I scientifically TESTED the tech job market... 

Yes, it's possible, but an actual researcher focuses on what the likelihood is compared to other factors. It's not supposed to conclude it's possible, therefore proving the circular argument. A proper research study is more well-rounded and nuanced. Plus always will discuss limitations that the researcher missed. No real good scientist or researcher will make a bold claim that it flat out proves something. They will always say an increased or decreased likelihood of something happening and what kind of correlation it has in the data. They also never forget to say that correlation doesn't equal causation.

Bang on the money :P

So I've actually talked to many U.S. recruiters, and they all said that with requirements of 3-5yrs for a job that is labeled entry level it's to trick mid-level or senior employees and pay them entry-level pay out of their own desperation during a difficult job market. They don't like this practice, but they do it cause they have to listen to what they're told. We also have seen a decrease in companies wanting to train new people compared to all the way back in the boomer generation, where the requirements were less for entry and employers actually were willing to train an employee and retain them. Hence, why pensions used to exist in most companies. The hiring process has changed dramatically and will continue to change. Those who don't adapt and stay competitive will no doubt have difficulty with the cyclical nature of the tech field.

Absolutely! Mostly JavaScript and python but I dabble in some C code and a few others

someones gotta do it :P

Yessir!

🎉