How to Use Math To Beat Roulette - The Martingale Strategy 

TBH, the whole Matrix calculus was overkill and just complicated the explanation. Many technical terms have been thrown and not everyone is familiar with these. Still a good video though .

Eleven minutes to say it is good in the short term, but not in the long term. Sheesh. The obviously problem with any strategy like this on roulette is that as long as your bet is X chips, every time you bet X chips, you'll lose more often than you win. Betting any pattern of up or down, or 1-3-5-whatever still works out that betting up will win 48% of the time, down the same, one the same, 3 the same, 5 the same. Here's a suggestion for anyone who thought they'd find something useful here. Find a way to beat sports betting, because other than counting cards, you won't beat table games.

@@aFREEsportsbettingSYSTEMyeah the short term thing is stupid because if you ever go back again and start paying off your taxi rides again your no longer in the short term. But sports betting is also not the answer in reality I’d say go to college and get a job, but poker is far superior to sports betting. Both are skill games but one your playing against Vegas literally the best a sports betting there is and the other your playing against the local crowd at your casino. If poker were like sports betting than the only poker games you’d be allowed to play would only be against pros.

@@aFREEsportsbettingSYSTEM It's not good in any term.

a great lesson at the cost of around 600$ lmao

Anytime you raise your bet after a loss will eventually turn in to a disaster and the quickest way to lose a fortune is with the martingale or grand martingale betting scheme.

@@angravante Unironically, the name for this chasing of losses is the Gambler's Fallacy

Qw+

1st time i ever went into a casino i played the big wheel, i put my money on 1 to 1 also on 2 to 1 and was doing quite well.

Lmaoo

You forgot that there has to also be no table limit

No it's not! You'll go broke faster with any of the other possible strategies (except maybe the Fibonacci dozens). The fastest one is to bet all of your money on green at once. That's a 97.3% chance of going broke in a single bet!

There is a limit on it and so yes

The casino would not stop the player in this case. No matter how many people someone bring with him (spouse, friends etc..). Because martingale does not give the player any edge, just retards the eventual huge loss that will compensate the casino for all those small player's wins. Casinos stops only advantage players (like proficient card-counters), cheaters, and people who disturbs other players from losing their money in favour of the casino.

Use fibonacci on the dozens start at the right time and hang on! 12 losses in a row is pretty difficult to achieve and youll go up on any hit regardless of previous losses.

How fibonacci😊 work

Thank you for letting everyone know you didn't watch the video

@@lukefranklin1766 boring video

10-15 times in a row is pretty common? 😭 rigged ass game if so, cuz that’s not true

the expected value of any roulette spin is always the same, regardless of the betting scheme. it is calculated as the probability of a win minus the probability of a loss. in the case of a roulette wheel with one 0, it would be 18/37 - 19/37 = -2.7% of your bet. It’s even worse for most american casinos with a 0 and a 00, at -5.3%

Poderia me ensinar como trabalhar com fribonassi

Poderia me ensinar como usa fribonassi no cassino

Por favor

Fib is an urban myth in my opinion. When it comes to roulette, the negative impact of the house edge will destroy all staking plans. The best method I've seen is random- pluck a number out of the air!

please try it and lose your money you bafoon

I don't think this works bro. It's just the same cycle just in reverse. The house always wins

Yeah like covid. Never been isolated

Woah that's interesting. Are there any math equations that reflect this? How did they simulate data, was it monte carlo simulations or similar matrixes like Dr. ben did here?

@@jonathanmezzenga2501 It's not simulated data, it's real data from real world systems. I got this from the book 'Chaos', by James Gleick, give it a read. It's old but still applies.

I use fibonocci strategy on the dozens it works freakishly well somehow. Need enough bank roll for 12 losses but I havent got past 9 or 10 then the big hit.

Yeah man, I saw 3 zeros in a row.. and 2 times I saw 20 red in a row

Yes. BUT fibonacci stategy on the dozens is way better imo

If you are a passive investor, chance of success is low. You must always average down on ex div dates and sell the peaks. Honestly better just to max out your SPY units

you will never get kicked out of a casino for using martingale. that is so dumb lol. it is a losing strategy and the casinos want to keep you around for as long as possible so they can take your money.

there is no betting scheme or game in the casino that gives the player a positive EV except for blackjack

It wouldn’t.

@@lost50 Good for you, but that doesn't answer my long term probability question.

It's weird I've seen it roll red 18 times in a row or black around that many times but never red black red black even close to 18x in a row.

@@mattcampbell5148 it does acctually

​@@mattcampbell5148 it wouldn't change anything because the probability of hitting a heads streak is the same as hitting an alternate heads-tails streak or any combination possible

No, you don't stand chance anyway.

If you dont have a massive bank roll start with $1 and use fibonacci strategy it seriously works. Need $400 for 12 consecutive chances to hit dozens.

@@AldousHuxley7Which fibonacci strategy?

@@Alphaa101 Idk I modify it as I go depending how im feeling but basically put $1 on a dozen and reset when you hit. If you dont hit increase like this: 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144

actually better to consider it a run of no-show's instead of shows... that way you are accounting for the green (0) as it can be considered just another no-show of the colour you are watching. This won't work in an actual casino though as they will ban you for "table waiting" and it won't work in an online casino as you will win too frequently and they will suspend / close your account under the guise of protecting you from being a person with a gambling addiction (you can lose as much as you like and they will not suspend or close your account... if you consistently win more than you lose they will find a way under there t&c's to suspend / close your account.) tried, tested and verified on multiple online casinos. If you're not losing money, they are not happy with you as a customer.

6 in a row of the same color has no effect on the probability of the next spin

Lol this is so false. Don't do this people.

Less likely, but still happens several times a day

OMG... really wait for "3 in a row", because then you know the other color is "due", am I right? You people are so funny. The casinos LOVE you.

@@_Coffee4Closers no kidding. I've seen the same even chance bets hit streaks of 20+ several times and I've only been playing a few months. It's why I rarely bet against a streak

Tried this after 6 in a row and still in a loss. Can't predict with 12 in a row

not true, the house loves it when you do this. because it’s a -EV strategy.

Even starting with a $1 bet, he shows at 10:42 that you need over a $million to survive 20 losses in a row. And if you're considering starting with just a 1 cent bet, then really, what's the point?

@@JohnSmith-ho3cubecause I honestly hate myself and this is the only way I feel alive anymore

@@LoDef647 Hopefully you're just joking, but if you're serious, I hope you can get some counseling to help with that. Best wishes.

@@JohnSmith-ho3cusemi, but ima be okay thank you

@@JohnSmith-ho3cuI won $600 of $20 btw. It was a roller coaster, would not recommend

There is no strategy for roulette

@@StefanReich You just weren't on my channel!

Good explanation of the strategy though.

Shoulda got your 8th booster

NO! The casino has maximum bet!

@@Alex-bq2vs very true

Tonight my table hit 6 7x in like 15 spins. I was doing fibonacci dozens resetting to $5 every time I hit. Tripled my money in 90 minutes.

They have several. everything from rigged tables, through very skilled distraction techniques all the way up to banning you from playing. As the customer you are not permitted to use strategies to increase your odds, they however are allowed to use all kinds of strategies to ensure you lose everything you own and get yourself into a debt.

@@Garuthius Rigged tables would be illegal, right? Just askig

@@dontanton7775 absolutely ... 💯 % ... and yet it still happens even in todays modern world

Set yourself a limit of plays, 30 40 or 50 plays. Even if on a winning streak, stop, no matter how tempting to go on. The worst thing is the 2 A.M. Excitement buzz, and then, Wipeout!!

I was playing blackjack in a casino and I was winning for hours using a similar technique. Finally all the other players lost and dropped out and it was only myself and the house. He assumed I was going to stop but I said, no, lets keep going. He looked at me like I was stupid but we went on. I then lost 17 hands in a row before quitting. I do not believe that was chance.

I find it very strange though that I've NEVER seen it Go from Black to red Back & Forth More than it's hit Solid Colors Over and Over.

you sound really dumb... playing online roulette bwahahaha

But what if he shot you in the face?

Yep. Another clickbait title

Why? You have a better one?

@@blucat4 I will do you the courtesy of answering this because you're probably young and I'm taking your question as being genuine. When I was a kid I used to fantasize about beating the house and I read all kinds of books on all kinds of strategies for all kinds of games. One thing all of the books had in common was to first and foremost expose the Martingale 'system' as the most elementary sucker bet of all. The reason is this - twofold actually. 1) the idea that because red has come up x number of times, then statistically, black has to come up, because it's 'due' . This makes sense to our mind because it seems to make sense. The odds are 50/50 right? ( Besides the fact that the odds are not 50/50 because of the 0 and 00 on the wheel which go to the house, and gives them that statistical advantage that makes roulette a valuable house winner just like all the games. But that aside, even if there was no zero and double zero on the wheel - the odds that you think you're going to play by doubling up bets ( the 50/50 probability) those statistics only occur at very high numbers of spins. Meaning - the house is going to grind you down easily. Because they have what amounts to very deep pockets. The ability to stay in the game for what amounts to forever, where is the player is going to go broke soon, and very soon especially if he is placing bets in hopes of recouping his ongoing losing streak. The house can afford to keep playing long long long long long long after your money is gone gone gone. Black came 15 times in a row seemingly against all odds, and by the 5th or 6th spin your bedding 30 grand to try and recoup your original 100-dollar bet, and you lost it all. How is this possible? Wasn't red 'due'? Those 50/50 statistics don't average until THOSANDS of spins. The idea that your shit is due - is an illusion

@@georgeofthehut9398 It's pretty clear you didn't watch the video. It's about how this strategy can help you win in certain situations, with low numbers of bets if only a certain amount of money is needed. 'Optimal Stopping Problems' are explained from 4:04 - 6:02 mark. He clearly says, twice, that it won't work if you're trying to maximise your winnings over the long term. For the reasons you stated. The actual example where it works starts at the 11:10 mark. Have a look. He also stated about the slight difference in odds caused by the green, and most of us were able to figure that out by ourselves anyway, so you you really didn't need to state it again. Maybe watch the video next time. 🙂

Thats smart! I do fibonacci dozens and reset to $5 every time I hit. Works freakishly well but I modify it a bit as I go.

Eventually you will hit the table limit and lose a crap load of money. That zero will come out at the worst time.