Image Sensors as Fast As Possible 

Anyone else catch the 2 in the binary numbers at 1:53 ?

CUDA CORES vs STREAM PROCESSORS PLEASE

This was a nice rap song!

this guy's voice is sometimes hard to listen to, but this is just the video I needed to watch, answered all my questions

Film cameras are really nice, I recommend everybody use them sometime. It teaches you to not be lazy with your photography and also gives you much more respect for pretty much everything to do with pictures. You can also mix your own solutions for hella cheap so it just takes more time than digital nowadays.

I just got into film, amazing process, especially learning to develop it yourself! And you get a physical copy of all of your pictures, which you can reprint infinitely!

Linus! A Topic for you! Can you PLEASE make a comparison once and for all about what the big differences are between DLP and LCD Projectors!? I am really stuck as to which type of projector has the least amount of input lag as possible (for gaming of course). Can you please settle this? Thank you so much for your consideration.

Thank you for explaining it concisely

Linus lost me at 0:15 , after that i just zoned out and realized it was 4 in the morning

CCD sensors have lower digital noise when given enough light but they are terrible in low light. CMOS sensors are kind of the opposite however the technology for CMOS is improving too.

Yes I totally and completely understood everything in this video because I'm so smart... *cough*

Was that whole video done in one take? BREATHE LINUS

1:37 "in your br%@#in"

I think the reaosn why people are so confused about this one is that he didn't really take the tie to explain the OLD system of how images are captured. With film photography, the lens of your camera leads light into the rectangular hole right in front of the film when the shutter opens. The film is made of a special material consisting of crystals sensitive to light on a transparent piece of plastic. It's literally a piece of transparent tape lined with crystal. When the film is developed, parts of the film that receive more light become black, and parts that recieved no light basically fall of the tape, leaving transparent film. This is why developed film is "negative", or reversed color. A DIGITAL IMAGE SENSOR attempts to work the same way as how the crystals on traditional film are CHEMICALLY ALTERED when exposed to light. Think of the sensor as that film that lies behind that rectangular hole in a film camera, but in a much smaller size, and instead of "crystals" that get exposed to light at a microscopic scale, you have little teeeny tiny squares, one for EVERY PIXEL, that are each recording data for the amount of exposure to light, and the color of that light, among other information (color has temperature and tint as well as exposure, there are lots of variables). So instead of developing a piece of FILM to remove MICROSCOPIC CRYSTALS to give a perfect image, a sensor is reciving pixel-to-pixel information, and a computer chip is processing the value of every one of those pixels.

This again, makes me wonder how efficient and effective our eye's mechanism of capturing and processing images when comparing to the current technology (May/2020).

Nigga I'm leaving here even more confused about image sensors.

Linus... as much as I love you (being the 14th that you published it), I have to disagree: CCD technology USED to have lower noise at specifics ISOs, specially lower ones. Which for most professional photography types, is needed most. But things have changed in the last 8 years. CMOS sensors have reached the same level of noise at low ISOs, while retaining greater IQ in the high ISOs, as they have better signal amplifiers, and specially since the convertion to digital has fewer steps, and therefore, less electronic noise is created. Anyway, almost all camera manufacturers have switched by now to CMOS, instead of CCD. Perhaps there are a couple medium format sensors out there that are CCD, but don't expect them to be many.

*nods*, *nods* So they work through magic.. Got it!

I've heard from some a few years ago that the extreme enthusiasts only use film because of it's pure nature. I wonder how true that is or will be as the digital photo process get's so much better than it was.

Dude thanks for saving me in my assignment, I owe you

The voice cracking at the start of this video makes me love it all the more

1:53 Anyone notice the 2 in the bottom right? hax0r

those subtle background noises that are intended to mimic 'computing sounds' drive me crazy

Not one of his best videos. Quality has improved significantly over the years.

On a similar topic I think you should cover RAW image capture and its benefits/drawbacks compared to using the camera's processing to create JPEGs

its funny that i was serching for"zfs as fast as possible" instead of google it....i like you guyz how you explain points..and mostly how you connect sponsered ad..😃😃

I'm dating a Photographer, and I hate people taking pictures vs enjoying the concert... Put down your cell phone, and stop recording it's shitty audio and enjoy the show. I sound like a frumpy old man.

Well, he just predicted computational photography a few tears early! Fun!

NTFS VS FAT32 PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE

Excellent explanation.

best explanation of how it works thanks , awaiting iphone 12 max

always cool to learn something new and add to the bucket of geeky knowledges.

I remember when i was young and my parents use to keep the camera films in the fridge XD

Great video guys - loved the indepth view and graphics for the CCD v CMOS comparisons. This was definitely a FAP with brains! ...Which is hot.

I knew it! "Intel Inside" just meant they wanted to get into my brain! wait... that tune was catchy... so they already are! Thanks for clearing that up :)

Watched video before posting. Very interesting technology actually.

A+ The humor alone is worth watching whether you are a techie or not...

3:59 I was disappointed to not hear the rest of the Intel jingle...

There's a major difference between CCD and CMOS that linus got very wrong: CCD sensors in most cases have multiple sensor panels stitched together to form one unit, and while it provides a higher overall sharpness, they're less reliable in low light due to the much lower iso efficiancy with noise; whereas a CMOS sensor will be a single panel sensor, which gives it the greater ability in low light as it's only one unit communicating with the cpu. if you try using a CCD sensor in low light vs a CMOS sensor, the CCD still is going to look like swiss cheese by comparison

fantastic exactly what i was looking for

Should you put annotations over the "get started" box of the squarespace ad? It's kind of misleading us a bit thinking that "get started" box is clickable when it's not...

I got so much to learn from you... You're great keep it up

do a fast as posible about all the different image types please

I remember the days when digital cameras were not very common and the internet was not full of photos in the same way as it is today. In those days the digital cameras that did exist were crappy and expensive. I am glad that now a decent one can be had for the same price or even less. I like how smartphones are coming with good cameras. If you ever had an Xperia or similar phone you would know exactly what I mean. I like the way prices keep falling while technology keeps getting better.

actually ccd should be the one with rolling shutter issues, because with ccd rows are being read out one after another, while cmos reads all rows simultaneously.

3:28 i was wearing hea'phones and I thought I was being hit by a freakin car

The way this video is presented it would make one think that only CCD sensors have a rolling electronic shutter and only CMOS sensors have a global electronic shutter. The reality is the opposite: most CCD sensors use global shutters and most CMOS sensors use rolling shutters. Good video though.

1:53 bottom right corner - nuber 2 in binary code 😉😀😉

this video explained all I need to know in a humorous way!

It was my understanding CCD pixels operate on principles making them closer to photodiodes, gathering electrons and holes, while CMOS image sensor pixels operate by way of the same principle as xerox machines and laser printers, id est the fact photons reduce the static charge of a charged substrate when absorbed by it. I think the charged substrate for CMOS sensors would be capacitors. A friend of my fathers that use to work at Micron once spoke of the way people noticed dynamic ram chips without their packaging could act like primitive image sensors if you just read the memory addresses before filling all their digits with ones again. Was never very practical because of the spare addresses they print on the dies to replace dead addresses, plus the arrangement of the individual addresses, and the devices making them up, does not lend itself geometrically to putting the image together after getting the values. I also once found an electronics enthusiasts magazine from somewhere in the eighties with an article in it discussing whether ccd or dynamic ram was going to become the dominant RAM technology. Thought that was interesting...

So every picture we take is actually a little technological marvel

hey man we want a modern version

Beautifully made video, love it

You guys should name this "Linus-Sebastian-standing-on-a-box-because-he-is-too-short-while-giving-informative-speeches-about-technology-tips"

Oh good heaven's, I had forgotten about geocities. Good explanation, Linus. Was hoping for a shout-out to us microscope users when you said "specialized uses for CCD sensors" but oh well.

1:48 - Can you spot the Futurama joke?

at least it doesn't matter much if you learn't anything from this unlike iso, shutter priority, and aperture priority, the dots spec is so simple

give our brains a run for their money *Intel jingle* 😂😂😂

Thanks!

Please make a video on what are Cuda cores and Cuda acceleration?

My first POTENTIAL gaming rig: (Need advice) CPU: Intel core i7-4790 MOBO: MSI Z87M-G43 GPU: MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2GB RAM: Corsair Vengeance 8GB Ram HDD: Western Digital Cavier Blue 1TB SSD: Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB PSU: Corsair CX600 Case: NZXT H440 Can I have some advice on what to change please?

So square space is a website builder? Can you keep the page you made after your trial has expired? Like export it to HTML and CSS or do they want you to pay monthly to keep your design?

What a great video!

Please do a video on how baby lamas learn to walk when they are born

Thanks for the video, do you have a similar video about CSI 1,2 and 3 sensors?

Great episode, thanks!

Loved it thanks Linus

love the faze logo on your shirt man

LOL, most people don't understood a single thing...Now, do you finally get that we consumers, prosumers don't know a shit about nothing...Now, imagine actually coding for all this stuff...that's why a product comparison should not be just about specs... E.g- want a graphics card? Compare fps on the games that YOU want to play. Phones or any other electronics should only be judged on real world performance. There is a lot of stuff that goes into making the phone even with the same SOC. For more detailed reviews go to AnandTech's or similar websites. On RU-vid, linus is the only one that I keep getting back to.

Is this dude currently going through puberty? WTF?! That voice... I can't!

have you just seen the 2 in the binary code ?

Sql Injection would be a create tipic for this youtube tech channel

no explanation of the sensor size number and other jargons?

Great explanation! The question that I have is on the comparison of ccd vs cmos. You had mentioned that ccd is better in low light over cmos. The issue I have with this comparison is that in most digital cameras (i.e. a Leica M using CCD and a Nikon DSLR using cmos) the ccd cameras have moved over to cmos sensors in consumer/commercial applications due to cmos having better low light capability by the way of increasing the sensors sensitivity know as ISO. In a CCD sensor this sensitivity increase "cap" is typically much lower before you start to product unwanted noise in the resulting image. This is why Leica cameras (even though very expensive yet product great images) have a much lower ISO rating than most entry level/consumer DSLR cameras of today that use Cmos. Were you referring to the CCD sensors having better noise handling at lower sensitivity (ISO) ratings compared to a CMOS sensor, at the same ISO? Im just curious on this. Thanks!

damn squarespace is everywhere these days, I guess their youtube/twitch advertising is helping them a lot

Thank for explaining, besides, i'm ukrainian user and i like this channel realy

Australia must be slow then, I'm pretty sure the last time I saw one of those film cameras where you have to spin the dial 100 times (bit f an exaggeration) and then click the button to take the photo was in 2009. I think I still might have some spare.

why cmos have lower noise in slr camera

What is the difference between UTP and FTP cable?

A question about the sensor. Which one is better and offers the better image quality? 1/2.5" Progressive Scan CMOS 1/2" Progressive Scan CMOS 1/1.8" Progressive Scan CMOS

Do CCDs have a “rolling shutter” problem?

Laser stoped and live mode interruptted Sensor 4979 May I know the reason of showing these?

Where do you get those cool pictures for transitions and examples for Techquickie ? Do you pay for a service that has hundreds of those pictures?

This is the most confusing Fast as possible EVER

Which image sensor is best for phone and why Sony vs samsung vs cmos....

i have canon 1100d , while capturing pictures, picture is not clear and has lots of noise.. will changing new sensor make my photo quality better??

Awesome a Quickie lol! Thanks enjoyed it.

I like to guess which sponsor is being advertised as soon as Linus or Luke start the segue :D

Electrodes are CMOS, Tubes are CCD.

What's a 20mp sensor for when 4k is 8.3mp? Thank you

Why is there more green on digital? And why was blue more common on film/analog? Curious to know since I'm into Sci-Fi (use of blue screens and green screens)

"well, even if you didn't the answer is image sensors" haha I can't stop laughing omg lol

what about OIS, BSI and any similar to these two?

How to choose right Image sensor & how image sensor works: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FJRO77HcJ74.html This video will help you learn how to choose the right Image sensor and how image sensor works. You will also learn about the factors to be considered while choosing an image sensor for a specific application.

In some circumstances i prefer Film over Digital photography, mainly in landscape photography. My Large Format camera far exceeds any Digital Camera in terms of Resolution, And it exceeds most in image quality. Only downside is it takes a few hours before a image is taken (not the exposure time). But if i use digital, i use CDD cameras. (and yes, CCD DSLR's exist)

The part about our eyes focusing on 2% of the area we look at makes sense, but I don't understand what that has to do with image processors. I watched it several times and gave up.

image quality in respect to image sensors is affected more by sensor size, more than resolution. for instance, a 50MP medium format camera will be more detailed and sharper than a 50MP full frame or apsc camera. kinda disappointed linus didnt talk about the sensor size part of the equation since its one of the most important factors of an image sensor.

Real funny Linus 1:53 there is a 2 in the code. I am watching you.

I had no idea that I have lived long enough to have seen the sphinx

you didn't mention the vidicon tube