You’re not just some guy with a RU-vid channel… you are a scholar-practitioner! Your viewpoints are immediately relevant, and greatly appreciated. Thank you!
For reading research papers, the most helpful thing I was *ever* recommended was the "three-pass approach" in a 2 page paper called "How to Read a Paper" by S. Keshav (2013). A brilliant friend and scholar suggested it, and I always point people to it when starting off reading scholarly work. Now, this video will be another thing I point people towards. 👍 Artem's examples of the different motivations are helpful for showing that the reading order need not be consistent and can be adjusted based on the specific context. Keshav's approach has a slightly different order than Artem's, but the spirit of the 1st pass is the same. Something that Keshav suggests is that at "the end of the first pass, you should be able to answer the _five Cs_ : 1. _Category_ : What type of paper is this? A measurement paper? An analysis of an existing system? A description of a research prototype? 2. _Context_ : Which other papers is it related to? Which theoretical bases were used to analyze the problem? 3. _Correctness_ : Do the assumptions appear to be valid? 4. _Contributions_ : What are the paper's main contributions? 5. _Clarity_ : Is the paper well written?" Keshav uses this info to decide if reading further is warranted or not, and then provides some advice for writing papers. Of course, being flexible with Keshav's (or Artem's) heuristic is probably best. In any case, both Keshav's paper and Artem's video deserve to become Anki cards and core Zettels in a Zettelkasten Obsidian vault :) Happy reading! 📖🐰🕳
Artem, you are one of the most underrated channels out here.Keep up the good work! And of course I would be delighted to watch a video on your postprocessing procedures.
I would love to see a video on your method for processing a research paper (using the second brain in Obsidian). Please include how to integrate references with zotero!
I would love to see a video about actually processing the paper, like you said, reading and processing are different things! Thanks for the awesome insights 😊
Great video! A post-processing video would certainly be helpful! I think many grad students are expected to have learned many of these techniques by osmosis, perhaps even as an undergrad, but the truth is that many students are just never exposed to a mentor willing to take the time to share their academic learning strategies. Fortunately, this video can stand in for that gap in mentorship to a large degree! Keep doing what you are doing.
This is so true! It’s always so odd to me that we’re surrounded by teachers and academics and so rarely do they teach us how to be successful and succeed in these types of areas.
I originally came to the channel for the research on the use of the Zettelkasten method but I have returned for the exceptional content. Thank you sincerely for sharing.
Talent and pattern. You seem like another version of my own adventure, same sequence of research. Soon you'll meet the other end. The chain of reactions. Emotions. Destiny
Hrm. I recently graduated highschool but I’m quite good at computer science and had to consult a few papers for a research project I was working on with a local University. Your insights are very accurate and It’s mostly exactly what I taught myself the painful way, wish I had seen this earlier !
@@007hansen fortunately I only had a few papers and a single youtube video to work with. There wasnt a whole lot of looking things up because of the lack of material so I didn’t have to filter any papers out from the beginning onwards. Workflow was pretty much figure out mathematical model > implement > figure out weaknesses > improve > implement mathematically > implement in code There wasnt a whole lot of research involved other than what model to choose and even that I only really had that one option lol
I've always had some difficulty reading papers even when I feel it might be useful for what am looking for. I've definitely fall under the category of 'reading the paper as a book', so come upon this new method is really useful, I'll be sure to try it out. Thanks for sharing it!
Brother the future of technology may be highly interlinked with brain machine interfaces. I would suggest you to generate content about this topic and expose people on to the subject and offer some recommendations and guidance. It seems like we may need more people understanding this domain.
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 📚 *How to approach reading a research article* - Importance of approaching research papers differently from popular books or blog posts - Reading the abstract to get the main gist of the paper - Understanding the different parts of a research paper: introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references 05:00 📝 *Reading order and approach for research papers* - Reading the abstract and skimming the discussion and conclusions to determine interest - Skimming the main part to get a rough structure of the paper - Reading sections of interest more thoroughly, paying attention to results and section introductions 08:59 🟡 *Importance of highlighting and post-processing* - Using highlighting colors to categorize information (e.g., background, assumptions, results, methodology, interesting facts) - Post-processing techniques such as creating mind maps, transferring ideas to a second brain, or creating flashcards - Separating the process of reading a paper and processing the information for better comprehension Made with HARPA AI
So, a paper is more like a collections of various kinds of bits of information, rather than a bit of information or a collection of very specific kinds of bits of information?
Show your work Arthem! Please do not underestimate yourself. You even follow obsidian discord. PLZ. You are making videos about second brain %99 of people don't know what is it about. I wish you a great luck and Allah (god) bless you sir! Having information is not valuable itself. Producing something out of it is valuable. Soo keep sharing everything you learn, a lot of people will get interested. Please do not underestimate thousands of people. Even millions of subs might be nothing but 2-3 guys can change the world essentially.
that was a good video, but it didn't clear the picture for me entirely. you see my problem is not that i don't know where to look at in a paper. my problem is that i'm just so not used to all these mathy descriptions. i'd love to have some sort of guide that translates certain math terms to how that would look like in some programming language like c++. for example sums could be loops where some variable gets added some other term on it each iteration. when i realized that these things are the same thing i was so mad, because sums look so weird. and i think maybe there are even more math things that i coudl already understand if someone finally showed me the code equivalent
Are your voice and image generated by AI? I ask because your gestures and expressions seem almost too good. If you are a real person, then the quality of your presentations are a result of a great deal of practice. You must have given many, many hours to rehearsal.