This strategy is great when playing in nations that dont require work permits like France or Holland but in England you would need european leagues loaded to avoid wp issues.
@@bbar182 I’ve never had the regens not wanting to go on loan problem but fair enough and usually players can get work permit after a couple seasons on loan
My transfer record profit on one player was buying a player for 5.5k (US Dollars) and selling him for 230 million in FM20. He was Colombian regen, actually the next Messi, and I was a Bundesliga club. But same principle.
@@Moulii far less players but they also had huge teams. Usually it's players bought just to loan right after. Many spend years and years on consecutive loans. Like a business model at this point, it was much worse a couple of years ago. I'm a Porto fan, the club had at some point over 60 players in tge first team during the pre-season.
Alot of teams in real life use this strategy, Chelsea and Brighton spring to mind, buy load of young players loan out for few seasons and then either use them for first team or sell them when their stock is high
I jumped into a new game, this time with a premier league club and the players found in Brazil this way are all shown as rubbish. Is that because of the relativities? Would they still increase in $ value? You can still buy them very cheaply but would the approach of loaning them out work?
@@kiweping5 Sounds reasonable, except it doesn't work as well as I'd like. Makes sense perhaps that it's so because it would be too easy to exploit otherwise, even more than it already is. I always get left with about 1/4 of the players that no one wants even though they are decent enough for many leagues and teams. Lowest I offer them out is 0% wage and squad status and yet no bids. In fact it's staggering how little difference offering them out for free actually makes. Lets say I want to loan out 50 players, about 30 will go out on regular loans, maybe 5 more for no wages and the other 15 stay at club or are forced into affiliate where they may or may not play. So now they are clogging up training for the rest of the team, and it's just painful to watch them rot. On top of that my club reputation and training facilites suck so it's not like they are living the dream being here.
Ik ben begonnen met HSC'21 maar heb geen transferbudget noch salarisbudget, oftewel een amateurclub. Moet ik dan alleen transfervrije spelers uit die braziliaanse divisies halen?
Thanks. Do you use minimum levels of current and potential to decide who you will take? For example do you grab only 5 star potential or would you take 4.5 or 4?
When you are at a higher level, you can even go for 3.5 star pot. players. When they are 16 or 17 the potential seems higher a lot of the times, so then i will take mostly 4.5 or 5 stars.
stars don't rly matter tbh, especially at lower clubs who don't have the best staff. This year was the 1st time I bought the ingame editor and that rly opened my eyes. There are literally only 2 indicators for a player to actually have good potential (170 or higher) and those are Determination and their value (even goods stats often don't represent their potential nor do potential or current ability stars as I said). But since lower division players don't have a value representative of their potential, you rly can sign whoever you want no matter how bad the report seems bc they're that cheap anyway
Hey, does it still work? Im getting like 30-40 free players that way every year. 100 loans a year. But my biggest income is coming from top-24 players/free agent players. From this method I only got 1 player who got into my top-24, and he was mercenary puss* bitch (but got me decent money). Some of these players are being sold for like 2 mil peak, and you also cant loan them in bunch after 22 years old mark. Many of them are shite. I switched to buy good players for 100-500k instead.
