i9-14900K Monster Hackintosh! | Music Production and Video Editing PC | with New Benchmarks 

Thanks 👍

@@TechNolli your score on i9 14900k is equal to my hackintosh i7 14700k hahaa

How About External Vst? Heavy one, Like Waves or Ozone 11 ?

Yes it is!

Thanks syay!

I haven't tested it, but I would use a real Apple adapter.

You need SSDTs for hotplug.

Im on 192gigs ram and same config as him i can with 100% confidence say that its faster than the m2 ultra

I have the exact same build except i went with 192gb ram

amd rx 6600 is a good choice

They do! Maybe he’s running them native. I doubt the audio interface could handle 30 tracks

All plugins are disabled@@dnalyen

Yeah you right but it is still faster than the all speced out mac studio ultra

@@oldtimer666 I'm in love with i7 14700k hackintosh:)). it beast ultra m2 :))

I know it works with Ventura, so I think Sonoma would work as well.

Running vsts more depends on the ram than the cpu, get a 14900k with atleast 128gb ram

What’s the cost of the embedded M3 Max compared to the socketable i9 which can be resold after many years of use.

@@thugfromeu you talk about upgradability but fail to mention that this particular i9 is on a dead platform z790, it won’t work in z890 or an lga1851 motherboard. It won’t support thunderbolt 5 and also won’t support 4 direct to cpu pcie5 lanes for nvme storage. Instead, nvme pcie5 bandwidth must be shared with the GPU. The apple iGPU is much faster than the Intel iGPU. Apple has been upgrading its iGPU ever since Apple silicon debuted, but the Intel iGPU in the 14900k is the same iGPU that debuted in alder lake. The key point for me though is that the m3 max consumes far less power than raptor lake refresh for similar levels of performance. It is embarrassing that a laptop chip of 30-35W is keeping up with raptor lake refresh which officially consumes 253W in its PL2, but by default in most performance z790 motherboards, will consume 280W or more. Of course there are cons to apple’s system, lack of upgradable storage and ram. And the cost that Apple charges for additional storage and ram is ridiculous. Also, no native windows on arm support. Also, no AAA gaming yet on Macintosh. But from a pure technological point of view, the difference in performance per watt is so stark. I hope arrow lake addresses this issue. Because arm is coming. More efficient AMD chips are coming. Risc-v is coming to the data center. Can intel keep up?

Buy a fenvi and everything works

I'm runing intel wifi with z790 in sonoma now hahaha

Hackintosh

@@JimCamorongan THIS IS PROGRAM? OR THIS NORMAL FOR WINDOWS?

You are kidding?

Did you check your resolution in RU-vid? This video is 1080p.

Try me at technollitips@gmail.com