The shapes of the icebergs in the video are very unreallistic. No matter how big an iceberg is, it can't be more than a few kilometres thick. Where the ice is thickest in Antarctica, it's about four kilometres.
Показанная форма крупных айсбергов имеет мало общего с реальностью: уже просто потому, что при указанных размерах её вертикальная составляющая в разы превышала бы глубину океана. На самом деле практически все они представляли собой плоские плиты размер которых мог составлять десятки километров, но осадка не превышала нескольких сот метров.
If an iceberg was also 40 miles thick, it would sit on the bottom of the ocean and would still be about 35 miles high. 7 times as high as Mount Everest.
They are still big, even if not so thick, assuming we are talking about volume. These must be the largest ever recorded, but the glaciers spawn many icebergs each year so, not so good .
As a kid, I'd read that the iceberg of Guiness records was one whose surface-area was bigger than the whole of Belgium! among the ones shown, here, which was it?
Dit slaat helemaal nergens op, ijsbergen die rijken tot in de stratosfeer, en de grootste ijsbergen zijn tafelijsbergen, die rond Antarctica ontstaan en veel groter zijn dan deze die hier afgebeeld worden., kortom zeer slechte weergave.
What an idiotic video, if the last Iceberg was over 90 km in length it would be about 90 in height according to your video. Which means it would be 8/9 times deeper than a Mariana Trench. You don't know the shame of the icebergs ...
