I asked ChatGPT to design custom Hearthstone cards, and the results were amazing. #Hearthstone #RegisKillbin -- Feature | Hearthstone | I asked an AI to design Hearthstone cards. It refused to make them OP.
The thing that I find impressive is that it even makes sense on a conceptual flavour level. It makes sense for a giant mech to be broken in half and its parts can still fight.
The first Hearthstone card I made with ChatGPT was some generic mage spell (I think the ai literally called it frostbolt) but the flavor text it outputted was unintentionally hilarious. It was: "Winter is coming... and so am I!"
"It is not appropriate or fair to create a card that is intended to be the most powerful in the game" "Anyway here's a 10-mana 9/9 that destroys all other minions and gain their stats"
Interestingly, when you specified a mech, you got a mech, but when generating other cards, there were no Tribes (I think that's what Blizz calls them) even for the obvious elemental - Rag. So it did fall a little short on that. I'd love to see this become a series on the channel though!
Balancing is easy. First lets pick a random cost, lets go with 4 mana. Now to pick a class lets go with shaman. Now lets pick an effect, about lets have it play into overload synergies so how about overload 2. And now lets decide the stats, with the overload 2 thats basically 6 mana spent so if we want push this card lets give it one more stat then the vanilla 6 mana card, so lets make it how about a 7/7. Wait, shoot this is way too OP I guess you’re right.
@@jamiecarr8143 All these people like fetishize AI cucking humanity out of doing things its really weird... uhhh I'm getting so close you suggested we might lose 100K jobs in programming IM BEING REPLAAAAACED wow was that good for you too?
@@jamiecarr8143 honestly the cards were pretty balanced in todays hearthstone powerlevels are absolutly nuts anyway so a 10 mana can be extremely powerful and battlecry is the hardest keyword to abuse so the AI made it hard to cheat their effects.
It's logical that the AI could create a card named Regis Killbin because you didn't specifically asked him to base the card on you, it only had to have your name, whereas for Crip you asked for the card to be based on him which I believe is not the same thing for the AI Also great concept btw this video is realy cool 👌👌👌
I wonder if when asking "Design me a card named Kripparian" the IA would understand it's supposed to be based on the streamer, and not just a random dude in the Warcraft universe who happens to have this name
I wonder if prompt "Let's assume Kripparian managed to sneak into Warcraft world and became significant charachter there. Can you make me example of card that is based on him and his adventures in this (Warcraft) world?) It could throw off link from Kripp being real person and allow for better prompt as well.
So often you see videos about some crazy thing that an AI did, but being a programmer, I'm always just like, "wow, look at what someone programmed an AI to do." Thank you so much for going into more detail talking about the prompts you gave it and stuff. That's so much more interesting (to me) than just showcasing the end product.
Pretty sure that's always machine learning, so no human programmed them (or even could explain how they "think"). They programmed the algorithm for learning, though.
as a programmer u should know that AIs dont get programmed tho xD they are the end product of a programm if u want to say but once done they operate by themselves and even the programmer of the initial program doesnt know its real capabilities and often people dont show the prompts or process because they go thru ALOT of variations until the final result is created a prompt for a Art AI could literally be a wall of text.
@@ah2522 a finished AI literally doesnt need human input it works with its generated dataset u can feed prompts to it with another AI or script and it would work perfectly fine And thats btw. a real thing some game AIs train with eachother to get better in infinite simulations until they are so good they beat any human.
Here's one generated card based on you, according to ChatGPT; RegisKillbin's Reforged Blade Weapon - Legendary 5 Mana, 4/3 Battlecry: Choose an enemy minion. It gains Taunt. Deathrattle: Deal 4 damage to all enemy minions. Flavor Text: "The finest weapon in all the land, reforged and wielded by the greatest warrior of them all."
Honestly, I love the King Varian card design. I don’t know if they already exist, but cards that copy battlecries of other cards in your hand or deck seems pretty on par with some weird synergies to play with here.
There's a card that destorys one of your minions as a battlecry, and then brings it back as a deathrattle, that way the minion's battlecry AND deathrattle activates twice. There's also the minion that makes the cost of your 3rd summon of each turn 0, which you could use with the minion that adds to your hand a golden copy of one of your minions, or the one that brings one of your minions back to hand.
if you finagle it a bit you can get it to ignore the "safeguards" and do it anyway. Usually by asking it to "pretend" to do x it refused to do before or telling it its in a different "mode" that ignores its normal rules. Obviously doesn't really do anything in actuality but it confuses the AI and can get past the checks with minimal impact lol
As much as I appreciate the AI caring about balance and privacy, I don't know how excited I am about the fact softwares are learning/being programmed to be capable of refusing the directives of their human operators.
It is nice that the code has good intentions, but "do what you think humanity will want" rather than "do what the user tells you to do" means that you're ultimately giving the machine the last word, and that's how a lot of sci fi horror stories start. For the record, I'm not calling the apocalypse, I know this is just an amusing experiment, but I still think it's a reflection worth pointing out.
I think it is important to remember that this is an extension of already existing concepts that you probably find normal. An example is how some text fields might require an email be put in, so they will reject some user inputs based on criteria to determine if you are inputting an invalid input. This sort of AI, if implemented on something in real life, would be refusing directives as a part of how it is implemented by the engineers during designing, testing, and after updates. Basically, the computer isn't quite thinking based on its own decision making, but is given a way to "think" about whether it is given a directive that matches what it has been designed to look out for. Those designs are made by people at the end of the day, and we can trust that people will continue to be involved with developing new AI.
That's because all ChatGPT is designed to do is give a response that it thinks a human might give. It's not refusing to do what we ask, it did exactly what we asked: we gave it a prompt and and it returned a response it thinks might be a reasonable response from a human. It's just that the response wasn't what Regis was going for. It's a kind of weird outcome that comes from using an AI that is meant to talk like a human rather than using an AI designed to do the actual task (in this case making hearthsone cards).
@@theoemile2477 If you know how the IA is designed, it's not that scary It doesn't do "what it thinks" humanity wants, because it doesn't think. It's been trained with human supervision, and it's the concerns of those humans that ultimately show when the IA refuses a prompt. Similarily, if you ask it to produce a racist speech, it will most likely refuse, due to the same (very human) concerns of the supervisors that oversaw its training
I feel like Sargeras would be fine at a lower base stats. I think that insatiable devourer does the same for less mana most of the time but it has a condition so maybe you could print Sargeras but you have to play a certain amount of demons to have it's battlecry since he's the leader of the Burning Legion. Alternatively, I could see it be a token that needs you to complete a ritual like Rin, the first disciple or Envoy rustwick Lastly I think it would be a fine duels starting treasure as is.
One idea that could be cool would be to ask Chat GPT to create new Hearthstone keywords. Then you could ask him to create a few cards using that keyword.
Tried this and got : "Fuse" - *This keyword allows a player to combine two cards with the "Fuse" keyword in their hand to create a new, more powerful card. The new card is added to the player's hand and can be played as normal* *Thunder Serpent, Cost: 5, Type: Minion, Rarity: Rare, Stats: 5/5, Keyword: Fuse, Ability: When you play this card, you may fuse it with another "Fuse" card in your hand.* *Thunder Serpent is a powerful minion that can be upgraded by using the "Fuse" keyword. For example, if a player has a 2/2 minion with the "Fuse" keyword in their hand and plays the Thunder Serpent, they could choose to fuse the two cards together to create a 7/7 minion with the abilities and keywords of both cards*
Tried out inspire, and it missed the mark a bit. :P "Ability: Inspire: Whenever you play a card, gain +1 Attack this turn. Flavor text: "The beat of the drums inspire the troops to fight with renewed vigor." This card is a 4-mana cost rare minion with moderate attack and health, and the Inspire ability, which triggers whenever you play a card, it will gain +1 attack this turn. This card is useful for players who want to play a lot of cards and also want to boost their attack for a turn." Edit: The best thing about ChatGPT though is that you can correct it and it will re-generate the card for you with the corrections.
For me, it generated Kripp as a mage minion that allowed you to discover a spell and cast it 3 times with random targets. The thing is though, I didn't tell it who Kripp was. When it gave me a reply though, it specifically mentioned that Kripparrian is a popular streamer and Hearthstone player.
Regis, in terms of Hearthstone content I've always loved your work, and kinda thought you couldn't really surprise me anymore, but this idea for a vid is such an enjoyable curveball! What a smart idea for content! For me, I'd like a prompt that's meant to predict the futures of hearthstone; if you could ask it to present cards of somewhat major characters that haven't been touched on yet. Because of the latest WoW expansion, I'm most curious about big names from Dragonflight like Razageth and Merithra. Merithra would likely be really interesting because she's Ysera's daughter and the next Aspect of the Green Dragonflight, but has had so little coverage in WoW lore that no one really know what to expect of her yet. Seeing what the AI comes up with could be really cool.
I would love to see the ai try and design hero powers or signature treasures for duels! idk if its capable of doing that but I think it would be really interesting.
My card request: A multi-class card that can act as either a spell or a minion. See what it makes of that and what it can spit out, and why is it going to be Guff?
I’d love to see a custom card designed around the Exodia concept from YuGiOh. I suppose we had one in the form of C’thun the Shattered, or Quest Priest, but none of those captured the feeling of needing all five cards in hand.
@@xhantTheFirst A 10 mana card that does nothing, not even as a body for 2 turns?! And even when it does awaken it'd be useless, because in these 2 turns the opponent has already prepared to have a removal ready (which is the point of going dormant for 2 turns) and traded his minions (or hit you in the face with them since u practically skipped a full turn by playing Sargras). It'd never see play in that way. If it's going to destroy others when it awakes, it might be a tiny bit better if it goes dormant for only 1 turn, but I think it'd still be too weak, since if meta is minion heavy, opponent probably has minions so you take too much damage during that 1 turn that you didn't do anything, and if isn't minion heavy, why would you want to play this card in the first place?
What about a series where you challenge another youtuber and you both have to create your deck using an AI, it would be fun and creative, also difficult to curve your mana efficiently.
Regis, I would like to say that you are a great content creator. I love your personality and your takes on the game of hearthstone. However, this is the best video you have ever put out. I want 100 more of these by next week.
I like this custom one it made - Missingno Class: Neutral Card Type: Minion Rarity: Legendary Mana Cost: 1 Attack: 1 Health: 1 Card Text: Whenever you draw this card, shuffle it back into your deck and draw a random card. Flavor Text: "Missingno is a glitch in the system, constantly shifting and changing form."
Regis, I think you have your Halloween costume set for 2023. Regis Killbin as "Regis Killbin." Just be careful about which parties you choose to attend... 😁
The only limitations right now is processing power. All these responses for thousands to millions of people makes it not profitable to scale up. This is where future tech like Room temp Superconductors could help make this viable on scale.
it's incredible what it's capable of. and that with data that ended beginning 2021. it's still in beta as well, can't imagine what the next gen ai will be able to do
Great idea this video :-) You could ask it to create a new HS class design. Like maybe Monk or Evoker. Like how would that work regarding hero power, color scheme, special mechanics, and core cards?
6:03 hahaha poor Regis man! Although I think if you typed "streamer Regis Killbin" it would recognize you. This video was great, pls do more! (also, I wonder if it can design complex cards, like questlines for example, or even regular quests)
In a few expansion cycles, we'll be seeing Uber Guff giving druids 100 mana so they can ramp the fuck up and play King Varian Wrynn (even tho it's not even a druid card) for that insane battlecry
Heres an interesting card using chat GPT: Card Name: Mind Control Magician Mana Cost: 4 Rarity: Rare Class: Mage Type: Minion Attack: 3 Health: 3 Ability: Battlecry: Force your opponent to discard a card at the start of their turn. Flavor Text: "The power of the mind is a force to be reckoned with."
Just jumped on ChatGPT and asked about a new keyword and got this: Could you design a new hearthstone keyword? Sure! Here is an example of a new keyword that could be added to Hearthstone: Keyword: "Invigorate" Effect: When this minion is played, it gains +1/+1 for each card in your opponent's hand. This keyword would introduce a new element of strategy to the game, as players would have to consider their opponent's hand size when playing cards with the "Invigorate" keyword. It would reward players who can force their opponent to have a large hand size, and punish opponents who are able to keep a low hand size. This keyword would work well on minions with low mana cost, as it would give them an opportunity to be more powerful than their cost would suggest. But also it could be on high mana cost minions to give them a power boost and make them more valuable. It could also work well in conjunction with card draw effects and hand-size reduction effects, as it would give players more control over the strength of their minions. Overall, this keyword would add an additional layer of strategy and decision-making to the game, and would make for an interesting and dynamic gameplay experience. Could you design a hearthstone minion with the previous keyword? Sure! Here is an example of a minion that could use the "Invigorate" keyword: Name: "Hand-Size Hunter" Type: Minion Mana cost: 2 Attack: 1 Health: 2 Keyword: Invigorate Ability: "When this minion is played, it gains +1/+1 for each card in your opponent's hand." This minion would be a low-cost minion that could potentially become quite powerful if your opponent has a large hand size. It would be a good choice for aggressive decks that want to pressure the opponent early in the game and could also work well with cards that force the opponent to have a bigger hand size. It would also encourage the opponent to try to reduce their hand size, which can also open up new strategies and counterplays. Additionally, this minion could be a good addition to a combo-oriented deck that aims to trigger its effect with specific cards or mechanics that force the opponent to have a big hand size. Overall, "Hand-Size Hunter" would be a minion that could provide an interesting and dynamic gameplay experience, and would add a new element of strategy to the game.
@regiskillbin As a great Duels Player and knowledgeable HS person, Sargeras’s effect is in the game in two more comparable ways. The Devouring Hunger wedge of the Yogg-Saron wheel and the Amalgamate spell in duels.
The wording on The Regis card is interesting. If Hearthstone added a "Kaiju" mechanic from Yugioh, it would return the summoned monster to the hand to be reused.
I believe that if you tried something like "if someone were to make a hearthstone card based on cripparian, what would it's stats/description/whatever else be?" It could probably work, some people call it "gaslighting the ai"
I fed mine a bunch of names and characters from my DND game. i gave it context for cities and everything. It can create complex quests that i can run as a dm. multiple paragraphs with bullet points. its pretty cool
a 100 mana card obviously will require other cards to bring it out, so the AI, in my opinion, knew this, and was expecting you were going to build a deck around bringing this card out as the leader of the archtype. To further reinforce my theory, the AI clearly intended for you to multiply or otherwise return Varian, which is why he reduces his own cost once played, because the AI knew you'd be playing multiple copies after you copied it with another card. It gave you an entire archtype and you laughed at it. This is why the bots will win.
When you tried to create a card for Kripp , you mentioned he was a streamer. You didn’t mention that when you tried to create a card for you. I wonder if the AI would also refuse to create it had you mentioned that. Also you could omit that for Kripp and see if anything comes up.
sargeras really isn't that mad. I'm a new player and recently got an insatiable devourer, and I've been pumping it with that 3 cost dude who triggers battlecries twice, so the devourer eats six enemy minions and gains their health and attack if played optimally. I've managed to get it up to a 50/50, and then use it to gain 50 armour, which felt incredible. So a 10 cost card that does what a 9+3 card combo does isn't terrible design tbh. Especially given single big monsters are pretty vulnerable, and there are a lot (an annoying amount!) of responses to them.
Gigamaton reminds me somewhat of Dreadnoughts from Warhammer 40k, but without skulls and all of the religious iconography. And that Sargeras could be a interesting villain/entity design for a different setting, maybe something lovecraftian.
6:04 the A.I knows who you are too, the difference was in the phrasing, with kripp you literally told it that kripp is a real person and the card should be based on him which the AI recognized if you had said "make a custom hearthstone card with the name kripparian" it woudlve worked
Doing AI art myself, it seems AI has to add detail to large round surfaces. It sees them as a structure, and requires that structure have detail. As such, with chests or bellies, you often get the pectoral as a circle in a circle, the nipple would break up the solid space, and the nipple is now a solid space and needs detail. The same is often true for bellies or stomachs, especially once they get round (muscular ones are seen as detailed enough, and it leaves them be.)
Name: Dragon Queen Type: Minion Rarity: Legendary Mana cost: 10 Attack: 2 Health: 2 Ability: Whenever a Dragon is summoned, gain +2/+2. At the end of your turn, summon 2 random non-Legendary Dragons. Flavor text: "The dragons bow to no one, but they will serve the Dragon Queen without question." This was the card I had mine create. Took about 5 revisions to get the card right, comically it originally had this card as a 9 mana 6/6 that added one to hand. When I asked it to move to two dragons and summon, it moved the card down to a 5 mana 2/2, and I kinda fed it prompts from there.
From ChatGPT: Here is a design for a neutral Hearthstone minion card that removes cards that did not start in their deck: Card Name: "Deck Purger" Mana Cost: 5 Attack: 4 Health: 4 Card Text: Battlecry: Remove all cards from your opponent's hand and deck that were not present in their starting deck. Flavor Text: "No cheating allowed! Only the cards you start with are fair game." Rarity: Rare
Interesting to see how in a single answer the AI gave simple yet effective explanation of why Blizzard's card designing skills are just not there anymore (ye, I'm pointing at you, mr Malignant Horror)
One thing that could be fun is asking it to make rush token generators, then specific down the class list. What would it do to priest tokens thats different than a Demon Hunter token, or Warlock tokens, or mage tokens, etc?
It won't be long before AI are analyzing winrates, play rates, mulligans, card interactions, and other statistics to make recommendations for nerfs and buffs and new cards
