If SchaffrillasProductions did a Warner Bros. Animation Ranking | Prediction 

With my ranking videos, I try to do something similar. I personally liked his format better than the typical tier lists.

@@fishmobsmovietv514It’s interesting when they’re ranked, but sometimes it’s hard to actually say which ones are better than others so that’s probably why a lot of people use tier lists

I'd love to I just don't wanna look like a Schaffrillas rip off

Cellspex does something similar

I would play even more money to see him talk about the teen Titan movie

True

He should have added that to his illustration ranking as well

True but it’s fine for it to be normal, making it more interesting

and because both movies were made by phil lord and chris miller

Honestly I put Lego Batman a quite above it myself, and if Schaff would put a Batman movie second, then he probably would put Lego Batman first

Maybe all Disney live action movies, up to Jungle Book Remake. Includes Holes, Enchanted, Homeward Bound, etc. Or maybe every Scooby Doo movie

He should also do Nick shows, CN shows, Disney shows and PBS kids shows.

​@@Alphaalexland if he do live action dreamworks movies, then he could talk about stuff like the cat in the hat, mouse hunt, saving private Ryan and the small soldier.

Plus Hitchcock Ranking Kubrick Ranking Tarantino Ranking And For The Schlock Snyder Ranking Bay Ranking Emmerich Ranking

Tom & Jerry, at the very least, didn't feel like a massive downgrade from its source material. Ninjago felt like so, and Space Jam is a commercialized insult to the Looney Tunes that doesn't qualify as a feature film. The Lego Movie 2, in every aspect, felt like a big step backward from the first one. Especially in the humor department.

@@thecriticalthinkeroutsidet4947 but it really isn't that bad. what it ACTUALLY lacks is the pacing of the original film. if they had had the same energy it would have been better.

@@thecriticalthinkeroutsidet4947 What do you mean the Lego movie 2 is better than Lego movie in every single way except for the plot it’s bit convoluted

Lego Movie 2's a good movie imo

Yeah, that's a lie, don't spread misinformation on the internet, you sillies, lego movie 2 is top 5

17: "You know there's nothing more pathetic than a flame retarded dragon" is a quote from Quest for Camelot.

6. Nothing Gonna Stop Us Now - Cat's Don't Dance

Tom & Jerry, at the very least, didn't feel like a massive step backward from the source material it spawned from. Literally everything about The LEGO Movie 2 felt downgraded from the first movie. Especially the humor.

as for your thoughts on storks and smallfoot?

@@BestOneEver247 storks was ok smallfoot was like 4 out of 10

@@thecriticalthinkeroutsidet4947 The storks and the Lego movie 2 are both great movies

@@nitrozeus6393 Neither were exactly good. The LEGO Movie 2 played way too safe with itself that it nowhere near came to the fridge brilliance of the first movie. I also liked the ideas behind Storks, but the execution was bad

I haven't seen a lot of these movies, so I am going based off of what I have seen and how Schaff ranks movies. So some of these may not be accurate to how a ranking of his may go.

Tom & Jerry was great, though. It was an amazing love letter to the original material that made no attempts to change the characters.

@@thecriticalthinkeroutsidet4947 The main problem with it is that it feels less like a "Tom and Jerry" movie and more like a "Boring Human Characters do Boring Things in a Hotel" movie with little bits of Tom and Jerry sprinkled in here and there as an afterthought. Although to be fair, it's still better than whatever the hell that thing from 1992 was.

@Indiand123 The movie was still the usual Tom and Jerry premise: Humans do their own thing inside a house, where Jerry moves in and wrecks havoc, and they enlist Tom's help to get rid of him. They weren't afterthoughts. The only difference between this movie and most of the cartoons is that it places them in a bigger hotel than the usual small house where they do their schtick. On top of that, many other characters from the cartoons made appearances, it was filled with references to the duo's history, and even many sound effects from the classic cartoons were in it. The people that made the film, including the director Tim Story, are big fans of the source material.

@@thecriticalthinkeroutsidet4947 Wait, the director’s name is literally Tim Story?

You forgot space jam

Personally mrpy favrouite is iron giant lego movie sis still 10 out of 10

I used screen shots

I based this list off of all the movies Schaff has reviewed on his letterboxd account, and he places Lego Movie higher than Iron Giant.

​@@fishmobsmovietv514where's his letterbox? And does that mean he's going to do a Warner Brothers movie ranking?

​@@FanaticMitchell1i have it right here, but yeah, this fella has some,, *takes* sometimes

I still like him and wish him the best, but dude, your takes sometimes..

@@FanaticMitchell1 also, the warner brothers ranking is an if, we don't know for sure, but, perhaps you could ask him nicely

@anamelessyoutuber1462 Well how would James (Schaff) rank the WB Animation Movies Not To sound jerkish or anything but I'm curious

I think y'all overreacting a bit, is a fine movie, it isn't lego batman movie, but it also isn't like, friccin space jam two or a really really bad movie

It is just decent

Also, midjago < nexo knights

@@kryptosbutitsanalt2476 have you watched the show? In comparison the movie is absolute garbage. It’s not clever, the characters not named Garmadon suck, the stunt casting was awful, they changed the character designs for no reason, it’s not funny, good GOD is it not funny! I didn’t laugh, chuckle, smile, grin or even think “That was a good attempt at a joke” ONCE! And yes that’s a Schaff reference

@@kryptosbutitsanalt2476 it is not “midjago” it’s way better than Nexo Knights. Name one thing that Nexo did better than Ninjago has done in it’s existence

Space Jam was an objectively terrible movie in every way. Even Chuck Jones infamously hated it for the way it did the Looney Tunes dirty. Tom & Jerry also stayed faithful to the characters and wasn't a downgrade from the source material. The LEGO Movie 2 downgraded from the first film, in every way.

Commenting on my other account, his letterboxd review puts it well above it.

He gave Lego Movie a 9/10 while the Iron Giant a 7/10 on a Letterboxd review

Happy feet is not an official Warner Brothers movie, Jessica productive, and on skate frills his letter box account, he actually did rate iron Giant beneath Batman and Lego movie.

On his letterboxd account, he does rank it higher than both Batman and Iron Giant.

Anyone can ask me anything, no permission needed.

@@fishmobsmovietv514 Isn't Schaffrillas a far-leftist?

​@@MrD-on6dpWhere on Earth did you even hear that?

@@MrD-on6dp leftist for sure. Far-leftist? I don't know about that.

@@ZaxTheAl1en Yeah, maybe I went a little far.

Simple, it’s actually good and makes fun of itself

@@carlosmattessich3883 well it still terrible

@@03mbc I respectfully disagree

@@carlosmattessich3883 how??!

@@03mbc I just have a different opinion, you don’t have to question it

Because Tom & Jerry and TTG were both genuinely great films. Also, Schaff preferred The LEGO Movie better than Iron Giant, according to his ratings.

@@thecriticalthinkeroutsidet4947Bruv… So many people hated the Tom and Jerry film because it freaking sucked, the actors were so bad, the 3-D animation didn’t fit well with the live action scenes, the humor used modern stuff just to *Keep up with the kids*, they used unnecessary product placement for Dang TIKTOK! Also the setting for this film is NEW YORK OF ALL THINGS! WHY! Can we have a family movie where it doesn’t take place in NYC! Also the screenplay for this sucks, it’s obvious, the pacing is too fast, also the title characters are barely in the movie! This sucks, GO FIX YOURSELF! Or keep your opinion, please just be careful of what words you say.

@@IceIsRick I'm a longtime Tom and Jerry fan who grew up memorizing ALL of the old shorts, and I loved the film. 1) The actors were incredibly natural with their roles and interactions with the animated characters. And seeing them clash with the mayhem of the titular duo is both entertaining and faithful to the original cartoons. 2) The 3D animation looked and felt exactly like the old-school 1940s - 1950s 2D Tom and Jerry style and animation, and the way it's integrated with the live-action backdrop is absolutely stunning. Also, the movie's setting in New York City was said to be a tribute to "Mouse in Manhattan." 3) I don't recall a single bit of product placement in the film. Besides that one joke where social media names were mixed up, that is literally meant to be ironic. And besides Tom flossing (which makes sense, since even the old cartoons portrayed him as hip and youthful), I don't remember anything else that was "hip with the kids." 4) Tom and Jerry literally appeared throughout the movie doing what they do. Jerry wrecks havoc in a house of humans (this time, a hotel), and Tom is brought in to get rid of him. Even many other characters from the cartoons, from Spike and Toots to even Droopy, made appearances. The movie is even FILLED with callbacks to the classic cartoons, like Tom being a jazz pianist. It's still the simple and funny Mouse Hunt plot that captured the essence of Tom and Jerry. The people who all worked on the movie, including the director, are all huge fans of Tom and Jerry, and it shows. So much so that many sound effects in the movie even came pulled straight out of the cartoons, according to Tim Story. Compared to cash-grabs like the Sonic movies and Chip 'n Dale: Rescue Rangers, this is a hybrid adaptation that sticks to the source material and feels like it was made with love and care.

​@@IceIsRicki agree with every single Word you said.

​@@thecriticalthinkeroutsidet4947I dont agree with your opinion. I watch the movie and I think that is pretty bad. But I respect your opinion. Have a nice day.

Because it was actually great.

Yeah, on his letterboxed that's how it was placed.

It wasn't even that bad. You all exaggerate how bad it is. It's everything a Tom and Jerry movie could be. Especially in the absolutely beautiful animation.

Because it's a nostalgic, funny, entertaining, and beautifully-animated film that did justice to Tom and Jerry, and it was even made by hardcore fans of the cartoons. It's everything a Tom and Jerry movie could be.

Let's agree to disagree.

@@botchedspiny477 I feel like you all overblow how bad the film is just because, when it wasn't even anywhere near as bad. The movie was made by people who are big fans of Tom and Jerry. Even many references and sound effects from the classic shorts were added in the movie.

Just my personal opinion, dude. I hated it, sorry. I'm glad you enjoyed it though.