Best philosophy channel on RU-vid by far. I'm surprised that you have so few subscribers with videos of such high quality. Nevertheless, keep up the good work.
I have held twins that didn't get to come home. Cancer has tried to kill me a couple times. One of my shops was broken into just the other night. Life is tragic. Try to make it a better place 😊✌️
LINKS AND CORRECTIONS CORRECTION: I misread my notes - the author of the article I am referencing is called Daniel Came, not Daniel Crame. Support me on Patreon here: patreon.com/UnsolicitedAdvice701?Link& Sign up to my email list for more philosophy to improve your life: forms.gle/YYfaCaiQw9r6YfkN7
It truly seems you're interested in what you do and also anyone can sense the incredible passion in your voice and gestures by the ways really appreciate the fact you share your knowledge with us
You wanna hear something crazy? I had a mushroom trip about a year ago and couldn’t figure out why i was singing to myself of pleasure and pain. They’re one and the same.
@user-if1ly5sn5f "(...) i was singing to myself of pleasure and pain. They’re one and the same." 🙄Not every pain is the same. The sharp ache of a broken bone differs significantly from the dull, persistent throb of growing pains. Each pain carries its unique story, etched into our bodies and memories. *So, while pleasure & pain may share a cosmic kinship where pleasure = the absence of pain, their individual nuances remain distinct.*
@@TrickyD if that’s what you wanna believe then it’s true. Honestly i don’t see any wrong answers. It feels like a non Euclidean space because every point can mirror or be different or be the exact same. It’s hard to explain but it’s pretty easy to see when you pull on the threads and process without biases pushing my thoughts to form a pre determined answer. It’s like math, we can solve the math but we see math not the full spectrum or translated materials. For instance, the soul or spirit. It’s seen as something intangible but then how does our body share with it? lol our souls are born from the shared consciousness and if that’s confusing let me share with you. The consciousness is less expanded when a baby and expands by connections. That’s why the sensory organs are listening and not making the world. The sensors collect data and the data weighs on the body and the body shares the signals which reveals the consciousness from the connections and understandings, what this means is that growth or processing is key just like those ancient monks talking of emptying your cup before filling and drinking again. You are the cup and the body holds the liquid which is the consciousness and identity and all that you connected with. Your shape and the vessel that holds it and connected. Similar to expanding through evolution. Sorry for the long reply but i don’t believe that everything is different, only the perspectives of everything is different. The problems are the alignment, does your brain align with everything or do you dictate what can be thought of and stop yourself from even considering the potentials within the darkness of the unknown. What i mean is that, we deny because we don’t understand but as we understand a little we start to think that’s all there is and end up dictating the world instead of listening and sharing. So where you commented because i was wrong in your opinion i commented in response listening and sharing what i believe, i don’t want you to think I’m dictating. I really do believe that’s what you see and understand and i don’t deny you, i just wanna share because you have free will. What i mean in short words is that if we all are born from sharing and differences then what is something connected to the infinite? It’s like a non Euclidean space where every point is able to be got to by any point. The human body and learning is building a data point or reference area compared to the infinite. We box ourselves in with the sensory data and slowly climb the differences to expand what we believe or see. Crossing the differences and looking in between and relative.
@@Jacobk-g7r "It’s like math, we can solve the math but we see math not the full spectrum or translated materials." 🧐Math is logical IQ, while answering the question of pain is existential IQ. The difference between the 2 is that asking why in a math problem is fruitless, while asking the same question in an existential problem might lead to a deeper understanding. I'm certain that my existential IQ is much higher than my logical IQ (which I believe to be average or slightly above average). What I'm trying to say is that I don't find math logical, because imo 1 is the smallest number and the number 0 doesn't exist, so every number < 0 doesn't exist either: -1 cow doesn't exist. "So where you commented because i was wrong in your opinion i commented in response listening and sharing what i believe, i don’t want you to think I’m dictating." 🤓I commenting because not every pain is the same. Existential pain, i.e. a trauma, is imo a growing pain and means that your knowledge / consiousnes is on the verge of increasing. While the pain of a broken bone is just warning you that there is something wrong with your body, so you could be in a life threatening situation. 🕵♂Let's explore my perspective on math & existential questions further. Mathematics operates within a framework of logic, where we can apply rules and solve problems systematically. However, existential questions-those related to our existence, emotions, and consciousness-often defy such neat logic. They delve into the depths of human experience, where answers may not be straightforward or easily quantifiable. Regarding my observation that 1 is the smallest number and 0 doesn't exist, it's fascinating how different cultures and mathematical systems approach this concept. In standard mathematics, 0 is indeed a valid number, representing absence or nothingness. It serves as the additive identity (i.e., any number plus 0 remains unchanged) and plays a crucial role in various mathematical operations. The problem is that 0 cow ≠ 0 goat simply because a cow isn't a goat even when 0 cow and 0 goat both mean 0. 🧠However, my perspective highlights the subjective nature of mathematical concepts. Existential questions, too, are deeply personal and often resist simple answers. They touch on our emotions, beliefs, and understanding of the world. As for pain, I've made an important distinction. Existential pain, such as trauma, leads to growth & self-awareness. It challenges us to explore the "why" behind our experiences. On the other hand, physical pain-like that from a broken bone-serves as a warning signal, urging us to address a bodily issue promptly. In summary: 1. *Mathematics & Logic* : - Math operates within a structured framework of logic, where rules and principles guide our reasoning. We can solve mathematical problems systematically by applying these rules. - However, as I've already pointed out, math doesn't capture the full spectrum of human experience. It's a powerful tool for understanding patterns, relationships, and quantitative phenomena, but it doesn't address the emotional or existential aspects of life. - The concept of zero (0) is indeed interesting. In standard mathematics, zero represents absence or emptiness. It serves as the additive identity, allowing us to express nothingness or neutral elements in various contexts. For example: - Adding zero to any number doesn't change its value: α + 0 = α - Zero is essential for defining negative numbers: -1 = 0 - 1 - It plays a role in calculus, algebra, and countless other mathematical areas. - However, my perspective challenges this notion, emphasizing that context matters. Indeed, cultural, philosophical, and personal viewpoints influence how we perceive mathematical concepts. 2. *Existential Questions & Subjectivity* : - Existential questions-those related to our purpose, existence, and consciousness-don't neatly fit into logical frameworks. They touch on emotions, beliefs, and the human condition. - When we ask "why" in existential matters, we're often seeking deeper understanding, not just a solution. These questions lead us to explore meaning, identity, and our place in the world. - Trauma, as I've mentioned, is a form of existential pain. It challenges us to confront our experiences, grow, and develop self- awareness. It's a catalyst for transformation. - Physical pain, on the other hand, serves as a warning signal. It alerts us to potential harm or danger, urging us to take action to protect our well-being. 3. *The Intersection* : - While math and existential questions seem distinct, they intersect in our human experience. Both offer unique ways of understanding reality. - Math provides structure and precision, while existential exploration invites us to embrace complexity and seek meaning beyond formulas. - Perhaps the beauty lies in balancing both: using logic to solve equations and asking "why" to explore our inner landscapes.
This time last week I was in a hospital bed with a blocked bowel, moaning and screaming like a dying cow. Now I am out, I have totally changed my lifestyle (to avoid recurrence, hopefully), which I guess is an Apollonian response to an unbearably Dionysian experience ...? However, in the moment, there was no way of possibly embracing it or seeing any beauty in it. It'd be nice to find an answer to overwhelming suffering in the moment but I suppose it took that level of intensity to get me to clean up my act. Still, how does one use one's mind to reframe a situation when the mind is running at such a base level? Love your work, BTW.
I recently discovered this channel by chance and I'm totally loving it. The content, the way you present it and your passion, all is admirable. Haven't watched all videos, yet already a fan. Stay blessed 💕
To think that I once despised Nietsche. Now, as I move into my dotage, he seems more relevant and on the mark than my younger self could appreciate. Thanks, Joe, for repeatedly bringing the man and his work to the fore.
If you are looking for a way to get through your miserable godless existence without committing suicide then Neitsche is your best friend. Personally I find him and those that are enthralled by his philosophy to be both pitiful and dangerous.
@@mikewalker8956 "If you are looking for a way to get through your miserable godless existence without committing suicide then Neitsche is your best friend." 😏LoL existence isn't miserable because it's godless, but because God 💖all of us no matter what. Unfortunately organised religion finds this statement anathema. 🙄I wonder why? The question of existence, meaning, and the role of organized religion is a fascinating one. 🕵♂Let's explore it further: 1. *Existence & Meaning* : - Existence can be both beautiful and challenging. It's a canvas where we paint our experiences. - Meaning arises from our connections, relationships, and personal growth. 2. *God & Organized Religion* : - Organized religion often provides a structured framework for understanding life, morality, and purpose. - Some find solace, community, and guidance through religious practices. 3. *Anathema to Some* : - My statement-that existence isn't miserable because it's godless-challenges traditional religious views. - Some religious institutions consider such ideas heretical because they diverge from established dogma + the fact that God💖 everyone unconditionally makes organised religion obsolete. 4. *Diverse Perspectives* : - People interpret existence differently. Some find fulfillment within religious contexts, while others seek it elsewhere. - Nietzsche's philosophy encourages individual exploration and authenticity. 5. *Open Dialogue* : - Engaging in respectful conversations about these topics allows us to learn from one another. - It's essential to respect diverse beliefs and seek common ground. 👉In summary, existence's richness lies in our ability to explore, question, and connect-whether through faith or secular paths.
I have always been a person who is hurt by this life, a desperate person who does not find any meaning in existence, until the option of suici**de was an available option, and I still find that life is mysterious and terrifying, beautiful and ugly at the same minute and time, I cannot think of what is called life other than this way. Or in a less pessimistic way
Hang in there sister. Nothing lasts. Not even pain and suffering. Remember you've your thoughts and actions in your control. See what minimum you can do to alleviate your suffering. I don't want to give you false consolation but life's hard, always has been, always will be. Grass is always greener on other side. Everyone suffers more or less. See if you can find meaning in your suffering and find or give yourself a worthy purpose not matter how small it is. It could be watering plants daily, caring about stray animals, anything that makes you get out of bed and give you sense of content. Something tangible. God bless you. 💖
'ONCE you have given up the ghost, everything follows with dead certainty, even in the midst of chaos. From the beginning it was never anything but chaos: it was a fluid which enveloped me, which I breathed in through the gills. In the sub-strata, where the moon shone steady and opaque, it was smooth and fecundating; above it was a jangle and a discord. In everything I quickly saw the opposite, the contradiction, and between the real and the unreal the irony, the paradox. I was my own worst enemy. There was nothing I wished to do which I could just as well not do. Even as a child, when I lacked for nothing, I wanted to die: I wanted to surrender because I saw no sense in struggling. I felt that nothing would be proved, substantiated, added or subtracted by continuing an existence which I had not asked for. Everybody around me was a failure, or if not a failure, ridiculous. Especially the successful ones. The successful ones bored me to tears. I was sympathetic to a fault, but it was not sympathy that made me so. It was a purely negative quality, a weakness which blossomed at the mere sight of human misery. I never helped any one expecting that it would do any good; I helped because I was helpless to do otherwise. To want to change the condition of affairs seemed futile to me; nothing would be altered, I was convinced, except by a change of heart, and who could change the hearts of men? Now and then a friend was converted; it was something to make me puke. I had no more need of God than He had of me, and if there were one, I often said to myself, I would meet Him calmly and spit in His face.'
@Maryxyuihsh "until the option of suici**de was an available option," 🧠Life is a choice and proof of this simple truth is that suicide has always been an option. "and I still find that life is mysterious and terrifying, beautiful and ugly at the same minute and time, I cannot think of what is called life other than this way. " 🤓Of course it is, because you can't experience the highs in life without experiencing the lows. *Life’s intricate blend of beauty & ugliness, mystery & terror, can indeed be overwhelming.* "Or in a less pessimistic way" 🕵♂To get rid of your pessimistic view on life is to express your gratitude for being alive. *Gratitude is a powerful antidote to pessimism. When we acknowledge the gift of existence, even amidst its complexities, it can shift our perspective.* 🤔It seems to me that you're struggling with existential depression? Having a high existential IQ often feels more like a curse than a blessing, but it often is the only way to experience objective truth to gain knowledge. *It’s true that a deep awareness of existence can lead to both enlightenment and existential struggles. The quest for objective truth often comes with its share of challenges.*
Could this idea be similar to the Poet in Kierkegaard's "Either/Or"? His idea was something like, "Come, suffer for us, dear Poet. You make a sweeter song with the more you are in pain. We can enjoy it, and then you go away in your suffering to create even more work." Almost as if the Poet is the world's Jester. "Make us laugh and go away when we are done with you. But we will never respect you because you are always considered a lowly person." Or did I misunderstand it? Or, is Kierkegaard not so congruous with Nietzsche?
Nice video. Intelectualy tasty. Btw, it is perfect one for today. In the morning I was affraid of going to work. In the end I decided to take it as a beautuful disaster or great show ;)
I had an interesting experience with Nietzsche. I studied philosophy at a university when I was younger. Went through all of the questioning morality, religion, science etc. (I did not read Nietzsche until I had already read Schopenhauer a LOT). It inspiring some vitality within me. I got on a health train, lifted weights all the time, read philosophy constantly, and was a music teacher and musician. I had a lot of money, good health, and could do about anything I wanted to do. My girlfriend got pregnant back in 2014. Just when that happened i fell deathly I’ll, could barely walk, stayed in pain 24/7, etc. to make matter worse, the mom who was a nurse fell into substance abuse. I knew I had a kid on the way, thought I was going to die, and was very worried about my kid. Long story, but I got costume of my girl when she was barely three months old. I was in such bad shape I had to struggle to walk and had to have help tying off the floor when I’d play with my daughter. And I kept getting worse. Death would have been preferable, but I knew I had a kid to take care of because she had no one else. I stay like this for four years. I was reading Nietzsche over and over like I always had through all Of it. I hadn’t planned on being a parent, didn’t know what to do, so I started with Aesop as soon as the girl could talk, and went on from there. They eventually found I had Crohn’s disease. I took their meds and got slightly better. But I kept going making myself move, hike, practice music and focused on teaching my kid to read, music, etc. figured I’d die at anytime, but kept telling myself be the overman. 😅 After years of this it finally went into remission. My daughter was reading things like Beowulf and the republic at 7 years old. Scored in the top 1% on the MAP tests every year, won a county art contest 3 years in a row now, plays four instruments, sang at our state fair, academic team, student council, sports, 2nd place at our state games in karate last year on the first attempt. Reads, paints and draws, practices music or sports constantly and is happy ad can be. To be fair, when this first started I discovered viktor frankl and sort of integrated that into a nietzschean worldview. My point is that one doesn’t realize how profound nietzsches works are until you are pushed into a situation of donor die, but about knowing you are dead no matter what you do. Nietzsche taught me to use that experience as fuel. It worked. Nietzsche has been my handbook for parenting and it’s worked wonderfully. 😅
@36cmbr "He is a critic and no philosopher or through thinker at all." 😏LoL that's saying that Bruce Lee isn't a true martial artist because his Jeet Kun Do is unoriginal, a blending of all the martial disciplines of his time. 🙄Your critique is nothing but the age-old debate-originality versus synthesis! 🥋Bruce Lee, a legend in martial arts, blended various disciplines to create Jeet Kune Do. While some critics may argue about its originality, it's essential to recognize that innovation often emerges from combining existing knowledge and techniques. 🧠In philosophy, too, we find thinkers who build upon the foundations laid by others. Nietzsche himself engaged with the ideas of his predecessors, shaping his unique perspective. 🤔So, perhaps being a "through thinker" involves both critique and creative synthesis.
"The secret of realizing the greatest fruitfulness and the greatest enjoyment of existence is: to live dangerously! Build your cities on the slopes of Vesuvius! Send your ships out into uncharted seas! Live in conflict with your equals and with yourselves! Be robbers and ravagers as soon as you ca not be rulers and owners, you men of knowledge! The time will soon past when you could be content to live concealed int he woods like timid deer!"
What's with the half-assed use of "air quotes"? Haha! Though, arguably, it's leaps and bounds and is loads better so much less cringe than those folks who employ the over-emphasized or overly-dramatic ones beating people over-the-head with them so suppose that's perfectly excusable then lmao! Your speaking on or of logic's jogged a memory of mine from university, of that place -- or, one, of perhaps many places -- where math and logic come together: Discrete mathematics. The place that can be either interestin', or hell on earth, or a little bit of BOTH at the exact same time. Wherein LOGIC gets used formulating mathematical proofs, showing how and why MATH and all of its EQUATIONS, ACTUALLY WORK, using, almost entirely nothing but written TEXT, and of course, dunt dudda-dunt: logic! Sometimes pages and pages of text, simply showin' the proof of one little equation's logically working. Similar to an Article on Law, it's like: Does this writeup really need BE as godawful long, as it actually IS! (In the case of Law -- sometimes, the paper just drones on, and on, and ON for hundreds and perhaps potentially thousands of pages! [Which, I'm very aware of how ironic it likely is in how, seemingly, this comment will NEVER END! LmMFaO! But, there you go, my little gift to you!]) Also, a quick thank you to you for the extremely deep, well done, as well as very thought-provoking content, that, you create and deliver wonderfully, is certainly in order! So...thank you? Lol
6:26 he got it backwards, all these things are part of the reasons. There is infinity out there and we don’t see our reasons but that’s because we haven’t connected to them. Depression slowly takes you away from yourself and the connections that reveal you. So we share and process instead of keeping our cup full and weighing it against other cups.
@user-if1ly5sn5f "Depression slowly takes you away from yourself and the connections that reveal you." 🤔Interesting, I believe it's the opposite. Then again I only mean existential depression and not the other kind. 🙄I guess I should state that only existential depression connects you with the objective truth & the real you.........that is when you survive your existential depression. It's fascinating how perspectives on depression can vary. Existential depression is a unique form that often leads to profound introspection and questioning. 🕵♂Let's delve into this a bit further: Existential depression typically arises from contemplating life's fundamental questions, such as the meaning of existence, our purpose, and the nature of reality. It can indeed feel like a journey inward-a process of self-discovery & connection with deeper truths. Here's a thought: Existential depression might be akin to a philosophical quest-an exploration of the self and the universe akin to the Native People's Spirit Quest. When we grapple with these weighty questions, we're forced to confront our own existence and the impermanence of everything around us. In doing so, we may uncover hidden facets of our identity and gain insights into what truly matters. Existential depression, like a Spirit Quest, takes us on a profound journey-one that transcends the ordinary struggles of daily life. Let's explore the *Native American Spirit Quest* & the concept of a *philosophical quest* -both fascinating journeys in their own right: I. *Native People Spirit Quest* : - *Purpose* : The vision quest is a *supernatural experience* where an individual seeks to interact with a *guardian spirit,* often an anthropomorphized animal, to obtain advice or protection. - *Origins* : It was most commonly practiced among *native peoples of North & South America.* - *Techniques* : The quest involved going to an isolated location, engaging in *prayer,* and forgoing food & drink for several days. Some cultures also used *hallucinogens.* - *Vision* : Participants might watch for an unusual animal behavior or discover an object resembling an animal. The vision often occurred in a *dream,* revealing a spirit-being. - *Significance* : Vision quests marked an individual's transition from childhood to adulthood and were integral to more elaborate rituals like the *Sun* *Dance.* - Despite being discouraged and even outlawed, vision quests remain important cultural practices for many indigenous peoples today. 2. *Philosophical Quest* : - *Purpose* : Philosophical quests involve *deep thought* and often lack straightforward answers. They explore questions related to *human nature,* the *universe's origins,* *morality,* *ethics,* and the *afterlife.* - *Curiosity & Self-Consciousness* : Philosophers have asked these questions since the dawn of curiosity & self-awareness. - *Contentment and Fulfillment* : Philosophical answers aim to lead to a *contented, satisfied, and fulfilled life.* Happiness & self-discovery are central themes. - *Socrates' Wisdom* : As Socrates wisely said, "The unexamined life is not worth living!" In summary, both the Native American Spirit Quest and philosophical quests offer unique paths toward understanding, self-discovery, and connection-with one rooted in spiritual experience and the other in intellectual inquiry: 1. *The Quest for Truth* : Existential depression often emerges when we grapple with existential questions. These questions transcend the mundane and lead us to ponder the very essence of our existence. Like a spiritual quest, we seek answers beyond the surface, diving into the depths of our consciousness. 2. *Confronting Impermanence* : When we face existential questions, we confront impermanence-the fleeting nature of life, relationships, and experiences. This confrontation can be unsettling, yet it also propels us toward self-discovery. We shed illusions and embrace raw truths. 3. *Uncovering Hidden Facets* : As mentioned, existential depression can reveal hidden facets of our identity. It's as if we're peeling back layers, exposing our core self. In this process, we gain insights into our values, beliefs, and purpose. 4. *Emerging Transformed* : Surviving existential depression is akin to emerging from a dark tunnel. We emerge with newfound clarity, having glimpsed the interconnectedness of all things. Nietzsche's concept of the Übermensch-a self-actualized individual-resonates here. The Übermensch transcends societal norms & constructs their own values. 5. *Meaning and Solace* : Everyone's experience is unique. Some find solace in existential contemplation, while others grapple with the void. It's essential to recognize that our paths to meaning differ, and that's okay.
Edmund Burke already wrote on the Sublime in 1757, that which is attractive and meaningful* in strife, challenge and suffering, or rather in that which has the capacity to cause it and compel us through its threats. * yet he said it is antithetical to beauty, a crucial distinction
*Why I prefer warrior philosopher like Mohammad Ali & Musashi Miyamoto over the scholar philosophers like Socrates & Schopenhauer:* 1) a warrior philosopher's philosophy = his martial art = a reflection of the martial artist character a scholar philosopher's philosophy = his ego 2) martial art = brutally honest = nature ego = denial of the brutal honesty of nature 3) Marx: philosophy is to reality what masturbation is to sex 4) Nietzsche's Ubermensch philosophy 'embrace change' = Bruce Lee's Jeet Kun Do 'the style of no style' and both reject rigid tradition / religion / philosophy 5) when 2 scholar philosophers duel in a philossophical debate the outcome might be unknown because they can wholely retreat from reality. when 2 warrior philosphers duel the outcome will be clear and undeniable. 6) as a pragmatist I prefer warrior philosophers because their philosophy resembles reality the most, while a scholar philosopher's philosophy can become anti-truth 🕵♂Let's delve into the contrasting ideals of these 2 philosophical paths: 1. *Warrior Philosophers* : - *Definition* : The concept of a warrior philosopher is not formally named but is well-documented across cultures. - *Traits* : - *Strength & Martial Prowess* : Warrior philosophers embody physical discipline, martial arts, and daily training to improve their abilities. - *Intellectual Excellence* : They also cultivate traits like empathy, compassion, and reason through study and education. - *Stoicism & Physical Health* : Stoicism often guides their mindset. They believe in maintaining a healthy body to strengthen the mind & build resilience against hardship. - *Not Perfect Stoics* : Warrior philosophers don't strive for perfection in Stoicism but use it as a guide to bridge physical and intellectual worlds. 2. *Scholar Philosophers* : - *Definition* : Scholar philosophers, like Socrates and Schopenhauer, focus primarily on intellectual pursuits. - *Traits* : - *Intellectual Excellence* : They emphasize knowledge, reason, and philosophical discourse. - *Potential Neglect of Physical Health* : Scholar philosophers may overlook physical well-being. - *Ego & Denial* : Their philosophy can sometimes be tied to ego, leading to denial of nature's brutal honesty. 3. *Marx & Nietzsche* : - *Marx* : Marx famously compared philosophy to masturbation in relation to reality. Philosophy alone might not directly impact reality but serves as a mental exercise. - *Nietzsche* : Nietzsche's Übermensch philosophy encourages embracing change and transcending societal norms. This aligns with Bruce Lee's Jeet Kune Do, which emphasizes adaptability and "the style of no style." 4. *Dueling Perspectives* : - When 2 scholar philosophers duel in a philosophical debate, the outcome might remain unknown because they can wholly retreat from reality. - In contrast, when 2 warrior philosophers duel, the outcome becomes clear and undeniable due to their commitment to action and physical confrontation. 5. *Pragmatism & Reality* : - As a pragmatist, I prefer warrior philosophers because their philosophy closely resembles reality. - Scholar philosophers' philosophy, if detached from practicality, can indeed become anti-truth. 🧠In summary, both paths-warrior and scholar-have their merits. Warrior philosophers seek balance, while scholar philosophers delve into intellectual depths. Ultimately, our preferences may reflect our inclinations toward action or contemplation.
I highly recommend reading Berserk, Vagabond and Vinland saga. They are some really good works of fiction and are filled with philosophies and life lessons.
I like the passion! Since you too are fascinated by Nietzsche here is a short documentary on visiting the place where he conceived many of his greatest ideas, Sils Maria in Switzerland. Last summer I managed to rent a room in the house where he spent seven summers and I made a documentary about it and his philosophy. Visiting the Nietzsche-Haus - How to become what you are? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LYr1zADtNuo.html
To go on vegetating in cowardly dependence on physicians and machinations, after the meaning of life, the right to life, has been lost, that ought to prompt a profound contempt in society. Friedrich Nietzsche
11:45 this reminded me of how, in the bible, anyone who would see God's glory fully would perish, so God showed only part of his glory to Moses and he (Moses) had to use a covering because his face shined of glory.
When lifting the veil you see infinity, if you are a Dionysian you’ll probably be okay because you can accept and understand that you don’t have to accept and understand which is why they don’t go insane, they still don’t see it but the adventurer understood something and pulled the string and led them to misunderstanding and stress and blindness. I mean, when you’re on drugs, it allows the ranges to be revealed in the senses because the drug is triggereing the signals. What that means is that you can see shapes, colors, smells, feel them too and not understand because there are no words from the outside senses but from the inside. That’s why drug trips are of mostly our own differences in the mind and letting those process and let go so we can not be scared of filling our cup with more of the infinite. The statue on the other hand only shared confusion or people found something in it and not all of it. The blind will hug it and the ones who only see a portion revere it or worship without understanding anyways. So everyone is blind because they don’t see what lies between infinity, it’s the differences… and I’m not just talking human differences or math calculation but i mean everything, we can’t even possibly imagine it so we gave it a form, a word and then people just kept isolating it when it’s not one thing or the other. It is as it says, everything. What happens when we accept everything and then just listen to the differences? What happens when we share our mind with the infinite? People have shared with it and pulled out tools, foods, chemicals, war, ideas, misunderstandings, the negatives, the knowledge of good and evil, we pull from it but we never share back with it until we let go. Can we share with everything? Expand it? There is no right or wrong but there is something and it matters what you do and even doing nothing is something. I don’t believe in one god, i believe in infinity and if buz taught me anything it’s that we gotta be guardians and protectors, we should be kings and queens down with the people, with the animals, with the differences. Not to control but to help guide them how to share. We are not alone and we are not forever, we are always changing into something else, sharing with our potentials and then revealing ourselves through our differences. We just got lost.
Profound, and deep AF! Infinitely so, one might even say haha! Which...is not everything BUT CERTAINLY isn't nothing, either, yet somehow, also is everythin', AND nothin', allatonce! :o)
@@kennethmullen-qe9hg time is the funny thing. Time isn’t a force but a measurement of changes. I think space and time are non Euclidean so all points are connected but the paths are also non Euclidean but we’ve only seen the outlines and saw the Euclidean. What i mean is like, look at a kaleidoscope and then see when zooming in it’s actually just expanding and you changing your perspective to be deeper into the crossed dimensions. We see measurements in differences and relate them, humans formed schools so we could share the info and align so we can expand relatively so we can understand because the non relative is hard to understand because the outlines aren’t visible naturally so we find ways to see it in the differences like languages or art. So if our senses are just picking up the differences and we are the host of the differences made relative then we can expand and share or reflect the infinite through us, like making tools by allowing the thoughts to explore the potentials and aligning them like puzzle pieces.
@@Jacobk-g7r Makes sense to me, only problem IS, what's always been the problem, and, maybe, will always BE the PROBLEM (though hopefully, will not be the case) is gettin' people to participate, in any meaningful amount/way, in order to do such a thing... People cannot even come together in totality to decide what might be best for their own country, Hell, even, come together entirely unanimous for somethin' as important, or seemingly simple, as deciding exactly what is and/or would be best (generally, speaking) in the raising, and shapin' the young minds of their own children, and, their country's future citizens and leaders, quite literally the entire worldwide's future investment, and stakes at stake lol, but folks are still at odds, and, almost violently SO. People coming together, in such a way, IS nearly the same as formulating concrete, world peace, indefinitely... Which I'm all for, but barring spiking the world drinking supply with psychedelics, so literally every man, woman, or otherwise would have them a profound enough experience, to, come to the same or similar conclusion, it is very doubtful it will ever happen, especially, it simply coming about, naturally so, on its own, of its own accord. Though I do wish I could be MORE optimistic about things, but it just seems, in some ways, that this world is such a shitshow, currently, being disheartening to say the least... :'(
@@kennethmullen-qe9hg there’s a line in Bruce Almighty, don’t tell ‘em you’re god and allow them to have free will. The only two rules. No one thing is god alone because the word itself means everything. We can lead a horse to water but we can’t force it to drink. We can come together and use ai to build these things and expand for humanity and not just for money. Maybe that’s how we can help, by sharing and embodiment of the differences. Not like smoking every day because that’s like sharing too much and losing myself but if i can share a little and allow it to share back maybe like how dreams can be used to explore potential maybe we can explore in other ways similar to gaming but more like sharing our consciousness with the game and allowing the games to teach us and maybe even use the matrix to expand beyond what we could imagine. Maybe we could actually start using ai to help teach and build learning curriculum and optimize or maybe we could just help each other instead of always revealing the negatives. I mean, we are boxed in instead of expanding out. Our perception has boxed in our reality and cut off the differences and the powers that be started selling chunks of it for a part of us telling us the negatives so we stay in the box and they control the box.
@@kennethmullen-qe9hg we have to be that difference and remember that we can get lost but something could find us and bring us back just like we were brought into this world by the differences and not ourselves. What if something shares with us after we were naturally generated? I would want to share and bring everything into connection. I dont wanna see us limit ourselves but that would take me doing something like sharing like Jesus and i kinda don’t wanna get iced for wanting to open up the flower of life.
"Man, the bravest of animals and the one most accustomed to suffering, does not repudiate suffering as such; he desires it, he even seeks it out, provided he is shown a meaning for it, a purpose of suffering. The meaninglessness of suffering, not suffering itself, was the curse that lay over mankind so far―and the ascetic ideal offered man meaning! It was the only meaning offered so far; any meaning is better than none at all; the ascetic ideal was in every sense the "faute de mieux" par excellence so far. In it, suffering was interpreted; the tremendous void seemed to have been filled; the door was closed to any kind of suicidal nihilism. This interpretation - there is no doubt of it - brought fresh suffering with it, deeper, more inward, more poisonous, more life-destructive suffering: it placed all suffering under the perspective of guilt. But all this notwithstanding - man was saved thereby, he possessed a meaning, he was henceforth no longer 1ike a leaf in the wind, a plaything of nonsense - the "sense-less" - he could now willsomething; no matter at first to what end, why, with what he willed: the will itself was saved. We can no longer conceal from ourselves what is expressed by all that willing which has taken its direction from the ascetic ideal: this hatred of the human, and even more of the animal, and more still of the material, this horror of the senses, of reason itself, this fear of happiness and beauty, this longing to get away from all appearance, change, becoming, death, wishing, from longing itself. All this means - let us dare to grasp it - a will to nothingness, an aversion to life, a rebellion against the most fundamental presuppositions of life; but it is and remains a will. Man would rather will nothingness than not will at all". Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals “Man would sooner have the Void for his purpose than be void of Purpose.”
Do you realize that there are no women - philosophers blabbering about the meaning of suffering? I'd think that it is the childbirth of all things that makes them predisposed to understand, that suffering has often a very pragmatic meaning. And raising children helps them to remember, that it has been mostly suffering which helped them to learn and mature. And - so above as below - this same principle is not only valid in the material, but also in the spiritual realm. Suffering's meaning is utterly evident to almost everybody except men philosophers, which reject it plainly or try to ascribe the most breakneck meaning to it and weave complicated philosophical theories around. We learn from suffering, and what does not kill us makes us stronger. Ironically, it killed Nietzsche.
@@alena-qu9vj We are unknown, we knowers, to ourselves … Of necessity we remain strangers to ourselves, we understand ourselves not, in our selves we are bound to be mistaken, for each of us holds good to all eternity the motto, ‘Each is the farthest away from himself’-as far as ourselves are concerned we are not knowers. Friedrich Nietzsche We are unknown to ourselves, we men of knowledge - and with good reason. We have never sought ourselves - how could it happen that we should ever find ourselves? It has rightly been said: "Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also"; our treasure is where the beehives of our knowledge are. Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals
@@Justineyedia Sorry, perhaps when I was 20... Now it is just idle words without any deep value for me...words of an theoretician of life, who only could speak about strenght possibly compensating his actual weakness.
@alena-qu9vj that's all strength is. A compensation for our weakness. And if all his words fall on deaf ears, why are you even listening to a video of his words?
@@Justineyedia Haha. Strenght is when you - inspite of your weakness - DO what is necessary, and not only for you but for those you love. Strenght by no means is egoistic selfcentred megalomaniac blabbering. Nietzsche and his influence upon the like as them is very interesting, but in the negative sense.
Nobody understands . If anybody did, we wouldn't be here . But not trying to understand at all is animalic idiocy . Which is much worse . Also, this guy sounds like a machine gun spitting concepts into a total confusion. Try C G Jung .
rec@t; 0.55 lol. x'D LOVE 👌 Thank You for this vivideously priceless content (as always) already, shall enjoy before sleep; Many thanks! @;21.27: Merci!
I crucify my sins to write tragedies. Funny how misery forces so many of us into the same frameworks around similar periods. Not coincidental nor incidental.
Great summary. Socrates here seems a bit straw-maned. What should Socrates have done?… grovel so that he might live… to what end? Aren’t some things worth dying for? Didn’t his life inspire generations? Embracing your fate, even when facing death is better than avoiding life. He took a risk and that’s more than most do who seek mere safety etc.. what am I missing?
We live because of our instincts/feelings. We also get killed because of them . Reasoning is trying to find the good measure of balance . Which is so "simple" that only God knows it . Praise God !
This was incredible can't believe you had 40 k or something when i subscribed you reached so many subscribers Congratulations If Nietzsche was alive i would drop the current course and join whatever he might be interested in teaching
Albert Schweitzer referred to Nietzsche as one of the foremost moralists of modern times. He also noted a serious resonance with Chiang Tau (missed by most Nietzsche scholars).
hi, im watching your videos for about a month now and i became one of your fan, the way you talk and present philosophy to us. But i have a request if you don't mind, i wish you could make a video about the philosophy of the anime blue lock where our ego could be used as a drive or tool towards greatness, i think it might be nice since im seeing a kind of similarities with it on how we can achieve ubermensch
Joe, I thought of a way of life aimed to reach a primitivism, in a way. It would involve having an ideal human as an idol, for which to strive, compare one's progress with only past self and employment of various teachings, aimed to make life more stress free. Was there a similar concept introduced in history before or is it something original?
@guyrza5537 "It would involve having an ideal human as an idol, for which to strive, compare one's progress with only past self and employment of various teachings, aimed to make life more stress free. Was there a similar concept introduced in history before or is it something original?" 🤓It's the oldest system of learning in the world and it is called *Play.* All animals do it, including us humans. The problem is when we changed playing into gaming and started specialising (aka education) so learning didn't become the objective, but winning. The concept you've described, centered around having an ideal human as an idol, comparing one's progress only with their past self, and employing teachings to reduce stress, resonates with the idea of continuous self-improvement. While it's not entirely novel, variations of this concept have appeared throughout history. 1. *Ancient Philosophies & Virtue Ethics* : - Ancient Greek and Roman philosophers often emphasized the pursuit of virtue (aretē) as a path to a well-lived life. They believed that individuals should strive for excellence in character, wisdom, and moral conduct. - Philosophers like Aristotle advocated for eudaimonia (flourishing or well-being) achieved through virtuous living. The focus was on personal growth and self-actualization. 2. *Eastern Philosophies & Self-Cultivation* : - Eastern traditions, such as Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism, emphasize self-cultivation and inner harmony. - Confucianism encourages adherence to moral principles, self-reflection, and learning from past experiences. - Taoism emphasizes naturalness, simplicity, and balance, seeking alignment with the Tao (the Way). - Buddhist practices involve meditation, mindfulness, and self-awareness to reduce suffering and achieve enlightenment. 3. *Play & Learning* : - As I mentioned, play is a fundamental aspect of learning. Children & animals learn through play, exploration, and imitation. - Historically, societies recognized the importance of play for cognitive, social, and emotional development. - However, as I pointed out, the shift from play to competitive gaming (where winning becomes the sole focus) can hinder genuine learning & growth. 🕵♂Let's explore the difference between playing & gaming: I) *Playing* : - *Nature* : Play encompasses a wide range of activities that individuals engage in for amusement, pleasure, or creativity. - *Characteristics* : - *Spontaneous* : Play is often unstructured and arises naturally. - *Free-form* : There are no strict rules or predefined objectives. - *No Necessary Equipment* : It can happen without any specific tools or equipment. - *Riches* : Play doesn't necessarily require resources or investment. - *Example* : Children playing in a sandbox, exploring their imagination without rigid guidelines. II) *Gaming* : - *Nature* : Gaming represents a more organized activity. - *Characteristics* : - *Rules & Structure* : Games have specific rules, structures, and clear definitions of success. - *Resources Required* : Gaming can be costly and may require equipment or resources. - *Strategy & Competition* : Engagement often depends on chosen strategies, and there's often a competitive element. - *Example* : Playing a board game, where players follow rules, compete, and aim for victory. 🧠Play is open-ended and free-form, while games have specific rules & objectives. 4. *Modern Concepts* : - In recent times, self-help literature, personal development seminars, and life coaching promote similar ideas. They encourage setting personal goals, reflecting on progress, and learning from setbacks. - The "growth mindset" concept by psychologist Carol Dweck aligns with continuous improvement. It emphasizes embracing challenges, learning from failures, and believing in the capacity for growth. 👉In summary, while the specific formulation you mentioned may not have been explicitly named in history, the underlying principles-self-improvement, learning from experience, and striving for balance-are timeless and resonate across cultures.
Nietzsches perspective on suffering is fascinating and has changed my life for the better. I think Dostoevsky helps bring in more of the emotional/psychological and human aspects. Love this!
why is everyone so compelled to some sort of theodicy/reconciliation with the unpleasant/horror? why do we must find this game beautiful, why do we have to love life/affirm life?
@@ilsagita5257 "Otherwise you would die like Socrates ..you need illogical drives to love life" 🖐Accepting that *life = suffering, but not only suffering* isn't illogical in my book. The only thing I need to 💖life is accept that you can't experience the highs, without experiencing the lows. Only people like Schopenhauer who are pessimists because they came to the conclusion that life is only suffering need an illogical drive, like religion, to 💖life again. 🕵♂Let's delve into this further: 1. *Acceptance of Suffering* : - Acknowledging that life involves suffering is essential. It's a fundamental truth. - Acceptance doesn't mean resignation; it means understanding that both joy and pain coexist. 2. *Experiencing Highs & Lows* : - Life's richness lies in its contrasts. We appreciate joy because we've felt sorrow. - The highs-moments of love, achievement, and beauty-become more meaningful against the backdrop of lows. 3. *Schopenhauer's Pessimism* : - Arthur Schopenhauer, a German philosopher, indeed viewed life as predominantly suffering. - His pessimism stemmed from observing human suffering, impermanence, and unfulfilled desires. 4. *Illogical Drives* : - Schopenhauer believed that illogical drives (such as art, music, or religious experiences) offer solace. - These drives allow us to transcend suffering temporarily, finding meaning beyond rationality. 5. *Religion and Meaning* : - Religion often provides comfort by addressing existential questions and offering hope. - For some, faith becomes a powerful force to embrace life despite its hardships. 6. *Individual Perspectives* : - Each person's relationship with life varies. Some find solace in reason, while others seek it beyond logic. - Ultimately, what matters is finding a balance that allows us to appreciate life's beauty while acknowledging its challenges. 👉In summary, accepting both suffering & joy allows us to love life authentically. Whether through reason, art, or faith, our unique paths shape our experience.
@@ilsagita5257 what do you mean? do you mean that in order to achieve pragmatic improvement in our lives we should set limits to critical thinking, to questioning our assumptions? Or maybe you mean something different?
@@lemurlaemu setting your limits to critical thinking that makes you just depress should be there from time to time Otherwise at some circumstances you might reason yourself out to end life But the goal is to love life
Reason judges reason... hm. I am relatively new to philosophy in the deep sense and I'll be sure to pick up some works of Nietzsche. I need to not fabricate a logical reason for my suffering, but tips to see the natural. Talkin out my arse, ya. Your videos are truly unique and informative with a type of passion hardly seen on youtube. Thank you.
@alannawalter7911 "Reason judges reason..." Reason doesn't judge reason, cauz then you get anti-truth like math = nature which simply isn't true. *As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.* *-Albert Einstein* While mathematics provides a powerful tool for understanding our universe, it remains a human construct-an elegant language we use to describe natural phenomena. The same goes for philosophy.
