Тёмный

HumminGuru Review - Affordable Ultrasonic Record Cleaning? 

Sound Matters
Подписаться 13 тыс.
Просмотров 32 тыс.
50% 1

The relatively new HumminGuru record cleaner promises to deliver ultrasonic record cleaning power at an affordable price. Its compact size and all-in-one design will undoubtedly pique the interest of record collectors far and wide.
Is it possible to make a great performing ultrasonic record cleaning machine that doesn't break the bank? Join us we put the HumminGuru through its paces.
Full review for before and after testing (audio linked at bottom of article):
www.yoursoundmatters.com/humm...
Product Links: (AAL = Amazon Affliate Link)
_______________________________________________
HumminGuru on Amazon: geni.us/humminguru
HumminGuru from Turntable Lab:
www.turntablelab.com/products...
GrooveWasher G-Sonic - (Use code SOUNDMATTERS10 for 10% off):
www.groovewasher.com/collecti...
________________________________________
Partner/Sponsor Discounts:
GrooveWasher Record Cleaning (Use code: SOUNDMATTERS10 for 10% Off)
www.groovewasher.com/
Twelve Inch Record Displays (Use code: SOUNDMATTERS10 for 10% Off)
twelve-inch.com/
VSS Record Sleeves: (Use code SOUNDMATTERS10 on checkout):
vinylstoragesolutions.ca/soun...
Vinyl Pursuit - Vintage Vinyl Online: (Use code SOUNDMATTERS15):
vinylpursuit.com/
Vinyl Moon - Record Subscription (SOUNDMATTERS10)
vinylmoon.co/
________________________________________
#vinylcommunity #vinylrecords #recordcleaning #audiophile

Видеоклипы

Опубликовано:

 

20 июн 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 99   
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 9 месяцев назад
Thanks for watching! 🎶🎧 Do drop your comments and questions below. If you'd like to support the channel, check the video description for many DISCOUNT CODES codes to enjoy money off various products and feed your vinyl habit! (I earn a small commission - no additional cost to you). Thank you for your support!
@sigmunv
@sigmunv 4 месяца назад
Thanks for your effort to show the Hummingurus magic. I have now cleaned approx 800 lp's with this box. And I'm happy! It's using kind of low impact (40kHz) vibrations, so it's treating your records gently. For most records I have used double cycle with 5 minutes cleaning and 5 minutes drying. This is enough in my not-so-moisty, indoor , winter environment in Norway to make it clean and dry enough to play directly after. I have used Hummingurus own detergent as well and distilled water. Many of the comments here says it's a waste of money and I really, really don't agree. For me it has been a lifesaver and has steadily produced record after record with fantastic results. I have done lots of before and after listenings on a good line of equipment and it never disappoints. Of course, fingerprints are a hassel, and for many records I have had to make a double cleaning or even triple before drying it. But hey, it's a machine and it will not be tired. Fat (or jam :) ) is difficult, so sometimes I had to use the liquid directly on the record along with a fiber cloth, and then use the machine. The machine will anyway fix the groves nicely. The bottom line is that for me, the normal process works great for many records, but you will need to do it a couple of times for the most dirty ones. And buy your partner some flowers now and then to make them happy. It's a little bit noisy.
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 4 месяца назад
It's a good affordable option for those who want an all-in-one cleaning and drying machine. I use the GrooveWasher fluid instead of their one. (The HumminGuru version is essentially a copy of the GrooveWasher one). I do have a Degritter now, but it's quite pricy. The HumminGuru does often need multiple runs to get similar results to the Degritter on very dirty records. One other option is to pre-clean the record by hand first. This loosens everything up and deals with the surface finger prints, etc. The HumminGuru then finishes it off nicely and works in the groove. Thanks for sharing your experience. Happy spinning!
@johntrott9513
@johntrott9513 2 года назад
I've owned my Humming Guru since it's initial release autumn last year. In this time I've cleaned and rinsed the vast majority of my collection, now well over 350 titles. Some of which are double LPs and boxsets so easily well into 400 individual vinyl's. I've experimented with all sorts of concoctions. Surfactants, cleaning fluids, deionised water, dehumidifier water the list goes on. None of this has caused any malfunction or negative effect to the HG. I've pretty much settled on my own mix of surfactant, IPA and deionised water for one or two cleaning cycles followed by a single rinsing cycle with just deionised water. I ordered a second water tank so I could keep the clean and rise cycles separate. So if you total that up with my collection and bunches of cleans for friends it's easily over 1000 individual cycles. Still running with its original rollers, I've only needed to change out the tank filters when necessary. Overall I'm very happy with how it's performed for the price that it is. Nearly all of my records we're either new or cared for by previous owners so bear in mind its not had to deal with many dire situations. If you're in the business of acquiring boxes of old records and sprucing them up for a profit then something like the Degritter would probably be worth the investment. There have been articles about vinyl being eaten away by ultrasonic cleaning. I don't know enough to fully comment but maybe the HG being lower in power is not such a bad thing. Maybe I'll upgrade to something more substantial one day, I recently bought an ORB flattener so some crazy money has already been spent! But for now the Humming Guru is working great for my needs.
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 2 года назад
Thanks John. Vinyl being "eaten away" huh? I'd be intrigued to read about this.... Happy spinning. Glad the HumminGuru is working for you.
@jpwilson79
@jpwilson79 2 года назад
its a great machine. I have had the same result as you commented. its great for new and used records. if your digging in the $1 bins you may have to clean a couple time or put a little elbow grease into the record before cleaning it with the guru. these comments that its not as good as a degritter no shit sherlock. most people that would look into this machine already take care of there records and don't need a professional ultrasonic cleaner.
@richardelliott8352
@richardelliott8352 2 года назад
@@soundmatters I suppose if you kick around you will find images of holes punched in aluminum foil with ultrasound machines, and one guy presenting a study of some concern , but the study was for a similar material , not vinyl, and frequencies were important. I guess one should investigate very carefully those machines that are not purpose built for record machines where someone has engineered a device to adapt it for record cleaning.
@Claus-CaptainPhoenixCorner
@Claus-CaptainPhoenixCorner Год назад
Thanks for a fine presentation and evaluation 👍Think I'll get one for myself as a Christmas present this year 🙂
@soundmatters
@soundmatters Год назад
Great! Happy record cleaning
@mercuryscat2703
@mercuryscat2703 Год назад
Excellent and honest review . I was thinking of upgrading my Project VC s but it looks like they are pretty much similar in terms of results .
@nattyco
@nattyco 2 года назад
Thanks. I always use a surfactant. I've tried several, including washing up liquid and dishwasher Rinse Aid, and they all seem to work as well as each other. A spin clean type/vacuum cleaner might have cleaned that record just as well. A better test would have been to take a record already cleaned by a more conventional record cleaner and then put it through the ultrasonic cleaner to see if it improves the clean and the sound compared to the conventional cleaner. Credit to HumminGuru for developing a cheaper machine, though there are even cheaper Chinese machines available now, which by all accounts work well though they do not dry the record.
@richiehimes7990
@richiehimes7990 2 года назад
Thanks for your video! Days of Future Past is a great album, BTW!
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 2 года назад
Absolutely!
@JackOusley
@JackOusley Месяц назад
Best I can tell, the power needed for ultrasonic cleaners to be effective is dependent on the volume of liquid, watts/liter, and other ultrasonic cleaners with small liquid capacities like this one are in similar power ranges. I used to have a cheap Chinese jewelry cleaner in this power range and it worked surprisingly well. Too much power can damage the records as well.
@705johnnyboy
@705johnnyboy 2 года назад
i bought a vevor ultrasonic ,229 bucks au ,it cleans my records beautifully ,totally amazing ...does 6 at a time...
@ginovairo6487
@ginovairo6487 2 года назад
I liked your video. I’m happy with my Humminguru and I think it is fine for cleaning “not so dirty” records and I agree it works better with a drop or two of surfactant (G-sonic, tergikleen or even photographic film wetting agent such as Photo-flow all work well). The drying effectiveness is improved with a surfactant too. I routinely do a “preclean” with either a spin clean or even a wet wash with a brush for anything that needs a bit more attention such as a newly acquired second hand record. Not a fair apple vs apple comparison to benchmark against a degritter/KL/audiodesk cleaner which all cost 10-fold more than the HG. This is relatively affordable, dedicated ultrasonic automated record cleaner and fills a much needed niche in the market. I guess we’ll still need to see what its lifespan will be with long term use, but from feedback on the HG forums the customer service from HG seems pretty good.
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 2 года назад
Great! Yes, it's important to remember the context of just how affordable this unit is. I too have noticed the drying improved with a drop of surfactant. I also agree a quick pre-clean is a good idea if it's particularly dirty.
@tacoseven1896
@tacoseven1896 Год назад
How much of an improvement do you get over the Spin Clean? Currently my whole collection has been through a Spin Clean, but there are still some records that are VG++ visually, but still just have a bit of surface noise or ticks in the quieter sections. Granted many are from the late 50s/early 60s, I’ve kind of chalked it up to just built in defects. But lately I’ve become curious if even what I’ve become accepting of could actually be improved.
@jeremiahchamberlin4499
@jeremiahchamberlin4499 Год назад
@tacoseven1896 Every report I’ve seen or heard tells me that ultrasonic cleans beats all other methods with some exceptions. Ultrasonic will not remove fingerprints. Overuse of ultrasonic will damage your records (do not exceed the 5 minute cleaning time). Repeated ultrasonic cleanings will improve the results, Paul Rigby repeats the cycle six (6) times. Ultrasonic cleaning cannot repair physical damage. Paul also likes to use a Spinclean competitor made in Germany that uses goat hair brushes instead of pads, like the Spinclean. So . . . I think you would find the Huminguru worth a try, it may not get all your records to perfection, but I’ll bet it will get them closer than they are now.
@michaelrowland6669
@michaelrowland6669 Год назад
Thanks for review, I think I will stay with my manual cleaning machine which I think does very good job.
@soundmatters
@soundmatters Год назад
Thanks for watching. What machine do you have at the moment?
@victorgamboa5354
@victorgamboa5354 6 месяцев назад
Great video
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 6 месяцев назад
Thanks for the visit!
@jwgrigg
@jwgrigg Год назад
Hello Mark, I just ordered a HumminGuru to clean my records. I have been using the spin clean, which does an OK job, but as you know, does not get as deep into the grooves as Ultrasonic cleaning does. I noticed your review was seven months ago. Now that you have used it for a while, has your opinion of its effectiveness changed? I would be interested to know.
@daveyf3144
@daveyf3144 2 года назад
The 'Guru' is a very good machine for what it is...a machine for the not heavily soiled or deeply grime imbedded records. I have this machine and it absolutely needs the Groove Washer G-Sonic liquid. Nonetheless, I have 'AB'ed the 'Guru' against the much more powerful KL Audio. The KL audio is a better cleaning machine, BUT the price is about ten times what the 'Guru' costs! I think with a vacuum clean first, from any decent vacuum cleaning machine, followed by the 'Guru', one can be in the same vicinity as the KL audio; for a much lower combined price.
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 2 года назад
Hi Davey. I think this basically sums up how I feel about the machine. For the price, you can't really argue. I have a vacuum too, and it's quickly looking like that will be my process for VERY dirty records. I can't see myself affording a KL or Degritter any time soon....
@rogerdjs
@rogerdjs 7 месяцев назад
I purchased a Guru about months ago for almost 600 dollars, needless to say I sent it back. With almost 4000 records to my collection this was like watching paint dry and it didn't clean as expected. I had to resort to a lot of touching up after using this unit, wasted time and money. So I purchased a Vevor Stainless Ultrasonic cleaner with Motor attachment and 8 label protectors to clean 8 Lp's at one time. I even incorporated a DIY filtration system and a wireless fan and attachment for drying, and all for under 230 dollars. I used Distilled water, Photo Flo, Dawn and ISO Alcohol and it worked like a charm and left plenty of evidence in the tank which was quickly eliminated with the filtration system.
@mr1enrollment
@mr1enrollment 2 месяца назад
Does the Vevor actually reach the inner disks of a separated stack?
@peterrech2307
@peterrech2307 2 года назад
Hi Mark. The HumminGuru certainly is not in the same class as the DeGritter. I have compared the two recently. The DeGritter has a huge advantage over he HumminGuru unit and that is the frequency, 120khz. My tests have shown the HumminGuru to be somewhat ineffective because of its frequency. If you run the spec numbers on the wall adaptor it certainly does not have the power capacity to run everything on the HumminGuru in its cycle at 40khz. Its meant to run at 40khz but i found that it does not reach that frequency cosistently.. A scientist friend of mine who is a mad record collector (like myself) used a scientific cavitation metre which showed an average frequency of 25khz. My own testing on Ultrasonic cleaning has found 120khz to be the safest and best cleaning frequency. The only commercial unit that runs that frequency is the DeGritter because the 120khz transducers are very expensive. The HumminGuru is a cheap all in one unit that will do an ok job. I tested it against the VinylStyl unit (using Tergiclean based cleaning fluid, used same fluid in HumminGuru) and found the HumminGuru to better on light dirt than the VinylStyl but not as good as the VinlSyl on greasy finger marks, but thre HumminGuru is a simple all in one automatic unit that will suit some people. I guess a pre clean with the VinylStyl, (which I prefer to the SpinClean) then a run through the HummingGuru would be a good method of cleaning and still cheaper than the other ultrasonic units. The HumminGuru is not great but it is cheap, and you do get what you pay for. In my tests, the DeGritter is the best unit around but in Australia it sells for around $5,000aud, so the VinlStyl/HumminGuru combo would be a much cheaper option with reasonable results. I do not have any connection to HumminGuru, VinylStyl, Tergiclean or DeGritter products, I'm just a mad long time collector with much tooooo many LP records.....Enjoy the music
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 2 года назад
Thanks so much for this Peter. I would love to try the DeGritter, but it's just out of my league price-wise right now. It makes sense to me that the 120KHz performance would be superior... albeit far more expensive as a result!
@pSynrg303
@pSynrg303 2 года назад
Hmmm, Ferrari or VW Golf? Which one will get you round the track fastest? DeGritter vs HumminGuru not a useful comparison at all...
@peterrech2307
@peterrech2307 2 года назад
@@pSynrg303 I do agree that the two units are not in the same class. I have just completed a test between the Degritter and a friend's German made AudioDesk unit, both units cost a similar amount in Australia, around 5k+. The Degritter did give the better results between these two units. I feel it is the frequency difference. The humminguru is an adequate unit, that does a cheap job as opposed to the Degritter that does a great job. As for your car comparison, I would certainly prefer to be going flat out in a La Ferrari on a racetrack than a VW Golf. Golf is adequate, La Ferrari is brilliant. Much the same as the difference between the HumminGuru and Degritter.
@nattyco
@nattyco 2 года назад
My understanding is the lower the KHz the more powerful is the bubble implosion and therefore the cleaning ability. Higher frequencies make smaller bubbles for tiny areas, but again from what I have read 40KHz is the ideal frequency for getting the bubbles into the grooves of records yet still being powerful enough for a thorough clean out.
@peterrech2307
@peterrech2307 2 года назад
@@nattyco Absolutely correct. The 40khz implosion is bigger than the 120khz. However the 40khz blast will not get as deep into the groove as the 120khz. 120khz deep cleans the record in a way that the 40khz can't. My unit uses 40/80/120khz transducers and I have run my own tests to see the difference, What I have found is best results come from running the unit at 5 minutes at each frequency. These multi frequency units are more expensive than 40khz units. The reason for this is that there are many more 40khz transducers made than any other frequency simply because for most other purposes of ultrasonic cleaning 40khz is the preferred frequency.
@ulgn1964
@ulgn1964 3 месяца назад
I only buy new records so the HG is perfect for me, 5 min clean and 10 min drying time and i have zero problem with any water left on the record, using HG record cleaning agent 2-3 drops and it works perfect.
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 3 месяца назад
Yea, if you only buy new, absolutely it’s enough. Enjoy!🎶🎧
@mark-yo2uk
@mark-yo2uk 3 месяца назад
Thanks Mark, a very interesting and informative video. One thing I am curious about is whether the unit leaves any residue that ends up on the stylus; no one seems to comment on this. Having tried other wet cleaners including Knosti, my experience is that the stylus can become caked with gunk which cannot be good for it and also suggests strongly that the cleaner is not fully doing it's job. I would be very interested in your views before I buy one...
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 3 месяца назад
I think that all depends on what surfactant you use and how much of it you add. I use the GrooveWasher G-Sonic and don't have any residue issues. You only need 1 tiny drop per tank load to break the water surface tension :) - hope that helps
@louiesipes2257
@louiesipes2257 2 года назад
Wonder if the greater benefit might be to use after a manual clean. I have been looking at buying a RCM but the $😊
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 2 года назад
Indeed, whichever way you look at it, a cleaning machine is more expensive than good old fashioned hand-cleaning records
@LloydGutteridge
@LloydGutteridge 2 года назад
Thank you for this informative objective video. I have spoken to a number of fellow vinyl junkies and the prevailing thinking is that a humminguru (ultrasonic or equivalent) then followed by a VCE clean is the way to go. I demoed a Degritter a few months ago was left unimpressed given the 5,000NZD price tag. The huminguru and VCE will come in for under 2000NZD. I have owned the VCE for 6 months and have been pleased but on really dirty records, I am atill have to clean using the VCE 5 or 6 times and still too many pops and clicks. (Of course I could be doing this incorrectly :) Any comments on the ultrasonic then VCE to remove all the remaining water for a really good clean? Thank you
@nattyco
@nattyco 2 года назад
Yes I do exactly the same. One run in the ultrasonic followed by the VCS-2 usually suffices for already pretty clean records. Dirty records I give an initial run in the VCS-2.
@Matasky2010
@Matasky2010 Год назад
You might as well just give it a manual clean with a wet scrub brush (like Mofis) then run thru a machine. Using 2 machines is ridiculous lol.
@TripleE76
@TripleE76 2 года назад
Was so excited for this, but there are many reviews that say it’s largely crap. I’ll stick with my manual big fudge cleaner.
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 2 года назад
I think it depends on your expectations at this price. There are definitely pros and cons to it, and it's certainly not a replacement for more expensive competitors. You can get a long way with manual cleaning when it's done in the right way, that's for sure.
@Dave30867
@Dave30867 2 года назад
The finger prints wont move unless you manually clean the record first think about it how do you get fingerprints off windows .
@TheNorliss
@TheNorliss Год назад
HumminGuru, is it you? HumminGuru, is it you? Sitting there blowing out hot air....
@davidcurry8440
@davidcurry8440 Год назад
I have had my HG for almost a year and have great results. I don’t use surfactants. For a record like the Pretenders record you showed I start by running the record through my Spin-Clean, which has a surfactant, first then running through my HG. This has produced the best results for me. Just like you noted, the HG does not remove fingerprints. It’s my understanding that other ultrasonic machines do not remove fingerprints. If I’m incorrect, please let me know and please offer that machine name when responding, because I’m curious as well!
@Matasky2010
@Matasky2010 Год назад
Just wipe the damn fingerprints off with a microfibre cloth!! Then run thru the machine, people need to use some common sense. The machine is used to clean INSIDE the grooves (where it really counts), surface debris/gunk can be wiped off BEFORE running thru the machine.
@davidcurry8440
@davidcurry8440 Год назад
@@Matasky2010 I believe that’s a given…Adam; however, some new collectors may not be aware of that.
@Matasky2010
@Matasky2010 Год назад
@@davidcurry8440 You were curious about it, obviously u don’t get it either.
@davidcurry8440
@davidcurry8440 Год назад
@@Matasky2010 you’re right. I’m new to collecting vinyl, I started in 1983.
@Matasky2010
@Matasky2010 Год назад
@@davidcurry8440 So have you ever tried to wash a greasy dish by submerging it in water and then just agitating the water? No soap and without even touching the greasy spot itself? Of course not, it doesn't make sense. Water doesn't clean grease unless maybe you heat it up enough. Not a reasonable expectation of any US RCM.
@bigedslobotomy
@bigedslobotomy Год назад
I tried to go to his site that had before and after sounds from the record, but had to leave the site because it was crippled with pop up ads.
@soundmatters
@soundmatters Год назад
Hey - Marc (owner of Sound Matters here). Thanks for submitting your concern. Balancing Ad revenue vs user experience is always tricky, but it's an evolving beast for me at the moment. I've just reduced the amount of ads near the top of the page and will continue to work on a balance that keeps the site sustainable financially, but allows you to access the content easily. Thanks for watching and happy spinning
@mikekuhn214
@mikekuhn214 2 года назад
If records r that dirty, I prefer to hand wash manually in kitchen sink using Ajax dish soap and a cotton towel. If records not as dirty or brand new, I use my HumminGuru but I do it differently. I first use a Tergikleen (surfactant) distilled water mix to wash the record then dry. The second wash/dry is just distilled water. This works so much better than stand alone distilled water only. I don’t care about the warranty. I want clean records. Look it up as Tergikleen does a good job. The HumminGuru does get hot so I do set a fan behind the unit which blows cool air underneath the unit. I do want 2 try the Degritter but need 2 come up with the $$$$ for it. Ugh
@Gez492
@Gez492 Год назад
I now have two Humming Guru machines and use one with small amount of ilfotol and alcohol. I don't dry, then I spritz the cleaned record in pure water and run it through a clean cycle in the second machine, using pure water only and then an extended drying cycle to complete the process. I use this method for first ownership cleaning, whether the record is second hand or Brand new following this, I place in new inner sleeves and if I clean again its a simple auto cycle in the humming guru with pure water only and we're good to go. Incidentally buying two Humming Guru machines was considerably less than £1000 one sixth the price of a KL audio machine that you need a cellar to use with its external everything. I'd challenge anyone to tell me my results are £5-6000 inferior to the KLaudio. The saving is better spent on a cartridge or most any other upgrade path. What grips my shit is that the technology is well known with almost exclusively chinese transducers used. You can buy the industrial versions for around £200 but put a bit of bling on it and call it audiophile quality and add 3 zeros on to the price and people fall for this Shite. Also think there is so much BS being spoken regarding 120 KHz machines doing a better job, they have nothing but conjecture, assumptions and subjective testing to back up their claims.
@0PsychosisMedia0
@0PsychosisMedia0 Год назад
91% alcohol, a extremely small drop of baby shampoo and distilled or spring water. Super soft micro towels (from the car care section) from the dollar store. With a record spinning in the background, I get all my used records cleaned, including incerts (if they are still there) and album covers with a separate towel. Just don't understand these hyper obsessive, unproven cleaning techniques. Kept it simple people. Simple ways are always the best ways.
@JackOusley
@JackOusley Месяц назад
I see they sell their own surfactant now, so should be fine to add.
@soundmatters
@soundmatters Месяц назад
They do. I believe GrooveWasher sent them a sample of their version and they basically copied it. Cheeky.
@RM-ks8pp
@RM-ks8pp 5 месяцев назад
Will this machine work on 45 records ?..
@scottelling5606
@scottelling5606 10 месяцев назад
Would it be worth buying this to clean new records?
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 10 месяцев назад
Yes. Many new records benefit from a clean before playing. I clean all mine in an ultrasonic before spinning. Removed the release agent and any other manufacturer contaminants
@zepromz
@zepromz Год назад
4'44, never remove a cleaning brush directly upwards, you leave a little line of dust. Move it outwards to the edge of the record instead.
@soundmatters
@soundmatters Год назад
There are many different schools of thought on this. Yes, there can be a line of dust, but you can repeat the process until that stops; it's more work, but the idea is that there's less risk of dragging a particle across the surface and scratching the record. At the end of the day, the method you choose is a balance between risk and how much patience you have :) - pros and cons to each I think. Happy spinning.
@thomaslytle5519
@thomaslytle5519 Год назад
It’s Not “affordable” first off. And in every single video review I’ve seen on this, the reviewer had to run the record through the process At Least 3x minimum to hear Any difference! Thanks but I’ll stick to my Vinyl Styl deep groove cleaner, which cost me 68 bucks and does the job in one to two cleanings 😂
@audiotomb
@audiotomb Год назад
I applaud your search for a less expensive ultrasonic! It will make a big difference for you Ultrasonics do not remove fingerprints I have had a KLaudio ultrasonice since late 2013. It is priceless but very expensive - but worth it for my very large collection . Place the record in from the top, only distilled water no chemicals, pristine
@tonyjedioftheforest1364
@tonyjedioftheforest1364 2 года назад
How much is it and do you need to fill up every time
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 2 года назад
Just over $400 in the US I think or around £350 here. You need to re-fill the machine with each cleaning cycle. Hope this helps!
@tonyjedioftheforest1364
@tonyjedioftheforest1364 2 года назад
@@soundmatters sorry to ask again but does that mean a refill for every record and how much water so how much is the average running costs for a UK user? I currently use the Knosti Disco machine but I am now a bit wary as it uses alcohol so was thinking of getting something else to do a second clean such as a Spin clean just in case alcohol damages the vinyl. I am thinking long term now though watching this video something like this Ultrasonic may be cheaper to run as I am buying more and more used records lately.
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 2 года назад
@@tonyjedioftheforest1364 - No worries! For a 12inch record, the water is filled to just under 400ml - hope this helps. So roughly speaking, if you buy in 5l containers, you're going to get juts over 10 cleaning cycles. The good news is, because it's fresh water every time, there's no chance of contamination between records like in a record bath system. Hope this helps
@tonyjedioftheforest1364
@tonyjedioftheforest1364 2 года назад
@@soundmatters so how many records can you clean in a cycle?
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 2 года назад
@@tonyjedioftheforest1364 - only one as the water drains from the basin back into the tank
@AnthonyBeebout
@AnthonyBeebout Год назад
I’m concerned that you would apply a dry cleaning process before the wet process. In my opinion, this is like taking your car to the car wash and asking them to hold off on using any water on the first pass of the beater brushes. Of course my concern is around large gritty debris, not fabric lint. The last thing you should do is push grit around on the surface. Do something (anything) to get the larger granular dirt off of it before you do a dry process. Use canned air…anything…just don’t push it around on the surface like your sweeping with a push broom. Just my opinion.
@Matasky2010
@Matasky2010 Год назад
Fingerprints are going to cause NOISE during playback??? Man, people have truly lost their minds in this hobby lol. People really think a record has got to be flawless to sound good. How do you expect water and vibrations to remove oily fingerprints from the record? It's not using magic.
@luton_gmanrock
@luton_gmanrock 11 месяцев назад
Mostly all these ultrasonic cleaning machines are a waste of hard cash. Degritter would be the only investment if you robbed a bank. All very gimmicky and fancy. The true is, if you use a SpinClean machine (the yellow USA one) and glue in some additional goat hair brushes inside like I did, use a good recipe of Purified water, surfactant, pure alcohol and a drop of dishwasher liquid and a few drops of blackhead remover (yes - blackhead remover!) then you have the perfect cleaner for £120 and not £3000.....true story.
@soundmatters
@soundmatters 11 месяцев назад
Love the Degritter. But it is very expensive. Congratulations on the Pre league promotion by the way! I think you’re fairly local to me 🎶🎧
@scrunts666
@scrunts666 Год назад
My Pro-ject is loads better than this, which is a shame as I was really thinking about getting one.
@soundmatters
@soundmatters Год назад
I think the two can work well together, so far using the two in tandem seems to work well for very dirty old records. But saying that, it’s a real pain in the ass to run it through both machines. I would like to try a Degritter and see how that compares.
@scrunts666
@scrunts666 Год назад
@@soundmatters I agree, it does sound like a pain in the ass to have to use both and it does make me wonder just how much more, if anything, the ultrasonic can bring to the process. I was massively shocked by how it underperformed in your video but kudos for showing it so honestly :)
@LovelyKauai
@LovelyKauai Год назад
All in one? I think you show it is not.
@mikewest1542
@mikewest1542 Год назад
10 minutes cleaning and still grime and fingerprints!
@soundmatters
@soundmatters Год назад
It's not great at fingerprints I find. Good at the stuff in the groove, but you need the additional surfactant. Pre cleaning by hand cleaning will help you with the finger prints.
@pascalhibon7928
@pascalhibon7928 Год назад
@@soundmatters I think you need some chemical in the water, such as alcohol or something, to be able to get greasy dirt out. Water alone will not do that even in an ultrasonic cleaner.
@MrPetermc199
@MrPetermc199 Год назад
Distractingf music
@londonguy73
@londonguy73 3 месяца назад
pointless without a before and after
@ndrsnvrz
@ndrsnvrz 2 года назад
I was suffering through the unboxing… 😱
@mercuryscat2703
@mercuryscat2703 Год назад
Excellent and honest review . I was thinking of upgrading my Project VC s but it looks like they are pretty much similar in terms of results .
@soundmatters
@soundmatters Год назад
Glad it was helpful. I like both units, and there are some minor pros and cons to each. I'm finding the Pro-Ject VC best for all-round results as it cleans finger marks better, but the HumminGuru does seem to help me dig deep into the groove where sometimes the VC struggles to finish it off. Happy spinning and enjoy the music!
@Matasky2010
@Matasky2010 Год назад
One has a vacuum and one doesn't, major difference.
Далее
Ultrasonic Vinyl Record Cleaning - with the HumminGuru
22:11
КРАСИМ ДЕНЬГИ В РОЗОВЫЙ!
01:01
Просмотров 385 тыс.
2DROTS vs RISENHAHA! КУБОК ФИФЕРОВ 2 ТУР
11:31
PROOF! Cleaning vinyl records NEEDS YOUR ATTENTION!!
34:53
HumminGuru Tips: Get Better Record Cleaning Results
7:06
Reviewing the HumminGuru Record Cleaner FINALLY!
13:29
The HumminGuru : Thoughts After Cleaning 100 Records
24:29
How Long will a Record Stylus Last? - When to Replace?
11:56
The GrooveWasher Guide to Vinyl Record Cleaning
11:41
I Like It
2:29
Просмотров 2,6 млн
지민 (Jimin) 'Who' Official MV
3:28
Просмотров 24 млн
Jaloliddin Ahmadaliyev - Kuydurgi (audio 2024)
3:26
Просмотров 1,8 млн
UZmir & Mira - Ey yor (MooD video)
2:52
Просмотров 990 тыс.
Malohat
3:35
Просмотров 1,1 млн