How to Ruin Watchmen 

Thnx

You need to get another sexxxxxxdoll sponsorship.

Secksdoll sponsorship??

Make a video on the watchmen tv show. I felt like the messaging was so muddled I need help unraveling it

nah

Batman's "edginess" in Batman v Superman clearly went way over his head.

Dude, Homelander IS America! Without him, how would we ever hope to combat the super terrorists?! I will also have you know that the seven is highly inclusive! Did you know that three of them are female now? Plus Starlight is just pretty hot you know. My favorite was the Deep, the dude really inspired me, but I haven't seen him in any press recently. It's a shame, my little brother is a swimmer and really looked up to him. We got his autograph once. The little dude models his whole life after him. I caught him trying to talk to his goldfish just yesterday. God bless The Seven. God bless America. RIP Translucent. May you never truly vanish.

Having read The Boys when it was originally releasing was a guilty pleasure but also fascination for how it could only be more edgy and lack substance more and more the story went on. Perhaps one of the worst things I've had the pleasure of experiencing in the medium.

The mixture of grounded realism with superhero elements is a lot more fascinating.

@@Unquestionable there’s actually a lot of substance in the boys. You just clearly misunderstood it

@Kevineitor yes

Lol

I think he also said that if he was the writer of The Dark Knight Rises he would have put a scene of Bruce being raped in prison.

He really said that?

@@abuamaanpal Zack Snyder wishes he was Todd McFarlane.

That.. Is the most accurate description of Rorschach ever!

No you are a retard if you like a fascist. You can say he is a good written character but he is not a good person you psycho 😂

From experience I get to know the other side of Rorschach fans, I met several guys who have this type of mentality that they are bad but they are trying to be good so they deserve some type of reward, despite the fact that they are not trying to be better, they think they are but they don't change their actions if you ask them nor try to think about themselves if is not victimisation, they have fantasies of fighting crime because criminals are suppossed to be the worst type of person, someone even lower than the insecure, petty and horrible person they are. Not every Rorschach fan is like that of course, I do know cool people that like him, also I don't really agree with the video that if you want Rorschach merch you're inherantly dumb about the subject, some people just like the iconographic of the character because he is kinda cool visual wise, same with people who have military miniatures, just because they have them doesn't mean they are ignorant or are pro-war or something.

Eh I’d argue the movie tries to make him seem really cool and bad ass

​@zabeerfarid7687 it does, cuz Snyder and the writers didnt understand the character. But he talkin bout the comic

YESSSS

Rorschach: "I'm nutty!"

OMG...as a HUUUUGE fan of all things Watchmen, this was off my radar. EGADS! Thanks Plague for the heads up.

Fun fact: that's still the one adaptation of his work Alan Moore likes

@@IfIHadMyTimeAgain HA! even better!!

"Joker's back in Arkham, huh? What did he do this time?" "Gave Avengers: Endgame a 6/10."

What you dont like the newest Barbie movie, no problem you can think it again on Arkham boy

Zack Snyder's Batman definitely does that.

@@bibbitibob I'd actually assume that he rated it too HIGH in that case, because...well, you know, DC v. Marvel.

Bibbitibob THAT IS 100% SOMETHING THE JOKER WOULD DO JUST TO PISS OFF BATMAN

What was it like meeting other fans?

oof

slayertakim1 probably stinky from all the canned beans they eat

Yeeeah i really wanna cosplay him cause it looks fun but I'm worried for the butthurt semi nazis 😬

I thought Rorschach was cool when I was a kid but now that I know and understand his character I hate him. Still looks cool though lol. He’s insane. Sees the world in black and white and if ur in the black u deserve to die. But he’s a hypocrite because he picks and chooses. He doesn’t even follow his own code.

It's like a teenager holding a piece of candy above their kid sibling's head and laughing as the kid keep jumping trying to grab it.

Batman doesn't get shit

I bust out laughing when I watched it, it's genuinely such a funny line

"Die Bitchboy" - Dr. Manhattan

Ask any woman--six inches can mean a big difference!😊

What’s the time on that

@@mcbrodz1663 31:36

The problem is that it props Superman up further at the expense of completely destroying the point of Dr. Manhattan. They're reducing Watchmen to yet another fun lil comic.

​@jack thursby It undermines and devalues Watchmen by totally forgetting the point of it. It can be interesting in regards to typical comic affairs, but it's far from what it was meant to be.

YEs I don’t believe it undermines it at all. If anything it’s the answer to the questions Watchmen leaves you with. The points Watchmen makes are unsustainable - as seen in the deterioration of its own world. Don’t misunderstand what I’m saying; Watchmen is deep, philosophical, and I believe, Perfect. However, it can be frustrating when people take its word for the only objective truth. Its not. In fact, I’d go as far as to say that it’s far from it. Not to say it’s wrong, but more that it’s a piece of a larger picture. I believe the primary error with this video, and in how people view Doomsday Clock, is how people forget the values these heroes are supposed to represent. People tend to see the Watchmen characters as the only ones with any philosophical value, and that’s just plain wrong. Another issue I hold with this video, is that he seems to forget the lessons learned by some of the characters in Watchmen. A few of them didn’t remain static. They grew. I was forgetting two main points when I said Watchmen’s meanings were unsustainable. Those points: Dan and Laurie, and Dr.Manhattan. Dan and Laurie’s choice to hold on to the things that matter to them -primarily each other- in an uncertain world is quite meaningful. And Manhattan’s restored value in people and the world at large is even more so. So, to say they changed Manhattan to a “DC” hero is almost ridiculous to me. They took him from where he left off and expanded on it. Doomsday Clock is actually an amazing arc for both Dr. Manhattan and Superman. Manhattan acting as the representative for the ambiguity of Watchmen, while Superman represents the hope and meaning a hero should represent. With the world being full of deconstructions, and the horrible “gritty” perspective of the likes of Zack Snyder; I cant help but appreciate the “old fashioned” stance of Doomsday Clock in showing the value of what these characters should represent. I’m not saying it’s perfect. It’s not. But I do believe it’s pretty damn good. I understand if people aren’t too crazy about the point of Watchmen being sort of “corrected” or “answered” by Doomsday Clock. However, moral ambiguities and muddied waters only get you so far. And in the end, moral values and objective truths have to be strived for if we hope to achieve anything. THAT is the point of Doomsday Clock. That is what it offers society. That is Superman. Anyways. Sorry for the book, man. Lol you don’t like it, that’s cool. to each their own.

@@YEs69th420 Whats the point of it then? To feel superior in your imagined nihilism?

@@leysonmose To provide a satirical lens for the superhero genre of comics, taking its tropes and trends to their logical conclusions in order to critique the unintended consequences of these ideas. It's not nihilism, and I am not nihilistic; don't assume, it's rude. Why, what did you think it's about?

Being the Garf-Czar wasn't enough for him!

This is the day we've been waiting for boys. Proud of y'all 😢

When he said he had a special guest I was going 'please be Linkara, please be Linkara' because I was going to enjoy guessing whether Linkara had seen Quentin's video about his movie or not.

THE LIGHT BRINGER

It was bound to happen someday

I'm surprised this dude didn't like Zach Snyder's take on watchmen.. that movie was a visual masterpiece and it asks very complicated questions about what happens to superheroes when given the power how they lose thier humanity.. it was made too early

@@Kevinselasie that’s the thing, what you described isn’t “Snyder’s take on watchmen”, it’s the entire point of watchmen period. Everything Snyder changed about watchmen when adapting it to the movie only server to water down that message, case in point the removal of aspect’s of Rorschach’s character to make him seem less evil and more of an “edgy badass”

@@Kevinselasie The only thing Snyder did wrong in that movie was make Ozzymandias a bad guy with little gray nuance. Rorschach is alright. If they could’ve made him less likeable and more bean eating scum then the ending would’ve been more powerful than it already was. It’s powerful that the most insane one in the group tries to tell the people of what really happened to new York. It was better than the comic imo(the ending) has Nite-Owl present for Rorschach’s death and the acting is impeccable. One last thing: Manhattan leaving the lie of him causing the explosions in New York undiscovered makes him better too

​@@hydrocritical2268 the squid is infinitely better

​@@Kevinselasieas a fan of the movie the cool action music and the fight scene serve to skewer the message, these guys dont get to have badass action scenes because watchmen also raises the question if superheroes belong in our society, the comic spends a lot of the time world building giving side characters some spotlight showing us how they are just guys playing dress up with lives and how manhattan is a game changer, in the end he has to make the conscious decision to leave or to not, in snyders version he just has to dip cuz he is public enemy

Yep. And when the show came out and portrayed Rorschach as the lunatic he was: People got mad. If the movie never came out, the reception of the show would’ve been waaay better

I think the movie obfuscated the character with the actor. Loved the portrayal of the character Rorshach, the actor who played him did an amazing job. The flaw in the movie was to make the character likable. As if he sacrificed himself for the greater good of exposing the truth. The whole point of Rorschach's death wasn't one of martyrdom, it was to expose the truth regardless of the outcome. Even if it meant ending world peace. The ambiguous morality of that moment and the subsequent epilogue of sending his journal to the press is a satirical commentary on how history can rewrite a garbage person into a hero. The movie left that open for interpretation as well as the book and it was up to the reader/viewer to decide what is that morality. Alan Moore was quoted as saying that his book wasn't adaptable for film. The tv series proves that he was right in ways that even Alan couldn't forsee.

Not very big differences between the two, except comic Rorschach is even more of a degenerate

​@@mr.random8638yeah I remember watching a review that was surprised they portrayed him that way in the show.

Technically his dad is still alive but he’s evil

@Mikhail G Alfred actually just died in the comics 💀

@Mikhail G my bad 😅

Even some violence can be found there.

i like this comment but i wont like this comment because it has 69 likes

And you could always make it violent but only certain people will like it

and he even can use the slowmotion! \^^/

Dark and grim superheroes are awesome DC rebirth is trash for being a superhero reconstruction

Dude Grant Morrison never said anything about disliking superheros like in all of his superhero stuff its very obvious he loves these characters.

Alan Moore loves superheroes, he just hates that he does

Man even a hypocritical hack like Garth Ennis likes Superman. That's when you know he's timeless.

@@concept5631 Garth Ennis can't write sincere superheroes for shit, because he hates them - except Superman. He can write a really good Superman, because _somehow_ he likes and gets Superman. It's weird.

@@KillahMate What stories has he done for Superman?

Yeah he really would

I mean given that he is essentially evil Batman (and yes I know Rorschach is originally based on the Question, leave me alone), he could be used to reflect on Batman similar to villains like Owlman, Hush, Talon, or Thomas Wayne.

@@BostonMBrand whilst he looks like the question Moore said Rorschach is Batman in real life so you are right !!

@@LuisMartinez-rw2lj Rorschach's objectivist nature was based on Question, but his morals (or lack thereof), insanity and "this city is afraid of me" is basically a parody of Batman

@@BostonMBrand Also, he'd be similar to a more cynical Anarky.

When the only thing we're taught in school related to literary analysis is being made to write a four page expository essay on To Kill A Mockingbird, it's not surprising a majority of people can't comprehend writing outside of the rigid formula that's been pounded into their heads.

Yeah, thinking on villain protagonist stories i very often see people fully straight faced defending the protagonists actions and their reasoning, ignoring any number of reprehensible actions, and i think this is especially easy when things escalate, the story is in first person and you see the protagonists reasoning, and reading a story all at once instead of reflecting on where the story is going, compounded by a seeming complete unwillingness to applya ny sort of critical thought into the protagonists actions and you have people nodding along when the protagonists is killing babies 600 pages in or something.

I agree entirely.

I think that idea is so annoying. I mean, I can't tell you how often I hear "Protagonist is unlikable/not a good person" as a criticism, ignoring so much about the meat of the story. Character arcs mean more than just "hero is bad, then becomes good." Some of the most interesting stories are about protagonists that aren't good people. The Godfather, Goodfellas, Drive, Snowpiercer, The Watchmen (duh), all these stories are about flawed people that either end up in a worse point than they started, or never really get better. At best, they're about atonement, at worst, they're about a decent into madness. Despite that, the idea that a protagonist, especially a "hero," like those in Watchmen, could be considered anything but a hero is inconceivable. It's part of the reason I think people *[SPOILERS FOR THE LAST OF US 2 AHEAD]* got so angry when Joel was killed. Ignoring all the value judgements about the quality of its writing, people were so angry over the idea that Joel was killed, despite the fact that basically the entire story of the first game was about how Joel was a shitty person who deserved death, or if not you don't believe he deserved it, then at the very least, it was the only logical conclusion to his story because he was a broken, bitter man that murdered countless people and ultimately lied to his adoptive daughter about the outcome of everyone she'd ever known because he couldn't bear the trauma. *[SPOILERS OVER]* Tl;dr The term "protagonist" doesn't necessarily mean "hero of the story," it just means the main character. However, so much of our media is inundated with stories of heroes that I think a lot of people forgot how to consider that a story doesn't have to tell us about a hero, it can tell us about a human. Edit: I should also make it clear that I don't blame audiences for this mentality, I blame the corporations for feeding us the "Ubermensch" ideal power fantasy, i.e. the logical conclusion to the "good guy with a gun" argument that's been trotted out a million times over. I don't even blame writers, necessarily, as those are just individual people who grew up in the same society that inundated them with the exact same mindset. I blame the people at the top who decide what we like and what we want to see, where every story told has to be one where they're the ultimate victors. You have a nice self-contained story about the rich elite using their power to do whatever it takes to make themselves even richer? Well, obviously the ending has to be about how those were just the evil capitalists whose power is ultimately usurped the good capitalist that will do the good thing. Its neoliberal garbage.

Walter White.

I don't think that's a problem. I think a superhero property by people who hate superheroes is way more interesting than any actual unironic sueperhero property. The problem is getting a good writer who hates comics rather than Snyder who can't write for shit.

@@danielyoung6778 that his movies were terrible and pften missed their chraters motivations and core valjues kinda proves you wrong

@@jasonjacksn I agreed with you that Snyder is a terrible writer in my comment. The man hasnever made a good film imo. Im saying a superhero film by a great writer disgusted by superheroes would be the only reason to have any excitement for one to me.

@@danielyoung6778 that would make for a good original story. In fact has created some good original stories. Not if you're doing an adaptation though.

@@danielyoung6778 in fact the biggest issue withcomic movis during the 90s and video game movies today is the lack of respect for the medium. Resulting in adaptations that both alienate existing fans and fails to attract new ones.

LMAO I was waiting for it too!!

It's been a while since I've read the book but I think it does cover that stuff.

God that sounds like fun

He definitely should've talked about those comics instead of Doomsday Clock.

Only Minutemen had anything of value.

@@deadpool630 yeah I genuinely liked minutemen and think that it is a decent addition to the Watchmen story. Everything else on the other hand is not too good from what I remember.

​@@gageansman295Dollar Bill was fun

his design is a naked blue man with a dot on his head, and the writting is "i dont care about anything, so i will only move a finger to comit atrocities, even thought i could fix a lot of the problems in the world at least for the people living in the moment" i like the story but manhatan is the last character i would have any merchandising

I like to think of it like this. Joker, Rorschach and Manhattan are interesting characters. But if someone says that any of them are their favourite character/s, you back away slowly.

I'm sorry, but DOCTOR Manhattan didn't go to medical school for six years just so you could call him Mr. Manhattan.

@@ROBERTJOHNSON020 That was a lot funnier than it should have been.

@@rileydavidson180 saying a morality bad character is your favourite isn’t concerning it’s when someone Denies that they are bad

He's hanging out with Dr. Manhattan on his glass superstructure out there.

Hes hanging out with Elon Musk in the internet historianverse

@@dildonius where do you think glasses.usa got their glass...es?

i wonder if the writers understand this on some level and use it as a strategy to sell to both sides?

To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Rick and Morty. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. There's also Rick's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation - his personal philosophy draws heavily fromNarodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realize that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a consequence people who dislike Rick and Morty truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in Rick's existencial catchphrase "Wubba Lubba Dub Dub," which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as Dan Harmon's genius unfolds itself on their television screens. What fools... how I pity them. 😂 And yes by the way, I DO have a Rick and Morty tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- And even they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand.

@@SuperOssumPossum I think this is my new favorite copypasta.

I’ve been coming to a conclusion that most people’s personalities are wired in a way where they don’t understand subtleties until it’s either explained to them or they’re just THAT dense and that’s been the reason why so many people often misinterpret media to the point where it’s had very negative consequences on culture or even the world. I mean yeah it’s an admittedly judgmental conclusion that is pretty generalizing. If not most people’s personalities that are like this it’s at least a certain amount of the world’s population whose personalities have them Stan fictional far righters without any self awareness of who said character was meant to be a metaphor for.

@@Raggedyfink nah, 90% of the population are morons that never question anything and aren't the slightest bit interested in understanding things on more than the most basic level. Anti-intellectualism is a real problem in America, and prob most of the world.

On the one hand, one will show me his literal magic cave. On the other hand, free pony. Who do I root for?

No, they should get married and both get to be our anarchist grandpa.

Yeah the quote from him in this is pretty horrible. Why do men like casually referencing other men getting raped, especially in prison?

I don't believe there's a respected critic alive who thinks he's any sort of genius.

This is my first time actually hearing a quote of his. I never considered him any kind of genius, but i do/did enjoy some of his movies in a dumb, mindless kind of way. But damn. That quote just gave me a sad, new perspective. Suddenly everything makes a lot more sense now!

Zack is so alike his fans it's truly amazing. One of us! One of us!

Dude, you're not even a regular genius.

Wait, wasn't that the point of Batman vs. Superman, though? Because it, um, succeeded.

@@dinosaysrawr not really as much as Warner bros wouldve hoped and it turned everyone off of justice league

@@lingy69 , oh, I meant it was successful at raping Batman, Superman, and other beloved DC characters, if that was Snyder's objective. :D

Well... he didn't actually have Batman raped in prison, right? 🙂

Well at least It didn't happen in the movies right guys?

@@spiderjerusalem4009 So The Boys boils down to "Corporate-sponsored superheroes are EEEEEEEEVIIIIIIILLLLLLLLL!!!!! Brought to you by: Amazon."

@@louisduarte8763 yes that’s the show and the comic. mostly just ignore this verse and enjoy watchmen

Every now ant then I want to watch The Boys but then I remember that I've heard about the gill scene

​@@louisduarte8763 Corporations run everything, so that's unavoidable. It's ironic for sure, but what can you do? You can create art that's critical of corporations but that only way to get funding and a platform is through them. Even crowdfunding sites are owned by corporations that take a cut of the donations. It's basically in the same vein of critiquing the fossil fuel industry while owning a car.

@@louisduarte8763 "You criticize society, yet you live in it? Most curious." That's what you sound like.

Yeah. I'd say this about Doomsday Clock: its a pretty good Superman story. Its not a very good Watchman sequel.

At least when the first two issues came out the way I heard people in the comic sphere talk about it was it was to continue with the DC Rebirth movement and bring back the Justice Society of America which does have a bit of a fanbase from bronze age comic fans as well as the writer of the Doomsday Clock who made a short but fairly popular comic series involving them in the 2000s.

@@U1TR4F0RCE yeah but due to the amount of delays doomsday clock had they ended up coming back first in a random issue of justice league.

@@Ultimataco That was part of why I said at first. I really wonder if things would have worked better if there was someone in charge to try and make sure Gary Frank and Geoff Johns stick to a schedule.

It’s a pretty terrible watchmen sequel, sacrifices everything that made them interesting and was badly written

Well, I was in thereapy. But my doctor gave me a referral and a restraining order after I broke into his house and ate his food.

I think it's more bc they only know the movie

@@TextosyGraficos agreed

Some people, despite thousands of years of philosophical teachings, still really cannot comprehend the idea of separating fiction from reality.

Idk, people here acknowledge that the characters in watchmen are complex, but also try to remove rorschach's complexity in order to "own" the rorschach fans. Yes, hes hateful. Yes, he enjoys killing criminals. Yes he doesnt shower. Yes, he breaks into peoples homes and eats their beans. But hes also one of the only characters in the story who wouldn't compromise. When superheroes were told to unmask and retire, he refused. When Veidts plan finished and everyone was prepared to let it all go to keep the lie, Rorschach refused. Even when a god like being was prepared to kill him, he refused. His black-and-white, objectivist view of the world (at least how Alan Moore interpreted it) also made for interesting comparisons with the other characters of the book, even when there are a few instances of him looking the other way for certain individuals. In a sea of grey morality, a black-and-white moralist can be refreshing, as is true for the reverse. There are also brief moments where we see that Rorschach is capable of empathy and care. He was the only character that seemed to care that the comedian died, and when he thought other masks might be in trouble, he tried to warn them. And then there was the whole landlady scene where he lets her go when he sees her crying children. Hes certainly vicious and ruthless, but its abundantly clear in the comic that the world in which he lives is equally vicious and ruthless. He wasnt a superhero for the fun of it like most of the other characters, we actually see he had a horrible childhood and was surrounded by horrible people who did shitty things, and therefore he genuinely wanted "justice" (that is, his own twisted form of justice) Theres plenty of things in his character that at the very least make him interesting with a few redeeming qualities so I dont really care if people find him cool.

The snyder fanbase men , they are worst than the belivers

He's just one of those that never moved on.

He's pretty cool, he clearly loves his work and he always tries to make the fans happy.

@@gregoriomassa8529 You mean the same fanbase that has raised a lot of money for mental health charities?

@@gregoriomassa8529 Lol I am pretty sure snyder haters are alot more toxic than his fans, there is even a snyder hate page in fb where people are making rape jokes about his dead daughter

It’s like the least milked comic book series

Originally it was supposed to be a send off comic involving the Question and a few other Charlton Comics characters. You can see this when comparing Question, his worldview, and Steve Ditko’s perspective to Rorschach. DC wouldn’t let the writers use the characters, so the Watchmen were born.

Rorschach = The Question Dr. Manhattan = Captain Atom Nite Owl = Blue Beetle/Ted Kord

@@Givemepeacealone and it was STILL too much

Icba Luv What? It’s constantly getting special edition versions, definitive editions and so on. It got prequels and TWO sequels, and now it’s getting a spin-off and it’s elements have been added to the main comics canon. Fucking BATMAN AS DR. MANHATTAN is a thing now.

Yeah I think Quinton doesn't understand the determinism that Dr. Manhattan is aware of.

I’ve never read Watchman but he seems more a neutral yet destructive force a la other nuclear bomb substitutes in fiction like Godzilla

@@Dogy0909 I'm not sure I'd really call him either of those, though it's not unfair to. He's neutral in the sense that he recognizes the meaninglessness of human conflict when compared to the scale of other events in the universe, but he still takes sides -- at first as an apathetic tool of the government, and later, as a detached being with some ethical consideration of life. And of course, he's clearly destructive since that is how he was used by the government, but he never actually caused destruction outside of the wars he participated in.

DankWarMouse THATS a good analysis,Thank you! I really should read the comic especially if it’s so easy to get ahold of

@@Dogy0909 It's really phenomenal, I definitely recommend it!

Nice Black Freighter reference. ; )

Isn't that just his relationship with nite owl lmao

Interesting is that in the all women are queens video, the if she breathes guy looks a lot like Quinton. To me anyway

低端辛吉德 I didnt know that phrase came from a video. Is it the Quartering? They look slightly similar

*duel of the fates begins*

I thought nightowl was supposed to batman.

Well DC had acquired those characters from Charlton and at the time DC had let a bunch of British writers go hog wild on do interpretations on some obscure characters, Alan Moore and Dave Gibbon's original pitch was going to use those characters, but... well most of them wouldn't be usuable so they had to make there own.

@@jonathaneilbeck2263 ah. i was lead to believe that the mainstream dc characters were the original pitch. thx

@@Sandra_aschenbach_doyle Yeah, some major DC characters were from rival companies that they later bought, like Shazam was once owned by a company named Fawcett or Plastic Man was originally owned by Quality.

@@jonathaneilbeck2263 Didn't know this but if fits really well given that most of Moores early career was just taking British characters in weird and subversive directions

Speaking of that when he said that I realized he had a figure of royshack behind him

Rorschach I couldn’t edit it

I had no idea he wanted to do Martian Manhunter, if he had the chance, the character would probably be completely different. At least he could do another green character, Swamp Thing, and he changed it for the better, but I'm really curious at how he would have handled Martian Manhunter.

Agreed. I don’t find Dr Manhattan a hero or someone to idolize but I would get a Manhattan plush. I also would of Hannibal too actually now that I think of it

Yeah, I own a glow in the dark Dr. Manhattan adult toy which I display on my night table, but that doesn't mean I support the ideals, or lack thereof, the character displays.

That's probably the norm for the average comic book fan, I think in this case Quinton is just referencing people where the nuance of the characters fly right over their head. i.e Unironic Joker worship via Joker merch, cosplay, and FB quotes

And furthermore, I completely disagree with what he said regarding "the fans don't get it" because he specifically stated the majority, which I think is just blatantly disingenuous. Granted he said "Most, not all" but that still implies that this is, in fact, the majority. Well think about it. He brought up Marvel/DC movies as an example so I think it's fair to apply it here. Do Marvel/DC fans misinterpret their respective franchises (for dc just count the nolan flicks + Shazam and Joker)? I would say absolutely not, because those movies stand on their own outside of the comics. A film should be able to do what it likes with the material as long as it UNDERSTANDS THE MATERIAL. The Dark Knight sure as hell isn't representative of the storyline it gets it from, but it's still a good movie. The fandom getting the point isn't the issue here, the issue is how the makers of the media interpret it, because that's going to A. Bring in new parts of the fandom And B. Give the impression of what that source material was like under the lense of a different medium. That's why Zach Snyder's movies sucked, not because "fandom dumb". Don't fault the way people think just because the media they got it from reinforces there ideas that the director had. Put quite simply, criticize the fandom for dumb shit they do, not because they enjoy a property and maaaaaybe don't want to think that much about it.

I found it disingenious as well, he likely talks about a small subsect of the fandom who unironically adores these characters as 'heroes', but the majority knows and understands they're crappy people. Watchmen became popular because people do like flawed heroes as much as they like idealistic heroes. A lot of people also love the Joker, but most people also know that he's a crappy person, and don't endorse his behaviour as something to look up to. I mean, Joker is one of my favourite DC characters, but in no way would I ever want him to exist in the real world. I don't look up to him, but I take delight in his nerfarious personality, because he is exactly a fictional character, and me liking the character is NOT a statement of my real world beliefs. Same with the Watchmen.

But then it's criticizing the wrong crowd. Watchmen never set out to claim that superhero comics should be pessimistic. It just created a demand for them that comic book publishing companies didn't understand, and decided that dark, edgy themes was what they needed everywhere now. That isn't Watchmen's fault.

@@writershard5065 yeah, from what I found out the dark age of comics was a result on Marvel trying to mimick what DC was doing at that time [Watchmen to the Long Halloween Continuity and the death of superman arc] by hiring complete hacks like Rob Liefeld and whoever made the transformers g2 comics, along side the new companies being directly responsible for comics crash by telling everyone that saving your comics can make you rich. DC back then was actually doing pretty well even if Frank Miller made DK2.

Sounds like you have a plushie of Dexter or Joker.

Yeah no , like off of design yes but he is still a obvious parody of bat man

@@googleacount3611 Nope.

He's both. Alan Moore started off Question and Mr A, but he has said in interviews that he thought of Rorsach as "If Batman was a real person, he'd be a nutjob".

GOOGLE ACOUNT he’s a parody of a version of Batman that was just recently introduced at the time

@@googleacount3611 It's all three. Most people don't even know Mr. A, but that's really the character Rorschach is based on. That character is all about objectivism and black/white morality. Batman doesn't have a black/white morality and if anyone believes so hasn't read enough Batman to know.

Money

Plata

The executives are the ones complaining, for more money. More!!

Because the VAST majority of living humans haven't read the comic book... Myself included. TV show was dope though!

He's the only one with actual superpowers. The others are just costumed vigilantes who know how to fight.

@@LauraGrrrr5370 True

Just like Superman in the Justice League

And yet he is powerless. Manhattan suffers from the determinism problem; in a purely rational, predictable universe, a sufficiently advanced intellect could predict everything that would ever happen, even below a subatomic level. For such a mind, their own motivations and the results of their actions would be equally obvious; they would know themselves well enough to predict their own behavior in every situation. This effectively means that the omniscient mind is a mere observer, a passive prisoner who can merely observe a universe who's form is singular, eternal and unchanging. This is Dr. Manhattan, and it's one of the most horrific fates I've ever seen put to print.

yeah thats the point

and people expect the man who allowed Batman to do this to make a better Justice League movie...

@@sarafontanini7051 and it was better.

@@eliaskouakou7051 yeah well, given the man's track record, didyou expect me to think otherwise? PLus it still had the issue of the Justice League being very....murdery.

@@sarafontanini7051 if you think batman doesn't kill you are clueless

@@belloutdoors5217 while there are POSSIBLY exceptions to the rule, that is depending on the writer, and by and large Batman REFUSES to take a life, as he does not want to be anything like the man who killed his parents. He is JUSTICE, he merely stops the schemes of criminals and helps the police. If Batman were to take a life it would haunt him, tarnish his name and ruin his standing with the people of Gotham, and thus he REFUSES to kill, even if it's someone like the Joker. Oh but, go on, tell me how I'm wrong, without using the movies as examples.

Which really makes me worry about people. Zack Snyder makes me movies that are so obviously looking up to superheroes and some of the most left wing or liberal someone has tried to make superheroes recently, and people don't notice that. Zack Snyder movies are the equivalent of someone writing down 1+1=2 and the response to it can be like people trying to tell us 2 is a stupid number.

​@@syafiqjabar I think Snyder just isn't as smart as his fans want everyone to believe. Shoving in garbage about leftism or liberals didn't add to your point at all and detracted from it.

B-but my sexist alt-right vigilante is based right? Right????!

I love Rorschach, but I think anyone who sees him as a "good guy" is messed up. He's meant to be single minded, stubborn, and literally autistic. I think people who deny the depth of the character are missing out on as much as those who think he's a "righteous badass".

@@JohnathanJWells depth don't justify a character. Being a shitty horrible psychopath isn't the opossite of complex.

@@JohnathanJWells How's he meant to be autistic?

Michael Moroney He could be. He has trouble with social cues and communicating with others in general.

A penny for your thoughts? This is a fertile ground for discussion.

Dr. Manhattan is my favorite cause he has cool powers too. I don't see the big deal with that.

ryne green isn’t the entire story of Dr Manhattan about how his power effects him?

ryne green I guess then you’re getting mad at him for something you assumed he meant which is stupid. He very well could have meant how it affects him since the powers of a character almost always inform their character. Superman is a great example but doctor Manhattan being able to see everything and being able to do virtually everything is a cool power and it’s interesting to see how it’s used

I mean I like Spider-Man cause he’s Cool. I love The Batman who Laughs cause he looks cool. No problem in liking something that’s Cool

Thank you for reminding me that exists.

Iafiv Iv that’s literally how Cena described Peacemaker whom he was based off

@Iafiv Iv yeah but my point still stands tho. like Rorschach is just with paint on he's make and a worse attitude.

@Iafiv Iv Rorschack is somewhat based on Batman but moreso based on Steve Ditko's Mr. A.

@Iafiv Iv If you read the Watchmen 19 suplementary material, they've actually created a fake psychological way of classifying different types of masked vigilantes. It is, of course, called the Wertham Spectrum.

@Iafiv Iv i think the funniest part is when that time that guy got his face deed fried.

This. Quinton missed so much of the subtext of DClock it's honestly upsetting. The story was always intended to be a meta-commnetary about the practices of tentpole superhero comics. But his talking points sound like they came from an article on AiPT or Newsarama or something. Just talking points that show me that he only bought the book, barely read it, and didn't bother ACTUALLY analyzing it.

@@deenydude7 Maybe but I could understand the point of view of going into Doomsday clock and expecting a Watchmen sequel as opposed to a Grant Morrison esc story. But it's super frustrating that he doesn't really go into depth or give context to why Doomsday clock was created

Well my reading is that Quinton isn't a comics guy, he just happened to like Watchmen. Reading that way makes it so that he can get Watchmen because he's seen Marvel movies but he won't get Doomsday Clock because he's not an avid DC comics reader.

TheRichandmighty I don’t even think you have to understand Dc continuity in order to get the message of Doomsday clock sure it helps and gives the story more nuance but you could still get it

Honestly, can we blame them? Imo the commentary was really poorly done, with even some other comics youtubers, such as Chris from Comic Tropes, not really liking the story.

*Looks at a framed picture of Jack Kirby*

I'm not sure that diatribe could have made you sound any more pretentious than your brief summary of it already did. Not sure if that's an achievement to be proud of, but hey.

@@captaincomic8678 honestly? that's fair

Idk man that sounds actually interesting. Also X-men has been doing the same thing for decades dummy

interesting perspective to associate conversion therapy for superhero rehabilitation center. The book always portrayed this as an insane asylum with the emphasis on split personality disorders. The entire satire of the book revolved around the Tick being an escaped mental patient and suggested that his adventures were in his head. But in reality, the reader couldn't tell if he was a super powered human or not. Authur being committed was more akin to concerns of losing his mind or having an addiction. If the newer tv show tried to angle this as conversion therapy, no wonder the series went nowhere.

Well, that’s because he didn’t need to try very hard in terms of direction. He just used the comics as a storyboard. Dave Gibbons and Alan Moore did all the work for him.

I agree about Watchmen, at least, but in retrospect, it feels like he just achieved that by just straight-up copying so much wholesale that he managed to get at least some of the point across without realizing it. Still feels like an overly simplified, less nuanced take on it, though. I mean, Rorschach's almost not an asshole anymore, for instance. Also, he lucked out in that the stuff he cut out didn't completely ruin the point either, though the above-mentioned white-washing of Rorschach, despite him being well-enough acted, cut it close. Also there's still a lot of little misunderstandings that bother me, and HERE THERE BE SPOILERS! Again to bring up Rorschach, in the original comics, in the flashback to his investigation of the kidnapped child, it's murdering the dogs who the kidnapper had fed the child to that caused Walter to snap. My own interpretation of it was always that he knew that the dogs were just trained to do their master's bidding, but at the same time, had played a role in the death of an innocent child, so he had to become a harder, uncompromising person to justify his cutting them up, and doing this took a permanent toll on his mental health. This was reflected by his lengthy monologue in the present to his prison shrink about it. Compared to that, killing the actual murderer goes rather smoothly. In the movie, the killing of the dogs is more or less glossed over, and the monologue about the dogs in the comic is instead given about his killing the murderer instead. I always felt the monologue made more sense for the dogs, primarily because killing the child murderer, even as brutally as he did, is simply a much less morally gray action than the dogs. It makes more sense for butchering the dogs to be this defining moment for him, that made him go from "I fight crime and stop criminals" to "I punish evil, lethally if I can" But yeah, even if the movie hits the right notes broadly, and is nice enough to look at, and the actors did the best they could with what they were given, I feel like little inconsistencies such as the one I over-described in the paragraph above drag it down a little, and show how the director and others involved with the movie did not truly understand the source material, however high their affection for it was.

Dude 300 is so fucking homophobic (even with the insane homoeroticism), ableist, racist, and fascist, and all those things are presented as badass.

Clay Because Frank Miller is the worst and Zach Snyder is similarly the worst.

Dunno about that, are statues not idolatrous?

Your argument is "What if i like it because it just looks cool" if you need something cool in your place just find something that is just cool and doesn't have the kind of meaning that you want to excuse yourself from.

@@clauhasavtuberaddiction3583 Ooh get em

Agreed. Maybe I have a statue of Marvel’s Carnage. Does that mean I condone hideous acts of violence? No. It just means I thought the character was cool and having a statue of it is a way of reminding me of the cool story arcs. Dr.M is a fascinating character and one of the most iconic characters in Watchmen and comics in general. Maybe you just want a cool statue of him since he was really well written and is synonymous with Watchmen. Doesn’t mean you agree with the fictional characters ideals. Just that you enjoyed his character and comic.

I feel buying a statute could be argued to be idolatry. Someone buying a Doctor Manhattan statute is Someone who knows a lot about them and wants an idol, another way of referring to a statute, of them.

Alan Moore even loved it ,and that's saying something .

@@thecrimsonghostakathefiend7508 No unless your talking about the Saturday morning cartoon

@@Metalbloodlord that's what i was talking about lmao

The Boys is fucking awesome

Because the boys's show doesn't follow its source material. The source material doesn’t seem to be as effective as the show at showing how evil corporate America could be using the superhero. Garth ennis tried so hard to make the readers hate superheroes but instead it was just constantly showing his hatred. The comic always came off as trying way too hard to be edgy and shocking, and it just had to shove down your throat so much shock value it got old really fast. The TV show is more layered, characters are more developed, the conflict is way more interest, and it actually has something similar to a narrative focus. The Seven are a surprisingly human bunch instead of being a bunch of one-dimensional awful people that are 100% awful with no redeeming qualities. I got honestly surprised at how the flipping Deep actually turned out to be a human with actual feelings. The Homelander doesn't act like an adult-sized baby and is actually someone who knows what the hell he's doing and is a threat outside of the realm of his flying brick-ness. Starlight and Hughie are both more well-rounded and active characters overall, and grow out just having everyone dump on their faces for I-don't-know-how-many-issues. Butcher too, is less of an asshole and more of a sympathetic jerk (in the good sense). Overall, just a much improved version of the story with good characters that actually capitalizes on its premise. and also Certain things like The Boys not having powers from the start, the elimination of the dog as Butcher's sidekick, Homelander being more stupid than a wet coast while in the show, he's been written way better, the changes to Homelander's character to make him more sympathetic (and to be honest there is a lot more ambiguity shown between the actions of Butcher & Homelander which if done well could be really great), changes to some characters (the deep is fucking hilarious), they did a hell of a lot right. One reason I think it works is that The Boys (comic) is a satire on Superhero comics while The Boys (TV) is a satire on Superhero movies/tvshows. The base premise is the same and there are enough similarities to the source that it still feels true to the comics without needing to be a pure conversion. thx god I don't need to see Terror fuck some old lady’s dog Not to mention a lot of unimportant dialogues, Queen maeve having sex with a small grown man, Hughie shitting on the floor, and a Superhero feeling the need to fuck everything including animals and inanimate objects... and of course children, & Teenage kix having sex and changing women which is done every night, etc. WTF? And also not to mention THE ENDING, The boys's comic's ending is so terrible, it probably makes into top 5 worst ending of all time. Doesn't even get to top 7 or 8 Ennis's work. Only pervert edgelords Ennis's diehard fans would say that the comic's better.

eh... The Boys is better than Watchmen sequels, but it still misses a lot. Watchmen is a genius deconstruction of the genre, The Boys is "what if superheroes=bad and superheroes=edgy?". I love The Boys, but Watchmen is a lot more

God Almighty please oh god tell me this was sarcastic

Why does nobody who talks about The Boys talk about the comic? The comic is fucking fantastic, more people should read it.

Can't wait for the Snyder Cut! Been waiting for it since 2016!

I haven't even seen the meme

meh, synder cut's probably gonna be shit

@@games_on_phone89 Sike!

@@BlackPrince24 it was a pretty "meh" movie, flash saved it at least it wasn't shit

Completely agree. I dont see it as a watchmen sequel but more of a love letter to superman. If they would've wanted to make a Watchmen sequel, then they wouldn't have put Johns as a writer (because it's not his writing style). It was an actually cash grab for doomsday clock to have all that watchmen iconography.

Jhons is out? What happpend?

@@gregoriomassa8529 he stepped down of his position as a creative director? I can't remember which position was. He's working on Warner I think and writing for dc. You should Google some info to be properly informed, I can't remember correctly sorry hahaha

@@alejotomasortega547 Doomsday clock is trash

@@gregoriomassa8529 Doomsday clock sucks

Honestly, that’s already the thesis. The only difference is that it then has Manhattan create a new Superman/Clark for the Watchmen universe because of that lesson, which tbh probably didn’t need to happen.

I genuinely thought that was what was going to happen. I expected Dr. Manhattan to realize "Oh shit, I'm the villain, I'm physically incapable of thinking morally, and these powers in MY hands (as opposed to the "good" that he saw Superman as) is imperically bad" and decide to go back and prevent himself from ever becoming Dr. Manhattan. It would also be one of the only truly permanent moves he's ever made since it would ultimately erase himself from existence and it works in direct contrast with the ton of experimentation that he did on the DC timeline. Reasonable character growth. [Even though there is an argument that the point of Watchmen is to deny them character growth, DC was going to put some in there anyway]

If that's the point it feels really disingenious. Like they claim to be washing their hands and the DC universe of Watchmen influence, while at the same time exploiting it even more for money instead of giving it back to Moore and also adding the characters to that same universe at the same time. Not to mention that, especially after the New52, modern DC isn't really any less dark than 90's DC was, some of which Johns himself has contributed to; like Darkest Night and all the stuff around Infinite Crisis. Like they still can't stop stealing from Watchmen (if all the darkness can be blaimed on Watchmen, which I don't think it can, but that's the thesis so that's what I'm going with) while at the same time decrying and blaming it for it?

Painocus It’s not decrying Watchmen, it’s decrying the decades of poorly made initiations trying to cash in on it and other acclaimed comics of the time by trying to make everything ‘subversive’, especially in 90’s comics.

@@videobeetle8: Then why bring Watchmen into it? Bring in the Death of Superman, bring in Knightfall, bring in Superman at World's End or whatever. If they are bad and Johns is not decrying Watchmen, then the fault is on them for being bad, not for supposedly being inspired by Watchmen. (And I'd argue the general tone of 90's darkness was more derived from The Dark Knight Returns than Watchmen anyways.) Like the point of doing a Watchmen sequel is that some other comics were bad, and maybe those comics were inspired by Watchmen, becouse they are dark, but DC comics are still often just as dark as the 90's, if not more, and quite a few of them are still bad, so... what kind of point is that?

Never read the Doomsday Clock. The moment I heard about it, knowing that it's a DC universe book, I immediately thought cash grab and skip it. The Watchmen was potitical satire of current real-life events and of the comics industry during the time. In no way is DC universe books ever going to have this level of writing. There was a reason why this book wasn't canon to DC even though it was published by them. All of the original Vertigo books weren't either and they failed to incorporate those charcters also.

@@riopato2009 it was a cash grab but it’s still a satire just a different kind. The watchmen were a satire of government and doomsday clock is a commentary of superheros

@@yourfavoritegames4971 it was a satire and criticism of politics in general which includes a realistic perspective of the ambiguous morality of costumed superheros. Alan Moore is an Anarchist and his writing is a reflection due to it. Of course he has issues with governments but Watchmen was a broader thesis critiquing the absurd implications of the concepts of superheroes. Doomsday Clock couldn't be in depth as Watchmen for the sole reason that DC heroes had to be involved. At best the story is surface level and an excuse to force these characters into a universe they don't belong in.

Doomsday Clock tries to analyze the new era of dysfunctional modern geopolitics (like the stuff in it about Putin, Black Adam, refugees, and the Middle East) and widespread distrust of people in power, and in response it tries to offer the superheroic ideal of Superman as a counter-thesis to the cynicism of Watchmen. Mostly so they can protect their bottom line and keep selling Superman toys and shirts to an increasingly disinterested public, of course. I mean, "Doomsday Clock" even has the same initials as "DC".

​@@yourfavoritegames4971 Technically everything is a cashgrab.

Only white republicans (nazis) would think that. I hate republicans.