Ilford Delta 100

Подписаться 25 тыс.

Просмотров 3,1 тыс.

50% 1

A new chapter in film comparisons, I look at the differences between Kodak Tri-X as our standard and Alford Delta 100. All films in these comparisons were shot using the same lighting and position, developed in Kodak D-76 using the manufacturer’s recommended time, and printed on Ilford Classic FB at 11x14 size using the same contrast settings. The printing time varied to cancel any changes in film base fog from film to film. I included the H&D curves for each film to see the individual differences and we look at the overall print, the spectral response of each film, and the grain characteristics.
Channel Merch, Discord, and more:
linktr.ee/The_...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @thenakedphotographer

Опубликовано:

14 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 25

@janjasiewicz9851 Месяц назад

I found the same thing with Delta 100 in Adox FX 39 II at 1:19 Dilution. Adox tech sheet does say that 1:19 development time should be increased between 75% and 100% of the 1:9 dilution (7:00 minutes). I reduced the dev time by n-1 (14:00 min/1.3 - which is approximately 75%) - and the negatives came out perfect.

@OldJockOldjock Месяц назад

An other useful film test, Greg. You make an interestíng point about Ilford's time in D76 being too much. Ilford states 9 mins at stock solution for D76 whereas for its own ID11 which many say is the exact equivalent in terms of a developer, the time is 30 secs less at 8.5 mins I can't explain why there is this 30 secs difference or know what difference a reduction of 30 sec in D76 might make but for sure it is likely to tame the highlights to an extent at least

@michaeltaylor3835 Месяц назад

DD-X is recommended with Delta 100 (I understand D-76 to keep comparison fair). Be good to re-run with a shorter dev time in D-76. Excellent grain and tonality.

@samue1991 Месяц назад

It's been my experience that many recommended times for Delta are on the long side, like ilfosol 3 1+14 being 7:30 minutes (six and a half is better). I don't know what's up with this film in particular with that but kind of weird

@romyaz1713 Месяц назад

just goes to show how important it is to calibrate your tools and process edit: are you going to redo the test with less development time?

@mike747436 Месяц назад

I’ve been using XT-3 with Delta film and am very happy with the results.

@jimmyha5212 Месяц назад

Does it have anything to do with Ilford vs Kodak Development instructions? I know Ilford says 10 inversions every minutes, while Kodak says 5 inversions every 30 seconds. So maybe Ilford recommends some time for D-76, but using a different interval for inersions? The only doubt to what I've said above is if inversion intervals make a difference, then we might have seen something really wild with Delta 400

@mchubble2226 Месяц назад

Great video and film! Do you have any plans to do these kinds of comparisons with color film? I'd be curious to see how the grain and color prints compare to each other.

@Adrian-wd4rn Месяц назад

lol...What is he going to compare color to?...It's all kodak film at this point.

@mchubble2226 Месяц назад

@@Adrian-wd4rn Kodak makes more than one film stock don't they?

@lespycrab8265 Месяц назад

@@Adrian-wd4rn Orwo and Fuji are still making color negative film stocks.

@Adrian-wd4rn Месяц назад

@@lespycrab8265 lol my sweet summer child...Fuji film is just kodak film.

@Adrian-wd4rn Месяц назад

@@mchubble2226 barely, and theres no point in comparing them. they make 2 pro line color neg, and e100.

@12TimmyProductions43 Месяц назад

Love this film. -- Have you tried Rollei IR 400? I'd love to hear your thoughts on that film

@mynewcolour Месяц назад

There is one for 400S, a very similar film.

@nytpu Месяц назад

@@mynewcolour Rollei Infrared 400, Retro 400S, and Superpan 200 are all the exact same film: Agfa Aviphot Pan 200 (Rollei IR and Retro 400S are labelled as “ISO 400” because they silently switched from Aviphot 400 to Aviphot 200 when the former was discontinued c. 2010)

@mynewcolour Месяц назад

@@nytpu Maybe. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FlmNTZvcBn0.htmlsi=Lx4gp7mcxxf3J83q

@RaistlinMaj Месяц назад

I personally use dd-x for this film, I love the results of delta 100 with that developer. I've done it with HC 110 and it was good but a bit with more contrast.

@lensman5762 Месяц назад

Off the topic, yesterday I used DDX 1+4 with Delta 400 under a very overcast sky using recommended times, and the result was very grainy, much more so than I have had with HC110. Both the film and the developer are fresh stock. The desnsities were spit on so film developed properly. It suprised me.

@mynewcolour Месяц назад

Thanks