Тёмный
No video :(

How to Prepare Your Music for Streaming Platforms in 2023 

iZotope, Inc.
Подписаться 236 тыс.
Просмотров 18 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

24 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 39   
@MartyMcFlyTop1
@MartyMcFlyTop1 Год назад
Thank you,this is really useful
@johnnyvegas2015
@johnnyvegas2015 Год назад
Great tips...thanks so much
@OfficialStevenCravis
@OfficialStevenCravis 11 месяцев назад
Sam, I appreciate your explanations!
@smoakestudios7610
@smoakestudios7610 Год назад
-14 not a go idea unless your going to make multiple mastered copies for different platforms. Streaming platforms are going to compress you music regardless …play a -14 LUF song in a club 👀 it will not come close to the rest of the tracks.
@seen524
@seen524 6 месяцев назад
100% agree
@mystikrebel1089
@mystikrebel1089 Год назад
Good time for this to turn up as im getting closer for doing releases soon
@TheCelestineProph
@TheCelestineProph Месяц назад
Hello. Very informative video. Thank You. Q; If one was to use Streamliner to see the LUFS on the different streaming platforms what target would one use to send their mix to Distrokid? Distrokid will distribute to multiple streamlining platforms and you can't send multiple tracks with different LUFs settings through Distrokid, you have to choose one setting and go with that. What setting/ target LUFs do you recommend? Cheers!!.
@user-ob9zo9cr4c
@user-ob9zo9cr4c Год назад
best timing..
@LYSHEmusic
@LYSHEmusic Год назад
It doesn’t make much sense to compromise sound for it to sound better on mobile with a poor internet connection. And I wish one day such big companies as iZotope and others (maybe some labels too) will talk to streaming services to stop this nonsense and to leave 320kbps as lowest possible quality (if I remember correctly RU-vid streams at 256kbps as highest quality). In the days when people stream 4K video online... The same with sample rate on RU-vid - who works at 44,1khz this days? Why after so much work our audio SHOULD be converted to 44,1? At least 48 would have much more sense - many people work at 48 and all Apple devices work at 48, so they convert it back when you listen something on RU-vid. It is pretty frustrating to me, to be honest.
@stevenleonmusic
@stevenleonmusic Год назад
I don't even know what he's talking about because Spotify does not default to 96 Kbps, at least not on a paid account. 96 Kbps sounds obviously horrid even to an untrained ear; they're streaming at 128 Kbps minimum most of the time or nobody would even be able to tolerate the sound.
@ThomasHerbert-tf1yn
@ThomasHerbert-tf1yn 10 месяцев назад
sehr gut
@thaexception3406
@thaexception3406 Год назад
Comprehensive
@NickLAnderson
@NickLAnderson Год назад
🙏🏼
@Juan_lauda
@Juan_lauda 3 месяца назад
Prepare your music for streaming services by acoustically treating your room so you actually know what you’re listening to
@djmad
@djmad Год назад
Great vid
@briancomstock7741
@briancomstock7741 5 месяцев назад
CD?
@user-pv2jy4yn7f
@user-pv2jy4yn7f Год назад
Great now we have to cater specifically to the Swedish Pimp Meister l don’t think so!
@YungstarProd
@YungstarProd 11 месяцев назад
…?
@thecommunitykidsclub2415
@thecommunitykidsclub2415 Год назад
Why did you not D ess your voice?
@jajajajaja152
@jajajajaja152 Год назад
Immediately wish he did 🤣
@Isdale
@Isdale Год назад
Ignore this -14lufs, true peak BS, just reference your tracks against others that sound how you like.
@chasphotography
@chasphotography Год назад
Your formula is obviously tried and true. However it's 2023 and the formulas you use should be combined with these since streaming didn't exist when the formulas you use were created for analog delivery. Digital brings new approaches. Tis best to not ignore any information and instead of being locked into one formula but use them all with the desire to achieve ones own signature sound . Which is the difference in a true artist and a technical renderer
@smoakestudios7610
@smoakestudios7610 Год назад
Exactly so much misinformation give the full context of why not just the some
@stevenleonmusic
@stevenleonmusic Год назад
Just don't use "Sex and Candy" by Marcy Playground because, for whatever reason, that track was mastered horribly and clips like crazy even in a decent stereo system.
@stevedoesnt
@stevedoesnt Год назад
Wow you cracked mastering!
@victorfranco3866
@victorfranco3866 8 месяцев назад
I'm with awal sony dude keep talking through the sky you have nothing compared to my music l😂
@kevinyounkins214
@kevinyounkins214 11 месяцев назад
DON'T MASTER TO -14 LUFS
@OfficialStevenCravis
@OfficialStevenCravis 11 месяцев назад
Kevin, tell me more! (reasons, suggestions for another LUFS etc) Thank you
@mylittleheartscar
@mylittleheartscar Год назад
You forgor the AI uprising !
@rkzarchive
@rkzarchive Год назад
what’s that?
@mylittleheartscar
@mylittleheartscar Год назад
@@rkzarchive There's some new innovations in AI and audio and Izotope has even made some advancements them selves. I look forward to seeing how this changes audio engineering and the composition of music for 2024 and forward ;D
@Dragndroprecords
@Dragndroprecords Год назад
Looks like a high pass would help you hit your target of -14 lufs!
@the95s
@the95s Год назад
-14 should not be your target only a baseline for the audio is normalized at and almost every professional mastering engineer will never recommend master at -14
@TangleWireTube
@TangleWireTube Год назад
@@the95sI’ve been going between 12 and 10 LUFS. Seems to be the right fit. Getting closer to 8 kills all my transients and starts to sound crushed, and sometimes introduces unwanted pumping.
@stevenleonmusic
@stevenleonmusic Год назад
@@TangleWireTube The pumping is probably more related to the attack/release of the limiter or compressor and the balance of frequencies. You can have a -7 LUFS track that has no pumping but you're going to probably have to do some surgical EQ and really carefully balance your kicks and snares with the other instruments before you compress or limit.
@TangleWireTube
@TangleWireTube Год назад
@@stevenleonmusic Fully agree that it's possible to achieve (and can be achieved without pumping), just saying I've found it to be a useless pursuit for what I'm doing that often will result in diminishing returns. If you're mixing music that is hitting you with a full wall of sound and really taking up full use of space in all frequency ranges -7 might makes sense. I'm making mixing music that is a lot like J Dilla's Requiem instrumental. Where the drums are the lead instrument, super front and centre, sharp, punchy, and dry. Everything else is tucked so far back in the mix to keep full attention on the drums. Trying to get that into a -7 zone would change the entire vibe of the music, so -7, for what I'm doing, isn't my goal. :)
@the95s
@the95s Год назад
-10 is a good level for a full mix. We have mastered things up to -7 with little pumping for a denser mix but it all depends on preference most commercial tracks are around -7 still @@TangleWireTube
Далее
How to Mix If You're Not a Mix Engineer
32:59
Просмотров 331 тыс.
Mixing Low End: The Ultimate Guide for Balanced Bass
34:01
3 Ways To Mix A Vocal (Easy To Hard)
31:40
Просмотров 12 тыс.
9 Ways the Pros Get Wider Mixes
33:34
Просмотров 92 тыс.