HYDRAULIC PRESS VS SEAT BELTS, CAR AND AIRPLANE

Crazy Hydraulic Press

Подписаться 1,2 млн

Просмотров 143 тыс.

50% 1

Видео Поделиться Скачать Добавить в

Using a hydraulic press, we will test the strength of car and airplane seat belts

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

17 май 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 177

@anomamos9095 13 дней назад

An automotive seatbelt is meant to keep you from exiting the vehicle through the windshield in the event of a crash. An aircraft seatbelt is simply meant to keep you from exiting your seat in the event of turbulence. If an aircraft experienced the kind of crashes cars do they wouldn’t bother with seatbelts they’d just nail you directly into the coffin.

@iyke4djakes 12 дней назад

🤣🤣

@redbarchetta8782 11 дней назад

Pretty much it. Seat tracks can withstand so much before they too break. In events of crashes those safety devices are rendered moot.

@jameshaney4494 11 дней назад

Well said.

@timhartherz5652 10 дней назад

Beyond a certain point neither one will save your live, a body can only take so much g-forces. Guss the car's belt is overbuilt so much to make it easier to find your body.

@buddy1155 10 дней назад

Boeing seatbelts are to prevent you being sucked out of the airplane if the doors fall off.

@cranklabexplosion-labcentr8245 14 дней назад

Do Boeing vs Airbus belts next 💀

@bernhardfahrni2336 13 дней назад

They are the same; manufactured by AM Safe

@bodan1196 13 дней назад

The culprite is not Boeing, but the economic lust of the inverstors, and that the company culture of McDonnell Douglas was allowed to replace the culture which saw Boeing produce some of the best, and safest commercial aircrafts around, for more than half a century. Ask not if it is a Boeing or Airbus, ask when the Boeing was built. If it was built before 2007, enjoy the ride. If later, listen carefully to the safety briefing, and read the safety pamphlet. But remember, you still safer in a Boeing, than in you own car. All be it _statistically_ .

@ABa-os6wm 11 дней назад

Boeing would fail at 10kg because the attachment of the belt would miss 90% of the screws 🤣🤣🤣

@phaa84 10 дней назад

Boeing and Airbus doesn't manufacturer any seats... Recaro, Safran, Collins aerospace and others... However as already said, there is only one seat belt manufacturer AM Safe. For cars are 5 manufacturers... Also, there is no car brand vs any other... The comparison is Bosch vs Denso vs Aptiv vs Autoliv and on.

@denniselvy3528 7 дней назад

There is always someone they are called Karen

@RobertF1964 14 дней назад

All of the rope failures occurred in close proximity to the knot. Please repeat with a bowline knot (ask a scout or sailor) as it is the only knot which will not induce compressive forces on the body of the material, thereby creating a stress raiser.

@chantalslut 12 дней назад

Not interesting about knots. Its look how they are connected in a plane or car.

@margauxj-broussel9186 12 дней назад

So true. My first thought. Regardless how big the know if, the rope keeps sliding ! Just use the proper knot.

@craigr6186 10 дней назад

Eagle scout is in agreement

@dirtfarmer7472 9 дней назад

That may be true but they all failed & would have failed regardless of what kind of knot was used

@j...bro. 13 дней назад

If you exert 2662 lbs of force ( pointish loaded) on your belt you have alot other problems coming your way. They both are fit for service.

@olli1068 13 дней назад

Totally agree. The belt will hold, but the body will not (at least not without fatal injuries).

@Ryarios 8 дней назад

Exactly. 2.6 metric tons of force isn’t going to do a person any good.

@bryanfarmer8685 5 дней назад

Airplane would be scattered parts all around you.

@pablobartelotte4553 14 дней назад

What are the ages of the various materials used here. Age and wear effect these tests.

@laurie4332 13 дней назад

The airplane belt looked older.

@jdinnis 10 дней назад

@@laurie4332 Like so old you can't even read the tag. If you can't read it, it is not a serviceable part.

@Bassthe1st 12 дней назад

For the final results comparison you need to double the steel rope value because the others are in a loop.

@mrmarkymarcus 12 дней назад

Yes. All ropes are in a loop. Only the steel rope was not.

@Inventive101 14 дней назад

Super test!

@johntrujillo6185 14 дней назад

Never saddle a dead horse. The Crosbys on the wire rope are on wrong.

@bendenisereedy7865 4 дня назад

I was once in a Land Cruiser in Sudan, which had been crashed. There were holes in the dash and steering wheel where the airbags had been and the seat belt tensioners had triggered (nobody using the belts, ha ha, Allah decides) and both front belts were so tight that I actually couldn't deflect them with my hand, they might as well have been steel beams. Amazing.

@dustinlackey4250 11 дней назад

Don’t be testing any of Boeings stuff! They may come after you! Haha. Very shady company they are.

@linuslarsson3442 14 дней назад

It would be interesting to see if VOLVO belt hold better than others❤👌

@miket2120 14 дней назад

The Boeing belt segment is old by the frayed sides, dull fuzzy look and dirt. Besides, both belts are not made by their respective brands, but contracted out. Both belts are far stronger than they have to be.

@jamielee9350 14 дней назад

Car seatbelts are designed for protection from impact, whereas an airplane seat belt is designed to prevent movement from turbulence. If you are in an aircraft that is flying and you have a "sudden impact" , no seat belt will do you any good...

@2testtest2 13 дней назад

Well, one could imagine scenarios in an airplane where the impact would not be hard enough that seatbelts wouldn't matter. Emergency landing in a field, or other semi favorable terrain for instance. It's not all or nothing.

@Biffo1262 14 дней назад

I have renewed faith in my cars seat belts.

@markloubser2433 5 дней назад

Perfectly good for comparison. Either way your body will depart this earth before either busts...

@michaelputnam1558 12 дней назад

Hey I was wondering what the “strongest” knot is…. Maybe an idea for a future video?

@PaijoNeosantara 13 дней назад

Please comparison, the Wooden nail, black concrete nail and white concrete nail.

@PrivateModelShow-vv1ve 11 дней назад

Nice video 😮

@borntoclimb7116 7 дней назад

Nice Video for Entertainment

@robertwillis4061 12 дней назад

My Grandfather used to use 3. Seatbelts tied together to tow cars with. The only problem he ever had was on a freezing cold night, he had only done 2 knots at the car end instead of 3, so it slipped loose.

@MrJudgementday99 9 дней назад

What I don’t understand is why a certain amount of seats in the aircraft aren’t fitted with isofix. For baby chairs

@userdetails1 14 дней назад

Can you press an orange, and set it up so it collects the juice to show how much juice is in an orange?

@mightyfinejonboy 14 дней назад

no boy scout i see.

@victory2115 9 дней назад

I’m impressed by both belts.

@marioborisov4894 6 дней назад

Amazing channel, very good tests! But with the ropes, you can see they are breaking at the knots. The knot you are using is irrelevant for this test. I would recommend you use an "eight" knot or another knot with a high percentage of durability and repeat the tests, I'm sure the results will be very different.

@sooty8992 5 дней назад

If you need that u bolt clamp it doesn't matter how strong the rope is. If it just pulls though it falls makeing the Kevlar rope the worst performer. Also try getting something that fits the materials you are testing. So they are not getting scratched up. And the eye ring is terrible with a rough seam running around the inside. It needs changing to a flat cylinder.

@veskomenas 4 дня назад

do same test with proper knots like figure 6, 8 or 9, or even alpine butterfly.

@teropiispala2576 13 дней назад

Was the measurement from cylinder or from the belt? The result seems to be too low. The braking force was about 35G's for 100kg person. 35G is relatively mild crash. 50G is generally limit for severe injuries and 75G can easily happen in a highway crash. Usually safety belts don't snap.

@lo2740 10 дней назад

lol, what are you talking about? a human body can handle 4 to 6g maximum.

@teropiispala2576 10 дней назад

@@lo2740 No. It is as I said. Some formula drivers have survived over 100g's. Inexperienced fit person can handle 6g's without loosing consciousness. Trained pilot can withstand 10-11g's in g-suit. World record for longer high g's is 46.2g. That was done in rocket sled by decelerating from 632mph in about one second. In car crash, peak g's are much shorter but goes higher than that. It's pretty simple math to estimate how many g's you have. Highway speed 75mph is around 33m/s. If you stop in 0.1s, that's about 33g's. With constant deceleration, that means about 1.6m distance. With 1m crushing depth, average g's are around 50. In practice, peak g's are higher. Head on collision from highway speeds into solid object or a vehicle with equal mass will typically expose 50-75g's. It is survivable in a vehicle with good crushing zones and airbacks but is getting close to the limit where g-forces themselves cause problems like brain damage. So, as a conclusion, you are mixing survivability with limits where physically unfit or normal persons can loose their consciousness.

@robertheinkel6225 9 дней назад

Being a retired crew chief, 9 Gs is enough to break our back or kill you. The aircraft engines were designed to break off at nine Gs.

@teropiispala2576 8 дней назад

@@robertheinkel6225 Maybe mine, because my back is not good, but there are still pilots who can go over 10 g's. However, in this context, it doesn't matter if human can take 9 or 10 g's on the airplane. This was about g forces in a car crash, and what I wrote about that is accurate. The dynamics and duration is much different in a crash and high g turn. In airplanes, highest g's are typically down, putting all the upper body weight on lower vertebraes in sitting position, which is not ideal. In a crash, forces are forward, putting much less stress on back.

@jameswest8280 10 дней назад

Tendon is supposed to be stronger than steel cable, you should try that. I would use animal tendon, not human, that's just a suggestion.

@minkymootwo 10 дней назад

Try some Dyneema rope, it is insanely strong.

@bodan1196 13 дней назад

The difference between _catastrofic failure_ and _fail safe_ . The aircraft seatbelt does not fail completely in an instance, but a little at a time, keeping some of it's function over a longer time. Which of these behaviours is to be considered better/prefered in an intended application, depends on the expected forces involved, duration of those forces, weight allowances, flamability of the materials, and certainly a few more considerations. So taking away from this video, that aircraft seatbelts are inferior to car seatbelts, is a flawed conclusion. It would be like saying that a wood driver is superior than a putter, because it can yeet the golfball farther. I don't play golf, but I suspect that there is a reason why we don't see people on the green, using the same club as they used at tee.

@user-serg1988 13 дней назад

А почему минус на Темзе?

@lenux21 8 дней назад

8,258.5lbs damn didn't think they had that much strength

@rubenbam 17 часов назад

Oh, the steal wire is very good. Lets replace our seatbelts with it!

@ArsenicShooter 12 дней назад

You can tow a car with a seatbelt. Easy to connect and disconnect

@geronimo5537 10 дней назад

I was thinking rock climbing myself

@AlteredCarbons 10 дней назад

And it's a wonder why my uncle stopped buying real straps and used just car junkyard belts to pull his engine.

@garage5125 14 дней назад

the steel rope did not have even conditions, as it only held on by one string, if you manage to tie the both ends together, it would be a fair fight

@skallittor5478 14 дней назад

If it broke, it was correct. Idk what youre talking about. But this is true, only one side of the string creates less resistance. But it shows well what is the level of resistance before it breaks

@mibo747 11 дней назад

great show of ropes... 10mm climbing = towing rope

@didierdlx448 11 дней назад

The orange belt is an extension for baby , not for adult . So not the same user weight !

@davetomlinson9063 11 дней назад

Crosby clip backwards reduces efficiency

@crazybytesve 14 дней назад

El experimento NO está bien hecho en lo absoluto. 1. Usa un aro redondo en la parte inferior, ocasionando una tensión desigual. 2. Los amarres de las cuerdas y de la guaya de acero son incorrectos porque la tensión va directo al nudo...

@Diekgraaf 14 дней назад

Die Augenschraube ist natürlich auch denkbar ungünstig für einen Zugtest mit einem Riemen.

@therednask 13 дней назад

No to już wiemy co jest mocne :)

@robertleszczynski4520 12 дней назад

Wiadomo linka stalowa wygrywa, to było do przewidzenia

@mitchbayersdorfer9381 11 дней назад

This shows static load - you need a more rapid test to show dynamic load

@robertleszczynski4520 13 дней назад

Olbrzymi błąd przy teście linek 10mm. Ponieważ to linka stalowa powinna wygrać test gdyż to ona jako jedyna jest testowana ma pojedyńczej żyle natomiast wszystkie pozostałe na podwójnej!

@rubbermoetroken 5 дней назад

try dynemaa plse :)

@caljucotcas 14 дней назад

Car belt is for holding You while crashing. Plane belt is holding you for turbolence, if plane crashes, your doomed anyways 😀

@edschultheis9537 12 дней назад

Not doomed if you have air brakes >>> Bugs Bunny 1960s >>> ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-gaIFLR8xLJY.html

@No_Way_NO_WAY 12 дней назад

next time i go climbing, im gonna take a seatbelt with me instead of a climbing rope.

@Dog.soldier1950 13 дней назад

Of course no one would survive the tension even close to the breaking point

@yoavlahav12 14 дней назад

It is a faulty experiment because you use round ring at the bottom. This create uneven tension in the belt, making the experiment unreliable.

@sunnydays4966 14 дней назад

And I suppose you have a square body.

@EdH447 14 дней назад

@@sunnydays4966 It's an experiment.... apparatus needs to be uniform to provide accurate data.

@EdH447 14 дней назад

@@sunnydays4966 It's an experiment.... apparatus used needs to be uniform in order to achieve accurate data.

@gasauto1675 13 дней назад

Problem is nearly static pull, these belts are for dynamic pull within milliseconds designed

@PrivateModelShow-vv1ve 11 дней назад

Very interesting 🧐

@cannonfodder4812 9 дней назад

Test is kind off pointless, since forces in an accident, would be a sudden jerk, not a steady build up of pressure Besides with the forces in either test you would be dead anyway.

@capwkidd 10 дней назад

Why don’t you list pounds also? Aren’t most of your viewers from the US?

@Geodreamcatcher 7 дней назад

The ropes need nautical knots that don't slip

@andreamelchiorri5302 13 дней назад

A belt than hold back a human body with 3000kg applied, probably cuts the body in two. Is better to die before. In any case your is a good exercise to demonstrate the resistance of that belts.

@rakeshritti 13 дней назад

It's 3.75kg I guess

@robertkelly5042 13 дней назад

the anchor points on the belts caused damage due to irregular loading

@robertj3116 12 дней назад

I’m sorry, but I am going to repeat that at home First I need what kind of press you have, the lighting the cameras where do you get the seatbelts from? How much oil does your press take etc. send me that information and I will not repeat this at home ??? I promise maybe. In the meantime, I’m gonna go buy a home and get the garage ready 😊

@Grisha5544 14 дней назад

Если оно так выдерживает такие тоннаж ток почему разрешается людям имеющим вес больше 150 кг не пристегиватся?

@hepphepps8356 14 дней назад

Are they? Where? Never heard of such a thing.

@moestrei 14 дней назад

Because the seat belt is too short for them.

@vintgant9295 13 дней назад

@@moestrei stewardessa może im dać przedłużenie

@malid3175 12 дней назад

Please, name music ambiance

@fillefilander 7 дней назад

This guy needs to learn how to tie a knot! 😆

@UninstallingWindows 5 дней назад

If you experience forces that can break a seatbelt, then you are already dead.

@campbeld63 13 дней назад

Seatbelt performance is about a lot more than ultimate strength. Seatbelts are not designed to hold the body rigidly in place, but to allow controlled yield to limit the load transmitted (and resultant injury) to the body. (This is why all occupied belts must be replaced after a collision.) It is not apparent from these tests how much elastic or plastic deformation occurs over the test or how much energy would be dissipated in the event of a collision.

@ivan-Croatian 14 дней назад

Now please 10mm rope made of a spider web!

@TruckCraftStudios 13 дней назад

I feel me now more and more safe in my 5 BMW

@chantalslut 12 дней назад

Fix yur blinker!!!

@laurahaaima1436 8 дней назад

8 knot would be better in this setup

@Spozinbro 9 дней назад

Doesn't that make it a hydraulic pull :p

@larryphillips4164 8 дней назад

Should test different rope knots to see which ones slip at what kilogram and which breaks etc.

@OtherWorldExplorers 13 дней назад

I do not think that this was an accurate test. (#NOT_AN_ENGINEER) Seatbelts are subjected to RAPID stress. (What they are designed for) Not gentle ones over a few min. It would seem to me that this is not a valid test if the intent was to compare crash values. Interesting findings though, if I ever find myself using a seatbelt to tow something... As others have pointed out the Airline Seatbelt look a lot older than the car. Again not a valid test. BUT you have a very interesting idea and it is worth doing again should the funds become available

@softwarephil1709 10 дней назад

You would be dead from the impact long before your belt broke.

@andrewallen9993 12 дней назад

As you are expected to hit an obstruction at least 3 times faster in a Boeing than a BMW that is the reason tne Boeing item failed earlier

@fsociety_exe 10 дней назад

Whoa guys, be careful using Boeings name in videos, you might get sick suddenly.

@yvesstocky9936 13 дней назад

Airplane belts dont have to support as much g's as car belts.

@patrickpat8878 10 дней назад

And guess what , the airplane belt is 400 time more expensive

@terran5569 14 дней назад

This person needs to learn how to tie some knots.

@user-dz4ey4oe9i 12 дней назад

Person, 100 kg x 10 gravity = 1000 kg!

@Geodreamcatcher 7 дней назад

In airplane you don't need good belt because it won't save you

@Clownmeati8 11 дней назад

Kind of a moot point.. If you break your seatbelt youre done for by the impact that caused it...

@-datolith2775 14 дней назад

😀

@robinsonrodriguesbetini8394 9 дней назад

Os nós de união dos cabos não foram bem executados.

@ejsampana426 14 дней назад

Luke Skywalker's belt

@artifacttor 14 дней назад

I saw how stars were born and died. What did you see?

@yudhowighanantyo9085 14 дней назад

Standar car and race car seat belts

@MikkoRantalainen 2 дня назад

You should learn to do proper knots and then try again. With a properly done knot, you don't need extra hardware to exceed the strength of a rope.

@olli1068 13 дней назад

I don't get the point of this test. A seat belts purpose is not to hold as much load as possible. If you apply such a high acceleration to a human body that causes this forces to the seat belt holding it in place, you have other problems to deal with. The seat belt is not the weakest point here.

@LukaDrwal 13 дней назад

He's Belarusian. There's no point. It's just about money

@olli1068 13 дней назад

@@LukaDrwal Thanks for clarification!

@Diplomaattikukko 21 минуту назад

You should splice and use timble to get real strength. Too many cutting points on the test. And do not round the rope and use knots.. try to test so that you have only one line of the rope at the time. here is one way to splice the rope. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rbSg0_XXd2I.htmlsi=PXbF2Izb_-ZQpiDg

@AC-el1hy 6 дней назад

I do repeat at home.

@Curiousity874 14 дней назад

no way this comment gets pinned

@tomaszwroblewski811 14 дней назад

Your tests are awesome, but your knots sucks...

@ruipflugketzer8117 10 дней назад

You know about knots is very weak. Consult a sailor or a boy scout

@Roberto9139 3 дня назад

Tua seat belt of cars need to maintein yout dead body inside the car for the family have anice funeral, not to catch the body from the road.

@patrickpat8878 10 дней назад

You have no idea how to make a knot that doesn’t slip

@MBSAU37 13 дней назад

Arbus 380😝

@fazemam3887 5 дней назад

Airplane is not safe

@davetomlinson9063 11 дней назад

So many forget me knots

@bofilen-ii4fs 13 дней назад

Its just stupid.....you kan wear 10 seatbelts it does not matter if you crasch the plane from 20 000f with speed up to 8-900km/h....sestbelt... lääää

@zwizosapu9368 14 дней назад

First comment 🍂

@kaiserchillhelm 14 дней назад

Your parents are proud of you trust me

@Biffo1262 14 дней назад

.....and....???

@robokpl 8 дней назад

you will die before that belts will fail anyway m..

@Lovetheducks 13 дней назад

In the airplane seatbelts defense it could withstand 100k tons and the result of me surviving will not change. Airplane seatbelts are strictly for peace of mind lol. I am impressed with the car seatbelts first test win.

@bodan1196 13 дней назад

Not strickly. If you actually listen to what the safety briefing says. There is something called clear air turbulance. It is like regular turbulance, but like the Spanish Inquisition, it can not be expected. And it is equally unforgiving too. If you do not have the belt secured, you can break your neck as the aircraft (and thus it ceiling), free falls, while your inertia sees you not accelerating as fast. It is rather interesting to realise that in such a situation, it is not you who "fly up into the ceiling", but the "ceiling falling down" on your head.

@Lovetheducks 12 дней назад

@@bodan1196 dude nobody ask for you correction. The comment was a joke. Why is there always one jerk like you that feels need to correct people? I didn’t ask need or want your correction to a joke I made. What makes people like you feel the need to correct someone that doesn’t ask for it? Does it make you feel smarter than other people? I’d say how smart you are but you clearly aren’t. You were so excited to get to correct someone that didn’t ask. You couldn’t use common sense and realize the comment was in fun. Seriously you need to learn first common sense and once you do that learn people don’t need you to correct them unless they ask. It’s insane people feel the need to correct strangers. Well I hope you feel smart now.

@danielebergamaschi8495 10 дней назад

european product is better!

@a1locc25 14 дней назад

Doesn’t matter if you are in the belt and there’s that much pressure on it you’re already dead

@ROCKGAMER-44 14 дней назад

Second ❤❤🎉🎉 I love you 1%❤ I love you 2%🧡 I love you 3%💛 I love you 4%💚 I love you 5%💙 I love you 6%💜 I love you 7%💗 I love you 8%❤ I love you 9%🧡 I love you 10%💛 I love you 11%💚 I love you 12%💙 I love you 13%💜 I love you 14%💗 I love you 15%❤ I love you 16%🧡 I love you 17%💛 I love you 18%💚 I love you 19%💙 I love you 20%💜 I love you 21%💗 I love you 22%❤ I love you 23%🧡 I love you 24%💛 I love you 25%💚 I love you 26%💙 I love you 27%💜 I love you 28%💗 I love you 29%❤ I love you 30%🧡 I love you 31%💛 I love you 32%💚 I love you 33%💙 I love you 34%💜 I love you 35%💗 I love you 36%❤ I love you 37%🧡 I love you 38%💛 I love you 39%💚 I love you 40%💙 I love you 41%💜 I love you 42%💗 I love you 43%❤ I love you 44%🧡 I love you 45%💛 I love you 46%💚 I love you 47%💙 I love you 48%💜 I love you 49%💗 I love you 50%❤ I love you 51%🧡 I love you 52%💛 I love you 53%💚 I love you 54%💙 I love you 55%💜 I love you 56%💗 I love you 57%❤ I love you 58%🧡 I love you 59%💛 I love you 60%💚 I love you 61%💙 I love you 62%💜 I love you 63%💗 I love you 64%❤ I love you 65%🧡 I love you 66%💛 I love you 67%💚 I love you 68%💙 I love you 69%💜 I love you 69%💗 I love you 70%❤ I love you 71%🧡 I love you 72%💛 I love you 73%💚 I love you 74%💙 I love you 75%💜 I love you 76%💗 I love you 77%❤ I love you 78%🧡 I love you 79%💛 I love you 80%💚 I love you 81%💙 I love you 82%💜 I love you 83%💗 I love you 84%❤ I love you 85%🧡 I love you 86%💛 I love you 87%💚 I love you 88%💙 I love you 89%💜 I love you 90%💗 I love you 91%❤ I love you 92%🧡 I love you 93%💛 I love you 94%💚 I love you 95%💙 I love you 96%💜 I love you 97%💗 I love you 98%❤ I love you 99%🧡 I LOVE YOU 100%💛 I Love you 101%💚 I Love you 102%💙 I Love you 103%💜 I Love you 104%💗 I Love you 105%❤️ I Love you 106%🧡 I Love you 107%💛 I Love you 108%💚 I Love you 109%💙 I Love you 110%💜 I Love you 111%💗 I Love you 112%❤️ I Love you 113%🧡 I Love you 114%💛 I Love you 115%💚 I Love you 116%💙 I Love you 117%💜 I Love you 118%💗 I Love you 119%❤️ I Love you 120%🧡 I Love you 121%💛 I Love you 122%💚 I Love you 123%💙 I Love you 124%💜 I Love you 125%💗 I Love you 126%❤️ I Love you 127%🧡 I Love you 128%💛 I Love you 129%💚 I Love you 130%💙 I Love you 131%💜 I Love you 131%💗 I Love you 132%❤️ I Love you 133%🧡 I Love you 134%💛 I Love you 135%💚 I Love you 136%💙 I Love you 137%💜 I Love you 138%💗 I Love you 139%❤️ I Love you 140%🧡 I Love you 141%💛 I Love you 142%💚 I Love you 143%💙 I Love you 144%💜 I Love you 145%💗 I Love you 146%❤️ I Love you 147%🧡 I Love you 148%💛 I Love you 149%💚 I Love you 150%💙 I Love you 151%💜 I Love you 152%💗 I Love you 153%❤️ I Love you 154%🧡 I Love you 155%💛 I Love you 156%💚 I Love you 157%💙 I Love you 158%💜 I Love you 159%💗 I Love you 160%❤️ I Love you 161%🧡 I Love you 162%💛 I Love you 163%💚 I Love you 164%💙 I Love you 165%💜 I Love you 166%💗 I Love you 167%❤️ I Love you 168%🧡 I Love you 169%💛 I Love you 170%💚 I Love you 171%💙 I Love you 172%💜 I Love you 173%💗 I Love you 174%❤️ I Love you 175%🧡 I Love you 176%💛 I Love you 177%💚 I Love you 178%💙 I Love you 179%💜 I Love you 180%💗 I Love you 181%❤️ I Love you 182%🧡 I Love you 183%💛 I Love you 184%💚 I Love you 185%💙 I Love you 186%💜 I Love you 187%💗 I Love you 188%❤️ I Love you 189%🧡 I Love you 190%💛 I Love you 191%💚 I Love you 192%💙 I Love you 193%💜 I Love you 194%💗 I Love you 195%❤️ I Love you 196%🧡 I Love you 197%💛 I Love you 198%💚 I Love you 199%💙 I LOVE U 200%💖