Ice Formation On Aircraft (1960) 

That’s great, but enough of you talking about people talking about themselves, I want to talk to about me talking about people talking about themselves...😉

@@georgemorley1029 🤣

Um yeah like I feel you bro. It’s like they think their audience is composed of people who talk back to the tv. And ,you know,add a lot of extraneous ,um , words and junk.👋

What do you think of the new super hydrophobic coatings/ surface etchings that stop ice formation?

Nice catch 👌

It's been 13 years since this comment, but if anyone's curious, it actually was produced by Disney. It was called the Aerology Series.

Finalshot92 no it has two engine but they explain one. if one engine fail u can use another one to complete the journey it's like #magnedous

I also noticed the lack of one engine

It's just there so they don't have to use two airplanes. Lol

Aviation uses a mix. They prefer imperial forces altitude airspeed and others

It is not "funny," it is just correct English. "He" is both a male and a gender-neutral singular personal pronoun, in English. When the gender of a person is known to be female, you use "she/her." When the gender of a person is known to be male you use "he/him/his." When the gender of a person is unknown you may use "he/him/his," or if you need to make it clear that the person's gender is unknown, you can use a construction like "he or she." My personal practice in such cases is usually to use "he or she" (or "his or her") for the first reference, and he/his for subsequent references to the same person. Of course, if you want to sound like an illiterate woke idiot, you can say "ze," or use "they" as a singular pronoun.

Can you explain what is wrong with it?

At 12:20 the streamlines are all flowing back straight. That wing would never ever generate any lift. The turbulent flow is more or less accurate. There is a NASA video on youtube that shows actual flight test and wind tunnel shots.

I’m a pilot, this video contains highly accurate information. I’m surprised they knew this stuff already.

@@bluegrayskies3831 They had to figure this out pretty quickly during World War I. The military would have noticed when their planes kept crashing due to ice. Pilots would have noticed the ice buildup. They did a lot of aviation meteorological work before and during WW2 to figure out all this.

@h k I am a pilot too. My issue is not so much with how the ice accumulation is discussed, but anytime I see streamlines that go straight in over the leading edge and then straight out the back I cringe. A wing that actually did that would produce no lift. The streamlines coming off the back should point downward which is the air accelerated downward which is the lift being generated (F=ma)