Hun-Hungarian Connection Has Been Proven？-Genetic Evidence Solves Historical Mystery Ep01-part2 

We made a mistake. Latvia does not belong to the Finno-Ugric language family. I am sorry that it has affected everyone's video viewing experience. We will strengthen the review of video production in the future. Thank you to everyone who corrected us. This conclusion is only an introduction to the Finno-Ugric language family and does not affect other conclusions of the entire video. You can watch it with confidence.❤

I suspect that someone paid you to put these lies on RU-vid, because you are starting from the wrong data, since the researchers clearly stated that those whose genetics were examined were based on samples taken from the graves of a very small number of military cemeteries! So their origin is not representative of the entire Hungarian population of the Carpathian Basin, because archaeologists and geneticists have shown that already in the 10th century, the Europid population of the Carpathian Basin was the overwhelming majority, and today's Hungarians are largely descended from them! I quote from the official website of the Hungarian Institute of Archaeogenetic Research, from new archaeogenetic data and population genetics: "The presence of the ancestors of today's Hungarians in the Carpathian Basin has been continuous for thousands of years" "A new database of 16,000 mitogenomes of 172 ancient and living populations was created, and their relationships were analyzed using artificial intelligence-based methods. The new algorithm recognizes all haplogroup correlations, regardless of the time of the process underlying the correlation." "Development of new calculation methods The population genetics method based on artificial intelligence is able to demonstrate the origin and kinship relationships of past and present populations from the distribution of haplogroups of maternal or paternal inheritance with a novel approach. The algorithm based on artificial intelligence can independently group populations with a similar distribution and then calculate the center (central vector) of the distribution. The authors showed that the central vector identifies with a good approximation the ancient populations from the mixing of which today's populations can be derived. With the method, not only the sources of past mixings can be identified, but also the proportions of mixing can be calculated. The inseparable unity of the Carpathian Basin Applying the method to the investigation of the former and present-day populations of the Carpathian Basin, the authors found that the vast majority of the present-day population is from a Copper Age (4500 BC-2800 BC) - Bronze Age (2800 BC-700 BC) can be traced back to a basic population, while immigration from the eastern steppe region seems to have had a smaller genetic impact on the population in the tenth-eleventh centuries. This result coincides with the result of the previous communication (2) written by the researchers of the Hungarian Research Institute, in which they found that the 10 -11th-century the population of the public cemeteries primarily represents the former local population. In our previous publication, we established that the 10 -11th-century most of the commoners probably represent the local population of the Carpathian Basin, which naturally mixed with groups coming (back) from the east, including Árpád's Hungarians and the tribes that came with him." The idea is that these ancestors of the Hungarians lived here in the Carpathian basin at least four to five thousand years ago, which means that they could not have been the ancestors of the Romanians or Slavs, but neither could they have been the ancestors of the Germanic people! Mainly not because the official international consensus also says that the Germanic peoples only came into contact with the Carpathian basin one or two hundred years before Christ, before that they lived much further north, and they moved here in larger numbers only after the Huns! The situation is similar with the Slavs, because even two thousand years ago, these ancient Slavic groups were located in the territory of today's Belarus and Northern Ukraine, which, according to official historical research, only moved south during the time of the Avars, and there are mainly Slavic historians who it is said that some of these Slavic groups also penetrated the Carpathian basin at that time, but this is also very doubtful, because it seems that the Balkan Slavs are from the 6th-7th centuries, they bypassed the Carpathians and thus reached the Balkan Peninsula, but in the time of the Avars, in the Carpathian basin, you can't really find any traces of them! But we have many data that indicate that at least part of the inhabitants of the Carpathian basin spoke the predecessor of the Hungarian language, and they even developed a special script that was later called the Hungarian-Szekler runic script! That's why the experts called this writing the Carpathian basin runic writing, because the punctuation marks match in more than 90%, but such a match was not found anywhere in the East! According to the researchers, it is clear that no matter how much immigration and mixing there was in the Carpathian basin over the millennia, the farming basic population was always in the majority, because otherwise this language would not have survived in the sea of Indo-European languages! Historian, archaeologist, linguist Vékony Gábor, who was an expert in Szekler-Hungarian runic writing, deciphered several such runic texts from the Carpathian Basin Avar period, from the 6th to the 8th centuries, and wrote that they were all in Hungarian, which means that the Hungarians already lived in the Carpathian Basin under the Avars! Historian and classical philologist Dr. Fehér Bence, who deciphered several such runic texts from the Carpathian Basin, in Hungarian, writes that it is certain that Hungarian-speaking peoples lived in the Carpathian Basin during the Avar period as well, and probably even before that. But this Szekler-Hungarian runic script here in the Carpathian Basin already has much older Kimmerian and Scythian parallels, so it should be added that here in the Carpathian Basin much older short scripts matching the features of the Szekler runic script were found, such as the writing marks found on discs and clay tablets associated with the Tordos - Vinca culture. And then it becomes increasingly clear that the ancient population of the Carpathian Basin, which also created this script, could have spoken an ancient version of the Hungarian language, since today's Szekler - Hungarian runic script can only really be applied to the Hungarian language, so not to other mainly Indo-European languages applicable! And the Italian professor of linguistics Mario Alinei, who studied the texts of the Etruscans for many years, as part of his "theory of continuity", became convinced that the Etruscan language was an archaic form of the Hungarian language. The basis of the connection is the extraordinary similarity of the names of Etruscan and ancient Hungarian magistrates and other similarities: typologies, lexicon and historical grammar. Mario Alinei wrote a book entitled "Etrusco: una forma arcaica di ungherese", in which he prove that the Etruscan language was an archaic version of an ancient Hungarian language. According to several Italian and Hungarian researchers, the Etruscan culture originated from the Villanova culture, which had its roots in the Carpathian Basin. Such finds, wrought iron objects, were found in many excavations, the comparison of which is the evidence. In the Bronze Age, Central Europe, especially the Carpathians, was an important industrial center with its many ore units. Excavation of old graves showed that the phenomenon and custom of cremation found among the Etruscans first took root in the Carpathian basin! According to Mario Alinei, the Hungarian-speaking peoples were called Tusci or Turcoi hence the name Tuscana - Toscana, and these Tusci tribes lived together for a long time, such as the people of the Kurgans, which is why they they always kept their own language! Alinei also lists many examples in his book from the prehistoric era, mainly quoting from the common vocabulary of the Hungarians and Etruscans. Here are some examples of parallel words, for illustration, quoted from the book. Capitalized words are Etruscan language, the lowercase letters come from the Hungarian language: URU - úr - lord, NAC - nagy - big, HUT - hat - six, HUS - hős - hero, ECA - ez - this, ELSSI - első - first, AVIL - év - year, MEX - megy - goes. The Italian researchers write that the Etruscans called themselves "Tyrsi" in the ancient Latin inscriptions, a name which is very similar to the name of the most ancient Scythian people in Transylvania, the name of the "Agathyrsi" people living in the valley of the Maros river, about whom Herodotus already wrote in In the 5th century BC. What is very interesting is that this valley of the Maros is exactly where most of the finds of the "Tordos-Vinca" culture were found, where even an ancient city was found there in the last decade, which according to archaeologists is at least 5 thousand years old! I know that it is unbelievable to many, but the name of the Maros river also comes from an ancient Hungarian word, which already appears in Herodotus as Maris, but this word does not mean anything in any other ancient language, only the ancient Hungarian language has the meaning of the words mar - maros, and this name is related to water! And then it is completely logical why in Transylvania and Moldova the rivers mentioned in Antiquity only make sense in Hungarian, and they could not decipher them in other languages. All these data, but also many other linguistic, archeological, place-name and geographical name data, prove that the Hungarian language and the ancient culture connected to it developed here in the Carpathian Basin and its surroundings! Then it is more and more likely that certain groups of the Tusci - Hungarian peoples migrated from here in several waves to the north, east and south, thousands of years ago, which has already been confirmed by the archaeogenetic data of recent years!

The 17 scientists asked the question: The aboriginal population of Europe, in what proportion are the ancient European genes present in the sons of various peoples living today? The ancestral gene, which means nothing more than the genetic code of people living here 35 - 40 thousand years before Christ, which peoples of the European population carry the highest proportion? In Hungarian, the question can be asked as follows: who are the indigenous population of Europe? The test is carried out by determining the Y chromosome. The male chromosome can be better researched because it can be determined from any cell fragment. An intact mitochondrion is required for the female chromosome test. The result is astonishing. Based on Y chromosome research, this group of scientists found that the European ancestor is present in 95% of the population living here in the truncated Hungary today. This means that 95% of the Hungarian population carries proto-European genes. It is at least as interesting as to what proportion of the other European populations carry the European ancestral gene? Who carries the European ancestral gene in a high percentage after the Hungarians? The Poles, the Croats and the Ukrainians beyond the Eastern Carpathians. (50-60 %) The other ethnic groups do not carry the European ancestral gene even in a fraction" Renowned geneticist Dr. Endre Czeizel Genetics of Hungarians c. in his book, he writes about the conclusions that can be drawn from the Semino study: "60% of Hungarian men are descendants of the EU-19 - Paleolithic - ancestor. ...A further 13.3% of Hungarian men are from the EU-18, 11% a is EU-7, and 8.9% are descendants of EU-4 ancestor. All this means that 93.3% of current Hungarian men originate from four ancestors, and 73.3% already here in the Paleolithic era the offspring of living men." Given the outstanding importance of this study, the names and locations of all its authors are published below: Ornella Semino,1,2 Giuseppe Passarino,2,3 Peter J. Oefner,4 Alice A. Lin,2 Svetlana Arbuzova,5 Lars E. Beckman,6 Giovanna De Benedictis,3 Paolo Francalacci,7 Anastasia Kouvatsi,8 Svetlana Limborska,9 Mladen Marcikiae,10 Anna Mika,11 Barbara Mika,12 Dragan Primorac,13 A. Silvana Santachiara-Benerecetti,1 L. Luca Cavalli-Sforza,2 Peter A .Underhill2 The Genetic Legacy of Paleolithic Homo sapiens sapiens in Extant Europeans: A Y Chromosome Perspective; SCIENCE VOL 290. NOVEMBER 10, 2000.

Menander Protector: "When the fourth year of the reign of Emperor Iustinos began, the Turkish embassy arrived in Byzantium... The emperor asked: Enlighten us how large a mass of avarice rebelled against the rule of the Turks and whether you still have any of this people with you. ? The answer was this: There are still, oh emperor, those who faithfully cling to our country, and those who escaped from us, I believe, number about twenty thousand. Euagrius: "The Avars are a Scythian people. He is one of those charioteers who inhabit the plains beyond the Caucasus. They ran away from the neighboring Turks after suffering trouble from them. This is how they arrived at the (Kimmerian) Bosphorus. (Strait of Kerch) They left behind them the shores of the Euxeinos Pontos sea... until they reached the banks of the Danube and sent ambassadors to Iustinianos." Chronicon, Monembasiae: "In the year 6064 of the creation of the world, which was the 32nd year of the reign of the great Iustinianos, the emissaries of that strange people called the Avars came to Constantinople, and the whole city came together to see them, because such a people had never been seen before." In terms of origin, the Avars are a Hun and Bulgarian people. Their hair was very long tied with ribbons and braided. Their other clothing was similar to that of other Huns." Isidorus Hispalensis: "The Huns were formerly called Huns, but eventually they were named Avars after their king."

Separation from the Finnic people and the Mansi (Ugric) people are also just hypotheses as it is impossible to prove it due to the depth of time (4-5000 years). Therefore other hypothesises are equally probable. I am more and more convinced that Hungarian is ancestral to both Finnic and Turkic languages. That could explain lots of genetic and lingquistics relations. Besides, the Arpad dinasty claimed their ancestors were the Scythians and not the Huns. This video also confirms mixing with the Sabars (Sabirs) a tribe of the Scythians. But also confirmed the mixing with the Xiongnu, the ancestors of the Huns, so again proints to the direction of Hungarians being older than the Finnic and Turkic populations.

Chronicon Pictum circa 1360 Noah - survivor of the flood (his son Jáfet, who received Europe from his father when the land was divided - according to the writings of St. Jerome - his son Magóg - the founder of the sittya, that is, the Hungarian family) Noah's other son Kham is his Kush, then Tana, who is the father of Nimrod Nimrod (who is the first king of the earth, who is the first king of the world.) is married to Enéh. His two sons, Hunor and Magor, are the founders of the Hun, that is, the Hungarian nation So: Noah's son Kham, his is Kús, then Tana, his is Nimrod, his is Hunor his Bor his is Dáma his is Keled, his is Keve, his is Kér his Belér, his is Kádár, his is Otmár, his Farkas, his is Bondofárd, his Bökény, his is Csanád, his is Budli, his Beszter, his Mike his Miske, his Ombód his Kölcse his is Levente his Lél, his is Zámor his Balog, hers is Bulcsú, his Szultan, hers is Berend, his is Kadocsa his Opos, his Ete, his is Szemeny, his is Torda, whose son is Bendegúz. Children of Bendegúz; Saint Etele, also known as Atilla (Food-Drink, i.e. Life..Body-Blood) (the second first king of the Hungarians, the Scourge of God, the Hammer of the World, the delimiter of our country) and he was Buddha (enlightened!) (material consciousness (Body level: active physical lifestyle) Magor (soul consciousness: process of becoming still)... The historical Buddha (Buddhism) Gautama Siddhartha, Gautama Buddha/Buddha The name Sakyamuni is a Sanskrit word, meaning 'Sage of the Shakyas'. Siddhartha Gautama's father is Sakya/Sakya, meaning Scythian... It is believed that the Sakyas/Sakyas originate from the ancient sage Gautama Maharisi (Magarisi/Magor) who lived in Vedic times... Atilla's son Csaba, his Ed, his Ügyek (Ugec), his Előd, his is Álmos, who led a significant part of the Hungarian people living in the east home. Árpád, son of Álmos, who strengthened our Carpathian country, dividing our people into seven parts, as follows: 1. Árpád, the most powerful, who fought at the forefront in battles, settled with his people in Pilis. 2. Szabolcs, still in the area of Szabolcs County. 3. In the part between Gyula, Transylvania and Nagyalföd. 4. Künd, next to the Nyír. 5. Lél, the Galgóc countryside became theirs. 6. Vérbulcsú, inhabited the elbow of Lake Balaton. 7. Örs, but the Sajó district became his accommodation. Árpád's son Zoltán, his is Taksony, his Géza, his Saint István (the third first king of our nation) Orseolo Peter Aba Samuel 1041-1044 Orseolo Peter the second time 1044-1046 Andrew I 1046-1060 Béla I 1060-1063 Solomon 1063-1074 Géza I 1074-1077 Laszlo I (Saint) 1077-1095 (Book) Kálmán 1095-1116 II. Stephen 1116-1131 II. (Blind) Béla 1131-1141 II. Géza 1141-1162 III. Stephen 1162-1172 II. Viceroy László 1162-1163 ARC. Viceroy István 1163-1165 III. Béla 1172-1196 Imre 1196-1204 III. László (minor) 1204-1205 II. Andrew 1205-1235 ARC. Béla 1235-1270 Stephen V 1270-1272 ARC. (Kun) László 1272-1290 III. András 1290-1301 Mixed house rulers (Czech) Wenceslas 1301-1305 (Bavaria) Otto 1305-1307 (Anjou) Robert Charles I 1308-1342 (Anjou) Louis I (the Great) 1342-1382 (Anjou) Mary 1382-1385 (of Durazzo) II. Charles (Little) 1385-1386 (Anjou) Mary 1386-1395 Sigismund (of Luxembourg) 1387-1437 (Habsburg) Albert 1438-1439 (Jagielló) Ulaszló I 1440-1444 (Habsburg) László V 1444-1457 Governor János Hunyadi 1446-1453 (Hunyadi) Mátyás I 1458-1490 (the moral decline of the world really began after the death of our lord Mátyás, after all, he was our last Sacral world king) (Jagiello) II. Ulaszló 1490-1516 (Jagiello) II. Louis 1516-1526 János Szapolyai 1526-1540 ....then came the chance and the time of the House of Habsburg....Mátyás Hunyadi closed his eyes and gave them the opportunity to rise...but unsuccessfully...

Extract from Neparáczki archaeogenetics: Based on Neparáczki, the following genetic distribution emerges from the 89 "occupier" graves excavated in Hungary: Scandinavian Germanic 39 (43.82%), Asian Hun 37 (41.57%), Caucasian 5 (5.61%), Slavic 2 (2 .25%), Other European 6 (6.75%). "The groups closest to the population of Karos are the early European farmers who lived 6000-3000 years ago (STR=Starcevo), the Middle Eastern Neolithic (MEN), the Szakálhát culture of the Carpathian basin (SZA), the Yamnayas (YAM, 3500-2300 BC Black steppe above the sea), the population of the Scythian kurgans of the Iron Age (KIK, 800-600 BC) and the Asian Bronze Age Scythians from the Tagar-Tachtyk culture (TAG, 800 BC - AD 400). The Central Asian Bronze Age is also close Sintastha culture (SIA, the first steppe nomads) and the population of the Iron Age Baraba steppe (BB3, southern Siberia)."

We the Hungarians have at least five (5) main connections with the Huns. The FIRST is that our common Wonder Deer cult is originated from Tuva regions in the begining of the etnogenezis of the Huns arround Mongolia in the begining of Iron Age (Accordig to genetic sience, Tuva was the real origin point of the uralic speaking nations (that is why the Hungarians and other "uralic" speaking nations in the reality are Tuva speaking nations). The SECOND arround 300 BD, when the sarmatians came from the west direction to the Mongolian region and affected the Huns to form the asian Hun Empire. Before that in the V. century BD, we the Hungarians and Sarmatians combinated 40%-60%, at the South-West Ural region. The THIRD: After the fight between the Huns themself in 50 BD, many of them start to go to the West in the Nodhern Silk Road traditionaly ruled by hun like (culturally hunised) "uralic" nations, who joined to them (nowerdays from 22 million "uralic" language speaking (in reality Tuva languages speaking) people 15 million is hungarian). FOUR: The Huns (in 200 AD) came to the territory of Magna Hungaria in the south-western part of the Ural and mixed 15% with us. Our great King dynasty what ruled for 450 years (!), the Árpád dynasty is from the Hun house of Tugrul. Basicly the Hungarian languages is a tuvian ("uralic") languages, deeply affected by the turk language. According of the genetic sience 50% of the hungarian nation of Árpád Khan was "uralic", 25% sarmatian, 25% turk. Geneticly our closest relatives are the volgian Tatars, the Mansi (and Udmurts) and the Baskirs. Turk ve Macar Kardes! Genetical sience: Dr. Neparáczki, Endre, Tibor (2019. november 12.). „Y-chromosome haplogroups from Hun, Avar and conquering Hungarian period nomadic people of the Carpathian Basin” (angol nyelven). Scientific Reports 9 (1), 16569. o. DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-53105-5. ISSN 2045-2322. PMID 31719606.

THE GESTA HUNGARORUM OF ANONYMUS, THE ANONYMOUS NOTARY OF KING BÉLA (ad, 1060 oraund) 1. Of Scythia Scythia is then a very great land, called Dentumoger, over towards the east, the end of which reaches westwards to the Black Sea [Nigrum Pontem]. On the far side, it has a river with great marshes, called the Don [Thanais], where sables can be found in such extraordinary abundance that not only nobles and ignobles dress in them but also with which even ox-herds, swine-herds and shepherds adorn their raiment in that land. Gold and silver abound there and in the rivers of this land precious stones and gems. On its eastern side, neighbouring Scythia, were the peoples ‘Gog and Magog’, whom Alexander the Great walled in. Scythia is very marshy in its length and breadth, and indeed the men who dwell there, commonly called Dentumoger, have right up to the present day never been subject to the sway of any emperor. The Scythians are certainly an ancient people and the strength of Scythia lies in the east, as we said above. And the first king of Scythia was Magog, son of Japhet, and this people were called after him Moger, from whose royal line the most renowned and mighty King Attila descended, who, in the 451st year of Our Lord’s birth, coming down from Scythia, entered Pannonia with a mighty force and, putting the Romans to flight, took the realm and made a royal residence for himself beside the Danube above the hot springs, and he ordered all the old buildings that he found there to be restored and he built them in a circular and very strong wall that in the Hungarian language is now called Budavár [Buduuar] and by the Germans Etzelburg [Ecilburgu]. What more! We will keep to the story. A long time after, there descended from the progeny of the same King Magog, Vgek, father of Duke Álmos, from whom the dukes and kings of Hungary trace their origin, as will be said in what follows. The Scythians, as we said, are indeed an ancient people, of whom historians writing of the deeds of the Romans, said as follows:32 That the Scythian people was most wise and gentle; they did not work the soil nor barely knew any sin among them. And they did not have homes built by craft but rather tents made of felt. They ate meat and fish and milk and honey and they had much spice. And their clothes were of the pelts of sables and other wild beasts. They had gold, silver and gems as common as stones, which they found in the rivers of this land. They desired no one else’s goods, for they were all rich, having many animals and sufficient victuals. And there were no adulterers, for every man kept only to his wife. But, later, this people, worn out in war, became, as some historians tell, so cruel that they ate in wrath human flesh and drank the blood of humans. And I believe that you may still know a hardy nation by its fruits. The Scythian people were never subjugated by any emperor. For the Scythians made Darius, king of the Persians, flee with the greatest ignominy, and Darius lost there 80,000 men and so fled in great fear to Persia. Next, the Scythians slew Cyrus, king of Persia, with 330,000 men. Next, the Scythians put to base flight even Alexander the Great himself, the son of King Philip and Queen Olympias, who had conquered many kingdoms in war. And the Scythian race was hardy so as to endure all toil and the Scythians were big in body and bold in war. And they had nothing in the world that they feared to lose for an injury done to them. And when the Scythians had a victory, they wished nothing of booty, as do their posterity today, but sought only praise for it. And except for Darius, Cyrus and Alexander, no people in the world dared enter their land. The aforesaid Scythian people were indeed hardy in combat and, on speedy mounts and with helmeted heads, they were better with bows and arrows than all the other nations of the world, and you will know this to be so from their offspring. And the Scythian land, as much as it is distant from the tropics, is as healthy for the generating of families. And although spacious enough, it was still insufficient to sustain or keep the host of peoples begotten there. On account of this, the seven leading persons, who are called the Hetumoger, not tolerating the pressures of space, thought very greatly of a solution. Then these seven leading persons, having taken counsel together, decided that they should forsake the soil of their birth and take for themselves such lands as they could inhabit, as will be said in what follows.

Prof. Grover S. Krantz Geographical development of European languages "... the Greek language, therefore, was present in 6500 BC, Celtic language was born in 3500 BC in Ireland. The greatness of the Hungarian language in the Carpathian Basin is equally surprising; I find that its origin leads to the mesolithic, before the Stone Age. "

You can see below that until the 18th century, the Hungarians and the whole of Europe knew that the Hungarians were the Huns and the Scythians. The Hungarian chronicles also confirm this. Chronicles are made for kings and lying to a king is dangerous. The chronicler can easily lose his head. So the chronicler wrote the truth. (But they did not yet know the Finno-Ugric theory or the Turkic-Onoguric theory.)

A very gratifying exposition, which more or less confirmed what I already thought to be probably the case from my historical readings concerning the Huns and the Magyars! Some fascinating further details as well that could not of course be obtained from historical records. Great stuff!

Thanks for the detailed research. It is very interesting. I think that the direct heirs of the Huns and Xiongnu are the modern Chuvash living on the Volga. Recent genetic studies of the Tashtyk mummies of Oglakhta from the Minusinsk Basin prove that the Chuvash are genetically closest to them. And the Minusinsk Basin was part of the Xiongnu Empire. It is also recognized by many scientists that the Chuvash language is closest to the Ogur branch of the Bulgar group of the Turkic family of languages. I wish you further searches in this direction. Best wishes to you.

Latvian isn't a finnic-ugric language though, although latvians of course have genetic and probably linguistic influences therefrom.

A.D. 1283 - Gesta Hunnorum et Hungarorum. "After the flood in the two hundred and first year, the giant Menróth, the son of Thana, born from the seed of Jáphet, started building a tower with all his brothers, thinking of the danger of the past, so that if the flood should come again, they could escape the vengeful judgment by escaping into the tower. However, the decree of the divine secret will, which cannot stand against human reason, changed and confused languages in such a way that, after they could not understand their relatives, they finally spread to different landscapes. In the mentioned tower, as Josephus says, temples of the gods were made of the purest gold, palaces inlaid with precious stones, golden columns, and streets lined with colored stones. And that tower rose upon four corners; fifteen thousand paces from one corner of its edge to the other, its length was the same, its height was not yet finished, but according to their intention the moon up to its circumference, which the flood did not reach, it should have been raised. The thickness of its base it was three hundred paces, but as it rose it gradually narrowed to the thickness of its bottom it can withstand the load pressing on it. Vala also published Nubia and Egypt and its remains Going from Memphis to Alexandria, you can still see it. 3.§. Nemrót moves to Persia. His sons Hunor and Mogor are the ancestors of the Huns and Hungarians. Disregarding the events that give color to our initial subject, we must return to the giant Menróth, who, after the confusion of languages had begun, went to the land of Eviláth, which at this time is called the province of Persia, and there by his wife Eneth he begat two sons, Namely Hunort and Mogort, from whom the Huns or Hungarians came. But since Menróth apart from Eneth, as we know, the giant had several wives, from whom besides Hunor and Mogor he begat several sons and daughters; the sons of these and their remnants inhabit the province of Persia, resembling the Huns in stature and appearance, but differing somewhat in speech from the Saxons and Thuringians. And since Hunor and Mogor were the first born, they separated from their fathers and went to separate tents." Menróth, Nemrót = Nimrud Nimród

So the Bashkirs occupied the former Hungarian lands with the residual Hungarian population living there (we have historical records on Hungarians living there even in the XIII century) and your conclusion is that the Arpads are Bashkirs because they have the same genetics as the Bashkirs TODAY? For god sake the Bashkirs assimilated the remaining Hungarians there, of course their genetics is similar to Hungarians as Bashkirs are part Hungarians therefore! And not the way around.

What's going on here. How the long story can be explained in short. The Early Xiongnu were like the Siberian Tatars, Bashkirs and Altaians. The western branch is of the Scythian-Siberian Pazyryk type. Eastern - Paleo-Siberian. The Late Xiongnu were defeated and fragmented, in the North and South. Southern fell into slavery to the Han. They were absorbed into the far eastern Donghu-Xianbei and Han. And the northern ones split into Altaian and Western Huns-Xiongnu and formed the first wave Bulgar-Turkic diffusion. The Sarmatians switch to Hunnic language. There are already at least three different non-interconnected Hunnu groups. Accordingly, the Early Turks Ashina were not related to the Turks, they were Nanai, Tungus and other Mongols, as well as Chinese from the absorbed southern Xiongnu. At the same time, the Early Medieval Turks were relatively europeoid, the heirs of the Early Xiongnu and Scythian-Siberians, like the Bashkirs and Siberian Tatars. As well as the Volga Tatars, remaining at the base of the Sarmatians, with some contribution from the western Huns. As a result, the early medieval nomads are completely supplanted by the far-eastern nomads of the second wave like Kazakhs, Kirghiz, Uzbeks and Uyghurs - who essentially come from the far-eastern Donghu, Mongolian Xianbei-Xiongnu, the yellow river Chinese who absorbed the remaining settled Sogdians, moving from Han to Turkmenistan-Iran and Near East. Many northern tribes are fighting, but in the end they are broken by the Muscovites of Ivan the Terrible from the west and the Mongols of the Uzbek Timur from the east. So the history ends, 3000-4000 thousand years long. For individuals who tell why Turks and Mongols are dressed like Scythians, as well as drink milk. Because the Scythians originated the Xiongnu, but the Xiongnu originated the Huns. But modern CA Turks are far from both, as are the Hungarians. It is understood that the proto-Ugric Khanty-Mansi-Magyar, on the periphery, fell into the sphere of interests of Sarmatians, and then into the sphere of interests of Hunnu.

The Hungarians who conquered at the end of the century were 10-(max. 15%) of the local population. 60% of the conquering population were genetically similar to the Bashkirs and Volga Tatars (former Volga Bulgars) living today. Among the ancient archaeological cultures, they were genetically related to the OKUNEVO culture, Siberian Scythians (based on samples of bones from Scythians living in Tuva and present-day Kazakhstan), Scythians found in Pazyryk in the Altai Mountains, Sagly-Uyuk culture, Xiongnu culture found in western Mongolia. Hungarians considered themselves Scythians and Huns (Scythians among the Huns) according to our ancient chronicles. Video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-6tjGxX-4ZZA.html time: 20:02. In the 10th century, 6% (max. 9 %) of the population of the Hungarian Principality were new immigrants related to the Manyssis. They certainly could not have spread a new language in 150 years. The local inhabitants, on the other hand, were largely descended from Scythians who had lived in the Carpathian Basin. What links the Siberian Scythians with the Scythians of the Carpathian Basin? Culture? Language?

There are suppositions that Arpad and his father were representatives of the Dullo clan from which the Bulgarian Dullo rulers were. The genetic analysis of king Bella III shows that he was bearer of a special R1a branch called Arp as I remember. The closest to it haplogroups were found among Afghanistan and Tajik people. The Amu Darya Valley was the homeland of the Dullo people and some of the pra-Bulgarians. Later the Dullo clan moved with the pra-Bulgarians to the west and founded Great Bulgaria in 632. After the end of this state some 50 years later a branch of the pra-Bulgarians led by Kotrag moved to Volga-Kama region where the Magyars and Bashkirs also dwelled. The Volga Bulgaria was founded. A branch of the Kotrag descendants led by Arbat (Arpat) and some of the pra-Bulgarians moved together with the Magyars and local Bashkir people to the west. They tried to enter to the south in the lands of the First Bulgarian Empire but were repelled by the Bulgars and Pechenegs and moved west. Arpat organized the first Magyar kingdom and was chosen to be the first Magyar military ruler (gyula < Dullo?).

Greetings from Hungary to our all Turkic𐱅𐰇𐰼𐰜 brothers🤘🏻🐺🇹🇷🇺🇿🇰🇿🇦🇿🇰🇬🇹🇲🇭🇺🇧🇬🐎🏹

When the Romans brought Tribute to the Court of Attila, they were really buying a mercenary army to create a buffer zone beyond their border. By financing Attila, the Romans ensured that the heaviest fighting would occur beyond Roman territory. If Attila failed to halt the barbarians, he would weaken the invaders and buy time for Rome to dispatch a legion. Rome was happy to do this. Training and equipping a legion took years and the loss of seasoned warriors was more dangerous than the loss of treasure. Attila's warriors were paid less than legionaries, so it was a good deal for Rome. Additionally, Rome's ambassadors could observe battle tactics and report back to Rome. If the Legions became involved, they would be prepared.

CONSTANTINUS VII PORPHYROGENITUS: DE ADMINISTRANDO IMPERIO 38th head. The origins of the Turks and their origins The people of the Turks used to live in Kazakhstan, called Levedia, the name of their first Vojvod, which was called Vojveda by Levedi and, by virtue of his dignity, as the rest of him, as a butter. This is where the Chidmasz River, called Chedilou, flows into Levedía. But at that time they were not told to the Turks, but for some reason Sabartoeasphali they named. The Turks consisted of seven tribes, but they were never their own or alien princes, but they were some kind of vajda, the first of which was the Levedi. Levedi was a hungarian leader and area was named to Levedia. So, originally the hungarian were named to Turks by the Bysanteum and Greeks.

It's a bit tricky concentrating on a small region of the genome, because depending on where you look you will end up at different places. Just going through the whole genome and cherry picking one region where what you are looking for happens to line up doesn't prove much, or anything.

The "God One" in Hungarian runic script, read from top to bottom, looks like this: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-CYwjPzIQ6l4.html time: 0:22. The top part has become the lily symbol. The meaning of the symbol is God. God in Hungarian is ISTEN. The sign of TEN is a tendril curving left and right at the end of a stem. This is the same sign as TENGRI's tamga. According to linguists, IS comes from the word ŐS, which means ancestor. In Hungarian runic writing, the sign is a seed, crossed out vertically in the middle. These two signs together make the lily symbol seen on the hat at 36:33 in the video (ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-54o50Gl3D0I.html). At 9:36 in the video, a similar symbol is seen on the tent decoration. On a disc from the 10th century at Solt-tételhegy (Hungarian locality), the sun is surrounded by the four lilies of God in the shape of a cross. A simplified version can be seen here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-uHBDVGDeAnA.html time 41:17, figures 17 and 18. Around the solar disk in four directions is inscribed God, God, God, God. What does this symbolize? This symbol is also found on a Scythian carpet. (Pazyryk Culture)

Hungarians,bulgarians,both follow Dulo clan,as other tribes,from Eurasia,as bashkirs,chuvash,karachai and kabardino balkarci,why all of those call themselfs bulgars.Are hungarians,bin onoguri.other bulgar tribe,from Volga Bulgaria.East Romans pay,to magyars to attack Bulgaria,but tcar Simeon beat them,not destroy them, send them in Panonia,to keep borders of Bulgaria.So are we cousins ?

That is a problem, that the Árpáds claim to be Attila's successors. This is important because because of this, it was possible to unite Avars and Hungarians and create a Hungarian principality. The important thing is that Avarkánság collapsed due to internal contradictions, and this was recorded by Hungarian chroniclers. Vi

0:09= Not misteriously , well known amongs us = he was poisoned in drink , than Ildiko stick up into his noise her hairstick . That's how he was murdered , thats how he died . Etc...

"Magyarization" in the 19th century - how about adding compulsory "ova" to female names of Magyar origin in Slovakia, NOW?

Could the people of the Carpathian Basin in the Hun era have claimed to be Huns?

Slight mistake right up front! It appears to be agreed that Attila died in March 453, not in 452!

You commit a grave error that seriously impeaches your claims: it is well known and not disputed that the Latvian language is Baltic Indo-European and not Uralic. However, a Finnic population formerly lived in the territory of modern Lativa and has been either assimilated by Balts or undergone language shift to Latvian: the Livonians.

Well, Latvian language isn't an uralic language excep some pull of borrowings, it is as baltic (indoeuropean) as Lithaunian. But genetically of course latvians have more y-haplogroup N than e.g. lithanians or russians or belarus (which also have, also Rus Rurik princes and Lithaunia Gediminas princes had N1c1). Also language isn't always following paternal ancestary of the elite. Relatively recent example is Bulgaria, the mame ist after turik conquerors and all the rest including language is from local slavs.

Where is the last diagram comes from?

Saint Isidore (around 630) also mentions it with the following introductory lines: "The Hungarians, who before that were called Huns..." [The Latin Patrologia, volume 82, book nine, chapter two, article 66. Migne Patrologia latina Tomus 82. page 334. S. Isidori: Originum sive Etymologiarum liber. IX. chapter II § 66.], then Rubruk (circa 1254) writes the following referring to Isidorus "Isidorus says ... the Huns, who were later called Hungarians ...

Well, it is very sad, that anyone can put fake things on RU-vid. There are a couple of fake ideas in this video. Most importantly, French scientists compared the genes from a Hunnic tomb in Mongolia with the genes of III Béla Hungarian king descended of Árpád, that the genes are in the same Haplogroup, proving our king had Hunnic origin so Árpád must have had Hunnic origin. as our chronicles, the old Bulgar chronicle and the old Bulgar family tree states. You only proved your ignorance.

great news❤thanks😊

make like this for Bulgaria pls. and check the map of Yamnaya culture,Scythia and Sarmatia,Onoguria and Old great Bulgaria of khan Kubrat,and DNA of yamnaya,thracians,dacians,scythians and sarmatians,old bulgarians,those are tribes around Black see steppes and today's bulgarians,coz we are here since 681 year AD,as country and give bulgarian alfabet and old church slavonic is old bulgarian,to many peoples,from our original lands,but where is mongoloid,or turk DNA in us,as every say,but cant see hah.In bulgarian is not Hungary,but Ungaria(maybe from onoguri),and land between Volga and Kama has bin country Volga Bu;garia,btw.Healt and happynes

Site full of complexities.

After eteloz the Hungarians no longer had magyar women.Were enslaved from pechenegs.

Hungarians of today who are Magyars, and don't even have the word Hungarian in their language, have nothing to do with the Huns. Huns didn't disappear at all. Procopius describes the Huns who were hired by Byzantine Empire as cavalry. Procopius wrote around the year 530 AD. Huns changed the name from Huns to Avars and continued to be an immense power until defeated by the Franks in year 800. After the defeat the Huns retreated in the Carpathian Mountains, but the name Hungaria still existed. When Magyars came to Pannonia (Hungaria) there were no great power to stop them. The Hungarians of today have the name from the land, not the other way around.

So conclusion: some Bashkirs became Magyars. So a third of the population is Magyar (which already is mixed Europeans and Siberians/Finno-Ugric) and half is European (Gepid, Gothic, Lombard, Vandal, German, Lazyg, Dacian, Celtic, Italian, Slavic). With the rest being Turkic (Bashkir and potentially Avar), Siberian (Asian, Aryan/Sarmatian/Scythian, other Ugric and potentially Avar). Therefore Hungarians are 65% European, 15% Finno-Ugric and 20% mixed Iranian/Turkic/Asian/Siberian.

Bla bla bla...

Such nonsense😂

Pa zasto onda biste crni vec plavi. Imate 40%slovensje DNK i ostalo UgroFinsko, isto su plavi.

Conquer hungarians lived seperated from the invaded indigenous people like 4-5 generations so hungarian archeologists knew for decades their were the minority like 1:10 ...and today hungarians 95% typically europeans and genetically very similar to austrians or slovaks.

Sources had preserved only 2 words of European Huns of Attila. Both words are 100% Slavic. It begs the question, why do we think that Atilla was a Turk?