I'm wearing Hanfu not Hanbok！丨Hanfu Vs. Hanbok Comparison：Similarities and the Differences丨Shiyin 十音 

Happy Lantern Festival! (Lantern Festival is a Chinese traditional festival celebrated on the fifteenth day of the first month in the lunisolar Chinese calendar. Its roots trace back more than 2,000 years ago and still continue to influence our life.) Did you have Tangyuan/Yuanxiao today ?😘 My last two videos about Hanfu and Hanbok: Hanfu is not Hanbo: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Wd6Z2ZOzbOY.html Hanbok was influenced by Hanfu: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-VdimXc9eX7o.html

我是台灣人 對於政治沒有特別的觀點。 不過在「歷史」這塊，我和十音學的是一樣的。確實韓國、日本及與其周邊國家的確有來中國學習文化並帶回本國的啊！所以各國都有相似的文化、服飾是正常的。 所以希望韓國人們不要再把漢服看作為韓服了！十音講的沒有錯！

全球華人無論你的政治觀點如何，都請支持十音關於漢服的發聲，漢服是中華文化的重要一部，這是我們華人的根，萬萬不可讓韓國人在其間上下其手。沒有了中華文化，就像一個人沒了靈魂，沒有人會再去尊重我們。

我在英国留学，过年的时候穿着马面去上课，其实大家包括外国同学都知道这是中国的服饰，并没有人觉得是韩服，大家都觉得是一套漂亮的裙子

Even as a non-Chinese, I can easily tell Chinese Ming Dynasty Hanfu and Korean Joseon Hanbok apart. I really don't understand why many South Koreans are in so much denial about their Hanbok being heavily influenced by Ming Hanfu. The Japanese people, despite their Sinophobic tendencies, are not ashamed to admit that their culture is heavily influenced by Tang (called "Kara" in Japanese) Dynasty Chinese culture. That's how confident the Japanese are with their own culture.

我是马来西亚华人，感谢十音出声讲解。这就是为何我好奇一直以来我都能区分汉服和韩服，但最近几年的韩剧里和韩流所穿的韩服都难以让我分辨出是汉服还是韩服。果不其然，我以为只有我认为韩国想更改历史，慢慢把自己的文化给汉化，然后再说是自己的文化。身为华人，遇到这种事情，真的感到非常愤怒且难过。希望全世界的华人都能出面捍卫自己的文化，以免让他人偷取和灭绝我们的中华文化。

身为马来西亚华裔，我支持十音。韩服和汉服是有差别，近几年韩国开始模糊化更改汉服和韩服的差别。看韩剧的话就可以看出来现韩剧和以前韩剧韩服上的差别。我本身也很喜欢汉服，只是这里比较少人穿，通常都穿旗袍。

I am Japanese. In Nara Prefecture, Japan, there are mural paintings drawn during the Asuka period(7th to 8th century). The mural depicts a woman who wearing clothes similar to those worn by Koreans today. However, the woman is a Japanese dressed in Tang clothes. At that time, Japan frequently interacted with ancient Chinese dynasties such as Sui and Tang, and the clothes of the emperor and aristocrats imitated Tang. In other words, even before the Ming dynasty, Chinese people wore clothes that could be said to be the prototype of Hanbok. In Japan, due to the shift from aristocratic to samurai politics, Eastern Wu clothes were preferred instead of such clothes. Japanese people understand that the prototype of kimono is in ancient China. 我是日本人。在日本奈良县，有明日香时期绘制的壁画。这幅壁画描绘了一位穿着与今天韩国人相似的衣服的女人。然而，这个女人是一个穿着唐装的日本人。当时，日本与隋唐等中国古代朝代频繁交往，天皇贵族的服饰都仿唐。也就是说，即使在明朝之前，中国人的服饰也可以说是韩服的雏形。在日本，由于从贵族政治转向武士政治，因此更喜欢孙呉的衣服而不是这样的衣服。日本人知道和服的雏形是在中国古代。

我是朝鲜族，感谢十音对汉服和韩服的讲解 从小看韩剧，确实，现在的韩国古装剧跟十几年前拍的服饰越来越不一样，真滴快分不清了 往下翻了下有没有韩国人用韩语的评论（英文省略，英语不好） 感觉韩国人破防和反击的点都是软绵绵的，要么就是拿不出证据污蔑十音胡说，要么就是颠倒历史说中国是韩国的附属国。 劝一下韩国网友，如果想反驳，拿出一点实际性，具有历史价值的证明，我们都拿出了韩国的历史古籍证明韩服起源于中国，拿不出实际点的东西就很想泼妇骂街。 还有北京冬奥会有朝鲜族代表中国56个民族穿了传统服饰韩服哪里有错了？有错的话08年奥运会时候你们怎么不说 한복의 기원은 중국한푸이고 이 관점은 반박하려면 참고 가치를 가진 역사문헌으로 변명하십시오. 중국의 역사문헌이나 한국의 역사문헌에도 많은 기록이 남아있고 더이상 몇년전의 한국인이 만든 동영상에도 위 관점을 인정하고 있습니다. 베이징 동계올림픽 개막식에 조선족이 중국 56개 소수민족 대표로 한복입은것은 무엇 잘못이 있나요? 08년 올림픽에도 조선족이 한복입는 장면이 있는데 왜 그때는 아무말씀도 없었나요?

實話實説To be honest，希望民族自信可以通關漢服樹立。曾經我好鍾意學日語，因為喜歡那些竹林幽徑的祭祀祭典，對和服感興趣完全因為傳統文化！因為漢服的出現，我才知道原來是我對自己的民族傳統文化一點都不了解！成為漢服同袍過後，我才發覺原來我們的寶藏，一直被掩埋在各種政見之下。可是繼往聖之絕學，傳承精髓文化，我以為漢族服飾之美，古人傳統工藝刺繡，傳統紋樣圖案，中國漢族傳統藝術審美，應是純粹乾淨的，如若丟棄，屬實可惜！ To be honest, to be honest, I hope that national self-confidence can be established through Hanfu. I used to love learning Japanese, because I like those sacrificial ceremonies in the bamboo forest, and I am interested in kimonos because of traditional culture! Because of the appearance of Hanfu, I realized that it was because I didn't know anything about my own national traditional culture! After becoming a Hanfu comrade, I realized that our treasure has been buried under various political opinions. However, following the sage’s unique knowledge and inheriting the essence of culture, I think the beauty of Han costumes, the traditional embroidery of the ancients, the traditional patterns, and the aesthetics of traditional Chinese Han art should be pure and clean. It would be a pity to discard it!

韩国人还有10秒到达战场～ 我也很奇怪，大长今的衣服和现在明显不一样，也说不上韩国人到底爱不爱自己的文化，怎么觉得她们是嫌弃她们文化呢？老实说我觉得大长今拍的不错啊…

I started watching C-dramas recently and ended up looking into hanfu, where I found your last video on this "controversy." You clearly know what you're talking about, you've done your research, yet people don't want to accept the simple fact that cultures influence each other. Influence has always been a part of human history, if there was no influence we would never evolve. It should be celebrated that cultural traditions are making a comeback, not a source of artificial controversy. It's like these people want all the attention/credit for the resurgence and are acting like they don't share the same cultural heritage. It's sad. I'm sorry you're continuing to get hate for it.

I have no idea how this got recommended to me, but it sure as hell helped me as a hobbyist character designer - thank you very much for this!!!!

明代汉服是韩服借鉴的主要服饰，当时男女衣冠都有跟明代靠拢！10年前韩国还没有大规模魔改古装剧的时候，我一次穿袄裙逛街碰到一个韩国妹子，她当时跟我说的是“your Chinese gown is so beautiful”说明他们心里都清楚得很，就是不肯面对现实😂

韓劇古裝為何越來越漢化，因為比較美呀😂朝鮮古裝真是一言難盡，偏偏韓國歷史紀錄保留最多的是朝鮮，所以古裝韓劇以朝鮮時代為大宗。

I'm so glad and appreciate that Chinese New Year has become more popular in different communities these years. I have no problem with the name "Lunar New Year," but I would prefer "Spring Festival," which is more accurate culturally. "Chinese New Year" is also a precise and straightforward way to name it culturally and historically because it is originated in China. I was always curious why the name "Lunar New Year" suddenly became so popular in recent years. Because we always translated it as "Spring Festival," why does someone create a new name for it when there is an English translation already. So I did some research. For more detailed information, Chinese New Year (農曆新年/农历新年) is based on the Lunisolar Calendar (Solar+Lunar), so Lunar New Year is an inaccurate way to represent this festival. However, I could accept this name until I noticed that some editors on Wikipedia obfuscated the Chinese traditional Lunisolar Calendar with Hinduism-Buddhist calendars, Islamic and Jewish calendars. Even those calendars are also lunisolar; they are entirely different from the traditional Chinese calendar. [Islamic Lunar New Year is in July. Indian (Diwali) is in Oct-Nov; to be more precise, this is not their Lunar New Year; it is just one of the biggest festivals for Indians, just like Spring Festival to us.] Therefore, "Lunar New Year" is not only an inaccurate translation, as I thought, but also confusion and unclarity. Chinese people called it Nong Li (農曆/农历), "Nong" means "farming" in Chinese; the Lunisolar Calendar came from ancient Chinese cultivation culture. It embodies the traditional culture of "harmony between man and nature, harmony between Yin (陰/阴) and Yang (陽/阳)" that the Chinese have always emphasized. So it is incorrect to call it "Lunar New Year." I understand that not only Chinese people celebrate this holiday, so they may feel weird to call it "Chinese New Year." We always welcome and appreciate sharing the joy and happiness. It is just like Christmas, people around the world who are not Christians also celebrate Christman, but we cannot say, "I am not Christian, why would I celebrate Christmas? No way! I wanna celebrate it too, so let's change the name of it!" It's just doesn't make sense at all. I've seen many people propagate the name "Lunar New Year" and misdescribe it. But, thanks to them, it also motivates me to learn more about Chinese traditional culture. I hope all Chinese people can notice this situation and use the correct name when celebrating the Chinese New Year/Spring Festival!

As a Korean, I'm a little concerned by the netizen (only representing a small fraction of a percent of the population) comments targeting this person and eachother through targeted cursing. It's also terrible that tabloids give any legitimacy to these discussions by making it seem like majority opinion. Before our understanding of modern day China and Korea, we were neighboring kingdoms/empires. Clothing then is just like our current day pants and shirts. Trade and trends transcend borders, similar to Europe. If one wanted to trade with China, one needed to become a tributary state. So to me, saying that this belongs to China and that belongs to Korea are all childish arguments. Both of our ancestors would laugh and call us idiots. Although Shiyin should've avoided showing breastfeeding clothing as representing commoner hanbok, I also understand that netizens did comment things that are very triggering. I just hope that we stop adding fuel to childish discussions. Also, here are some additional fact checking, 1) Neither Chinese or Koreans invented the universe 2) Picao and Kimchi are different. Kimchi is also eaten in China by ethnic Koreans. 3) Hanbok vs Hanfu can look similar and varies in style by region. Again, multiple kingdoms/empires were neighboring states. 4) and ffs, Koreans never said Confucius is Chinese. There was this insane Korean guy that left one hate comment decades ago that went viral. 5) Lantern festival is a Chinese custom spread through Buddhism in Korea. Again, some insane trolls and the tabloids. 6) Current day beauty/fashion trends do get influenced by Korea, but trolls really need to stop calling this out as copy culture. We are all eventually influenced by different cultures.

Shiyin has explained the historical evidence quite clearly. I really hope people could do their own research before they leave a comment. I have actually been to South Korea. In many traditional temples there, the inscription on the stone is written in Chinese characters. It is not a shame for a country to have a relatively short history. But it is a shame for a person to be ignorant.

Both the hanfu and hanbok are really beautiful and unique in their own way

Really hope Shiyin can invite some professionals in the videos to give us more insights on these differences!👏🏻

One of the most difficult things for South Koreans is to recognize their own history.

力挺十音！ Some comments below are saying that the Yuan Dynasty doesn't count as a part of Chinese history because it was founded by the Mongols. I mean, if this is the case, many countries in the world cant count their modern history as a part of their country's history....... For example, Cleopatra VII is one of the most famous historical Egyptians, and yet, the Ptolemaic kingdom and the Ptolemies (Cleopatra's forefathers) are Greek..... Another example is also in Ancient Egypt, Egypt had a few Hyksos kings, who are also on the Turin King List, nobody would doubt this part of history is not a part of Egyptian history.....

支持十音向大家科普,讓外國人和中國人都認識漢服

I wonder why Koreans can be so in the right and self-confident when lying?

I feel like a lot of Koreans nowadays don't want to admit the fact that they have a very young history that didn't get influenced by other cultures such as China and Japan. Korea has an very rich and world-famous modern pop/entertainment culture so I always think of them as the USA of East Asia, as they always got the newest and trendiest stuff ready to show the world. But Koreans don't seem to be satisfied with their new culture and want to desperately prove to everyone that they have ancient culture/history that is completely unique to themselves too, but the further you look back into their previous kingdoms' history the more you'd find it tangled with ancient China. And it seems like a lot of them are very shameful to admit the fact that their traditional culture was heavily influenced by China. So this is why a lot of them try to twist history around and claim parts of traditional Chinese culture as their own. They need to recognize their own history and admit the influences China had on them as a nation and stop trying to prove that they are an ancient civilization with an unique culture which is just simply not true, stick with what you created that belongs to you such as K-pop, k-drama etc. and leave the past behind if you're not gonna recognize your actual history.

我把你说的翻译给了韩国小姑子 一开始她说就是韩服后来听完你说的就瞬间豁然开朗哈哈哈 谢谢你 希望有一天能够让更多韩国群众理解❤️

漢服真的很美，作為一個少數民族，除了自己民族的服裝以外，最喜歡的就是漢服，不同朝代的漢服都有自己的特色，魏晉仙氣飄飄，唐製雍容華貴，宋製溫文儒雅，明製端莊大氣。i love hanfu.❤️

看了一圈发现韩国人很闲…一个人居然有时间发几百条评论…

I don't care if you are a Mainlander, Hongkonger, Taiwanese, Singaporean, Malaysian, in our soul is the Han Chinese spirit. Even if we hate each other politically, we can't let foreigners like Koreans take and claim what our ancestors passed on to us thousands of years ago. To have a country of South Korea with less than 80 years of history dictate our culture is an insult of the highest order. Let's set aside political difference for now and fight for what our ancestors gave and trusted us. Koreans are very smart and often use Taiwan and Hong Kong disputes to make Han Chinese fight each other. Even if Communism falls, Koreans will continue to claim Chinese culture which Taiwanese and Hongkongers also use.

For some Koreans who want to find a distinct type of clothing to represent their culture, I would suggest them to look for something from the recent days and not to find something from the ancient history (like Modern Hanbok). The further you look back into the history, the more you would find that the ancient Korean clothing history is tangled with the ancient Chinese history. It’s difficult to find a type of ancient Hanbok that is very distinct and unique, and it simply cannot be easily separated from the ancient Chinese clothing.

Chinese student from my school wore their hanfu to school on culture day, I have to say it was absolutely beautiful! Hanfu and hanbok are all very beautiful and elegant. I’ve been seeing Korean netizens in hanfu post or videos saying it’s their hanbok but like yo the differences are pretty big how could they get them mixed up😂

2024的春晚看到汉服节目真的泪目😢特地回来给十音留言，你真好棒！十音真的是很早一批开始推广汉服的先锋人物之一了，而且除了展示还有很多科普视频。对于汉服复兴，相信很多人都是一样有受到十音的影响，从而进一步推广汉服。新年好呀十音，希望你越来越好❤

全球華人，特別是漢人，無論你是什麼國家，什麼政治主張，請拋開政治成見，站出來，保護我們民族的文化，我們民族的傳統服飾！！！！！我們有服裝之美謂之華，禮儀之大謂之夏！！我們祖先的服飾有嚴格的等級製度，這也是只有中國皇帝才能穿五爪金龍，藩屬國只能著蟒袍的原因！！！ 他們偷了我們祖先天多東西，陰陽風水，五行八卦.........請大家拋開政治成見，站出來保護宣傳我們祖宗留給我們的文化和寶貝！！！！！！✊🏻✊🏻✊🏻

我是漢服愛好者，我想說朝鮮王朝皇室貴族以及大臣的衣服都是很多是來自明朝，華麗的衣冠以及首飾全部是明朝供給，這些在《朝鮮王朝實錄》上有記載，而且是漢字記載。 到了清朝，中國衣冠製度改變，清朝不會給朝鮮賜服，但是名貴的布料和首飾依舊在賞賜。 朝鮮為了獲得來自中國的好東西，甚至頻繁進貢，為眾多屬國之少見，以至於明朝不得不限制朝鮮進貢頻率。

非常同意大長今裡的韓服才是真韓服，現今的韓劇傳統服裝錯誤百出。

Despite the wide argument of ancient culture influence in the comments, let's simply get back to the clothes. Shiyin's video clearly shows the differences between two clothes. Appreciate it. No matter which one was influenced and which one appeared former, they are two kinds of wearing now and should not be mixed. Some points to add: 1. 'Han漢' in 'Hanfu漢服' means ethnic Han of Chinese, not Han Dynasty. Chinese people use 'Hanfu' to refer the clothes appeared throughout their whole history, including Dynasty Ming (in this video), Song, Tang, Han, Qin and even before it. So there are actually lots of different styles of hanfu. The one in this video is one of those in Ming Dynasty. 2. 'Han韓한' in 'Hanbok韓服한복' means Korean. It is not the same Chinese character as the Han漢 in Hanfu漢服. But in Korean, they share the same character '한' even if the meanings are different. For example, 한자 means Chinese characters but 한글 means Korean characters (자 and글 both mean character) ; 한나라 means Chinese Han Dynasty, 한국 means Korea (나라 and 국 both mean country). So it does make the confusion sometimes. 3. Some Hanfu videos in the RU-vid or TikTok may not be the real Hanfu. Clothes in some of the Chinese history or fantasy dramas (Films, gamrs, etc.) are changed a lot from Hanfu. They are just costumes that have Chinese elements . Even some Chinese people can not tell which are real Hanfu and which are not. Recent years, Hanfu lovers are increasing, and more people start to learn true knowledge about Hanfu. This is a good trend to let ancient clothings show their true beauty again. Many cultures have absorbed a lot from ancient China, but they are all absolutely Independent and unique. Wish all of us know better of our own culture, and let all the beautiful cultures bloom in the world.

But the Hanbok was inspired by the Ming dynasty. The easiest way to tell the difference is that many Hanbok has a circular/octagon embroidery. Many Chinese Hanfu doesn't have the circular/octagon shape. Many Hanbok's tie is more towards the front but Hanfu tend to be closer to the side of your waist. Many Ming Hanfu tends to be more covered around the chest but Hanbok doesn't share the same neckline as the Hanfu. Hanfu also loves to wear the MaMian skirt while Hanbok isn't a skirt but a dress. Also Hanbok's dress with jacket seems to be more puffy looking than slimming/fitted to body. I love how she has explained it.

真真心希望十音小姐姐，可以把汉服这一个系列做下去。我们国家历朝历代的服饰都不一样，顺便普及一下我们的传统服饰。韩国通过韩剧普及他们的文化和服饰，给很多人造成错觉和误会。如果不是这次事件发酵，很多人是不hi去深究的，可能就本能性，下意识觉得，哦～这就是韩服呀！等以后看到类似的，自己都会有下意识的产生。

you are doing a great job.. i could tell the different between the two easily because i read many literature about east asia before. but for people who don't have the knowledge about east asian, they would believe anything they see in Korean drama... even japanese are very confidence to admit that their traditional clothing are influenced by the chinese. i don't understand why korean nowaday having this inferiority complex.. it's okay to admit chinese influence in your culture, it's not a shame.. afterall asian countries was influence each other in the pass. i see chinese admit openly some of their culture was influence by foreign nation too. that's how confidence they are about their own culture.. admiting influence doesn't mean your culture is lower than other culture.. after all every culture are beautiful... no need to create war for it. i saw many south korean(only south korean btw) was unhappy that korean chinese wear hanbok in olympic,, i don't understand their logic. culture is belong to it's people, not to a country. and south korean could not claim korean culture is only for them, because there are korean people outside korea who also belong to korean culture. who gave them the right to claim korean culture only belong to them!? that's so facist.. in fact there are almost 2 million korean in china. they have the right to promote their culture too.. not to mention korean in north korean. many han chinese around the world celebrated their culture too. never see han chinese in china complain about it.. korean in south korean are weird sometimes.. korean is homogenous country.. maybe that's why they failed to understand the difference between nationality and ethnicity.. korean in china is chinese by nationality, but they are korean by ethnicity. just like han chinese are still han chinese everywhere they go, but they are not chinese by nationality.

Korean people are using Chinese language in an incorrect way ( just like the Japanese language). It´s "Han Fu" NOT Hanbok, is originated in Northern part of China! ^^ Everybody knows it! ♥ The way the words are pronounce make absolutely sense, very Chinese ♥ ^^ Many things like Compass, Seismograph, Paper, Print, Money, Coint, Fire-work and many more are Chinese origin, also food, like 炸酱面, Noodles in general, even Sushi has Chinese Origin, Teas, Ramen, Pizza, Tortelini as a tiny imitation of Wan Tan, Dumplings, Ice Cream,... and many more. Many (foreign) people still don´t know that all these wonderful inventions have Chinese roots!! ♥♥♥ ^^°^^

It’s not so hard to admit part of ur culture comes from other countries, this is why history is important so you don’t make a fool of urself, everyone is learning so c’mon Koreans.

最开始关注十音就是早期的汉服视频，敦煌那一期好喜欢的，还纳闷最近都没有汉服视频。为汉服发声，不愧是十音，赞👍。

韩国说中国唐朝的齐胸襦裙是露胸装（chest-exposed clothing），结果却偷中国的齐胸襦裙；韩国说中国只有旗袍，结果说旗袍是韩国传统睡衣和传统礼服。我已经…… 一看到vogue发布的就知道是汉服啦，韩服那个结是打在胸前，这个特征特别明显。十音姐讲了更多我不知道的，希望十音姐能够和其他志同道合的汉服博主合作，出更多直观科普的视频哈哈哈，大家一起出力，宣传汉服。💕💕

The Japanese will admit that part of their culture is influenced by China, while the Koreans will just call it their own, strange country

很有意思的内容，期待十音给我们带来更多的有关汉服的内容

我是越南人。 我个人对中国汉服非常感兴趣， 所以这几年也去理解。 看到明代汉服和韩服可以分别。但是大部分网民都不太了解这个， 造成很大误会。

用韩国魔改韩服之前的影视剧出来做对比真的很能看出不同，我看过韩国一个三级片帝王之妾什么的，不说里面的衣服有多朴素，就连皇帝的住所都非常简陋，感觉这才更贴近历史的真实，而不是像近几年韩剧里面那样布料有那么多花纹，住所那么豪华之类的。明明一直以来都是韩国在各种碰瓷汉服，结果还利用一些偶像明星出来摆受害人姿态，用一些魔改韩服来说“这是我们的韩服”，这才是真的很像被传销组织洗脑。

也许，我们应该去掉“韩服”这一称呼，而是改用本身的称呼“朝鲜服”。

Can you put korean subtitles so I can give th links

朝鲜人模仿不来明制裙袄的原因是： 1，琵琶袖他们做不出来就做成直袖… 2，褶子不会打直筒就可以… 3，织锦不会就印花上去 4，裙子系不了在腰上挂到脖子上去

所以日本說的好，對待韓國就是五不原則：不要教他們；不要幫助他們；不要讓他們來；不要被偷；不要同意。

谢谢十音，终于搞清楚了❤️

支持十音，也谢谢你一直在为中国传统服饰发声！让更多的人了解到中国汉服，不让其他国家的人和影视作品偷走我们的传统服饰

所以我真的替十音感到很心累，你们的韩服不好看吗，好看啊，所以为什么要说中国的汉服是韩服，就包括十音所说的最近的韩剧古装部分真的是越来越“汉化”，这个真的很明显，具体的可以看看你们的男主所穿的那些衣服，你们真的确定你们韩服有那种剪裁？你们确定你们古代的男士有那种半披肩的发型？我真的希望大家可以和平共处，最近一直说的LNY和CNY也让我很无语，就是真的，你保留你的历史，我宣扬我的文化，这本应该百花齐放，却非要争的头破血流，真的是不懂

以前大长今才是韩国的韩服，现在的电视剧真的弄得跟中国的一模一样，连影视城也是抄袭中国的

I am so glad u made this video! So proud of you! LOVE you!

It is funny to see some Koreans commenting here without providing FACTS.

Greetings from Japan !!😊 🇨🇳💓🇯🇵💓🇰🇷 我日本人。I LOVE both Hanfu and Hanbok. These clothes are so beautiful.

I mean, y’all use Chinese Characters in your ancient times , even your historical proofs are written in Chinese, then y’all tellin me that’s China copied your culture ? ? What a big joke 🙂 4 earliest civilizations: Mesopotamia, Ancient Egypt, Indus Valley , Ancient China. I believe these are being taught in everyone’s world history class 🙂 Also Koreans that I met in real life won’t say those kind of stuffs, like hanfu is hanbok, Confucius is Korean, or other crazy stuffs. only Knetz and some random Korean professors will say those crazy things without any documents to backed up.

In fact, I had never even heard the word Hanfu 20 years ago. Before Ming Dynasty, Mongols ruled China. Mongolians liked Goryeo(old Korea) sheep. Goryeo hanbok, which was popular in the Yuan Dynasty, is being insisted on as Ming Dynasty Hanfu these days. I heard that hanfu is the traditional costume of the Han people? But why do they wear hanbok, which was popular among Mongolian royalty and nobles?

摘自小红书：简单来说，明朝赐服给他们，他们贵族才穿上了唐衣。平民还在穿白色衣服，因为没染料。他们自己当时应该也不具备制作礼服的技术，世子礼服坏了都得上奏折求明朝再赐（世子应该最多是个郡王的礼服吧）。近代以来就一直在tou汉服、发型、中国饰品、扇子、图纹。。。他们之前一根大发簪挺好看的，虽然也是学的中国但是也算有自己风格，现在嘛，不听说话都看不出来是韩剧了。

It's not a shame to admit your culture was influenced by others. Hundreds of years ago, China had a great influence among east Asia. But nowadays, K-pop and Japanese anime/lifestyle also impact Chinese a lot. And one day, it will become a part of our history.

The calling of Dangui(唐衣）speaks everything. They even used the same Chinese character 唐衣 to call the hanbok in the past.

I want to know about hanbok. Hanbok is original from Korea?

十音之前是不是还有一个全英视频是讲汉服和hanbok的？怎么没了？

看了十音视频很久但很少留言。喜欢这种理性的对比加解说详尽，希望十音以后越办越好。有一点小私心，作为男生希望十音能也科普男式汉服相关的知识。相信有一部分男生也想了解并借此机会入门。

中国人真辛苦，还得给韩国人上历史课

Lady Saso (Korean: 사소부인; Hanja: 娑蘇夫人) is said to be the mother of Hyeokgeose of Silla. Also known as the Sacred Mother of Mt. Seondo (Hangul:선도산), legends say she was a princess from the Chinese royal family. Having coming from China and settling upon the Jinhan Confederacy, she gave birth to Hyeokgeose of Silla who was the founder of Silla.

Korea's history documents were all written in classic Chinese characters with the same grammar and vocabulary as Chinese. Their king invented the Joseon gul/Korean letters in 15th century. Korean language is totally different from Chinese language, but 70 percent of Korean vocabulary was imported from China. There's a legendary person called Dangun(檀君/단군) in Korea, it's said that he lived for 1908 years. It's normal and universal to have a ancient tale in the places worldwide, but it's ridiculous that Koreans treated such fictitious tale as the real dynasty and wrote it down in the history book for education, that's why they have half 10000 years history lol. Dangun's name was firstly appeared in the unofficial history document "三國遺事/삼국유사" in the 13th century, that is to say, ancient Koreans didn't know and record Dangun before the book was published. Nowadays, the world deny the existance of Dangun except North Korea and South Korea, North Korea even dug out the tomb of Dangun and his body. *Details about Dangun as below:* ❶The myth of Dangun is a fictional creation of the undeveloped ancient Korean people imitating the legend of the ancestor of the Han Chinese! Korean nation is a nation that was formed in a relatively late history. The pedigrees that make up the Korean nation are Paleosiberian, Yayoi (Japanese), Han Chinese and other ethnics. Primitive peoples only have ignorant ethnic consciousness and historical memory, and this historical memory will be very fragile and will be washed away by history at any time. The ancestral legends of the Mongols were formed based on the historical memory of the Genghis Khan family, and the history of the earlier period Donghu (東胡), the Mongols did not have the historical memory of this related ethnic group. They just used a strong family or small groups to cover a community memory. ❷The Silla people (Modern Koreans' main origin) were already a hybrid ethnic group. They absorbed the cultural nutrients of the Han Chinese ancestors to construct their own ancestral legends. The Park(朴/박) , Seok(昔/석), and Kim(金/김) were similar to Han Chinese surnames at the beginning. The Park’s ancestor myth was structured after imitating the Han Dongyi ancestor Taihao Fuxi(太昊伏羲) gourd culture, and the Kim’s structure is imitating the Han Dongyi ancestor Shaohao Jintian(少昊金天)’s structure. The surnames of the Silla show that Silla has barely aboriginal culture from the beginning. The surnames of the Huns, Xianbei, Khitan people as well as Jurchens are all indigenous, while the ancestors of the Silla people were Han surnames from the beginning which represents the essence of Sinicization of this nation! It's like African Americans use western surnames, only the color of skin can indicate the difference between their ancestry and whites. The surname of the Silla people is a Chinese surname, but the given name is aboriginal. For example, the given name of the ancestor of the Park family, Park Hyeokgeose(朴赫居士/박혁거세), is Hyeokgeose(Bulgeunae), which is a monosyllable in Chinese, and Hyeokgeose(Bulgeunae) is a polysyllable of the indigenous languages ​​of Paleosiberian, this is a mixed product of two cultures. The ancestors of the Seok(昔/석) family is the original form of Chinese Character "鵲" after removing the character for 鳥, and it is a deeper expression of Chinese culture. ❸The people of Silla originated from Jinhan(辰韓/진한), And Jinhan is also called Qinhan(秦韓) by the Han Chinese. Qin means the Qin Dynasty of China, during the Han Dynasty, Han Chinese immigrants merged into Jinhan. The characteristics of Silla ancestors' myth, the Han Chinese cultural characteristics of the Silla ancestor's surname, two key points indicate the origin of the Han Chinese people and the origin of the Han Chinese culture of the Silla people. Of course, the Silla people retained the low-level nature of the indigenous people of ancient Asia (Paleosiberian), but the origin is the product and characteristics of multi-ethnic hybridization. The historical memory of the Silla people is the hybrid state of their origin, not the single fictional source by Koreans. In the Tang Dynasty, the Han Chinese conquered Baekje(百濟/백제). Baekje was a fusion country formed by Fuyu(扶餘/부여) people who conquered the earlier indigenous Mahan(馬韓/마한). Baekje and Silla people also have differences in bloodlines and languages. The Silla people took advantage of Baekje’s rebellion against the Tang dynasty to annex Baekje, and Silla also invaded part of the southern territory of Goguryeo(高句麗/고구려), which earlier was a county under the Chinese dynasties. ❹Silla, Baekje, and Goguryeo are ethnic groups with different bloodlines and cultures, and each was a hybrid race. For the Goryeo dynasty(高麗/고려, established by Wang Geon(王建/왕건)), it was necessary to bridge the three races politically and make up a common ancestor to bridge this difference in bloodlines. It was a political behavior of the Goryeo people. In the middle period of Goryeo, Kim Bu Shik(金富軾/김부식) wrote "The history of Three Kingdoms"(三國史記/삼국사기) which showed that the ancestors of the three kingdoms were different. Many insightful people in Goryeo had already noticed this historical division. In the late Goryeo period, the monk Yil Yeon(一然/일연) made a fictionalized Dangun mythology on the basis of "The history of Three Kingdoms" to politicize history! Note that Dangun's name is a complete Han Chinese cultural feature and most of the connotation of Dangun’s mythology is also Han Chinese culture, as well as Buddhist culture of course. These factors have clearly indicate that Dangun’s myth was constructed too lately! Dangun, this is a standard Chinese feature, even more Chinese than Park Hyeokgeose, this is so funny! And the pronunciation is also standard Chinese, which exposes the falsehood of this myth. ❺The Korean nation history does not exceed 1700 years, and the Korean nation began to take shape during the Southern and Northern Dynasties of China! Therefore, the Silla and Goryeo people have extremely deep inferiority to Han Chinese, and they also wanted to have their own long-term ancestors! The monk Yil Yeon fictionalized Dangun in order to satisfy the imaginary of the Goryeo people, and pushed Dangun before the Gija(箕子/기자) Joseon to pursue the period of Emperor Yao(堯), the three emperors and five emperors of China. Note that Gija Joseon also shows the Han Chinese origin of the Koreans, which was deeply concerned by Koreans. However, the fictional Dangun Joseon and the emptiness of the Gija Joseon can deceive Koreans themselves to release the concern of their void indigenous history. The myth of Dangun is fictitious based on the connotation of Chinese ancestors. The Yellow Emperor came from the Xiong(熊/bear) clan, so Dangun's mother was transformed by a female bear. As for the archaeological discoveries of Dangun’s tomb in contemporary North Korea, they are completely fraudulent, and is their consistent historical politicization. ❻The history of Korean nation is not far away at all, because the Korean nation is a product of multi-ethnic hybridization. Their historical memory and sense of community are based on this hybridization. The history of the Korean nation does not exceed 1700 years, because they has no ethnic historical memory more than 1700 years ago, and many of the Korean history is imitated from the Han Chinese or a pirated version of Han Chinese culture, if it is not fictional, it was actually brought from the Han Chinese which was of one of the origins of the hybrid Korean nation, but rom the perspective of historical politicization, Koreans are afraid of losing their national independence and refuse to recognize these facts.

Chinese have never denied the existence of hanbok, the traditional dress of South Koreans, North Koreans and Chinese Koreans (one of the 56 ethnic groups in China). hanbok and hanfu are different in themselves. In ancient times, Korea was a vassal state of China, so many hanfu elements that were not supposed to be on hanbok。 However, these elements are abused by K-dramas and Koreans nowadays. Their dramas do not refer to the real history at all. But this drama leads to a lot of confusion between hanfu and hanbok. I hope that when discussing such issues you can actually learn the history before answering, rather than choosing to call people names or attack them when you can't refute them. The Chinese respect the history of any country, but only if you also respect our history.

This is Chinese Hanfu, not Korean

3 basic forms of Chinese Hanfu: Yi and Chang/衣裳制: jacket with skirt. Shenyi/深衣制: upper jacket and skirt tailored separately but sew up together. Shan and Pao/衫袍制: one robe. 上衣下裳(상의하상) which means jacket with skirt is the essential feature of Chinese clothes. 黃帝堯舜垂衣裳而天下治，蓋取諸乾坤。 From《易經》(역경)(The Book of Changes) Translation: Huangdi(黃帝)(황제), Yao(堯)(제요), Shun(舜) (제순)promote upper garment and dress(上衣下裳) so the whole country is in harmony, because the structure represents sky(乾) (건)and earth(坤)(곤). Generally the upper garment tucks in the dress at the beginning, but upper garment covering the dress also appeared in a very early period in China before Eastern Han dynasty which is 2000 years ago, and it is recorded literally: 晉興後，衣服上儉下豐，著衣者皆厭腰蓋裙。 From《宋書》(송서)(The Book of Song) Translation: After Jin(晉) Dynasty was prosperous, the upper garment is short and the dress is long, and all people wear the clothes covering the dress. m the relics of every dynasty including figurines, paintings, sculptures, murals, and even unearthed original objects. 管仲相桓公，霸諸侯，一匡天下，民到於今受其賜，微管仲，吾其被髪左衽矣。 From《論語》(논어)(The Analects of Confucius) Confucius says that "if it’s without Guanzhong, we should be dressed like barbaric, with left lapel and loose hair." 竊念吾東方賴父師八條之敎, 用夷變夏, 得免左衽, 禮義文明之盛, 見稱於天下, 實萬世罔極之恩也。 From《朝鮮王朝實錄》(조선왕조실록)(Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty) In Korea’s ancient history document it says that because of Gija(箕子/기자), ancient Korea turned the barbaric style into Chinese style and avoided dressing left lapel. 古来，中国漢民族の衣服は右衽，周辺の遊牧民族の衣服は左衽であった。 From《世界大百科事典》(Heibonsha World Encyclopedia) Translation:Since ancient times, the clothes of the Han Chinese people in China are right lapel, and those of the neighboring nomadic ethnics are left lapel. So the right lapel is a significant feature of Chinese style. 初令天下百姓右襟。 From 《続日本紀》(속일본기)(Shoku Nihongi) In 719AD, the king of Japan commanded that all the people in Japan should dress right lapel. 天下儀式，男女衣服，皆依唐法。 From《続日本後紀》(속일본후기)(Shoku Nihon Kōki) Translation: All of our country's ceremony, the clothes of men and women should follow the Tang(Chinese) style. Although the right lapel collars is the significant feature of Chinese style, it doesn’t mean Hanfu only has right lapel or all the right lapel clothes are Hanfu. It's funny "Hanfu"(漢服/한푸) of China are recorded for times in Korea's documents. Instead,"Hanbok"(韓服/한복) didn't appear in the history documents like 삼국사기(Samguk Sagi) or 고려사(History of Goryeo) or 조선왕조실록(Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty). 凡虜之來投者, 使其養子毛有見主之, 卽換着漢服, 人不得識別矣。 대체로 귀순한 노인(虜人)은 자기 양자인 모유견(毛有見)을 시켜 주관하도록 하고 곧바로 한복(漢服)을 갈아 입히기 때문에 사람들이 식별을 할수가 없습니다." 城外有長興寺, 張、朱着漢服, 居於寺中云。 성 밖에 장흥사(長興寺)가 있는데, 장·주가 중국 복장으로 절 안에 거처한다고 합니다." These two sentences are from 조선왕조실록(Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty)

Many Koreans said that the clothes at the end of Goryeo (918-1392) were very similar to those of the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644). Goryeo was established earlier than the Ming Dynasty, so it was unreasonable for the Ming Dynasty to affect Goryeo, but they did not know that Emperor Zhu Yuanzhang also rewarded King Gongmin/恭愍王 and King Wangwu/禑王 of Goryeo at that time with various men's and women's clothing. The clothes in the mural tomb of Park Ik/朴翊 in Miryang is not really Goryeo Hanbok, because the tomb is a Joseon dynasty tomb, according to the tomb stone that says it was built in the reign of Yongle(Ming dynasty). Koreans can’t even provide a real Goryeo Hanbok. Look at the TV series Moon lover made by Koreans which is Goryeo background, the clothes existed in various dynasties in China, which is the most classic Hanfu. Koreans, please take a vow before answer me, Is this your Korean clothing? Don't you really feel guilty? Lol, it turns out that your restored Goryeo clothing is plagiarizing the Chinese Hanfu. So why are you always spreading the “Goryeo Yang” rumor? Chinese Women wear jacket covering skirt or Aoqun style in every dynasty before Ming dynasty, many relics can prove that. Some Koreans will say that women in Song dynasty wear H shape jacket, but they don’t know H shape jacket is just the most popular style, Aoqun look jacket also coexist at that time as well. The first version of Dangui was granted by Ming dynasty for royal women wearing as formal clothes, it’s not for the ordinary people. Dangui changed gradually into current design, if you check the unearth object of Dangui from 16 century, you will see it is nearly the same of Chinese Ao of Ming dynasty, including the tie position. So why did your ancestors call that style as “唐衣/Chinese Jacket”? Isn’t obvious? Don’t be sad, Koreans, you even adopted Chinese surnames after all. The introduction of Dang'ui(당의) from the Encyclopedia of Cultural Knowledge of South Korea(한국민족문화대백과): 당의는 간이예복 또는 소례복(小禮服)으로 평복 위에 입었으며 궁중에서는 평상복으로 입었다. 조선 초기 명나라에서 전래된 단배자(短背子)가 배자저고리로 변하였다가 다시 숙종 이후 조선 말기의 당의와 같은 제도가 이루어진 것 같다. 당의에 영향을 준 반비(半臂)·배자 등은 당나라의 유속(遺俗)으로 명나라를 거쳐 전래되었으므로, 이 옷의 명칭에도 ‘당’자를 붙여 당의라 부르게 된 것이라 본다. Translation: Dang'ui is a formal attire or sub formal attire worn over ordinary clothes and it was worn as casual clothes in the palace. In the early Joseon period, the short Beizi(短褙子) introduced from the Ming Dynasty became Beizi jacket, and in the late Joseon period after Sukjong, it seems that the same system as Dang'ui was formed. Banbi(半臂) and Beizi(褙子) influenced by Tang's clothes were passed down through the Ming Dynasty as relics of the Tang Dynasty. This kind of garment also attaches the character "Tang" to its name, which was called Tang garment (Dang'ui).

Most funny part : A week ago, the SCMP published a video ， three South Korean girls accused the Chinese Winter Olympics of copying their hanbok, but they didn't even notice that they were interviewed on the back of the historical building of Korea that has Chinese characters "興禮門" （means the Gate of Ritual Prosperity） edit：I also saw another korean man wear a dark blue “hanbok” that has dragons on it （He is very angry about China），everybody know only Chinese emperor can wear robe with dragons ，some king or top official can wear dragon robe with less claws! Due to well-known historical reasons，some kings of korea got robe with dragons from chinese emperors ！

Thai people originated in Southern China. I like Chinese more than Korean.

Yes Korean people wore something before getting in touch with ancient China. Hanbok goes through times. There are different forms and styles in Hanbok. I don't doubt that. So is Hanfu. Hanfu goes through times even with non-Han regimes. I think a more accurate way to say is that certain styles not all styles of Hanbok had been influenced by certain periods not all periods of clothing in ancient China be that Han's or Mongolian or others'. It's no biggie. Hanfu as well had been influenced by other ethic groups during certain times. I hope whoever reading it is not one of those ignoramuses denying the inheritance of Hanfu. There are historic relics for Hanfu including written materials, art makings and ancient tombs and so on that endure scientifc tests to prove their years. Modification for traditional clothing happens. I am not against that but I think there are certain elements should be maintained as a signature of ethnicity and not incorporating too much elements from alien culture. I have seen some improved/modern Hanboks with Chinese elements. Similar situations happened in some improved/modern Hanfus but with Japanese elements. Personally I don't like that. It is unnecessary and takes away each's identity. I knew many Hanfu lovers agreed with me. I am happy to see Hanfu makers and lovers are putting efforts to keep Hanfu alive, design improved Hanfu with Chinese elements only and really dig into archaeology for restoration of traditional authentic Hanfu. As mentioned in the video, some people deliberately took Hanfu as Hanbok, it is DESPICABLE.

大家心知肚明啦，哪個人沒念過歷史，總之就是支持你！！！

十几年前我就起了念头，想大家了解韩服，汉服还有和服的历史和根源，可惜当时周围环境，自己一直没有将想法付出行动。感谢如此优秀的十音，让国内外人，能够真正认识到中华传统文化的优雅，大气，内敛和胸怀。❤

Hello! I think your video explanation is very informative. But sadly there is no Korean subtitle yet. By adding the subtitle I'd believe that Korean will be more informed about the similarity and eventually end the unnecessary online war. Good job 💞

To my fellow Chinese, continue to refute and debunk Koreans. We can win this fight and cultural plunder war by Koreans. But mainly, it's important to defund their activities first. Boycott and stop buying their products and entertainment. This is crucial in crippling their soft power propaganda in China at least.

This! It's so funny watching some ignorant people accusing Hanfu of copying from hanbok while hanbok clearly was greatly influenced by Hanfu

Beautiful hanfu and Hanbok 🥺🥺🥺Thank you Shiyin for sharing the details, also happy Lantern Festival!

感謝十音的科普❤️

If you look at the paintings of the MING era, you can definitely find Mongol hats, Terlig, and Goryoyang. In particular, Ming's portrait of a noble woman still wears the crown of Mongol 罟罟冠 used in the Yuan period. In addition, Square Collar Top of Goryeo women is used at that time. As the Ming era has reached, the clothes and culture of Yuan and Goryeo have not completely vanished. In addition, the Aoqun and skirt of the Ming era were completed by improving the clothes of the northern immigrants and Goryeo. The skirt design of court ladies and eunuchs in Mami-gun developed into Mamyeon-gun. There are many picture materials to prove this.

看到十音的這篇分析真的挺有感觸的，無論是我自己或是朋友，都有穿著明制被問是不是韓服的經驗，這些歷史的脈絡真的沒有補足且漢服推廣不夠，才會造成這種問題。我自己身邊還很長碰到一個問題是認為旗袍就是漢服的一種形制，也是讓人很困擾呢

承認自己國家以前受到中華文化薰陶到底有多難?

Koreans can't tell the difference between different styles of Chinese Hanfu in different periods. In the eyes of Koreans, the Chinese clothing and image are very fixed. That is the style of the Qing Dynasty, so no matter what era or style of Chinese Hanfu, as long as it is not in the style of the Qing Dynasty, Koreans will definitely think that this is korean

谢谢十音的科普，希望有更多人能看到这个视频

謝謝十音幫我們科普，漢服和韓服各有自己的特色，她們看起來都很美，沒有誰抄襲誰這種說法，希望🇰🇷網友可以理性的交流和討論。

Para los hablantes de español: Se que muchos de ustedes son amantes del K-pop, no les quiero ofender, pero por lo que muchas veces tienen nociones preconcebidas (no digo todos, pero en muchas ocaciones cuando le tienes preferencia a uno, es muy obvio que estas a su lado). Que les gusta el pop de Corea del sur, entonces la comida debe ser buena, igual con la cultura. Así que ellos siempre tienen la razon, es correcto y perfecto. (No digo por solo decir, he visto muchos internautas de diferentes paises difamar a China que estan robando la cultura de Corea del Sur. Estoy muy segura que no averiguaron la "verdad" solo lo dicen por sus idols). Pero no es así, necesitamos pensar racionalmente en todo, no hay que confiar completamente en una sola página, un artículo incluso una persona, ya que el billete, la cosa mas "real" del mundo, puede ser falso, ¿Por qué la palabra dicho por el ser humano no? Por ejemplo, su hanbok es transformado de acuerdo con la ropa que se les dio el emperador de la dinastía Ming de la antigua China. (Dado a ellos como ropa para el culto, ya que fueron estado de vasallo en aquellos tiempo, aunque sus libros de historia están escritos en chino, muchos de ellos son reacios a admitir la verdad). China como un país grande en la antigüedad, influyó muchos países vecinos pequeños, ya sea en la vestimenta, los hábitos alimenticios o algunos festivales tradicionales. Estamos felices de compartir todas las cosas, no es tan tan importante si no admiten el origen de las cosas que vienen de China, porque nosotros mismos lo sabemos, pero no puedes revertir los hechos y calumniarnos, o incluso nublar la vista de todos y luego decir las cosas que son suyas. Espero que no se dejen engañar/malinterpretar. No les pido que sean totalmente justo y hable por China, pero espero que pueden ser posiblemente justo, no por los chinos, sino por la verdad y ustedes mismo. Gracias por su tiempo, saludos!

我觉得韩国人的想法跟中国人区别很大，很有意思。比如中国人在国外看到一个东西跟中国很像，中国人的第一想法是，哇你们也有这样的文化呀，人类真是一家人！而韩国人则是: 你们跟我们一样，是从韩国传过去的吧。 比如韩国/朝鲜族泡菜，不出意外的话是从中国传到半岛上的，当然最初形态的泡菜肯定跟现在的泡菜区别很大，中国只是主张泡菜的源头可能在中国，然而韩国人不知道为何如此激动。常见的韩国泡菜是腌大白菜，大白菜的话，大长今里都说是明国传过去的呢。 中国很多地方都有制作泡菜，腌菜的习俗，中国地大物博，看到风俗跟自己的家乡不一致的地方并不会大惊小怪。韩国的面积比中国很多省的面积都小，文化比较单一，而中国不同。 韩国泡菜目前的做法应该是他们自己的原创，不过除朝鲜族以外的其他地方，比如云南贵州湘西有跟韩国泡菜十分类似的腌菜也不应感到奇怪，相似只是巧合。

很想知道十音的汉服是在哪里定做的， 淘宝有一些比较高端的汉服店价格也在2000-1万不等， 但是男装太丑了

This is a very clear explanation of the differences between Hanfu and Hanbok! Thank you Shiyin! We need more people like you to protect and carry forward Chinese culture. LOVE U!

感谢十音的详细解说科普。从某种意义上，可能也要感谢南韩人这几波对中华文化的冲击和挑战，让更多的中国人能意识和认识到中华文化的博大精深。连我这个普通人也开始想有一套汉服了，真的是太美了

感谢十音！看了之后感觉自己长见识了！（但是我心里想的是完了，那边肯定会有人开始做有织金工艺的韩服= 。=

That’s what Chinese people want to believe. Everything originated from China which is not true. Hanfu was influenced from Goryeo. Korean do not claim Gimono is originated from korea so Gimono belong to Korea, but Chinese wants to claim every asian culture originated from China. Look up the history. Every country influences each other. Respect what you have and have been developing by influences. Hanfu and Hanbok is different design and style. We don’t even have to argue. Just keep yours things what u have in history and do not copy the same design as korea has developed from hanbok history. We often see china copy current Korean hanbok design and claim it is original Chinese design. This is obviously wrong. If you copy Gucci design and say it is yours, than it is absolutely wrong. Just respect and develop your own Hanfu style. Korean would not really care than. It is that simple. We have cared and developed Hanbok from ancient times that is why modern Hanbok looks so good. We never heard much about how Hanfu design has been developed from ancient times up this modern days. I have seen many Chinese game and movies copying korean modern days Hanbok and than claim it is Hanfu. Suddenly claiming this design is Chinese. Those design have copyright of korean fashion designers. That’s really shame. That’s why Korean people are upset about Chinese copying and ignoring all the effort korea fashion industry made. Simply claiming korean designers copyright design as Chinese, saying it is Hanfu.

Thanks Shiyin i am a malaysian from Johor,I have also been to Korea before, and when I visited Gyeongbokgung Palace, everyone wore the Hanbok just like they the right one. I don’t get it why Koreans even claim that the Hanfu on the left is belong to them.... Obviously, no one wears the clothing like the hanfu on the left at Gyeongbokgung...(think korean don't knows how to make cuz is not belong to them hmmmm)

其实从严格意义上来说，根本不存在韩服的说法，只有朝鲜服而非韩服，韩国是现代朝鲜分裂后才有的国家，古时候的服饰严格上来说跟“韩服”一点关系都没有，个人认为这其实是韩国人文化不自信的一种体现。

Thanks Shiyin！Thank you for the clear response showing people who aren’t familiar with Chinese Ming Dynasty clothing and Korea clothing the differences.

The wonsam is a female ceremonial topcoat in hanbok. It originated from China, and it was worn by queens, high-ranking court ladies, and royalty during the Joseon dynasty of Korea (1392-1910). It is also called 'daeui' (大衣, big clothing), 'daesu' (大袖, wide sleeves) and 'jangsam' (長衫, long clothing). The queen, princess consort, and consort to the first son of the crown prince wore it as a soryebok, a robe for small ceremonies, while wives of high officers and sanggung (court matrons) wore it as daeryebok, a robe for major ceremonies. It was also worn by commoners on their wedding ceremony.