Omg im so. Lucky to listen such vintage the corination of our late king tqsm 👑👑❤️i bow to the yoyr majesty wish i could be a part of the royal family or be the queens personal servant 💖
@@umbertotoni3021 This is the only rendition of the 1902 version which I could find. I can't tell you how much I'd give to hear a full orchestral performance with the original opening and vivats.
It's "Vivat Regina Elizabetha" and "Vivat Rex Georgius" respectively. Obviously there was a mistake at the latter acclamation, as the King's Scholars came in too early and you can faintly hear them shouting against the orchestra in around 8:00
@@georgev9170 Sigmund they are not too early. Parry wanted the King's Scholars of the Westminster School to have their own proclamation alone (as is their right since medieval times). The entire chorus joining them in proclamation is a later addition - first heard with this work during the coronation of Edward VII. If you were around during the Coronation of Queen Victoria, you would just have heard the male students yell their Vivats as the Queen entered the Abbey -- without musical accompaniment.
@@eddihaskell What I was trying to say is that the boys ought to exercise their (exclusive) privilege TWICE instead of once. The first "vivat rex georgius" is overplayed by the orchestra, consequently you only get to hear the second "vivat rex" before the general choir already sets in.
Out of curiosity, I've had a look at my score of the 1937 Coronation, and what was sung by the King's Scholars is exactly as writ. Perhaps the amendment in 1953, so that they came in after the accompaniment was released, was done to allow them to be clearly audible throughout. An asterisk immediately before leads to a footnote, 'A fanfare will be interpolated here, should the procession demand it'. Obviously it does and, as much as I like Bullock's music, I do hope very careful consideration is given to this moment the next time it comes to crown a king and queen together!
