Thank you so much for the video lesson. It helped me to improve my vocabulary range, especially to describe the trends. I have noted all important words which are supposed to use in IELTd writing task. Next week is my IELTS test. Thank you once again.
You made writing task 1 so easy. However, I would like to point out that you don't need to mention the word "given" on the Introduction. IELTS checkers expect us to make a report as if they don't have the graph with them. No need to think about the synonym for "the graph below".
I have a worrying concern ? Today at the exam, I couldn't do task 1 due to some mixup. But I did well in task 2. Is there any chance I will get at least 5.5?
The line graph illustrates the consumption of fast food (fried chicken, pizza, hamburger) by teenagers between year 1985 to 2015 in Mauritius. Overall, hamburgers have shown a rapid increase in over the period, with an expectation to increase more with years. Whereas fried chicken shows a fluctuation in it increase with time. The pizza is at the bottom and it is showing significant decrease in its consumption over the years. The rate of consumption of hamburgers is rapidly increasing from 10 number of times eaten in 1985 to more then 70 in 2013. It is expected to rose more with period. While fried chicken shows irregular growth. The friend chicken is consumed less than 10 per year in 1985 with a gradual increase till 2003, where it counts as 60 per year. Later the graph become constant till 2010. It is after 2010 that t shows a slight increase to more then 60 per year in 2013. In comparison to three fast food, pizza is the only item which is becoming least favorite over the period. It shows the maximum consumption in year 1985 then there is a continuous downfall. In 2000, it crosses the rate of consumption of pizza and hamburgers and gets even lower then 40 per year. Having a constant decrease, it results to 10 per year in 2013.
Thank for your video but I wonder if this sentence below is correct or not?? "Likewise, teenagers in Mauritius ate fried chicken only 5 times per year in 1985 before rising dramatically to a plateau in 2005, then increased slightly at the end of the period to finish as the second most popular food". in this sentence, we use "before" + v-ing when we have the same "subject" and the subject here should be " the number of times" rose dramatically, but the sentence above, the subject is " teenagers" and the last sentence is " then increased slightly......." also follow the subject "teenagers" not " the number of times" . Could you explain to me please? thanks
The given line graph provides information about the consumption of three types of fast food by Mauritian teenagers between 1985 and 2015. Units are measured by the number of times each type was eaten annually. Initially, Hamburgers and Pizza had become teenagers' favorite fast foods by 2015, whereas the demand for Pizza fell dramatically after being the most ordered food in 1985. The number of Hamburgers consumed had been increasing steadily since 1985, peaking at 70 times per year by 2015. In addition, the consumption of Fried Chicken was below ten times in 1985. It then saw a gradual increase until 2005, when Pizza consumption plateaued for five years before rising slightly towards the end of the period. Conversely, Pizza was the most ordered food in 1985, with 60 servings in 1986. Its consumption dropped by ten times each year, and by 2015, Pizza was only consumed ten times annually, overtaken by both Hamburgers and Fried Chicken.
The given line graph gives information about three types of fast food consumption by Mauritian teenagers between 1985 and 2015. Unites are measured in the number of times each was eaten annually. From the outset, Hamburger and Pizza had become teenager's favorite fast food by 2015, whereas the demand of pizza fell dramatically , after being the most ordered food in the year 1985. Obviously, the number of consumed Hamburgers had been increasing since 1985, and its consumption by teenagers had reached a peak by the year 2015 with being eaten for 70 times. In addition, the number of ordered fried chicken was below ten times in 1985, afterwards it saw a gradual upward until 2005, when the consumption of Pizza had a plateau for five years. Then this increased slightly at the end of the period. In contrast, Pizza was the most ordered food in 1985 , and it was eaten 60 times in 1986 by adolescents, its consumption dropped ten times lesser every year, by the year 2015, pizza was only eaten ten times, and it was overtaken by both Hamburger and Fried chicken. please evaluate me.
@@madingbol1568 well I got 6.5 Reading: 5.5 ( I choose randomly cause what the hell there’s no enough time) Writing:6 ( didn’t write the last paragraph in the second task) Listening:6.5 ( I lost my mind and didn’t focus for three seconds and I ended up choosing randomly) Speaking:7 ( I did pretty well I don’t know why he gave me a 7?) As a first time it’s good but not satisfying at all am gonna take it again + and with FOCUS My problem was with the time 😢 I could’ve got a better score if the time was good
you are marvelous! got so lucky finding you here over a thousand other yt channels. with any luck, will come back here after acing the test just to express my gratitude.
Result has been published yesterday through social media with large number of student.I got overall 5.5 band in ielts.I have curiosity to learn of ilets.Your video is being easier way me .❤
Is using "gained popularity" correct word to describe the information in the graph as it only shows the data about consumption and not popularity ? Just a question . great fan
It is a really impressive way of teaching method mam. Clear voice and easy to understand. Everything in details especially for the people having english is their 2nd language and have been preparing for ielts test. Mam, basically how many type of questions are asked in writing task 1 according to your experience so far. You got lovely voice but cannot see your picture. Looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks for your video and have a great day
This video is just great, I guess thoes who pay tons of money for languge school would only have a lesson this good. and by this good I meant awesome at any aspects.
