Except for the fact that no aircraft ever built could transport it, it doesn’t fit through any railroad tunnels, and no tank transporter would be able to drive on roads. A fully loaded M1A2 SEP V3 Abrams is less than a third the weight of this thing, and the US Army still thinks it’s too heavy and is working on a new program to shave some weight off.
I designed alot of Modern MBTs of my own designs and It's pretty damn fun to do so, in Sprocket. I made a good 110ton MBT, and another great one that was 60t and mobile. My most recent design I put 3 guns and it has 5 crew members. A 130mm main cannon, a 30mm anti infantry on the hull, and a 50mm anti air next to the main cannon. I put a 14 cylinder in it and it goes really fast for how much armour I put on it. I put spaced armour and armour plates too on it's most vulnerable spots. It has a crew of 5 which I'm surprised it works. It has an average of 27-35km off road, or over bumpy terrain. But on flat ground it can go 50km.
12:23 bro dont worry of the side armor there's 3 tanks that have flat side armour and are so good tanks first the ww2 pzkwf.Vlll maus. second the leopard 2 a good and powerful german tank with FLAT SIDE ARMOUR and the last and my favourite tank in the world the M1A2 ABRAMS a 1999 U.S.A tank a powerful beast😎😎
I've been enjoying making sub 62.5 ton MBT like late war tanks with nearly invincible armor and high speed with the knowledge of today and understanding the bad ai.
With it looking like a cross between the Sweden's CV90 120T and Poland's the PL-01. Now I wish the CV90 120-T or PL-01 was adopted at lest by a few countries.
