I Remade Monsters EXACTLY as described in the book... Pt.4! 

I bought it just now. I wonder when it will arrive in germany.

Not sure if you’ll see this Jazza, but for future videos in this series, could you make thumbnails that don’t reveal what the characters are? As someone who likes to guess along, it does take a little bit of the fun out of it because we already know who/what it is before hand. Anyhow, love your work man! Keep it up!

Yes! 😆 Kids birthday present sorted 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 Thank You Jazza 💓💓💓

Bro pls check your comment section the bots are outta hand. Aside from the fake telegram gift spam there are now also adult content spam bots copying other people’s comments to apear legit

does it work for overseas shipment, i live in the UK and really want to purchase it but i'm not sure if i can :(

I was just thinking that! I didn't realize that they were based off toothless' original description until I saw jazza's drawing (disclaimer, I've only read part of the original book)

I’ve never read the original book so I just assumed it *was* a terrible terror. Only thing that confused me was no teeth.

Dang, I didn't even know there was a book lol. And yeah! I noticed that Toothless' description was very similar to the Terrible Terror.

The book series of How to Train your Dragon is very different from the movie, if my memory serves me as correct. Both are masterfully written and constructed, though, and Jazza did a fantastic job.

Yes and hiccup doesn't ride him

YESS the movie is just inspired by the first book but has almost nothing to do with the actual movies

Yeah tbh i don't get why they even kept the names and title. Could as well have gone all the way, this feels like false advertising

I assume movie Toothless was based more on Windwalker.

They really should have just not named the movies "How to train a dragon" as they have nothing to do with the books at all.

And show

they only be seen by those who witnessed death consciously

Nah i heard the description and immediately knew what it was

yessss

He got really close just missing that little plotting mischievous grin. He’s literally such an annoying gremlin I love him.

Book toothless is The bastard and we love him for it

He’s a menace and even more so since he can actually talk

It's true. My dog acts the same way.

He gave toothless the demeanor of a dushound, but really he has the demeanor of a grumpy cat.

Same here, like perfect timing!

Possibly the best way I've seen it put, and I agree with you wholeheartedly. Those books were just something else.

oh yeah they'd be cool to see drawn

+

definitely. I watched the (poorly done) movie before I read the first three books and I had a bit of an issue when comparing the monsters in the movie to their description in the books.

Yes!

@JaydenHewitt666 I tried to read the last three but I couldn't get into them. they just didn't have the same feel as the first three. the retconning of certain key relationships really threw me off of it. I just couldn't bring myself to finish it. the third book is where it ended for me. the end of the third book is satisfying. it leaves the future uncertain, yes, but the loose ends are tied up and it feels like an ending. while I was excited to find that they had continued past the trilogy, I was disappointed at how they decided to proceed. the combination of unraveling the well earned ending of the third book, disregarding established lore, and tearing apart relationships seemingly for the hell of it made it seem like a cheap non-canon spinoff series or something. the author should have quit while they were ahead.

that’s actually a great idea

Sounds boring as hell

Yeah I adore both the movies and the books, but they are totally different stories with totally different stakes and aesthetics. It’s really best not to think of them as connected.

I Just want to see the original green death being accurate to the book design maybe or the hellsteether

The cute and innocent part is definitely deceptive to say the least

The how to train your dragon movies were awful.

@@drsch that first movie got me through fourth grade man… it’s magical. To each their own though

Future top comment

it’s nice to see some one be positive on the internet 👍

Would love to buy one, but dont want it to sit for a year.

Seen

It's the top comment now

Really! I would have thought it was connected to "hound"

​@@ursidae97Yeah hund means dog. In Dutch (my language) it's hond. Very similar. Dachshund badger/dog Dashond badger/dog Just fun etymologie.

It's funny, as noone in Germany says "Dachshund", we only use the abbreviation/diminutive "Dackel".

At least where i grew up, we pronounced it a bit closer to doxh-un with an o sound before the x/cks and not a u. Language and dialects and all that stuff is so great 😊

how many times does he say it wrong?, I'm up to 5 and I don't think I can continue the video.

YES!

Yes omg that is such a good idea please is love if he did that!!!!

Which is probably a big compliment for the author. It means they did a great job explaining what it looks like.

@@schrodingerskatze4308 yea cowel was a good writer and honestly it’s a disappointment that the films aren’t more accurate I would have loved to see it

I never knew there was books.

@@nekoboygames7786 this always depresses me the books are great but the films are more famous and as the books and films are so different nobody ever goes from the films to the books its always a pity to me

​@@ka-1atmyth353 a lot more people like to watch movies compared to reading a book. Plus movies get promoted more. So yea books will mostly get overlooked. Reading can be very fun tho. I do read a lot myself. But its mostly comic books that I read

I've been asking for the Ra'zac since episode one lol, maybe your comment will have more luck

I mentioned urgals in a previous video in this series. It would be interesting to see how jazz recreates Paolinis urgals from their description next to whatever the hell the movie made. I think the ra'zac would be cool for that too. Whatever the movie depiction was, was cool in its own right, but not a ra'zac. Jazza would do a really cool depiction of such a putrid description. The lethrblaka description would lend itself really well to jazzas own style. He would make a fabulous depiction of them. Honestly think they are perfect for his style. A jazza fanghur or nidhwalar would be flat out cool, but really would just be another variation on dragons. So maybe not great for content. Sundablaka (might not be quite right, but the shadow flappers of vroengard post-fall) would be pretty fun to see what jazza does with such a vague and ominous description.

Ra'zac would be so cool to see, the description gave me the creeps when i read the books.

I would LOVE to see some Eragon creatures/monsters! Screw the movie; they apparently never read the books when they made it! The Inheritance Cycle is one of my top three with Chronicles of Narnia and Lord of the Rings!

I thought the thestral was a lethrblaka at first

Also completely opposite in personality. Book toothless makes you wanna smack him.

@@BlewBerri yes, 100%

@Paristheninjanerd I'm just glad that they're both good individually

@@slishslash9202 i agree If toothless (the movie version) was in the books I feel like he would be more of a windwalker And if toothless (book version) was in the films then he would definitely be a terrible terror But even though the books and films are quite different they’re both amazing and I love them all

Reminds me of a happier Spyro

English speakers laugh at me whenever I pronounce it as "Dachs - Hund."

Dock Sunned (getting a nice suntan on the dock) (:

I'm sorry but you are completely wrong. Dachshund is actually pronounced: Dacks-Hund

I’ve always said it like that but when speaking quickly it sounds like doxen

Just say Dackel - prunounced like duckle

Or a Myrddraal

I was going to say, because if it was the movie toothless, I was going to say whoever is describing him is a complete alcoholic

To make that more interesting, the description sounded like the small dragons from the move and show

@@jamisoncohen611 no its the exact description toothless had in the book (:

Now guys this is the real comment! Please don't like the copy, this is the original😄

I believe they based the movie toothless off of Hiccup’s riding dragon in the books. Can’t remember his name though. Wind something? The movie basically combines the two.

That was me for the thestrals

I felt so freaking smart when I realized what it was

I wanted to explain to him that the OR is not because the creature is confusing or described by different people, but because there are many of them with many variations!

I’m not a massive fan of the first season…but I have to admit that it is pretty cool to see WOT characters entering public consciousness if only in a small way. Never before have references randomly popped up in unrelated media I consume.

I was so happy with the trollocs

Wait do you mean Gantu?

In Germany we mainly say Dackel. The "a" in the first syllable sounds like the "a" in "father", The "e" at the end would sound like the "e" in "pet" or "get." So, the approximate pronunciation would be "dah-kel." Hunters and associations however, mostly refer to the Dackel as Teckel (pronounced like the english "tackle".

so it's not pronounced dash ow-nd?

In the US: dock-sun

Just to make sure how you pronounce it here it is in phronetic transcription: [ ˈdakshʊnt ]

@@xyreniaofcthrayn1195 nope, not at all. It's a common mistake to read the first "chs" and misread it like the German "sch" which is the same as English "sh". But it's in fact the German "ch" (pronounced kh) with an s after it, followed by "hund". Dakh-s-hund

How i would describe the emperor: A man about 10 feet tall Long black hair that turns gold at the roots looks about to be in his late 20s to early 30s Glowing golden eyes A large "halo" behind his head as if he was standing in front of a miniature sun Heavily adorned by think golden armor Large royal looking cape flowing down to the ground A large metal claw on his left hand A flaming great sword about the size of the average man in the other hand

maybe a before and after picture :)

Yeessss

Give him multiple prompts, each one a different holistic description of the Emperor.

I guess the 40k universe could be a source of many awesome and likely confusing descriptions. We got different demons, the primarchs, nasty dark Eldar stuff, necron creations, stuff made by the priests of Mars...

They're actually closer to the story of Hiccup the First funnily enough.

@@blizzardgaming7070 I’ve read How to Train Your Dragon, and How to Train Your Viking. Can’t remember if there was another I read, I just know toothless was a pathetic dragon and everyone else had cool ones. Edit: the other one I read was How to Speak Dragonese I think.

@@timehunter9467 it's told in one of the later books.

@@blizzardgaming7070 Oh right, I like the films and the books, but if the films were like the books they’d be awful tbh.

Right there with you

The thing is, thestrals are suposed to look kinda scary but they're really kind and gentle, there might be a ton of metaphor between this and how we perceive death or grief. I think that's why, in the movies, they prefered to go with something not that "deathly", that and also the target audience

@@muriloolianivock89 that makes sense

i realised when Jazza finished his interpretation!! such cool creatures

I agree, his thestral is very impressive. So cool!

Fun fact: the terrible terror model was going to be Toothless's model because that's what he looks like in the books, until they decided they wanted to do a different story so they kept the Terrors in the movies as an Easter Egg👀

Ooh! Good idea, another character could be Om when/while he regains power: . Theophany . A cloud of golden horns, eagle-headed men, and bulls fusing into each other . Shimmering golden figure . As tall as the temple . Fiery

Yes! I'd commented this on the last time he did this. Terry Pratchett's descriptions are great!

Agreed! Love Pratchett and his characters are so unique so would be interesting seeing what he comes up with

Even some of Lady Sybil's dragons (Errol in particular)

​@@LizardWizard. I'd love to see Om

What does it mean when I got a Thestral as my patronus?

@@novemberoscar98 somethins off

@@novemberoscar98 When it comes to the Thestral Patronus’s meaning, it is generally associated with death and considered a bad omen since only the wizards who have witnessed death and accepted the concept of death can see this creature.

It looks just like him! :D

Ooooo really? Now i want to read the books even more

That's not quite true. There's a similar story in the backstory as an easter egg, but it's not at all identical. Wodensfang is not literally movie Toothless, and Hiccup I is not literally movie Hiccup.

X2 Dustwyrm. They are different universes entirely, even if there is a very similar relationship to Toothless and Hiccup from the movies described from history, it isn’t canon.

@@dustwyrm It has been a while since I read the books I miss-remembered things. Thank you for correcting my mistake.

@@kajamaja7148highly recommend the read, they’re completely different things which makes it a fun read and not like as if you’re just reading the plot of the movie. I really enjoyed them even though I watched the movie first and did have some biases at first

@Paristheninjanerd i agree so much

I think that'd be sic. I remember being so weirded out seeing the more "Until Dawn"ish more traditional wendigo. Also, apparently most natives don't like the more modern pop culture wendigo because the deerskull and antlers are very pagan which is the opposite of what they want for their folklore

@@Big_ol_Yams I think the traditional one is more terrifying because it's more humanoid and emphasizes the origin as a human turned into a monster.

my bitterness never shows more than when a movie destroys the book it’s based on, but thankfully as i grew up i learned to appreciate and love the httyd books and films as separate entities

Ooh, it has been so long since I read that book, but those would be awesome!

1000x yes! This book is so underrated... Third part is kind of dissaointing but the first two are great and introduce such a n interesting universe! There is also definitely too few fanarts of it.

Thanks for reminding me that I was wanting to read those!

Yes the movie is only very vaguely based off of the book

Same. The whole series is illustrated!

I never understood why they had to call the movie "How to Train Your Dragon" even though most of the stuff shown wasn't part of the source material. It felt like half the characters in the film weren't in the books and the other half had been altered in ways that made them unrecognizable without their names.

Yes, that's the point of these videos. Drawing characters as described in the books

Because he IS Toothless! Widdle Toothless is the cutest dragon of all!

Have you seen the baby dragons in the third Spyro game? Play the Reignited Trilogy! There's one that picks his nose when the thinks the elders aren't looking. lol

Classic book

I'm waiting for his take on a martian fighting machine as well

Yeah! We need this as a video!😄

Omg that'd be incredible!

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤