"I thought I did Awful" Breaking Down The Oxford Debate w/ Rev. Calvin Robinson 

Straightforward and honest for sure, but don't forget why. Always be sure to explain *why* we believe these things, because that's what actually changes minds and shows nonbelievers that we don't live by blind faith, but by reason as well. Yes God commands these things, but explain the *benefits* of living by His commands. If we don't, they call us superstitious bigots and and mock us as foolish. Don't give them such a foothold.

@@sandstorm7768 I think you'll find that they call us bigots and mock us even when we argue our positions robustly. But you are right! We should make arguments and explain benefits. Doing so is an act of charity. Further, God commands it. (I Peter 3:15) I'm just pointing out that not all circumstances allow for a fully-fleshed out argument. Our responses should be proportionate. In this circumstance, Deacon Robinson was responding to a person who made a noise - not a statement, certainly not an argument - just a noise. But what the noise signified was clear enough, and he smacked it down in epic fashion. I think it was an inspired move. Anyway, thank you for the reply above. Hope you have a great day!

​@@sandstorm7768That's literally what the whole 20 minute speech was about.

And said with a lovely British accent made it even BETTER! ❤

@@Aidan_Spalding Yes that remark by the student proved Rev. Robinson's whole point. This is the degeneracy the church is promoting.

I loved how he did that. A gentle rebuke, but a necessary one.

Correct!! He immediately took authority over that.

I still wonder what the person said to get as stern a rebuke as that in public

I too loved it. Authoritative yet gentle and need i add, absolutely necessary.

Dude’s a bulldog. You love to see it.

This. We need more of this.

Yep three offices of the bishop is to : Teach, Govern, and Sanctify. They should have been there. But God takes the lowly to shame the mighty.

Calvin Robinson should be at speaker's corner with his videos being seen all around the world. Instead he is deserting the UK because of his obsession with Glitzy clerical robes, repetitive prayers and rosary. These actions take him closer to RC than the Evangelical churches who follow the teachings of Jesus and his disciples who have no need for fancy clothing and group repetitive prayer which was scolded by Jesus. Jesus instructed us to pray directly to God in private. His reason for going to the US is not to serve God but to serve Calvin's need to find a church (to accept him) steeped in 4th century + + religion which continued to moved further away from 1st century teachings.

Amen. And the world is full of mentality that sin is no longer sin if the majority commits it.

So I'm assuming you're also contending that decades ago everyone was wrong in their opinion and views of Gays? LMAO

Don't stop digging and searching for the Truth - Christianity is amazing, sobering and grounding -you will be surprised at the number of fantastic and clever people on this side. I find being a Christian invigorating and joyous!

Look, Jesus has his heart open for you. Why not try and welcome him in? What have you got to lose?

I suspect you're being drawn by the voice inside your heart. Best of luck in your search for answers. It's the most important thing (imo) that anyone can do for themselves. No person can do that for you. Pursue Christ and anchor yourself to Him. .. "No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day. It is written in the prophets, ‘And they shall all be taught by God.’ Therefore everyone who has heard and learned from the Father comes to Me." - John 6: 44-45

Faith comes by hearing🎉 praise God 🙏❤

@@NVRAMboi I've exited Plato's cave, opening my mind for the first time to God, and at this point I'm trying to find my footing in what exists. A bit lost, but a lot of online resources, attempts at prayer, and books have been helping.

Melt

Learn what woke means. Stop using the bastardized version of a saying that’s been a part of the Black community for over 60 years.

​@@marishajames3581Definitions change over time. Woke today is basically just an identifying term for people who believe in DEI. There's more to it, but that's the simple definition.

Me too !

Yes sprayed over a DIE Rainbow flag as its background.

Loved that part! Praise God!!!!!!!❤❤❤

Me too!!!

Make it and give the money to this young man's ministry

🇿🇦

A breath of fresh air, indeed. Yes!

Weird how he hasent appeared to anyone with a camera phone or cctv yet 😂

God bless.

Amen, 1/2 my family in England are Church of England, but, when we visited I realized how Catholic they were, they didn't believe in divorce, they literally hung out with us at the Catholic Club , one of my cousins even worked there to make a few Pounds (she was a stay at home Mum). May, she RIP, she passed on her birthday and left her dear Mum childless, but, she said her Grandchildren give her great comfort.

​@@CinMcNicholl-g4zI was raised Anglican, and have always said that it's Catholicism-Lite.

He's in the closet. Anyone from his school days will tell you.

@@dansaber5853 Your obsession with his private life, making unsubstantiated claims across multiple videos makes you look quite the cheap troll, and begs the question if thou doth protest too much.

​@@dansaber5853and you are in the gutter

Nonsense. At least the traditionalist Anglicans have the Bible, the 1662 BCP, and the 39 Articles. You Romanists have no defense against an apostate Pope.

@@annefranciselizabeth3840 i rather have an "apostate" pope than an entire apostate clerigy.

@@bandie9101 But Romanist clergy are apostates by definition. Read the 31st of the 39 Articles in the BCP.

@@bandie9101 The real reason for the creation of the doctrine of "Pontifiacal Infallibility" is that no one knows what "Sacred Tradition" means! Romanists will point to their Catechism as the definitive document. But like the Bible, "the Catechism" must also be interpreted. And unlike the Bible, only very few doctrines in "the Catechism" have ever been infallibly defined (such as the Assumption) so most of its stipulations are mere pius opinions. I know many Romanists who have declared the current Pope an anti-Pope or a "Protestant Pope" simply because they disagree with his NON-DOGMATIC OPINION on some aspect of the "Catechism!" Consequently, there are now nearly as many "Roman Catholic Orthodoxies" as there are Roman Catholics. Romanism is more fractious than Protestantism, which Romanists accuse of splintering into thousands of sects. There is far more unity of doctrine between the CLASSICAL FORMS of the main Reformed Churches (Anglican, Methodist, Presbyterian, Lutheran, Baptist, etc) than amongst the confusing array of Romanist contortions. Each RC denomination (Mainline, Montinian, Sedevacantist, SSPV, SSPX, Conclavist, Lefebvrist, Catholic Restoration, Sedeprivationist, Ultramontanist, Semi-traditionalist, Concilarist, Neo-ultramontanist, Novus Ordo Catholic, Catholic Liberal, Extraordinary Formist, Opus Dei, Divine Mercy cultists, etc, etc) seems to make up its own "Catholic Truth" on the go. Ironically, it is easier to know what a Reformed denomination believes than to pin down RCs to anything. I do not (yet) know any Baptists who believe that the President of the Baptist Convention is an unsaved heretic. But there is a zealous army of RCs online screaming that all Popes since Paul VI (some even add John the XXIII for good measure) are damned heretics, demonic schismatics, & unscrupulous false prophets! What can be more fractious? [POST-SCIPT: The doctrine is Papal (not Corporate) Infallibility. General Councils of the Roman Church are merely advisory. The Pope can act regardless of them. "PI" is a monstrous distortion of genuine Catholic magisterium. Pius IX (a control freak) deliberately defined the doctrine in that strange way, so that in the future a populist Cardinal will not sway a Church Council against the Pope as happened in the past. Pius bullied the Bishops and SENT AWAY FROM THE COUNCIL ALL THOSE 150 BISHOPS who (very wisely) insisted on rejecting the infallibility dogma, in spite of Pius's threats.]