@@EmpiricalMind That and the option to expand the grid (not just the time division) to 32 steps! It's already an awesome sequencer, though, and I use it all the time.
hello. Im having trouble mapping the cc numbers of my vst synths. Most synths do not have the right click assign cc number like the one in this video. Im using ableton btw. Any help? thanks
Can you lock some parameters or whole steps so random wont change it? Also really wierd decision to have default note set closest to C and not root note. Really interesting tool but still really similar to probablistic seq which is great! hope to have some updates and new features to this one! :)
You can lock parameters, cause every parameter is separate. Randomization affects one single parameter. You can’t lock steps for what i know. But this is a feature that could be added. The vst will be updated with time, as Alex told me. The difference with prob seq is huge. First of all because of the possibility of setting the range. Prob Seq was sometimes giving sequences spreaded in too many octaves. Second, i prefer to work on a bigger and clearer interface, bjt that’s my personal taste.
The lock function would be useful on individual steps and I think a simple tweak to the code would set the root note to the root note of the scale chosen by the user. Seqund looks like a very versatile and 'musical' tool and kudos to the presenter for some valuable advice on getting the best out of probabilistic sequencers i.e. without a discerning ear it's still GIGO
There are a lot of great sequencers out there, its well designed but it doesn't have any features that make want to pay what he is asking. I would rather a sequencer had electron like trig conditions for each step, I would pay for that.
