Imitation Game (HD CLIP) | Are You Paying Attention? 

Woah

Precisely. He was looking for an outsider to have a conversation with to ‘break’ the wall or things he thought already/knew. A lot of his responses were sarcastic back to the officer he just didn’t catch on or did…

I don't believe there was any intent to be disrespectful towards Mr. Turing vis a vis his many technical accomplishments before or during the war. Everything he did during the war was highly classified, and he had, as the British would say, "signed the Official Secrets Act". So did the actor Christopher Lee, who to this day had been involved in any of a variety of things which are still classified and undisclosed. But unlike Mr. Lee, the whole Bletchly Park thing and the Enigma Machine / Bombe Machine thing has been declassified, along with much (maybe most, but probably not all) of what Alan did. It's just that what has been declassified was declassified long after his death. The far more tragic thing was how many countries, including Britain, perceived and dealt with non-heterosexuality.

@@scifisurfer8879If chemical castration and being pushed to the edges of society to commit suicide despite his accomplishments in the face of being homosexual isn't disrespectful then I think there might be some disagreement on the words meaning. In a just and fair world Turing would have been held up as an icon in his time, allowed to be who he was and benefit from his acheivements. Not given the societal booby prize decades after his forced isolation and death, like it means a fucking thing.

"One of the most shameful episodes in the history of Britain"?? Dude, not even close

@@cadulino83 Considering that the computer is the greatest invention since the Wheel, and the sewer systems, Turing's stature is greatly underestimated. He didn't work on as many inventions as Edison, but his work was crucial and brought the world into the computer age.

@@edwarddejong8025 i didn't mean that, Britain has such history, one human life is nothing comparing with raping and pillaging across the world.

In interrogation quick simple answers are always considered closer to the truth than to a lie. When somebody gives a simple answer with no other indicator of lying you dont make up a theory of how that person must be a skilled liar unless you are biased against them. I havent seen this movie but this answer would have been a good one.

@@GGGmod1 As I recall, the answer was truthful. In the way an illicit drug dealer is a pharmaceutical salesperson.

@@GGGmod1 Murder amongst the Mormons might interest you. You could maybe like "JCS - Criminal Psychology" here on RU-vid.

@@GGGmod1 Not always. With interrogation, for an interrogator, you aim to try to build upon or ascertain the current information that you have, and eliminate/reduce the ones deemed 'irrelevant'. Quick answers don't necessarily mean closer & the truth/lie. With answers, as an interrogee, your sole focus is the quality of info presented. Give the other side enough to satisfy & make them back down, but not too little or too much to pry.

Neeks

Sadly, if this scene actually had happened, what details of the happenings during the war are still very much “Ultra”. And therefore a worse crime of traitor and such under the Official Secrets Act, than the small “crime” of being basically gender divergent, should he revealed it to the inquisitive fella there, who by all measures doesn't have the relevant clearance anyway.

It seems unfathomable, but the Bible Belt is working its hardest to drag the US back to legislating the same kind of persecution Turing endured in England, so it's unfortunately all too fathomable in 2022. It only gets better if we fight for it to be better

Perhaps had a genuine interest in learning about the person seated before him. The greatest interrogation might just be a genuine conversation where one is honestly interested in the other's response.

Nonsense. Turing's work during the war saved literally millions of lives. If that had been public knowledge, he would have been regarded as a hero and he would not have been persecuted for homosexuality and would not have committed suicide.

probably not because a maschine cant think outside the box. It doesnt even know there is a box.

@@konradplatt3833 A machine smart enough to pass the Turing test will be smart enough not to.

@@ryukoysusei the turing test isnt that hard, maschines have that beaten for years.

@@konradplatt3833 you definitely missed the point of the statement but yes I agree. Beating the Turing test isn't difficult especially for machines built to beat it.

@@konradplatt3833 You made this typo twice, so, I'm going to point it out. It's "machines", and not "maschines".

Nah, just new Turings. Kevin Spacey

Kirin-lll, Yes, and accelerating faster. And not in a way we want. . . . - - - . . .

Strong family matters 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇦🇺🇨🇦

@@poker_dealer Gosh, you brought all your intellect to bear there, didn't you.

Yes, but has it really changed ??

I completely agree with everything you say here except the medieval part. It’s obviously a very controversial topic today (and for full transparency I’m a straight male that is very pro-LBGTQ) but even the APA considered homosexuality a psychological disorder as late as 1973. It is possible, though obviously not certain, maybe not even likely, that the authorities who adjudicated Turing’s case and ordered his chemical castration genuinely thought they were helping him. But indisputably it was a tragedy, for Turing as well as human kind because it is indeed fascinating and wistful to wonder what he may have accomplished had he been allowed to live out his life in peace, free from persecution.

@@danshowlund Medievalism could prevail even beyond its..."appropriate" time period.

@@danshowlund they founded lgbtq disgusting back then, and seeing his condition, they couldn't care less about helping

The Father of Computers** these existed before AI

It's ironic that you claim Turing a "miraculous gift from God"...and it's this same God who's myths say being gay is a sin punishable by death.

@@TheHigherVoltage That is not necessarily a contradiction. Personally, I believe that the Bible was written by humans, and was taken from and based on true events, but that because of its human writers, certain things slipped in. There is no logical contradiction there. I also believe that G-d has changed and grown over the millennia. That is why miracles used to be big, obvious things, like three-day darkness, or splitting the sea, even though nothing big like that happens anymore. G-d has since learned that it is more effective to make small, calculated changes. Likewise, even though G-d may have, at one point, said being gay was a terrible sin, that doesn't necessarily mean G-d thinks that way now. We would need another prophet now, in the 21st century, to know if G-d still thinks that way. But I find it quite unlikely that G-d has any plans to do make new prophets in the near future, because that's not how G-d does things anymore. Of course, you're free to believe what you want to believe when it comes to G-d. But these are my beliefs. And they do not contradict themselves, nor do they contradict the idea that there might, as the OP says, be another Alan Turing out there who just needs to be given a chance.

@@yf-n7710 um...we know from the sciences and things like genetics, that the bible is just a collection of stories and nonsense not rooted in historical facts. Take the flood myth. There's never been a global flood in human history, and we didn't have an incest reboot of all the species. Let alone when the bible claims this happened. "I also believe that G-d has changed and grown over the millennia." So God isn't perfect. He's just like a human that changes and grows over time.

@@TheHigherVoltage ...and that is why God gave us free-will. A life without sins means nothing if sin is not possible.

@@TheHigherVoltage Wrong about the floods there groomer. Read about how fast the Mediterranean filled, read about the Younger Dryass period and the Younger Dryass Impact hypothesis, and then read about rapid sea-level rise at the end of the most recent Ice Age the world is still coming off of.

Yeah this is Turing

.... You're trying to be smart but this is literally a movie about Alan Turing. That's the point. Well done. Gold star.

such is life really ... one day you might have a gold bar fallen on your head, another in jail for a crime you didn't commit...

Yeah bro is autistic also you're missing context watch the movie

Lol

That first depends on their sensory inputs. If they have no ability to sense the existence of pollen, they can't have a response to it. No different than humans or anything else 'alive' for that matter.

@@TheHigherVoltage That doesn't even accurately describe how humans and other multi cellular organisms respond to such things.

@@seanwebb605 If you have no sense of smell, how would you respond to a perfume scent? If you're deaf, how would you respond to a dog barking behind you? If you're blind, how would you respond a flash of light? If a computer has no way to detect something (ie. sensory input), it can't respond to it.

@@TheHigherVoltage Nonsense

@@seanwebb605 You should go back to school bro.

The Turing Test is more about rational answers that a human could give, to the extent that it's not possible with certainy in a blind judgement to say either way. It likely inspired the Voight-kampf test in Blade Runner, but that test starts with the presumption that a repicant can pass a Turing Test, and instead focuses on verbal and physical responses emotionally provacative questions.

Rob Chilton recipient*. :)

Ro Tyler *Replicant :-)

@@charliepearman crack?

In blade runner they know they are cyborgs of sorts, the test is supposed to check if they have become too sentient or rather strayed from their mission objective.

to the game

as i understand it: to Alan Turing telling the policeman what he did during the war, which is a part of the "imitation game" that they are "playing". if you pay attention, the movie begins with Turing sitting in this room, the policeman coming in and Turing saying the exact same thing that he says to the policeman in this scene ("are you paying attention? ...), from which i conclude that the whole movie was Alan Turing telling the policeman what he did during the war, the whole movie was the imitation game "played" by Alan Turing and the policeman.

He asked him the question about what he did during the war. When Alan answered he asked him the same question again about what he really did during the war.

Apple's slogan was "Think Different." which is subtly not the same message as "Think Differently." Apple was suggesting the listener to manifest and use that which is different from what is already available, while "think differently" might mean to have a contrasting opinion. Steve Jobs wanted the slogan to be colloquial, similar to "Think big." Interestingly, the slogan was partially in response to the IBM slogan "Think."

Who cares your comment isn't relevant

@@owellwellwell2418 Pod is the debut album by American alternative rock band the Breeders, released by 4AD records on May 29, 1990. Engineered by Steve Albini, it features band leader Kim Deal (pictured) on vocals and guitar, Josephine Wiggs on bass, Britt Walford on drums, and Tanya Donelly on guitar. The Breeders formed in 1988 when Deal, a member of the Pixies, befriended Donelly of Throwing Muses during a European tour. They recorded a country-infused demo in 1989, leading to 4AD co-founder Ivo Watts-Russell funding an album, Pod, recorded that year at the Palladium studio in Edinburgh, Scotland. The album became a critical and popular success, reaching number 22 in the UK. Critics praised its dark, sexualized lyrics, and compared it favorably to the Pixies. Nirvana's Kurt Cobain said it was one of his favorite records, and Pitchfork ranked it number 81 on its list of the best albums of the 1990s. The cover art was designed by Vaughan Oliver and portrays a man performing a fertility dance while wearing a belt of eels.

@@Cukito4 But what else?

@@PhiltheMoko ha ha trolling with a twist, "are u paying attention?"

@@Cukito4 Good to see you're consistent