How to MAKE $3500 in less than a minute  

facts like wtf😂

Ahaha fr so dumb

For the content 😂

I think it’s like a fact check, if he calls/raises then you know, he calls and we miss the turn we give up, if he raises, we give up

the missed 2nd barrel on the turn is even worst...

You think that was a donk bet? If he checked the guy with the aces most likely woulda bet either way 🤣 probably more than $150 who knows

@@Top10soon I don't think, I know. That's the literal definition of a donk bet. Donk bets aren't always bad, but that's what a donk bet is...

He did get info and possibly see a cheaper turn card…

It's not intuitive but important to note there are 18 combos of AA, KK and QQ. And 16 combos of AK, meaning 53% of the opponent's hands crush him, not 75%. I know you didn't say 75%, but you did say it like there were significantly more hands that crush him which isn't the case.

​​@@Top10soon "Donk betting" is leading into the preflop raiser, which he did haha.

"Should have lost" 😂 you understand how poker works?

@@narele25 Do you? If he decides to play that hand in the way that he does, with the same information available, firstly, he’s leading out with a projected range total of 29% equity into a 75% likelihood of only 12% equity. Then followed it up with a CR that should have been a shove to avoid the 6-8 scare cards on the River. This shove offers better value for stacks when the opponent has less complete information, and could potentially put you on an overpair yourself, thus making his call more likely while you’re sitting with the nuts. So yes, I believe that I know how to play poker enough to give that simple explanation, and also to know that he profited $1220 from the hand, not $3500. And that saying he should have lost his $2500 stack would have happened approximately 71% of the time after his flop lead.

@@BigBlackRepublican except he wasn’t in for 2500 until he made the set...., means he wouldn’t have lost 2500 he would have folded

@@joanharrower5529 He CR’d to 800 when he hit the set on the turn. Which by his read on the flop, (Opp having overpair), was the time to play for stacks. Giving his Opp more information and allowing him to see the river is a -EV play. If he trusted his initial read, the flop lead and moderate CR on the turn, are both just silly plays. Controlling the pot should be key when playing from behind and set-mining. And getting max value from a hidden set, while repping a hand that Opp’s range dominates (i.e. JJ-KK < AA as could be repped from action thus far), should be optimal strategy. He allowed Opp to get away from his hand. Yes, he was +1220 for the hand, but over time, this play style will more often result with negative value.

@@BigBlackRepublican should have lost…lol he played the odds and won. Just because you can read stats off the internet of probability means nothing.

It wasnt hard. The 9 made it easy. Most kther cards he would call.

​@@blowc1612the 9 didn't make it easy

Lol this is a tutorial on how not to play oop.

The guy with AA only have single pair which is kinda terrible yes? At that point, shouldn't you fold?

The only impressive part. This hand was played like a fish and his analysis is mind bogglingly stupid

At that point all Hero’s holdings got there. Not too difficult a fold but a river check is a tough call. Villain can’t feel good about sets and QJ etc. I would have down bet river if not check. Try to induce or at least get a little extra.

​@@jamesbjorliewould have shoved on the turn, the aces definitely assumed straight. That all in shove with that 9 showing its an easy fold.

That is the one valuable thing to learn from this video.

The freaking discipline man geez..

pretty easy fold. no one shoves 2k here with worse than 1 pair.

Nailed it

Requests are coming in for said player to give this a try on behalf of a fan: 🎰

Couldn’t have said it better myself

Don't forget to shove the river and get the dude to fold aces

You play bad sir and you talk even worse 😅😅😅

Pocket tens and that flop followed by the turn 10 is a fish play ok then

@@j-roc6989 lol how much he paid for u to blow him and put in good words for him?

@@j-roc6989 When you put an OMC on aces yea it’s a stupid play

Yeah... 💯

If the other guy played it well, then why he fold? Lmao!

​@@ThomasIsGayForMe cuz he would have lost...?

@@tylerslenk8243 So he didn’t play it well. Lmao!

​@@ThomasIsGayForMe You're dumb or what ? He fold because it was easy to him to read the hand of his opponent... So when you know that you haven't the best hand, you will call? Pffff what a dumb lol

Not that impressive against a check raise on the turn. Almost no one check raise bluffs on the turn, especially not this fish that made the video.

pretty easy fold. no one shoves 2k here with worse than 1 pair.

@@jonathansykes4986speak for yourself. I’ve done it plenty of times.

A couple reasons: 1. If BTN has AK (16 combos, compared to 18 combos of QQ, KK, AA) I’m likely ahead and I don’t want action checking through giving everyone a free card. 2. In case he does have QQ+, I’m setting my own price, because it’ll be tough for me to fold an overpair to a single bet anyway

But once he calls my flop bet, I’m fairly confident he has a large overpair and not AK, so from there I tried to play accordingly

​@@BrantzenPoker if he has 18 combos of hands that beat you and 16 you win against you. You aren't "likely ahead". You are likely behind. Referenced by the fact there are more hands that beat you. I think you need to revisit math. 18>16

@@nex8000 😂😂 Nono the first point was given scenario 1 where he has AK, I’m most likely ahead of the other players, not JUST him. I also realize 18>16. But a $150 bet to win a pot of $365 doesn’t need to work 50% of the time. Technically, if everyone folds 29% of the time or higher, it’s a profitable bet. And that’s in a black and white world discounting any additional equity realization if people just call (like what happened)

@@BrantzenPoker Ok I understand now. Either way though your logic makes no sense. If his range is QQ-AA and AK then the logic you claimed doesn't work. You are saying to "deny equity from AK". But you are then ignoring that his range is heavily weighted towards hands that are ahead of you. You need to consider the whole range when deciding to bet for value/deny equity. You are NOT betting for value here against AK. You are betting for value against QQ+, AK. Which again, makes zero sense since you have an equity disadvantage against that range. Sure you deny equity against AK, but you are essentially are throwing dead money into the pot when he has an overpair and you are drawing to 2 outs. you aren't setting your own price. The other person has the option to raise.... "Technically, if everyone folds 29% of the time or higher, it’s a profitable bet" Yeah and technically if I get AA every hand I can just jam preflop everyhand and its still plus EV! You aren't getting folds 29% of the time given the range you described. I'm not sure if you even get a fold at all, ever. He's never folding his overpairs on the flop. I don't see why you'd fold AK to that sizing on the flop either. Even if he's super tight, it's only going to work like 5-10% of the time. And the folds are going to be exclusively AK with no backdoor draw, which are hands you want to be calling a value bet.... The only way I could ever get behind what you are saying is if you think the opponent is so tight he is just always going to fold his overpairs by the river unimproved... Maybe thats the case since it happened here. Or you are just super obvious and he pegged you to give up on turn unless you had a strong hand. Either way you aren't betting for equity denial at that point, you are just str8 up barreling with 1010 to bluff on a board that does not connect with his range. Which is fine, but its not the logic you are representing. Either way I don't even mind the flop bet in general. Its just the logic doesn't make sense given the range of hands you think he has and your reasoning behind the bet.

Nope. He should have shoved on the turn. Make it look like a straight draw, which what the aces was thinking and the 9 hitting made him fold.

Hard to rep the straight draw because the flop is hard. A legit straight draw on turn would’ve been 97, J9 - but that’s hard to continue on flop, let alone the pre flop action. Let’s look at maybe A3, A4, which is a bit more plausible - but hard to imagine with that much equity you’d go all in, too. Flush draw and overs? Maybe QJc to also have a gut shot… possibly. I think maybe that play could be balanced with any set, but IMHO it’ll be hard to rep a straight draw with a push.

Never seen you on the World Series of poker. How many bracelets you got?

He wouldn't have showed the video...

They barely if ever show losing hands…

To be fair, if we boiled it down to the simplest math equation (we’d need to go much more in depth for better results) 1. 16/34 combos of AK, villain folds. ($365)*(16/34)= +$171.76 2. 18/34 combos of QQ+, villain raises, we fold and lose all equity. (-$150)*(18/34)= -$79.41 Added together this yields a positive outcome. However, of course there are other variables such as opponent calls with AK, or just flat calls with QQ+ giving us a chance to realize our equity, or other opponents entering the flop.

Donking into 4 way 3-bet pot pretty mathematically unsound idk. SB, UTG can easily have 88, 22, 55 , AXclubs. You’re running math against 1 player that stayed in instead of the board and ranges

@@BrantzenPoker AK isn’t folding that flop

​@@BrantzenPoker or.....he raises you with air and you fold🤷

@@BrantzenPoker Your second scenario falls apart because he he HAD aces and DIDN’T raise. Therefore, you’re more liable to lose more money with your overpair on later streets, lowering your EV significantly.

Yeah - maybe I should’ve picked a size of 900-1k

@@BrantzenPoker higher than that. You put him on 3 overs or AK. AK isn’t calling any of it, the overs aren’t folding to maybe any bet.

**loses

Check jam is the play on the turn.

@@BrantzenPoker yeah check jam turn or lead jam the river .... that near min raise check raise is just so strong and way under-bluffed... for that reason I actually use it as a bluff a decent amount, but its folded to me the vast majority of time. Actually weakest looking option is by far just leading the turn, check raising spooks people.

Wow - that’s amazing. I’m so happy I can help you relive the memories ❤️

Its part of poker. Terrible bet on the flop, terrible not shoving on the turn, terrible bet on the river.

The only mistake? Lol.

Mans said only 😂😂​@@juanantonio3487

😐 he didn’t hit a single ace he should’ve folded sooner

why y’all so mad? poker involves a lot of luck 😂 also he had a over pair on the flop

He was probably playing to tight.....Tight players rarely win big pots

Thanks for all the analysis - I think you’re pretty spot on

You're gonna fold a pair instead of calling for less than 4% of your stack? 😂 Ooook

Yeah my flop donks are really only in multi-way pots. Heads up I have almost no donk spots, but in multi-way, flops will often check through as players are forced to play more face up. So I might choose to donk if I think I likely have the best hand but it’s extremely vulnerable

For example: top pair or an overpair on a low board

@@BrantzenPoker SO sets would still be in the C/R line what about draws? what I'm curious about is do you have to balance these spots at your level and at $2/5. I can see some overs with Gutshot and flush redraw as a possible candidate, if your opponent has history with you isn't he just printing money by calling and jamming turn?

If you thought he would have ended up with any card combos that could be a straight by the way he played that, you have zero clue about poker.😂

Always the wannabe poker expert that will write a few paragraphs about how he would have played it better now that he sees the outcome 😂