Hypothetical NATO intervention in Ukraine; what might it look like? 

just a small note of correction I think Ukraine actually has two patriot missle systems.

Binkov’s final cope lol

Random note. Do other people also notice clear paralel between this war and Earth-Romulan was in Star Trek?

Nato targets civilians, Russia claims to denazify, yet released azov from Mariupol. This war makes no sense!

Putin would most probably use tactical nukes onto NATO troops near the Donbass or Crimea, just to project strength. He has little accountability in the incipient 2nd gen soviet block. China has ensured the sanctions have mostly failed, and the UN has no flexing power. NATO would not have any grounding for launching ICBMS against Russia if no NATO nations have been attacked.

Too many people believe war propaganda.

Saw this comment before reading others and decided Imma just stop here.

You stay out

Nah come get that smoke

@@thegermanfool8953 good idea German.

Tell russia maybe you can consider that

@@carlharper557 I tried to email them, but they never responded. Maybe it went to their spam folder. 🤔🤔

@@carlharper557 USA*

@@Su-27_433 both of these suckers. Russia and US both like to start wars they lose

​@@Su-27_433definitely, Ukraine and USA should have thought before provoking Russia

Yap like the west propaganda , cnn , bbc et

Russia Today and Russia Media Monitor be like

@@discipleofdagon8195 Or Trump. jus' sayin'...

Like!

Mushroom clouds in russia at least.

@@abraham2172 implying you will escape lol

​@@abraham2172 russia has better and more nukes that usa

only if a member is attacked, in any capacity, by any state or none state actors. the precedent is already set by the US when we triggered article 5 against Afghanistan.

​@@artruisjoew5473 that's was when the usa was attacked

nato states will do the US bidding. forget 'bout letter and spirit of agreements, they are written not for commoners crowd.

@@palar4195 you mean like the NATO minimum GDP % for the war economy that most countries were ignoring for decades? You people are so delusional it's hilarious.

They used article 5 in Libya after france invaded

Yeah to Moscow

No.

At your service 😂

I guess the interview really opened some mines after years of brainwashing

Nice to see NAFO bots like you coping hard. What else a loser do but hurling insult to the winning side?

You are the trolling bot.

This video was so good and informative, that Putin sent me here to tell you it's not.

NATO is not ready for a war with Russia. The real reason ammo and shells have stopped. Isnt political or financial. Its because there isnt much left to send. NATO cant produce the amount of shells and ammo needed. NATO's military Industrial complex is profit focused and cannot ramp up production. Russia can and is producing enough ammo and shells. Russias military industrial complex is designed for ramping up producation and its state owned. NATO may theoretical have more military might. But its spread across dozens of armies. Only the USA is a match military to Russia. But the USA lost its production capacity that helped win WW2. Russia still has that capability.

But the question is what Russia could do? They had riots when last official conscription happened and they have already prompted up their military industry and are having problems because of these two factors. How much more they can do?

Russia is already doing everything they can to win, they are breaking rules of the un and commit war crimes they cannot escalate further

@@darthsidius9631 But the direct NATO involvement would legitimize the war effort and consolidate the population around Putin and it would suddenly justify all the myths of the West planning to conquer Russia.

@@darthsidius9631 America has seasonal race riots over dead criminals, and Russia had no problem raising 400k men.

I like Binkov, I've been looking at other videos for accuracy and sadly this is dawning on me.

@@Nick_Zan prop asset? How. In some of his videos, people claim he is russian propaganda and some other ukrain lol. He is just analysing and what he think is needed if x = y. Sadly you people are too dumb to see that.

That’s true, he expected Russia to win very early on.

Yeah like 98% of the people lol. Everyone was talking about how the 2nd or 3rd strongest country would destroy Ukraine....problem is, no one expected them to be this incompetent with there logistics and strategies. Heck some generals didn't even immediately realize they were attacking them lol

Also, like he said pretty damn early in the video. This is a highly HYPOTHETICAL video. Soo it really is only for entertainment like a lot of his videos

russia has solved these issues to a high degree unfortunately. poor morale they have not, but they will murder their own troops if they dont fight as if they hard morale ukraine is still winning. however the US infighting is making munitions extremely difficult. ukraine is more effective, but russia has more men, equipment, munitions, and money. that ukraine can hold russia off makes it the "second best army". yet that is more than a meme than something to strategic value

Clearly Binkov has an agenda. You are precisely correct in the sense that all his previous videos are anti-Russian...and pro-West. He's been wrong so many times.

Every Ukrainian retreat is a tactical victory and every time Russia advances it is a strategic loss. 🤡 You may support anyone just don’t fall for the propaganda. Obvious stuff is obvious.

​@@sirati9770In a war, with the martial law, it's pretty normal to face consequences, even getting shot, if you disobey the orders, that includes both Russia and Ukraine. Ukraine is not winning the war at all, they're holding the Russians, sure, but they clearly have no chance to retake everything that was taken from them. Ukraine will win only the moment they retake Crimea, which is impossible. Russia cannot be defeated there and NATO cannot expand to Ukraine as long as it has territorial disputes. Russia is winning on almost every aspect, their real big loss was the inability to overthrow the government and install their puppet regime (like Belarus), and for that we should prop to Zelensky who proved to have balls of steel, regardless of what we think of him

Because they have been lying to you the entire time. Ukraine has been lying to get western countries to waste more money on the war while the leaders in Ukraine stuff their pockets with it and get rich. The government has been lying to you because the money they are printing is going to thier donors in the military industrial complex making them rich producing more weopens for a losing war. The media is lying to you to manufacture your consent for running up debt and if things go really wrong to send you to die fighting over a useless country in Eastern Europe. Ukraine and its borders mean nothing to anyone in the west and noone should stand with Ukraine. This is all about making the rich richer at your expense and possible death from politicians who don't fight wars. The Russian version of the senate voted to start the invasion Putin did not just start it. Only American presidents can illegally attack countries without consent of congress or the public Russia cannot

🤦🏾‍♂️

And then you get 200+ nukes in your face

Because that worked in Iraq and Vietnam

​​@@mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520at what point did anyone go in full force in either Iraq or Vietnam remind us...

@@mosesgoldbergshekelstien1520 1. Iraq was never lost and, 2. We never fully committed to Afghanistan or Vietnam

Scholz: we will supply Scholz: we will not supply Scholz: we will supply Scholz: we will not supply Scholz: we will supply Scholz: we will not supply

@@MuLLeR029 The actual Scholz policy is forfeiting any interests of his own country for the sake of US interests, with zero payoff for himself or his fellow countrymen.

Because last one went so well.

@@iamaim2847 some people … Western European people specifically … don’t seem to learn from history it seems.

@@iamaim2847 Dude compared NATO to Nazis and thought them to be in the right, you can't make this shit up.

Russia could easily defeat NATO in a battle of conventional arms. It's NATO who would resort to nukes. That's the only chance they got. It took months for the US to move its heavy armor, artillery and troops to Iraq for both wars. And both times they had a friendly place to dock their ships in Kuwait and Saudi where they could unload and assemble. Russia would never let these US ships cross the Atlantic. Also, the US would have to pull its forces and equipment out of Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Persian Gulf countries and from Korea. They can't do that for strategic reasons. In reality the US and its NATO vassals combined could send a 100,000 man infantry force to Ukraine. Putin could handle them with just his Chechens.

Obama knew that the US could not challenge Russia in Ukraine because all the logistics strongly favored Russia. This is why he didn't bother sending serious weapons there. Obama would have never provoked this war the way Biden -- the corrupt idiot -- did. Truth be told, Biden got us into this mess to protect his family's criminal financial interests there.

@@gordonipock9385 then why does Putin screams nuke every time NATO sends anything? sending tanks? threaten a nuclear war. sending planes? threaten a nuclear war. and he never actions on it too. nobody believes him now hes cried nuke a few too many times.

​@@gordonipock9385ok but they can simply use European or friendly country's as a staging ground of a land war and use the navy to harass russia in the east with alaska or attack in two fronts I don't know the geography of this I'm just basing this on a simple world map We already know that their navy is not that well maintained and I wonder the effectiveness of russian subs other than in paper

@@gordonipock9385 how delusional, cope harder

Nato has nukes aswell

You obvious have no clue!!!! Russia WILL NEVER make a first strike, but, when the first dtrike is done by an opposite part Russia will react WITH ALL WHAT THEY HAVE!!!! We all die, you 1d10ts!

@@Nazzyyyy And of course a lot of geunine 1d10ts like you!

A "tactical" nuke isn't going to be very effective against a military unit in the field - they'll be dug in, dispersed, and have protective equipment. So, you're not going to see effects radically greater than what a conventional weapon would cause at the tactical unit level. Therefore, to achieve the outsized effect that nukes are capable of providing, that means targeting something "softer" and more "strategic" like air bases, logistics facilities, rail yards, etc. Except those tend to be co-located with large civilian populations... And russia using a nuke to take out an airbase on the outskirts of Kiev or Liviv (etc.) is going to devastate those cities - at least from the perspective of fallout and radiation injury to the civilian populations, even if the fires caused and the blast damage suffered, are limited. And given the cycle of escalation we've already seen, it's exceedingly unlikely the West would not respond in some way to that. The unfortunate fact] about nukes is this: Ultimately there's no real way to use a "tactical" nuke without causing an escalation to strategic warfare in very short order; with the civilization-threatening consequences that entails. This is why most of the people charged with nuclear decision-making conclude there are no real use cases that make the massive investment in weapons we can't really use worthwhile compared to putting that investment into conventional weapons instead.

@@cosmincasuta486 No we don't all die. We are 1.5 Billion people spreads across three continents.... But all the ethnic moscovites will die - with the few remnant moscovite populations being subjugated by ethnic minorities who have centuries of grievances against them.

lmao they are afraid to send too much weapons and you say they should send troops, yeah right, the only way that happens is if anyone they sending will be guarding some outhouse far away from frontlines.

Imaginary military stuff

Nafo seething that A) the war is lost B) normal westerners have no appetite for escalation

Russian web brigades seething that A) people are scared and coping with what happens next so the best way is to be rude to everyone else B) normal easterners don't like human rights and freedom of expression and just about everything else like democracy

Dude get down it's not safe here

@@boom-wj1gt, LOL

All the paid trolls are out at full force.

Why click the video then lmao

@@donpedro00769 To find out what it's about?

Good.

@@jameschalkwig787 that was a lot of words to say nothing.

Nah it is time to remind the russians that their only victory was ww2, not one other great victory in their history and it will remain that way

Dude, Tzar Alexander got into Paris

@@nicolasmella8450 what did us won btw?

Why? Scared of Russia 😂

Exactly, its rules for thee but not for me

but it is an escalation? literally using the airports of countries that arent fighting in the war

Then what’s stopping NATO from doing it? They’re afraid they will lose all their aircraft and airfields, that is what will happen.

Yes and Ukraine tried to engage them, which means Russia could then engage them inside NATO countries.. if you don't consider that an escalation you're just delusional.

Yes, it is. It's all been escalations from NATO, starting by the coup d'etat they financed in 2014 "for freedom and democracy" (who believes this BS anymore?). It's clear NATO wants to weaken Russia to tear it apart and take its fuel and mineral resources. Whoever thinks otherwise, maybe its time to turn off your Netflix a little and live in the real world.

Genious plan, i'm sure nothing will go wrong.

влажные мечты....ну или прогрев общественного мнения

@@wizeghunter6490 Не, это на самом деле честный анализ. Блинков точно не состоит в штате пропагандистов. Все названые в видео цифры легко бьются с открытыми источниками. Предлагаемый размер группировки вмешательства тупо повторяет размер российской группировки.

@@heyhoe168 Открытое вмешательство НАТО приведет к третьей мировой войне.

Копиум

@fadaos Вы правы, это бред, но он основан на гипотетическом видео.

Putin started the war in Ukraine so how are all world leaders incompetent?

UK military Intelligence has estimated it would take 4-6 days (depending on the weather) for NATO to destroy 90% of the armoured vehicles in Ukraine using airpower alone. This would involve 750 bombing sorties per day. Russia knows this, which is why they keep babbling about nukes. And Russia has been told (back in 2022) that if they use even a small nuke in Ukraine then NATO will do the above. Putin is in an impossible position, his only hope is a conventional victory, which simply won't happen.

based

Incompetence

​@@YwhMusic The west should have no business in Ukraine in the first place, besides if that happens China which the so called west also hates will provide 100% support to Russia, the entire west cannot outproduce 1billion Chinese people under any circumstance.

So the fact is, the US should be start expanding production line capacity today. Even in WW2 it took a few years to fully expand US production capability. The US has seen a significant loss in manufacturing capacity as a result of business decisions from the 80s to increase short term profits to shareholders. However, it would still take 3-5 years to widen pduction capacity. A great example of this is the adoption of the new 6.8mm cartridge for the Army's new rifles. It's going to take the US Army a few years to add those new production lines at their ammo production facilities. Some production lines are so complex they can't really be widened any further. Like the F35. Something like 1000 us subcontractors across the country supply parts. Some of them are actually rather small companies that really can't double production. As for supplying Ukraine with older hardware, part of that was mutual spendthrift ness. If Ukraine spent it's company money in the US company weapons store, they could "buy" a lot more older equipment for cheap. It was still better than what they or Russia had, but it didn't hamper US capabilities. It's also worth pointing out, Ukraine isn't fully trusted with US secret technologies. They're not "in the fold". Part of it Ukraine still has a corruption issue. That hasn't been resolved, and it's even caused trouble for Zelensky in the last year. The US is not going to give Ukrainians unfettered access to and F35 or even the latest Gen radar on the newest F16s. It's not going to happen. Russia and China would have access to the data within a month. The reality is, and this sucks to say, it's not in US interest for the war to be fast. The war weakens Russia a lot. The issue is Russia is starting to form a wartime economy, and I'd be curious how much China has widened production. The US is lagging behind, pososbily in naive hope war will not break out like PREWW2 Britain. Let's just hope the US has its Mosquito figure out properly before the war.

​@@dosunmupelumi7845lol china will not suport russia against NATO on this matter , since it would broke the globalization who is the only way to survive for china , they would even take siberia from russia after they loose for sure 😂 they are not russia friends at all , they just share some interest and when those interest will change china will dump russia like an old hookers😅

@@granatmof You cant expand production with out recourses ,In WWII in USA no single civilian car was produced ,no single civilian building,all recources went to war production. Are you ready for that just for sake off some land where 99% off Russian live and was actually Russia before communist give it to Ukraine in 1954

That's not correct. NATO has 8 patriot systems in Ukraine. 6 covertly brought in

@@jensramputh Did Lavrov tell you that?

Historically such claims about American war involvement being short term have not held up well lol

@@alexmaclean1 in any war (WWI+II; ukraine etc)

Mr. binkov always misleading his copium dosed sniffing lines.. next time I;m expecting overdose and a great compilation of fake facts as an Secretary general of NAFO as leading forces behind his dilapidated bots forces.

As you said yourself, Russia knows that using nuclear-capable weapons against those NATO airbases would be suicide. So why would they do it? It's much more likely that the Russian elite decide that committing national suicide for a meaningless war isn't worth it. Is there a risk it happens? Of course. But it would be in Russia's best interest not to do it, and every other red line they have spoken about in this conflict has turned out to be nothing. This one is likely the same.

​@@hrisoflinoski4803Russia using nukes is always very unlikely unless someone invades their country even then they will try to fend them off with conventional methods

🎯

Even a 1% risk of all out nuclear war is too much - that is civilisation ender if not a species ender@@canitnerd

Russia has only dared to mess with countries outside of NATO, and was pissed that that could end when Georgia and Ukraine wanted to stop getting messed with. Now they are all in and perhaps delusional. If they do attack a NATO country it will not be a long war, neither will the existence of the elite that started it.

Exactly, russian imperialists always eager to start was in Eastern Europe and now Ukraine. When will russia stop?

@@2hotflavored666 How can something the size of a truck fly over your head so easily is beyond me, a clear victimhood mentality of "THIS IS TO BLAME, THAT IS AT FAULT, EVERYONE IS EVIL EXCEPT ME, HELP ME" Just open your eyes. You seem like the type to say "Lmao Ruzzia can't take down ukraine in 2 days, such a weak army, pathetic" and then turn around and scream "RUSSIAN ARMY IS SUCH A THREAT , WE NEED EVERYONE IN NATO, WE NEED TO SEND ARMY TO EVERYWHERE, PANIC PLEASE"

also almost all sentiment against Russia is based on rambling about the alleged past crimes of the Soviet Union or going back several hundred years. None of it is based on the status of Crimea or the actions of Putin. This makes NATO clearly the aggressor because its whining grievances are based on psychological instability and frustration about past historic events

Russia will attack, it doesn’t have to be directly, can easily repeat Crimean scenario with units using no sign on the first stage. Then propaganda will do the rest, to assure the sleepy west that it’s not quite certain what’s going on, maybe we should do nothing. By the time people realize they will come to bargain to bite it off piece by piece, like they did in Ukraine. Surely, they won’t need let’s say Italy, but a controlled puppet (purchased to be friendly) government why not.

The Ukrainian front line has fallen. Russian gains can be measured by the mile.

and russian loses measured by what?@@MrLougarou1000

hopefully not zelensky, i'm pretty sure he cant count or add up@@4inNashinal

LOL, pure projection. Love it.

@@MrLougarou1000 Been hearing that for two years now, vatnik 🤡🤡

"Lightning Alley" really does have a good ring to it, doesn't it?

I hope that I am. If I discover that my taxes are simply going to a immigrant welcome center I will be upset.

Certainly not Red shield and he's ghouls as after all they are the sole benefiters of these types of wars😂

Well, you, my dear chap! US and EU tax payers. And all that money goes to US-EU military industrial complex.

you can't pretend when for example us colonel is killed or number of US pilots that can not be hidden, couple of soldiers here and there yea but when it comes to high ranking members and pilots i don't think so, and involving F35s in war would immediately put in danger future effectiveness of F35 because Russia will learn how to find them and destroy them it isn't that easy, you can say just go in undercover but in reality Russia would immediately have every reason to legally attack NATO countries even nuclear response would be in consideration, because if NATO attacks then they would make Putin right and everything that Putin was saying from 2007 was actually truth

​@@fpsserbia6570 Russian did that during the Korean war

Just call them little blue men. 😂

What are you talking about, NATO can’t find artillery shells :)

Because they cannot keep production up

It was never there intention to take it completely over. Hence the invasion only began with 180,000 troops. Putin expected negotiations to start, which were at the beginning stages in March of 2022, until the west ended them.

@@realpolitiksanta5980 🤡

@@realpolitiksanta5980 Ah yes, an entire armor column closing in on the capital of a country isn't trying to "take it completely over". Fortunately, the Russian army showed shocking incompetence and the Ukrainian people impressive resilience.

​@@PhysicsGamerare U dumb enough to believe that an armour column of 25000 troops and few armour vehicles will take a city of population more than 2 million

First turn off CNN and BBC. Second, understand what their military objectives are.. Taking and holding land is very different than completely pulverizing a nation. Russia technically, without nukes, could absolutely level every major urban center in ukraine through overwhelming air bombardments, but that would be heavily counterproductive politically. But ukraine is winning, so you got nothing to worry about :)

Szia Józsi! Nagyon tetszik a profilképed, nosztalgikus lett a hangulatom tőle! A legjobbakat!

The fact two thirds are duds is a good help though

that's the scale of the war, problem is people are living in their toyish echo chamber thinking this war is about a bunch of tanks destroyed and a couple of drone videos shot every now and then

You need to have precision ammunition and destroy guns

Made from north Korean slave Labor

How many barrels did they provide?

This. The war will escalate all over the world if big Western powers shift their war machinery solely to Ukraine. Bye bye France from Africa, bye bye US from the Middle East, and most definitely, bye bye US from South and East China sea. If NATO enters Ukraine, China will never ever get a better chance to deal with Taiwan, once for all.

It's not that easy for China to escalate even if NATO will involve itself in Ukraine more intensely. Naval and air NATO's assets will still be free to interdict stuff on the sea.

@@saldownik there are many ways China can escalate. Yes there are huge drawbacks and devastating economic consequences for both NATO and China. The magnitude of the consequences of escalation are huge and not properly addressed in Binkov's analysis.

@@peetasmith4403 what would be your first thought when it comes to what China's escalation could answer greater NATO's involvement in Ukraine?

@@saldownik firstly direct and vertical escalation, there are rumours of direct military aid, such as 122mm shells, vehicles direct logistics support but mostly economic and supply, drone batteries and motors, chips and electronics and manipulation of other supplies, both in favour of Russia and against NATO. Other escalation such as trade relationships and fiscal policies such as adoptions of trade in non dollar denominations. Then lateral escalation of proxy conflicts such as what Russia has done in Africa and a possibility of Israel's current conflict. Lots of options that will enflame American interests and drive a response. Escalation theory is a huge area of political science and foreign relations and one well understood. Often such escalation is to provoke a response and use the enemies own response to hurt them. We can easily conclude this has already happened to a large extent and could be escalated to a significant degree, calculated to destroy NATO economies and cause internal political instability.

If you can't deal with sand people how are u gonna deal with a now semi professional millitary ?

I think a Nato involvement would be the worst thing to happen. Because a direct Nato involvement would mean that the russian folks really would feel like they are fighting for their lifes again. Right now, I am sure that its hard for putin to mobilize more troops for that war. Russian people are not all invested and definitly not willing to participate, at least the majority isnt. But as soon as it goes official that Nato is fighting there, its all hell loose. It means full mobilization. And majority of them are going to participate in that war more willingly. It always has been like this with the russians. And I doubt this time will be different. Which only then means, that Nato also has to send more and more. And this will spiral down and definitly start ww3 and involve more than one country. And probably go nuclear. Right now, the best thing is to try to freeze that conflict. Just freeze it for a while or forever, and start negotiation or at least start talking. This will stop the useless bloodshed. Aint no way russia is backing down an single inch, aint no way the whole world should suffer because of ukraine. Its not worth it.

No it wouldn't. It has no existential threat for Russia.

It absolutely would, as once a full on war starts, it quickly spirals out of control. Lets not take that risk.@@parabalani

@@parabalani Of course it would. It would no longer be the “proxy wars” since 1945, this would be the “full fat”. Russia would use Nukes right away. And the west, with its men dressed as woman, drug addicts and third world infested cities would collectively defecate.

Есть Яндекс браузер, который хорошо переводит видео на русский язык. Никто не смотрит это в России, поскольку здесь низкопробная пропаганда.

I usually tell my children the following: In 19th century Russian nobility studied French and there was war with Napoleon. In 20th century Russians studied German and there was war with fascist Germany In 21th century Russian children study English and who will we soon fight....😮😮😮

​@arhidemus your television is crazy propaganda

@@exstazius man, TV is the same propaganda as in the western and eastern Europe but to find the truth you need many points of view

protecting Ukraine is definitely worth it, right?

We don't. you can send your LGBTQ armies and we will call you with wrong pronouns and win.

Basically Russia have just contradicted it's own propaganda against the reality! 😏

If I teach you how to make a pizza am I cooking the pizza?

Ever heard of proxy wars? The US is also fighting Iran through it's militias. Same for US and Ukraine

@@dragonemperorsy2515 I do agree that proxy wars exist. They pretty much always existed. The thing I don't understand is why when the US does it is bad but when Iran or Russia do it it's ok.

I doubt any countries who haven't already participated in the implementation of sanctions have any real interest in doing so. The West has lost this conflict.

Sadly yo say but the UK army can use alot of improvements..

?? Typhoon is a more potent A2A platform, and the meteor system was partly developed in Britain... the RAF has been using Meteor for years.

Guys. I spoke about the video. It's ukRAINIAN military related... not UK one ahha.

@@tomsoki5738 In fact MBDA is the industrial prime contractor, with Saab (Sweden, 10%), Bayern-Chemie (Germany, 16%) and Inmize (Spain, 10%) as its main industrial partners. But you'r right, the MoD choose this missile for RAF (for Typhoon in particular)

@@xxdarkphoenixxx1 ah.. thanks :)

Yeah with no confirmation

@@zayedbinimran957 does you questioning oinkraine reports? r u a putin's orc-bot?

They have literally not provided any footage of what they claim LOL and we know very well the Ukrainians publish every single thing they do on the internet, I prefer to not believe in the words of compulsive liars LOL

@@zayedbinimran957 except for footage and reputable Russian Telegram channels like Fighter Bomber confirming it, yeah, no evidence whatsoever

​@@palar4195 ??????

its not comprehensive, ignores current developments, ignores what western media has already covered.

@@e33d90Nothing is relevant in perpetuity, we all have finite situational awareness. Omniscience is an ideal few can achieve. Perhaps you could add a comment mentioning significant facts not present or considered, so you're part of the solution.

@@paratracker Or I could just point you to way better sources? Modern war institute podcast has regular episodes about the ukraine war, with high quality quests who are professionals, then there is also a plethora of youtube channels which do a far better job, ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-R31hMWs25UI.html&ab_channel=Perun

If you do not have quality information, it is very hard to identify low quality information.

@@paratracker seems I am not allowed to post links it gets deleted, Perun has a great youtube channel where he interviews professionals, also the west point academy has a very good and concise podcast

lol shhhhh

@@barbosaguzman6101go back to ural russian trol

You are hilarious.

People seem to conflate total casualties and KIA. Both sides have realistically estimated killed and wounded in lower-mid hundreds of thousands.

Ukraine needs to mobilise another half a million troops to, and I quote Zelensky: "To replenish the ranks of our armed forces". The 31k number is complete and utter nonsense.

Of course it is likely, since Russia have a bad record of heavy losses in all major wars!

@@privatebandana 31k is in big likelihood an underestimate, but I think you've got the wrong idea. Even with just 31k killed, given the ratio with wounded, casualties could very well be in the 100-200k range. Additionally given Russia's huge and ongoing increase in personnel count, intensity and multitude of offensives amidst Ukrainian ammo shortages, could alone incentivise them to need an extra 500k, even if Zelensky's numbers were true.

What the fuck is a maverick and a Rambo? Your dream lover boys? What the fuck? You must be a child of minor age, go back to bed with ya warm hot chocolate.

Yeah but the comments section has been totally flooded by bots, take a look at the insane amount of accounts with 4 numbers at the end of the name just all parroting exactly the same messages. It's crazy.

@@PluvioZA didn't even notice that all pro-russia comments have 4 numbers at the end, that's kinda funny

@@KaboomHS You do know that the 4 number at the end of a name is just a feature of RU-vid right: RU-vid has been adding numbers to usernames that are already taken. This is to ensure that every user has a unique username.

It might means dooming Russia but you can expect anything from desperate dictator. You can't count out bad possiblities, things can escalate so fast that we might have way more human lives gone than Ukranian-Russo war ever would cause. US been very carefull with not escalating the war so i hope they will contunie to be carefull.

>someone throws one back No, someone starts talking, there are none of the nuclear states that see this issue as existential except russia.

It probably would if they could afford to make anything similar

There is a huge difference between having tech to look at compared to being able to reverse engineer or manufacture it

Nah Rememebr the invisible stealth bomber in Kosovo the yanks said was impossible to shoot down as it was invisible. The invisible plane was then shot down by an obsolete 30 year old russian SAM battery. Yanks are terrified the world will see that this wonder weapon is not very good in reality, bit like the M1 and every other game changer.

@@DavidNavalThere's no way they could make all components of the F-35 if they had a downed example to look at and study, but they would be able to get a decent grasp of at least some of it, or at minimum be able to use some of it for improving their own weapons to counter the F-35. And don't forget, although Russia would be unable to copy much of it, their infamous reverse engineer ally China could get even substantially more usable knowledge from it, especially in combination with all the knowledge they already had about the F-35 aquired through hacking and espionage.

​@@pieterveenders9793西方所谓的工业革命文艺复兴实际上几乎所有知识都来自于唯一的古文明中国，只不过西方最近200年大量修改世界历史谎称是自己发明的

its funny to see how Ukrainian meat is literally fighting with US+Nato toys and 100 B budget and still barely holds the line and loses actually to current "sanctioned" Russia

А какой смысл снимать ролики, про то, что вы сильны? Придите и возьмите.

Read about the Wolfowitz doctrine. It can quite possible change you're perspective on the current events happening in my country of birth (Ukraine) It is quite easy to see who is actually benefitting from all of these proxi conflicts once you start searching around for some censored names, families and organizations. Sadly though RU-vid doesn't allow these certain names and links to be posted on here as they are a direct *threat* to freedom of speech and democracy these days (SARCASM)😄

​@@pavels8890I can tell how bad youre coping and crying into your keyboard as you type this by the disorganized structure of your sentences😂 On the contrary, your boys are struggling to take 20% of your own decrepit third world ex colony armed with our 1980s warehouse surplus😂

They are going to OD on copium still thinking they can take on NATO when Ukraine alone is taking 2+ years now. 😂

Because they know that NATO will never attack Russia unless Russia attacked them first or used nuclear weapons. Why trigger the only scenario that poses an existential risk to their country and regime? Even Ukraine doesn't matter that much to them.

Putin is a little coward who threatebs the use of nuclear weapons because he knows he's about to get his a$$ kicked by the rest of the world. He wouldn't use nukes--because he knows it would be suicide. All of Russia would be flattened.

@@VIDS2013 Russia flattened by who? by your country? or by whichever country other than your country?

​@@VIDS2013rest of the world?! You know that more of the world supports Russia than the West?

exactly, Russia can nuke Ukraine if they see that NATO is going to join the fight, ukraine is not in NATO yet, some EU politicians just want the war keep going for next decade while knowing that ukraine war already lost@@ChrisWalker-fq7kf