Mongol Army - Tactics, Logistics, Siegecraft, Recruitment DOCUMENTARY 

Yea! Love your videos🔥🔥

You are so cool

Where is the translation?

Where is the translation?

Where is the translation?

@Indian Streetshietters so what does that have to do with 1 TB of horse sounds?

@Indian Streetshietters nice bait

@Indian Streetshietters this is the laziest bait I've ever seen.

@@SA2004YG bait for what?

@@kv4648 Salt

And we have at least a bachelor degree

I don't care. I am loving it.

You should listen to the podcast. Has an entire season on the mongols. It's amazing!

What are your qualifications? "I watch Kings and Generals's videos"

Have you seen their podcast? Because now YOU can get a doctorate in Mongol history too!

I understood that reference.

"I will draw you, Gout, as poison is drawn from a wound." -Mithrandir, probably

@@skynyrdjesus Coincidentally, I am on Febuxostat, with an emergency stash of Eterocoxib.

@@Z020852 How fortuitous! I hereby name you Ezra, Toes-Friend, for your services to the feet of the Great Khan

@@levelperfecto plz explain

One should have known by then that the ultimate act is in the hand of a remote control creator whose power's are the same now,before... and after and forever. Qui dit mieux?

in the wars, logistics is almost everything. air superiority, logistic, and military war tactics...

@wargames hardly. His baggage train and suppy routes were half the reason he was pushed out of Russia

They could wage guerilla war in enemy lands😂

Napoleon?

What's your favorite era

> 'Netflix and... turn your brain off.'

People come out with some really cool stuff when they do it for love instead of money. Hollywood is just corporate now. They have no soul.

Thank you for your service.

@UCMIl1td3mzadKQpjyfN9oCw you’re an i/d/i/o/t . If we didn’t quarantine. We could have easily lost 10s of millions of people within the 20 months. A drastic drop like that is bad for stability and the economy.

They were so Advanced for their time

and Turkic Baibars killed him

Always reminds me of Scarface ending.

@@rahel7443 The numbers were roughly the same and the climate was also an advantage for the Mamluks but Im sure that Baybars and Qutuz are much better generals than Kitbukha nevertheless we can accept that if Hulagu was to take part it wouldve been all over

@@nenenindonu If they were equal, Hulagu would also lose.

@@rajeshbande1136 LoL 😂😂 Baibars won 22 Battles,or Hulagu? BAİBARS BATTLES Battle of La Forbie Battle of Mansurah Seventh Crusade Battle of Ain Jalut Siege of Safed(1266) Siege of Antioch(1268) Fall of Arsuf Fall of Caesarea Fall of Haifa(1265) Siege of Tripoli(1271) Fall of Krak Des Chevaliers Siege of Askhalon Mamluks Conquest of Makuria Siege of Halep Battle of Halep(1270) Battle of Elbistan Baibars’s Campaign of Anatolia Lord Edward Crusade Ninth Crusade Battle of Mari

Merci

Thanks bruh

❤

All they did was stitch together their previous 8 videos and add some animation. Nothing’s new here. It’s a good product nonetheless.

I like it better in a longer format say 1-2 hours than the usual 15-20 minute segments which is akin to a snack rather than a full meal.

The history channel is in decline since the mongol invasions.

But this production leaves out the fact that the Mongol technology was given to them by space aliens.

@@MrNiceGuyHistory Ancient astronaut theorists say yes.

Nice🤜

Turks and Mongols lived together, and some Mongols wore Turkish clothing, for example, it was the Turks who appointed the first decimal system in the world and an officer at the head of the army.

​@@dorulegnobody cares about the Turks

@@changedpace9169 Are you sure that no one cares, if you take us out of history, there will be no such thing as history

​@@changedpace9169😂

Yeah. It all comes down to maintenance/protection. It kind of reminds me of people who oversimplify the M16A1's unreliability in Vietnam - that was more to do with people neglecting to clean it because they didn't think it necessary.

It was rather chinese vs chinese at this point with sieges lasting several years.

I'm pretty sure most of Kublai's troops that took on the song with Chinese auxiliaries.

@@ICCraider Yes, that's true. The northern Chinese of the Jin Dynasty were known for using composite recurve bows, and the Song Dynasty also used composite bows (in addition to also using self bows). So the Song Dynasty themselves were using composite bows in hot and humid wet environments.

@@qqtrol1774 Yes. Both the northern Chinese Jin troops sent to invade the Song, and the Song Dynasty themselves were using composite recurve bows and composite recurve crossbows. So the Song Dynasty was using composite bows (alongside self bows) in the hot and humid wet climate of southern China.

Yes we do . Just checking in silence.

I think y'all have an amazing culture. I hope to visit there one day.

@@KingNoTail thank you brother. If you ever visit make sure to visit around july for naadam. Winter here sucks so avoid travel to mongolia in winter unless you like arctic weather.

Yes i am

here we are, just chilling and living in harmony on a huge ass cold land

I felt the same way learning about the vikings

Today's society has made us weak, ancient harsh environment made us tough in the past but now we all are weak!

well for a man with no words, you just used a lot of words.

Hahaha, hang in there buddy.

Failure! You must be trampled by the horde! Naa your good mate, Fortunate for the rest of us aye

Nah,the real success of the mongol empire was due to them valuing skills,intellect,abilities and loyalty above wealth and social status...

​@@mikeguce7959 valuing skills, intelligence and ability is also a form of adaptation. So, he's right

Seljuks are not a steppe empire. It is Turko-iranian sultanate

@@kila200 The most important aspect which is the military was completely Nomad-Turkic what are you on about ?

@@nenenindonu if you look that way then safavids should classify as a steppe empire because their military was mainly from nomadic turkomans?

@@kila200 It was nomadic until Shah Abbas' military reforms while the Seljuk armies always remained nomadic

@@nenenindonu you think safavid empire was nomadic before shah abbas? I don't think so. Army is not the main identification for an empire's culture. Safavids were more of a iranic state

I'd forgotten about it after 5 minutes lol

Lol, I seen that video

Greetings from Turkey, Genghis Khan's general, we were Turkish officers and soldiers

😂😂😂😂

Thank you so much!

Dont invade Russia......

You marring Josephine😀

Facts

@@DaVultureTTG but fun facts

@@MucizatTevarih She sure is a great kisser

It's not just in 21st century standard that their tactics and methods were gruesome and cruel. Even in their time period, normally an army wouldn't massacre the whole population. In the west and middle-east, this hadn't happened since ancient times when people who resisted conquest would've been killed for doing so. You had much smaller armies and populations in the medieval ages, so conquering territory meant conquering the population too and only, if at all, kill the garrisons - and even those were often unharmed even after sieges if it didn't come to the siege of the citadel rather than just the castle/city - so you would have people working the fields and stuff. As nomads, mongols at first didn't need people working the fields because they were self-sufficient. Only when they incorporated more and more people into their empire, they mostly stopped killing everyone who resisted - even tho they still did it because with all the chinese they just made their subjects, they didn't have to keep smaller populations alive. Again - such massacres were not common. Just look at the massacre at Ayyadieh , were "only" 2000 people were murdered. It was still considered barbaric, even by christian sources. For the christians and muslims, massacres were something rare and gruesome. For the mongols, it was only one of their many terror-tactics to break their enemy even before actual battles happened to weaken their moral.

Attila and Timur were Turkic, Gengish Mongol

@@scourgeofgodattila579 I think it not wrong though they all Nomadic people. Plus I think Timur is Turkic-Mongol and Attila is so long ago the culture of Turkic or Mongol not even exist yet so you can’t really classify him as such. If we were to believe the Chinese source then he would be Xianbei culture and according to European he is Hunnic

@@thienngo7252 The Xiongnu became politically dominant in the steppes around 300 BC, and although the linguistic affiliation of the Xiongnu proper is still a matter of dispute, their political confederation certainly contained a significant Turkic component. By both ethnohistorical and linguistic considerations this component may in the first place be identified with the Bulgharic (Bulghar Turkic) branch of Turkic, today represented by the Chuvash language in the Volga region. The Turkic component of the Xiongnu is, however, unambiguously signalled by a number of Bulgharic loanwords in Proto-Samoyedic, such as *yür 'hundred'. The Bulgharic (Proto-Bulgharic) speakers are likely to have entered Southern Siberia , the location of Proto-Samoyedic , not earlier than the last century BC. At the same time, a number of local words, notably *kadï 'conifer' (> Chuvash xïra„ ~ xïr 'birch '), were borrowed from Proto-Samoyedic into Bulgharic. Review: J. Janhunen (ed.),The Mongolic languages, London, New York : Routledge, 2003 An earlier date for the separation of proto-Turkic, preceding 209 BC would support the identification of Xiongnu language with proto-Bulgharic or one of its subgroups, while a later date of separation would make its association with proto-Turkic more plausible. Alexander Savelyev, Martine Robbeets, Bayesian phylolinguistics infers the internal structure and the time-depth of the Turkic language family, Journal of Language Evolution, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2020 Xiongnu (Pre-Proto-Bulgharic, in Mongolia). Mongolian Vowel Harmony in a Eurasian Context In: International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics Authors: Ian G. Barrere 1 and Juha A. Janhunen University of Helsinki Online Publication Date: 18 Jun 2019 As this time depth coincides with the beginning of the Xiongnu empire (209 BCE-100 CE), the association of Xiongnu with Proto-Bulgharic does not seem unreasonable. However, given the relatively large credible interval involved in the Bayesian dating, the breakup of proto-Turkic may also be connected with the first disintegration of the Xiongnu confederation under influence of the military successes of the Chinese in 127-119 BCE (Mudrak 2009). In sum, the time depth of the breakup of Proto-Turkic can be estimated between 500 BCE and 100 CE. Martine Robbeets, Remco Bouckaert, Bayesian phylolinguistics reveals the internal structure of the Transeurasian family, Journal of Language Evolution, Volume 3, Issue 2, July 2018 The language of the European Huns is sometimes referred to as a Bulghar Turkic variety in general linguistic literature, but caution is needed in establishing its affiliations. The predominant part of the Xiongnu population is likely to have spoken Turkic (Late Proto-Turkic, to be more precise). Cite this article: Savelyev A, Jeong C (2020). Early nomads of the Eastern Steppe and their tentative connections in the West. Evolutionary Human Sciences 2, e20, 1-17.

@@scourgeofgodattila579 Who cares? They were all nomads. Jesus you Turkophiles can be annoying sometimes.

@@thienngo7252 When the Mongols' 60% Turkic origin, the Göktürk state, the Hun state and the Uyghur state collapsed, the Turks came under the rule of the Mongols and in time they dissolved among the Mongols and became Mongols. The real Mongols are the people of the forest, the main steppe nation is the Turks.

Timur is a Turkified Mongolian, he grew up in the Barlas tribe and grew up like a Turk.

They have done most of the original Islamic conquests already.

@@johnathan5291 you are correct, but the level of detail doesn't match this piece on the Mongols. I'd like to know the details of what made the Islamic wave so unstoppable. BTW, I'm not a Muslim. I want to know because I'm curious.

@@S0ulinth3machin3 as someone who was just recently made aware about the history of Islamic conquests, I agree

Well people often under estimate how difficult it is supply and support missile units like archers, if you got thousands of archers and each archer got 1-2 quivers with them and they carry let's say 60-80 arrows each and you have to make sure there is enough arrows to account for battlefield usage over extended periods of time or if arrows are lost due to other means then you can easily see tens of thousands of arrows or more being produced. Now did the English archers at Agincourt have a million arrows? Well we don't know actually how many arrows exactly they had, I personally doubt it but we really don't know.

Indeed!

So

Cue the Mongoltage

I see you are a person of culture

Ahhh a man/woman of culture

Dan Carlin has a great episode about horse archers the major thesis being that it is a fighting system that reigned supreme until well into the gunpowder era.

Hollywood depiction of medieval warfare is complete bullshit,and has nothing to do with reality or real history,and its because of Garbagewood that people imagine medieval warriors charging at each other like brainless idiots,which people who dont know better,take as a fact and believe it.

Most of the soldiers during the Mongol era were wearing light armor, if armor at all. Horsemen with bows would have been quite useless against a charging group of steel armored knights.

@@niktorrente6640 Hollywood itself is bullshit people worship professional liars .

@@sharkkan3894 is your brain still as smooth as peanut butter?

@@YuuSHiiiN Agreed. Netflix wouldn't be happy unless K&G wastes time on making things more modern and in line with their political ideals. There are too many ways they'd try and scrub up this violent part of history.

@@YuuSHiiiN very good point!

Then Europe had been used gunpowder. After That British empire and Europe had started to development. Such as; Colonisation, gun

Man, your username is amazing!

@@This-jy6wn thank you bro!

@Fətəli xan Xoyski 🇦🇿 no I'm from Iran but yes I'm half Azerbaijani yasasin iran ve Azarbaycan

@Fətəli xan Xoyski 🇦🇿 bele kardasem ❤

Who is the guy in your profile picture?

@@samatar1025 nader shah afshar

He is easily one of the top 10 military commander in history aka second alexander

Very true Mehmet! That is because Turkish and Monggol are both members of the same language group which is Urgo-Altaic! Salaam Alikhum from Sheffield UK

Thanks for sharing Turkic words. I'm Mongolian. I can understand these 🙂 Şölen, şülen: Шөл (soup) Nöker, nökod: Нөхөр, нөхөд (friend) Tümen: Түмэн which means 10'000 Manga, Minggan: Мянга, Мянган which is 1'000 Bahadır, bahadur: Баатар (warrior) Kurultay: Хурал (meeting) Ordu: Орд in Mongolian it usually means the place where many people reside. Very close to Palace meaning. (Horde) Karakol: might be Харуул in Mongolian (guardian) Seems some meanings are changed little bit.