AKdd and maaaaaybe KJdd, but his sizings don't indicate either

I open for smaller sizes preflop so I can include these hands in my open range. I only open these at a table that doesn't 3bet often. (A tough table you can expect a 3bet roughly 40-50% of the time when opening UTG) at this table its in the 5-10% range. You need to be very willing to fold flushes this deep when opening these hands though.

The SPR is already shrinking, think tournaments, even with the additional ante money in, they generally raise smaller than cash. Allows us to profitably play more hands, and increase our hourly.

I'm out of position, and called a Flop bet. Turn lead makes zero sense there, we only see an overcard 25% of the time, and only a max of 17% will it connect with my opponent

A5s, low frequency A4 and A3s, suited 1 gappers, and then some Broadway hands like AJo ATs etc etc. AKs does make it into the 4b range, but offsuit you really only get action from better, and fold out worse at deep stacks

At 1/3 a rec's 3bet range is QQ/KK/AA and sometimes AK, player dependant. KQ is getting absolutely trashed vs this range.

When he bets that size, I think his range is just too heavy on the medium strength hands trying to get to showdown. I don't expect to get snapped by something super strong very often

KQs much too strong vs a LJ open to not squeeze at very high frequency!

I have 2 phones, and try to remember the hand

Great idea, Sam plz consider!

I'm hot ham water at PLO. More like road to -100k

Pokerbankrolltracker

I would start to consider checking back with bottom pair no kicker. Everything else is going for value

I like the upswing level up podcast on youtube

@@BluffaloSam thanks!

He told me he didn't have Aces, I'll show my hand.

@@BluffaloSam if they say "you're good", I'll show, but if they have value, I wanna see it.

@@digitaldavid5633 I don't care enough to make my opponent's show

If it wasn't inconvenient to the dealer making change, I'd raise to $7 or $8. I never vary preflop raises based on hand strength. I'm not trying to eek out an extra $5 when I hit the flop and win the pot 60% of the time. I want to play as many hands as possible vs my opponent's and the small open sizes allow for this.

@BluffaloSam If you were playing a tighter range like more standard preflop range chart based on position would you be raising 15 or still 10? My standard open is 15 with all my hands not just top of range. And it seems like everyone is opening minimum or 15 like 95% of the time in my 1/3 games. You think this is bad? Or are you just trying to play more hands than usual so you open to 10 with all hands?

@adamo36532 Big open sizes should be the first thing to go, especially from EP. You can build the pot with 4 bets, overbets etc. I hate large open sizes

@6532 open sizes vary from table to table. Nothing's set in the rules. Depending on your position, action before you and players' profiles behind. When in the same situation at the same table, I always open the same size regardless of what I'm holding (people are watching!). Then, depending on who you are: NIT - always opens large. And they better do (that way), b/c of their card selection and playing style. TAG - opens mid to large. LAG - opens small. Always!! b/c they play wide, all sort of craps, and they play opponents. Their power lies in a raise/reraise tool. Which requires smaller pots to start from. CS - it does not matter how they open. They're gonna lose anyway! lol So: regarding your stance, I'd say you're NIT. . When a player from $5/10/25 comes down to $1/3 tables, he is sandbagging...and all players are his customers. So: let them open large and reveal what they holding. He is rather going to wait for them around the corner and hit them hard, so they even do not know what hit them. Hoping, this would do?

Typically with bluffs you do only get called by better! It's just based on his sizings, I didn't think he was too strong, but I also don't think our hand is best enough at showdown to make the call. I think we do run into AK and KQ a bit too often, it is a 4bet pot and we are deep so those hands are absolutely in his range, I think he pretty much never has a weaker king here. Betting Turn is too thin, AK would be my minimum value bet on the turn, king with weak kicker (relative to a 4b pot) is a nice hand to have in our checkback range

@@BluffaloSam I appreciate the reply!

I agreed about turn bet. Turn check back was calling for troubles on river. And that's why V decided to bet. Then, an insane bluff needed to bail out (Nut flush was V range, damn it!!). Then, facing shove, V folded everything lower than Nut flush, I believe. So: whenever you need an insane bluff to bail out, that's b/c you screwed up something on earlier streets. Myself, V also played this hand poorly. If he had anything on turn, he must've bet it. (Maybe he was scared of a K??, if he had AQ (which very likely was the case!). Well, another lesson for him: DO NOT CALL 4-bet pre with AQ while OOP. Fish!

I have Twitter! BluffaloSam