I Heard Him Scream! 

In that context, nobody's like Jack Reacher, with a highly accurate clock in their head. Nobody will pay close attention to the time on a relaxed night out with their Mrs and a friend. The "2 hours" or "A couple of hours ago" fits very well with the narrative from the defense witnesses.

yeah he is grasping at straws big time! only making himself look even more foolish than he already is. he spends more time with his face buried in his phone than paying attention! Judge should sanction him for unprofessional court conduct! i find it very disrespectful to the court for someone to have their face right up in their phone like that in court!

Drinking in the bathroom of a bar would be a new scenario I've never seen 😂before

That is something I've never thought about. Good question. I've never seen it in any other trial.

Good point. Maybe a lawyer could answer that? @TheDUIGuyPlus

Yaah that is a problem. Even the Georgia hearings over Fani Willis, she clearly listened to testimony from outside the courtroom when she wasn't supposed to.

The cop has already testified at this point as the State already closed its case. That's why Defense is calling its witnesses and State is cross examining them

At the start of this video, the judge said the prosecution had finished their case in chief (not his exact words) 0:50

Indeed, once they state that they suspect the defendant was under the influence, the human psychology thing to do is to act with extreme confirmation bias. Which in this case and millions of others like it across the globe escalates into an arrest. Having made the arrest, the incentive is very much there to double down on the arrest. Because their job and livelihood is on the line if it can be proved that the arrest was a load of baloney. To my mind, from this and the other video from this case, the commonwealth are a long way short of proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

You just described all prosecutors.

You just described all prosecutors.

Fair, it seems 😊

@@16MedicRN This is the distraction ameritards crave... Meanwhile he leaves the door wide open for completely irrelevant questioning and badgering from the prosecution. Southerner will fck you with a smile..

Almost too much too. The ending line of questioning was wildly unnecessary. Mind of well said are you lying because your sleeping with him.

sitting around all day eating fast food and drinking energy drinks does a number on people.

I was thinking damned he was born the year I graduated and looks as old as I do.

Yeah but only 1 (rookie) cop on duty in the whole county at that time of the night so great chance of getting away with it.

😂😂😂

😂😂😂😍

I don't think he gives a damn about his job.

@leroytruth always gtsy🤟🍻

Well, hello there :)

I wonder how often he does that… 🤔

Yep, because he might lose his cushy police officer's job.

Well I hope you and DUI Guy see my responses but don't see them on my end darn utube . Keep up the wonderful work @leroytruth 💪💪👍🤟💜

They are probably good friends. He seemed to favor Mr DA

i love that! he does look like uncle fester 🤣

its all because his is trying so hard to convict the guy with basically no evidence he will try every dirty tactic he can to discredit anyone helping the defense. I think he would have tried harder on the defenses first witness but the guy was a former cop and i think knew the playbook so he couldn't use it on him

The copper on the stand is his mate, correct?

The 100mph is the testimony of deputy King, and as remarked upon by @TheDUIGuy+ in his opening remarks and on the direct by the prosecutor objectionable due to the officers lack of expertise in the field of traffic accident reconstruction as well as at the time the accident occurred being less than 90 days on the job and unsupervised. The only evidence against Danny at this point is this unschooled inexperienced rookie cop vs the eyewitness testimony of someone with many years of law enforcement experience and a 27 year veteran of the medical field specializing in respiratory therapy. If I am in that jury, the prosecutions case has more holes in it than a strainer.

This is a lesson to all of us: make sure you have a dashcam. Because without one, it's a dead cert that each side will blame the other for the collision.

@@lint8391 agreed

That’s what I wanted to know

The word of a police officer in any country in the world would never be enough for me to convict someone. Because cops can and do make mistakes. And they can and do lie. And they can and do police via their feelings. And they can and do get vindictive if you don't lick their boots. Which always puts reasonable doubt in place. Convictions have to be based on objective evidence (for them to be lawful). The word of a cop is NOT objective evidence.

We have the constitution. You can't force me to incriminate myself, hence no test of any kind will be taken.

because in your so called "proper countries" you only have the rights the government thinks you should have in the usa we have rights guaranteed by our constitution that as hard as they try the goverment can not take away and have no control over

Mince. It's not unreasonable after an accident to be obliged to submit to a breath test. That's not incriminating yourself, if you're drunk you've already incriminated yourself. Of course there is always the right to refuse but refusal in such circumstances is a different offense in (for example) the UK. The alternative is anarchy and drunks killing people on the roads without sanction.

Larry charges a $250 consultation fee, but, he's said on-stream several times that he will talk to anyone and give them an hour of his time for that fee, so yes, you absolutely can call him if needbe, as he can practice law in any state 👍👍👍👍

It's obvious a dumb one.

@@dianahrussell4944 Dumb, lazy and what I consider disrespectful, too lazy to stand up to address anyone in the courtroom!!

Looks to me like there's a circular blur effect in place, during a lot of it. No matter what camera view is being shown.

​@kerryedavis nah its definitely the work of aliens. Surely its not just a smudge on the lens.

Judge sets decorum.... Remember that.

I am subscribed 👍😁

@@shadowbeast2276 I had notification 🛎️ on mute 😅

@@ThatQPerson it happens. BAD PUPPY!!😁👍

Often it's easier to remember a location/occasion than a date/year.

@@FlexDRG Absolutely. I was observing that Larry asked him a question, he answered it, and Larry then asked him a question to which he had immediately prior been given the information by the witness. Essentially when the other attorney would object and state ''asked and answered'' because the subsequent question is redundant due to a previous answer 👍👍👍👍

This piece of trash prosecutor is such a hypocrit and tyrant.

If I was on the jury, I'd be thinking "I can work out for myself that she's his wife. And what that means. I can also work out the nature of the arresting officer. With me having all the Lackluster videos I've seen in the back of my mind. Balance of probabilities: both sides are lying or exaggerating. Therefore Not Guilty due to reasonable doubt."

She could have retrieved it by saying she thinks nobody should drink and drive and it would be better if everybody obeyed the rules all the time. Because road safety is important. No drink driving = no convictions.

I accidentally skipped over it @_@ - I will post it tomorrow.

It’s in the back corner there, boomer. Maybe be more up in arms about the miscarriage of justice that the prosecution is attempting to sling.

Maybe everybody there knows what country they are in.

​@@georgestewart3924maybe everyone should remember that they have due process because of this country.

It depends on the courtroom/location. Some of them are crystal clear and others not so much ❤

Kentucky

This is a multi part trial story, so you can just go back and look. In short, his client crashed his car and got arrested for DUI at the hospital later, when he denied to take a field sobriety test (alledgedly - we haven't come to that part of the testimony yet).

Yes

You beat be to it good thing the defense was playing chess instead of checkers

Not all, but a big big percentage are yes.

Most

This attorney shows his past cases in pieces. DUIGUY posts every evening around 6pm daily. This is about the 3rd or 4th video in the series. Hope this helps 😊

There's always something to learn/notice/pick up, from how everyone in the court behaves 👍👍👍👍 [Edit to add] Look up the Uniform Code of Military Justice, then watch A Few Good Men, and then keep a tally of how many times Tom Cruise's character commits 'Conduct Unbecoming an Officer and a Gentleman' (It's a Looot of times... 🙈🙈🙈🙈) Even that is a learning experience 👍👍👍👍

So, you understand that lawyers have ZERO control over cameras, maintenance of, position of, and quality of? It depends on the city or county involved.

That’s how court cameras and audios work. Deal with it

@@16MedicRNObjection: Loaded question... Re-phrase, counsellor 😉😉😉😉