With Zion injured, if he is out, it’s doubtful that they beat the Kings with how they just manhandled the Warriors What’s weird is that when guys like CJ or Trey go off, they’re good. When they don’t, no matter Zion, they’ll drop.
Should be 25 - 15, bc 4 of the freethrows were intentional fouls. I hate how people always point this out, ignoring the fact that Lebron/AD live in the paint. Warriors vs Kings had a 23 - 15 freethrow disparity but you don't see anyone crying about that.
@@Jeff09x Girl Zion had 40. Zion also lives in the paint. Zion also got nearly double digit free throws. Zion was feeling it, he was unstoppable. Lebron and AD couldn't buy a freaking bucket, meaning... guess what? They have less points in the paint? Even though they took a bunch of shots in the paint? Gee, its almost as if you can be very aggressive going to the basket, put pressure on the defense, draw fouls, but still shoot poorly from the field? Isn't that crazy how lots of things can be true at once? Wrap your head around that before you speak.
@@Jeff09x Like imagine if the Lakers went 10/30 from free throws, and someone told your biased a$$ "The Lakers don't shoot a lot of free throws because they only scored 10 points from the free throw line". Like isn't that just a really stupid thing to say? Maybe points scored from a certain area is correlated with shots taken from a certain area, but do you know the actual way to find shots taken from a certain area? You look at... shots taken... from a certain area...?? This hypothetical free throw person you are thinking is a dumba$$ is you by the way. Just replace "free throws" with "paint shots"
@@Paulie_Geelie wrap your head around that most of them fouls was bs and just cuz you can’t buy a bucket you deserve calls? And they was NOT aggressive as Zion was come on now and half of those fouls were not shooting fouls on the lakers and they was never in the bonus but we all kno the league gives them fouls
@@Jeff09x I don’t like engaging with people like you because the point just always seems to go over your heads. I said “Lakers shoot alot in the paint so they draw a lot of fouls” You said to refute my point “fool, you’ve fallen for my trap card. The pelicans scored more in the paint”. Presumably claiming that the lakers don’t shoot that much in the paint (which if watched the games you’d know is hilariously wrong). And I said “points scored does not equal shots attempted…? Shots attempted equals shots attempted…??? And you said “whatever the Lakers are cheater meaners anyway so you’re a meanie too”. Like imagine if the lakers shots 10/30 from the free throw line, and the pelicans shot 20/20, and then I said “the pelicans score more from the free throw line, the lakers don’t shoot many free throws”. Like listen to how unintelligent that sounds. Just replace “free throw line” with “paint”, and that’s you. That person you just hypothetically called unintelligent after reading that line is you.
