Actual Tank Commander asks ChatGPT to choose tanks in War Thunder and this is not what I expected. ↓ Social Links ↓ ➤ Twitch: / panzerpaw ➤ Twitter: / panzerpaw ➤ Discord: / discord ---
The thing I like most about panzer is that he rarely gets insane kill numbers like other tubers and he doesn’t have every tech tree maxed out with every premium known to man. He just feels like a high skill normal person which makes me feel better as a medium skill person
About the M41 looking like an enlarged Chaffee, he's right. The army at the time wanted a replacement of the light tank but a bit bigger, & the end result is the walker bulldog, which is based on the Chaffee
Essentially after every update the game stutters and it is annoying asf. I got my ram from 16 to 32 GB, I use an RTX 2080, yet still stutters. from 140 fps down to essentially still screen for 5 seconds, sometimes a crash.
It's actually incredible how maintenance quality of life has improved through the tank generations. Just comparing the Leo 2 to the AMX-13 or Centurion, they're worlds apart
You aren’t angling on the tiger correctly. You need to angle to where your barrel is over the area that slightly goes outwards more on the front right or left of your tank.
7:08 The M4 Sherman was designed to fight tanks, the "M4 wasn't made to fight tanks" idea came from a widespread misconception about American Armored Doctrine of WW2. The reason people think this is because they take the line "tanks are tools of exploitation used to support the infantry" out of proportion and equate it to "tanks were only meant to support the infantry and anything else is the job of tank destroyers" which is not only incorrect but a massive leap of logic given armored doctrine stated in the passage on the Tank Destroyer Branch that Tank Destroyers were purely defensive units. The US defined the role of the tank to support infantry, to break enemy lines, and to destroy what it found beyond. This often consisted of enemy tanks either at or beyond the line of contact and it was *by definition* the friendly tank's job to handle those enemy tanks. The biggest thing that puts this myth to bed is the 75mm Cannon M3's designated role. It was a medium velocity (not low velocity, that's another misconception) multi-purpose gun. As in it did more than one thing. People like to talk about how great it's HE shell was for dealing with fortifications but many people downplay just how devastating the thing's AP shell was to German armor when the Sherman made it's combat debut. The mainstays of the German armored force for the entirety of WW2 Panzer 4 variants and, earlier on, Panzer 3 variants. Things that the 75mm M3 Cannon was far more than sufficient to deal with. With 85-95mm of armor penetration at most early-mid war combat ranges it made mincemeat out of the standard 50-60mm of frontal armor on most Panzer 3 and Panzer 4 variants. It was not until much later on the Panzer 4s were reinforced with a thicker 80mm frontal plate which was still vulnerable at shorter ranges but merely less so. It was not until 1944 with the invasion of France and later Germany that the 75mm M3 became consistently impotent against enemy armor. By this point M4s armed with the 76mm gun already existed in large numbers. However, they were left behind during the invasion because of a rather major lack of foresight on the part of American tank commanders. The biggest reason they were left behind was because the 75mm M3 was "good enough" to deal with the vast majority of armored threats American tank commanders had met up until this point and retraining for a bigger higher velocity gun was not seen as a necessary thing at that point. Of course they were proven rather disastrously wrong when they came into contact with a much higher ratio of Panthers and Tigers than they were expecting which were things the 75mm M3 was woefully incapable of handling frontally. The M4 was a tank designed to do everything the Americans thought a tank would need to do during the war. From bulldozing obstacles, to handling fortified enemy positions, to killing other tanks. They always knew a bigger, more heavily armored and armed tank would be necessary. The thing that made this an issue was the Armored Board's harsh requirements on reliability and weight. The tank that would eventually become the M26 Pershing was in development for years before American boots touched down on Normandy but the program simply kept getting kicked down the road because M4s were doing "good enough" and the challenges of getting such a heavy vehicle both reliable enough to be sent over seas and light enough to make the number of vehicles that could be sent even worth it was a near Herculean challenge for the technology of the time.
Range finder takes to long just upgraded targeting for gunner and get it to maximum level and then your shots will almost all the time land were the crosshairs are
I dont glorify the is reverse tactic but i tried it once on the stalingrad map in a full uptier and i only died after being bombed u survived so... so many hits
can you make a video on wt tractors? the zis 30 which has a high velocity 57mm in the ussr tech tree and the french spaa which has 4 13.2mm in the french tech tree, both of which are low tier
Is noone gonna talk about the fact that he dosen't complain about the fact that the T34-85 has no thermal sights ? (I understand why but he usulay talks about thermal sights,that's why I am saying this)
