How To Use Collections in Capacities 

Is there a way to autmatically add objects to collections based on a certain property? Thinking something like "Relationship" which is a multi-select property. Each select option could be connected to a collection so any time you create a person with "Relationship" containing "Friend" they are automatically in the Relationship/Friend collection? Or am I thinking too much into this?

Please, help me... What's the point of the collection If I can use a Tag, instead? And it will work better. It allows me to connect everything (which is the point of the Capacities, isn't?) And it's fast to tag a note, I just have to type #.... With collections I have to manually click click click... until I assign a page to a collection. 1:49 Let's take the "astrophysics" tag as an example (video). Let's Imagine if it was a collection I have an object: Lecture and an object: Person I have an Astrophysics collection (Lecture) and I also have an Astrophysicist collection (Person) Using Collection I couldn't have a page select and connect both. Because those collections are not from the same type/object. But, with tags I can. Not only that, If I need that, I WILL NEED TO create the tag to connect both.. Tag: Astrophysics. Filter: tag_Astrophysics + type_Person = Astrophysicist Filter: tag_Astrophysics + type_Lecture = Astrophysics I mean, isn't that how our brain works? An astrophysicist is a person with an 'astrophysics' tag!? I really think that collection is pointless. Think with me.. What is a collection? I mean.. If I have a type/object and I want to group a bunch of notes in a "collection", then.... I have a 'shared topic' between those notes. And those connections will ALWAYS occur between different objects. That's how humans works. I connect John (person) with his book (book type) which I had a lecture (lecture type) and where I Tweet about those, everyweek (tweet other type) So there's no point in 'collecting' only things that are the same type. As a human, as my brain works, I will always vary the POINT OF VIEW, based on my needs on that moment. On the example above, sometimes I want to see "john" from the Person perspective, sometimes from the Book perspective, sometimes from the Lecture perspective For me, to connect that I'll need a Tag. So, why use collections? It's literally on the website: "Folders and hierarchies limit our creativity - They silo our thinking. They are too rigid to structure our dynamic, diverse, and interconnected work." so... we create the collections to FOLDER and create hierarchies and limit our creativity? I mean... Tag is a "over-powered" collection, so why would I limit myself and use collection of types?! If I create to many tags, lets the capacities AI suggest collections based on topics and I just click "confirm". We, humans, have MILLIONS of mental 'tags'.

The way I expected Collections to work, is I add a collection and filter that collection based on properties. Having to add each individual record to each desired collection is tedious. I'd rather create a collection that adds everyone that is a Musician. So, If I create a new musician I don't have to add them to the collection they are automatically added because their properties meet the filter criteria. Maybe it's possible, but it's not intuitive.

Thank you for the explanation video. I'm finding it a little tough to dintinguish tags from collections. When should I pick one instead of the other?

I want become a believer but its too expensive. Hoping to get a discount code for upgrade.

I want deeper collections! I need 2th ~ nth collections. For example, people > scientist > physics > ... Can you update like this?