It's more into the journey, but I think it would be helpful to to get a job market comparison. How good of a landscaper would Link be compared to a Deku, a Goron, and a Zora?
Your methodology doesn't work with Majora's Mask. It got such a high score because you didn't do the whole five minutes and didn't account for the time spent reloading the area. You should have done it in Clock Town or Termina Field.
But, you can make a lawnmower in TotK. There's tons of builds for them on here. You just attach bladed weapons to a wheel, and perhaps not even that, and they cut while in motion.
@@gferrol118 Maybe. I think you could make a contraption that funnels them to you. Problem is this is a discussion that should have been in the video. I think looking up build ideas would be a pretty obvious thing to do for this video and it perplexes me that he didn't. It's not like they're hard to find. There's plenty of videos on them and they are touted as being good for rupee farming too. Are they? Say you're right that it's less efficient than doing it by hand, that would have made for an interesting upset! It would also be the crown jewel of the video to give Landscaper Link a legit lawnmower. Ideally it would be optimized, but I think that even just taking and crediting the lawnmower build with the most views and using that would have been fine. Could even have a cheeky joke in there like: "Hey, I'm dedicated, not creative." while showing his fucked up napalm mower burn itself up. Easy W.
I was surprised not to see any of the 2D Links represented, until I realized the Four Swords games would easily take it! Until I realized that their grass doesn't grow back as quickly, and you would also have to split the profits between four people. I guess a followup video is warranted!
Im sure the video is nice, but the AI thumbnail? I dunno this is kind of low here, would it have been too much trouble to make a funny looking photoshop of link on a lawnmower. (Rhetorical)
@@toumabyakuya I don't usually expect much from yt comments but listen to yourself, do you even know what you're talking about or are you just upset that someone rightfully criticized a content creator that you like on the internet
@@ineedahero1283 Okay, first and foremost: How rude. *"do you even know what you're talking about..."* I actually do. *"that someone rightfully criticized"* Rightfully? Rightfully?! Only way this could be "right" is if you truly believe that all your opinions are fact and that anybody that dares to disagree with you will always be wrong. Do you truly believe that your opinions are the only valid ones here?.
@@toumabyakuya A little bit of sass never hurt anyone, chill. I say rightfully because the use of AI here is disappointing and frankly wrong. Also you're putting your own words in my mouth and getting mad at them
@@ineedahero1283 *"A little bit of sass never hurt anyone, chill."* Dude, I simply don't like to be treated like this, especially from a complete stranger like you. *"I say rightfully because the use of AI here is disappointing and frankly wrong."* Disapointing? Maybe. Wrong? No. AI is a tool like any other and can be used as such. *"Also you're putting your own words in my mouth"* I am not. How could I do that when I am quoting you first and I only reply to what I quoted?.
It's obviously totk link that I guy can probably make, like a crane, a bulldozer, and a wrecking ball if he wanted to. My guy can make like a machine that instantly burns any grass
as someone who does not give a fuck about a.i, you should probably change the thumbnail. not because i have a problem with it but because most people do and you will certainly get a lot of hate.
Meh, let those people hate him and go away, we are better of without them here. After all, if this is enough for them to go away, then they weren't really fans of him to begin with.
@@A_Surpluss_of_Stupidity I’m going to assume this is a genuine question. It is a proven fact backed by multiple studies, and news sites like the Newyorker, that all AI art softwares (unless you make it yourself and feed the it a pool of art that is entirely copywriter free) make their “art” off of stolen art found online, and actively takes and Frankensteins together real artists work. To use an AI art software for monetary gain is to literally steal the work from actual artists
If you make another video using AI art for your thumbnail then I'm unsubbing. Kids and tech bros who lack art literacy will defend you but no one else will.
@@toumabyakuyaaww here comes the person to literally prove their point. lashing out at every comment that even remotely dislikes people using this AI nonsense instead of spending 20 seconds in photoshop or five bucks to get an actual human person to doodle something.
@@3possumsinatrenchcoat *"here comes the person to literally prove their point. lashing out at every comment that even remotely dislikes people using this AI nonsense"* Dude, you are being, right here and right now, one of those rude persons I vowed to fight. You literally respect nobody else's opinion but your own. *"instead of spending 20 seconds in photoshop"* For a pic that would be half as good as this one already is?. *"or five bucks to get an actual human person to doodle something."* Maybe, just maybe, he simply couldn't afford it.
@@tdk7326 to answer the "minimal effort" question its called working smarter not harder why should anyone spend hours on something if they can do it in 5 minutes instead. To answer the "stealing" question it isn't stealing sure ai is trained on other art but have you heard of something called fair use before it means you can take others art if it is transformative and obviously an ai is transformative and the ai art is also within a larger transformative peice of art.
@@jacobs5546it’s a proven fact backed by multiple studies, and new sites like the Newyorker, that all AI art softwares (unless you make it yourself and feed the it a pool of art that is entirely copywriter free) make their art off of stolen art found online, and actively takes and Frankensteins together real artists work. To use an AI art software for monetary gain is to literally steal the work from actual artists
@@toumabyakuya are you dense? CMee never had a problem creating his own thumbnail. If you can't use Paint or Gimp to make a quick edit, then sure as hell you can't make quality video and should stick with screenshoot/photo + text format Also AI *is* stealing art. During first waves of neo-AI art, top "targeted" artists with watermark or signature had those stolen. AI tried (and failed) to apply those in places and shapes specific for each artist. Let's say you always put your name with heart under characters elbow. If fed enough of your art, AI would try to put squiggles and heart-like shape under its elbow as well. It is this blatant and disgusting. If you ever see weird blob, lines or random letters, know that it's someones signature (and art) stolen
@@OnlyTAS Man, this is the most dense I have seen somebody be. *"CMee never had a problem creating his own thumbnail."* Mostly because all his prior videos were fine with using either official artwork (and that is, in a way, him stealing as well) or by using screencaps (this could also be seen as him stealing). *"then sure as hell you can't make quality video"* What does this have to do with anything?!. You do know that making a thumbnail and a fun video are two different things that require two different skillsets, right?. You are just hating on him because he dared to use AI. *"and should stick with screenshoot/photo + text format"* What if that didn't make a good a thumbnail as AI could?. *"During first waves of neo-AI art, top "targeted" artists with watermark or signature had those stolen."* By the way, those artist you care about so much also stole art as well, after all, I highly doubt even one of them asked for permission from the rightful owners they were making fan-art from to make said fan-art. Honestly, the arguments you are making right now could also be used against fan-art itself, after all, both of those commit the same "mistake": Using somebody else's product as a basis (or as materials) to create a fully different final product without asking for permission first. Also, the only way for AI to make an image similar as somebody else's is by telling the AI to make an image similar to the one that it is being feed. Otherwise, the AI will use the feed image sorely to recognize patterns but will make a final product that is highly different from every image it was feed to make said product.
@@toumabyakuya but you know I never started the fanart topic, don't you? And yet you keep going on, and on, and on... It tells me all I have to know about you. About your fanatism with this sick technology. Also your lack of creative skills, but that's to be known from your passion towards stealing others art. Please, grow up and be better :)
Get actual art for the thumbnail instead of using AI You know as well as I do how much that shit hurts the artists Your old thumbnails were fine. Stick to em, or get a comm
And what if he cannot get a comm? And what if simply using screencaps wouldn't be enough? Should he then give up a video idea sorely because there's no way for him to make a good thumbnail without AI?.
extremely disappointed at the use of AI images for the thumbnail. :\ i hoped someone who puts so much effort into their craft would respect other artists and not use generators built off the theft of others' work.
That is such an overreaction that I would be embarrassed to have you as a fan if I were him and I don’t even like ai thumbnails at all. It just shows you never even cared if such a small thing that does not even show him contents quality can ruin it for you that much. Honestly, pathetic.
@@jacobs5546I’m going to assume this is a genuine question. It is a proven fact backed by multiple studies, and news sites like the Newyorker, that all AI art softwares (unless you make it yourself and feed the it a pool of art that is entirely copywriter free) make their “art” off of stolen art found online, and actively takes and Frankensteins together real artists work. To use an AI art software for monetary gain is to literally steal the work from actual artists
Exactly most people are just spewing out out other people's opinions without actually thinking about what they are saying or if it makes any sense at all its idiotic
@@toumabyakuya "ai is a tool, like a pencil or a brush" How incredibly dull can someone be? That's like saying a magnum is a tool, just like a taser or pepper spray. I shouldn't have to explain how ai 'art' generators are trained, or the many allegations against groups who develop them.
@@NovaMaster375 *"How incredibly dull can someone be?"* I don't know, you tell me why *you* are this dull. *"That's like saying a magnum is a tool, just like a taser or pepper spray."* Yup, they are just that, tools. They cannot be wrong by themselves, they can only be used in a wrong way bu us humans. I mean, kitchen knives and scissors have been used in murders prior, should all of them be destroyed as well?.
Don't let comments about the thumbnail dissuade you. Another banger video, your content is always unique, original, and interesting. I really enjoyed this video covering rupee gain which I never really thought of before. I wonder if you could do a video on which link is the richest? Either way loved the video keep it up.
Really guys? We're gonna make this a giant controversy to the point where CMeeCraft has to physically address it? Look, I'm not a big fan of A.I generated stuff either, but it's really telling how many of you just refuse to give him the benefit of the doubt. Pro tip: this isn't a runway. You don't need to announce your departure. Doing so and blaming him for, what could be, a one time thing? That just shows a complete lack of maturity, and maybe he's better off without people like you in his subscriber base. There are laws being passed that limit how much A.I can be used for, and apparently, that's still not enough for some people. Well, if you don't like it, leave! The door is right there!
