An amazing effort but I must say, after having done some research in the field of paleoanthropology, I've found this video to have a few inconsistencies and innacuracies to real-life Human evolutionary history. Whilst most of it seems correct on the surface, some major features of the species listed are slightly wrong, I hope to provide some constructive criticism: - Dryopithecus likely lived 12.5 - 11.1mya, not 15 - 20mya. - Ramapithecus has been found to actually be classified under Dryopithecus. - Sahelanthropus lived 7 million years ago, rather than Ramapithecus, which itself was unlikely to be part of our ancestry, rather an offshoot like Neanderthals and asian H. erectus. - Ardipithecus was partially bipedal (bipedal on the ground and quadrupedal in the trees) and had shorter arms, not quite like humans yet, but not what the video has shown. - You missed Australopithecus africanus. - Australopithecus robustus has been found to actually be part of its own genus: Paranthropus, which is not a part of our ancestry. - Australopithecus boisei (technically now considered Paranthropus boisei) is not part of our ancestry. - You missed Homo ergaster (although this can be forgiven since most now see H. ergaster as a racial subdivision of H. erectus). - Asian Homo erectus has been shown to probably have no fur and was not part of our ancestry, but a sister species that descended from H. ergaster/early African H. erectus. - Even archaic Homo sapiens didn't have fur. - Neanderthals weren't a subspecies of Homo sapiens (Homo sapiens neanderthalensis), they were their own species (Homo neanderthalensis) who likely descended from Homo heidelbergensis. - We didn't descend from neanderthals. - Neanderthals most likely didn't have fur.
@@Дмитро_Ісаєв1598 По версии религии первые люди это Адам и Ева которые появились из-за того что бог захотел 7 тысяч лет назад, в то время когда кроманьонцы уже перебрались в Европу, по этой логике кроманьонцы не люди или их не существовало?
@ yes but actually no.If we take your perspective then everything should start from eobionts,pre cells but this video is only about human evolution not organic evolution so it should start from ramapithecus
@@_Reverted Brother don't be fooled you are a human not an animal and God gave you the highest place you can't be an animal This a propaganda of those who don't want to see the truth and if you have any questions or doubt so please read Quran in your language read this book by your heart not mouth thanks brother 🙂
So I take it you've never heard of Francis Crick - The British molecular biologist, biophysicist, neuroscientist; co-discoverer of the structure of DNA. Who's life time studies/work since the 60' discovered the double helix. His research 'proved that what we are told about evolution is not true? I suggest you look uo his work. Oh and all the work of Billy Carson. I think these two genius's alone without having to name more brilliant minds on our planet who also have evidence to 'prove' this theory to be the bs it truely is. Man did not evolve from an primate. They have the evidence, start looking closer at chromosome 2 telomeres. The information in this video is hilarious ! And very much today PROVEN TO BE - DISINFORMATION.
The human being owes his predisposition to the doubtful generic of the little time he dedicates to making his happiness a meaning. At the height of life and his direction to being able to predict for himself whether the State of his life...or if passing with time...makes him change
Welp this is old model of linear evolution that doesn't relevan today, but cool animation btw. I know it's hard to make an animation using modern braided stream or phylogeny tree
Because there's a huge distant in knowledge, culture and life style between homo sapiens from 30000 years ago and homo sapiens nowaday ( us ) though "they" are basiclly the same so i guess we considered homo sapiens from 30000 years ago are dead
@@namekiz3199 Actually, Archaic Homo Sapiens are not believed to have had the same mental capacity that modern humans do. They had much simpler language capabilities, and they could not collectively imagine things (such as religion, and government) like we do.
@Toy Slendy dont tell people what to believe in? I'm not the one doing that. The schools are forcing evolution on kids, taught as if there is no problem with that. In reality, its not a settled issue. Scientists cant even agree, and we already know that ideas on evolution that were taught in the past arent even true. Whats taught today will be proven wrong. Its ridiculous.
Thai HD Vision yes we’re still apes we just look different back then we were apes thriving then it got to the point where we can’t get food by just swinging tree by tree so we had to learn on to walk on 2 feet and so on so yes we’re still apes just we look different but back then we all looked the same as apes and monkeys these days sorry if I didn’t make that much sense
@@thorodinson5201 okay,but if we were to evolve into monkeys shouldn't there be no more monkeys in the world? If we evolved from monkeys all monkeys would become humans right?
@@NikodAnimations that is scientifically true because since we were before monkeys the monkeys ate banana and the bananas dna transferred to us humans so your not wrong
@@jonahboris6681we have proof that its fake we were humans from the start. it says humans were the 3rd conscious living thing. 1st was the angels then us
Ofc some religious dude says that. Doesn’t anyone find it weird that we find bones similar to ours from long ago? That’s proof right there! Early creatures we evolved from.
